Energy-dependence investigation for a range of clinically used detectors from 70 kV to 6 MV.

PURPOSE: Accurate measurement of out-of-field dose in radiotherapy directly impacts beam data modeling in treatment planning systems, verification of implanted electronic devices/lens/fetus dose, secondary cancer risk estimation, and organ-at-risk dose reporting. When performing out-of-field dosimetry, it is therefore imperative that the response of the detector has been well characterized. Due to the softening of the radiation beam out-of-field, many detectors will exhibit energy dependence. This study investigated the energy dependence of a range of clinical available detectors over typical energies experienced out-of-field. METHODS: The response of detectors to photon beams from 70 kV to 6 MV was measured. The relative change in response from 6 MV down to 70 kV highlighted the expected deviation in the response of detectors that would typically be calibrated in-field for use out-of-field. RESULTS: The Pinpoint detector displayed the most energy-independent response over the energy range investigated. The Micro-Lion detector was the only detector to show an under-response to all low-energy beams relative to 6 MV. The diode-type detectors showed the largest energy dependence. CONCLUSIONS: When considering detectors for use in out-of-field dose measurements, it is important that the energy dependence is investigated over a low-energy range as out-of-field the energy spectra comprise a larger component of photons in the 50-100-keV range. This study highlights the variation in response of a range of clinically available detectors to low-energy radiation beams relative to 6 MV for out-of-field dosimetry. The Pinpoint detector was the most energy-independent detector with a response close to unity over the entire energy range investigated.

Complete patient exposure during paediatric brain cancer treatment for photon and proton therapy techniques including imaging procedures.

Background: In radiotherapy, especially when treating children, minimising exposure of healthy tissue can prevent the development of adverse outcomes, including second cancers. In this study we propose a validated Monte Carlo framework to evaluate the complete patient exposure during paediatric brain cancer treatment. Materials and methods: Organ doses were calculated for treatment of a diffuse midline glioma (50.4 Gy with 1.8 Gy per fraction) on a 5-year-old anthropomorphic phantom with 3D-conformal radiotherapy, intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity modulated pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy. Doses from computed tomography (CT) for planning and on-board imaging for positioning (kV-cone beam CT and X-ray imaging) accounted for the estimate of the exposure of the patient including imaging therapeutic dose. For dose calculations we used validated Monte Carlo-based tools (PRIMO, TOPAS, PENELOPE), while lifetime attributable risk (LAR) was estimated from dose-response relationships for cancer induction, proposed by Schneider et al. Results: Out-of-field organ dose equivalent data of proton therapy are lower, with doses between 0.6 mSv (testes) and 120 mSv (thyroid), when compared to photon therapy revealing the highest out-of-field doses for IMRT ranging between 43 mSv (testes) and 575 mSv (thyroid). Dose delivered by CT ranged between 0.01 mSv (testes) and 72 mSv (scapula) while a single imaging positioning ranged between 2 µSv (testes) and 1.3 mSv (thyroid) for CBCT and 0.03 µSv (testes) and 48 µSv (scapula) for X-ray. Adding imaging dose from CT and daily CBCT to the therapeutic demonstrated an important contribution of imaging to the overall radiation burden in the course of treatment, which is subsequently used to predict the LAR, for selected organs. Conclusion: The complete patient exposure during paediatric brain cancer treatment was estimated by combining the results from different Monte Carlo-based dosimetry tools, showing that proton therapy allows significant reduction of the out-of-field doses and secondary cancer risk in selected organs.

Comparison of out-of-field normal tissue dose estimates for pencil beam scanning proton therapy: MCNP6, PHITS, and TOPAS.

Monte Carlo (MC) methods are considered the gold-standard approach to dose estimation for normal tissues outside the treatment field (out-of-field) in proton therapy. However, the physics of secondary particle production from high-energy protons are uncertain, particularly for secondary neutrons, due to challenges in performing accurate measurements. Instead, various physics models have been developed over the years to reenact these high-energy interactions based on theory. It should thus be acknowledged that MC users must currently accept some unknown uncertainties in out-of-field dose estimates. In the present study, we compared three MC codes (MCNP6, PHITS, and TOPAS) and their available physics models to investigate the variation in out-of-field normal tissue dosimetry for pencil beam scanning proton therapy patients. Total yield and double-differential (energy and angle) production of two major secondary particles, neutrons and gammas, were determined through irradiation of a water phantom at six proton energies (80, 90, 100, 110, 150, and 200 MeV). Out-of-field normal tissue doses were estimated for intracranial irradiations of 1-, 5-, and 15-year-old patients using whole-body computational phantoms. Notably, the total dose estimates for each out-of-field organ varied by approximately 25% across the three codes, independent of its distance from the treatment volume. Dose discrepancies amongst the codes were linked to the utilized physics model, which impacts the characteristics of the secondary radiation field. Using developer-recommended physics, TOPAS produced both the highest neutron and gamma doses to all out-of-field organs from all examined conditions; this was linked to its highest yields of secondary particles and second hardest energy spectra. Subsequent results when using other physics models found reduced yields and energies, resulting in lower dose estimates. Neutron dose estimates were the most impacted by physics model choice, and thus the variation in out-of-field dose estimates may be even larger than 25% when considering biological effectiveness.

