Advanced molecular pathology for rare tumours: A national feasibility study and model for centralised medulloblastoma diagnostics.

AIMS: Application of advanced molecular pathology in rare tumours is hindered by low sample numbers, access to specialised expertise/technologies and tissue/assay QC and rapid reporting requirements. We assessed the feasibility of co-ordinated real-time centralised pathology review (CPR), encompassing molecular diagnostics and contemporary genomics (RNA-seq/DNA methylation-array). METHODS: This nationwide trial in medulloblastoma (<80 UK diagnoses/year) introduced a national reference centre (NRC) and assessed its performance and reporting to World Health Organisation standards. Paired frozen/formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumour material were co-submitted from 135 patients (16 referral centres). RESULTS: Complete CPR diagnostics were successful for 88% (120/135). Inadequate sampling was the most common cause of failure; biomaterials were typically suitable for methylation-array (129/135, 94%), but frozen tissues commonly fell below RNA-seq QC requirements (53/135, 39%). Late reporting was most often due to delayed submission. CPR assigned or altered histological variant (vs local diagnosis) for 40/135 tumours (30%). Benchmarking/QC of specific biomarker assays impacted test results; fluorescent in-situ hybridisation most accurately identified high-risk MYC/MYCN amplification (20/135, 15%), while combined methods (CTNNB1/chr6 status, methylation-array subgrouping) best defined favourable-risk WNT tumours (14/135; 10%). Engagement of a specialist pathologist panel was essential for consensus assessment of histological variants and immunohistochemistry. Overall, CPR altered clinical risk-status for 29% of patients. CONCLUSION: National real-time CPR is feasible, delivering robust diagnostics to WHO criteria and assignment of clinical risk-status, significantly altering clinical management. Recommendations and experience from our study are applicable to advanced molecular diagnostics systems, both local and centralised, across rare tumour types, enabling their application in biomarker-driven routine diagnostics and clinical/research studies.

Diagnostic concordance among pathologists interpreting breast core biopsies on secondary review over a 1-year period at an Australian tertiary hospital.

This study provides data on the diagnostic concordance between initial and review diagnoses of all breast core biopsy cases at a single tertiary hospital in Western Australia over a 1-year period. A retrospective review of all breast core biopsy cases between January 1 and December 31, 2016, was carried out at PathWest, Fiona Stanley Hospital in Perth, Western Australia. Each biopsy is reported by a single pathologist and then reviewed within 1 week by a panel of intradepartmental subspecialist breast pathologists, who either agree with the original diagnosis, have a minor discordant diagnosis, or a major discordant diagnosis. Records for 2036 core biopsies were available between January 1 and December 31, 2016. Of these, 56.0% (n = 1141) were classified as benign, 34.3% (n = 699) as malignant, 7.2% (n = 147) as indeterminate, 2.3% (n = 46) as nondiagnostic, and 0.1% (n = 3) as suspicious for malignancy. In 99.1% (n = 2018) of cases, there was agreement between initial and review diagnoses. In total, 0.9% (n = 18) were disagreements: 0.49% (n = 10) were major discordant disagreements and 0.39% (n = 8) were minor discordant disagreements. All cases of major discordant disagreements would have resulted in significant changes to clinical management. This study demonstrates that an Australian institution is providing a high-quality pathology service with a low error rate between initial and review diagnoses of breast core biopsies. It reinforces the importance of secondary review of biopsies in a timely fashion for detecting potentially serious misdiagnoses that could lead to inappropriate management.

Internal Pathology Review of Invasive Melanoma: An Academic Institution Experience.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies of internal pathology review (IPR) for melanoma have shown that changes in the pathology analysis are common. How these changes impact clinical management of melanoma or how the margin status reports may modify has not been evaluated. Our goal was to determine what changes to staging and surgical management occurred after IPR of newly diagnosed melanomas and to determine how the final surgical pathology report may correlate with the IPR. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted from 2014 to 2016 of newly diagnosed invasive melanomas referred to a single National Comprehensive Cancer Network tertiary care center. RESULTS: A total of 370 cases met inclusion criteria. The most common feature changed after internal review was mitotic rate, in 155 (41.7%) patients, followed by Breslow depth in 99 (26.9%) patients. Tumor staging was changed in 45 (12.2%) patients. The most common change was a T1a lesion being upgraded to a T1b lesion. These tumor staging changes lead to 38 (10.3%) overall staging differences. A biopsy's deep margin status was changed in 27 (7.3%) patients. Outside hospital reports lacked information about deep margin status in 71 (19.2%) of specimens. Based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, 22 (5.9%) patients had changes in their sentinel lymph node biopsy recommendations and one of these patients had a positive node found on pathology. Of those patients who had changes in the T-stage, 16 (4.3%) of them also had changes in the recommended wide local excision radial margin. CONCLUSIONS: IPR of invasive melanoma leads to both changes in staging and the surgical management of melanoma and should remain an important component of care of melanoma patients at a tertiary referral center.

A nationwide study of ovarian serous borderline tumors in Denmark 1978-2002. Risk of recurrence, and development of ovarian serous carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Absolute risk and risk factors for recurrence and ovarian serous carcinoma following ovarian serous borderline tumors (SBTs) is not well-established. METHODS: We included all women with SBTs in Denmark, 1978-2002. Diagnoses were confirmed by centralized pathology review and classified as atypical proliferative serous tumor (APST) or noninvasive low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC). Implants were classified as noninvasive or invasive. Medical records were collected and reviewed, and follow-up was obtained. Subsequent diagnoses were also confirmed by centralized pathology review. We examined absolute risk and risk factors for recurrent APST and serous carcinoma using Cox regression. RESULTS: The absolute serous carcinoma risk after, respectively, 5 and 20years was 5.0% and 13.9% for noninvasive LGSC, and 0.9% and 3.7% for APST. Serous carcinoma risk was significantly higher following noninvasive LGSC compared with APST among stage I patients/patients without implants (HR=5.3; 95% CI: 1.7-16.3), whereas no significant association with tumor type was found in advanced stage patients/patients with implants. Advanced stage - notably invasive implants - bilaterality, surface involvement, and residual disease increased serous carcinoma risk. However, women with stage I APST also had