Validation of a Monte Carlo Framework for Out-of-Field Dose Calculations in Proton Therapy.

Proton therapy enables to deliver highly conformed dose distributions owing to the characteristic Bragg peak and the finite range of protons. However, during proton therapy, secondary neutrons are created, which can travel long distances and deposit dose in out-of-field volumes. This out-of-field absorbed dose needs to be considered for radiation-induced secondary cancers, which are particularly relevant in the case of pediatric treatments. Unfortunately, no method exists in clinics for the computation of the out-of-field dose distributions in proton therapy. To help overcome this limitation, a computational tool has been developed based on the Monte Carlo code TOPAS. The purpose of this work is to evaluate the accuracy of this tool in comparison to experimental data obtained from an anthropomorphic phantom irradiation. An anthropomorphic phantom of a 5-year-old child (ATOM, CIRS) was irradiated for a brain tumor treatment in an IBA Proteus Plus facility using a pencil beam dedicated nozzle. The treatment consisted of three pencil beam scanning fields employing a lucite range shifter. Proton energies ranged from 100 to 165 MeV. A median dose of 50.4 Gy(RBE) with 1.8 Gy(RBE) per fraction was prescribed to the initial planning target volume (PTV), which was located in the cerebellum. Thermoluminescent detectors (TLDs), namely, Li-7-enriched LiF : Mg, Ti (MTS-7) type, were used to detect gamma radiation, which is produced by nuclear reactions, and secondary as well as recoil protons created out-of-field by secondary neutrons. Li-6-enriched LiF : Mg,Cu,P (MCP-6) was combined with Li-7-enriched MCP-7 to measure thermal neutrons. TLDs were calibrated in Co-60 and reported on absorbed dose in water per target dose (µGy/Gy) as well as thermal neutron dose equivalent per target dose (µSv/Gy). Additionally, bubble detectors for personal neutron dosimetry (BD-PND) were used for measuring neutrons (>50 keV), which were calibrated in a Cf-252 neutron beam to report on neutron dose equivalent dose data. The Monte Carlo code TOPAS (version 3.6) was run using a phase-space file containing 1010 histories reaching an average standard statistical uncertainty of less than 0.2% (coverage factor k = 1) on all voxels scoring more than 50% of the maximum dose. The primary beam was modeled following a Fermi-Eyges description of the spot envelope fitted to measurements. For the Monte Carlo simulation, the chemical composition of the tissues represented in ATOM was employed. The dose was tallied as dose-to-water, and data were normalized to the target dose (physical dose) to report on absorbed doses per target dose (mSv/Gy) or neutron dose equivalent per target dose (µSv/Gy), while also an estimate of the total organ dose was provided for a target dose of 50.4 Gy(RBE). Out-of-field doses showed absorbed doses that were 5 to 6 orders of magnitude lower than the target dose. The discrepancy between TLD data and the corresponding scored values in the Monte Carlo calculations involving proton and gamma contributions was on average 18%. The comparison between the neutron equivalent doses between the Monte Carlo simulation and the measured neutron doses was on average 8%. Organ dose calculations revealed the highest dose for the thyroid, which was 120 mSv, while other organ doses ranged from 18 mSv in the lungs to 0.6 mSv in the testes. The proposed computational method for routine calculation of the out-of-the-field dose in proton therapy produces results that are compatible with the experimental data and allow to calculate out-of-field organ doses during proton therapy.

Out-of-field doses in radiotherapy: Input to epidemiological studies and dose-risk models.

Out-of-field doses in radiotherapy have been increasingly studied in recent years because of the generally improved survival of patients who have received radiotherapy as part of their treatment for cancer and their subsequent risk of a second malignancy. This short article attempts to identify some current problems, challenges and opportunities for dosimetry developments in this field. Out-of-field doses and derived risk estimates contribute to general knowledge about radiation effects on humans as well as contributing to risk-benefit considerations for the individual patient. It is suggested that for input into epidemiological studies, the complete dose description (i.e. the synthesis of therapy and imaging doses from all the treatment and imaging modalities) is ideally required, although there is currently no common dosimetry framework which easily covers all modalities. A general strategy for out-of-field dose estimation requires development and improvement in several areas including (i) dosimetry in regions of steep dose gradient close to the field edge (ii) experimentally verified analytical and Monte Carlo models for out-of-field doses (iii) the validity of treatment planning system algorithms outside the field edge (iv) dosimetry of critical sub-structures in organs at risk (v) mixed field (including neutron) dosimetry in proton and ion radiotherapy and photoneutron production in high energy photon beams (vi) the most appropriate quantities to use in neutron dosimetry in a radiotherapy context and (vii) simplification of measurement methods in regions distant from the target volume.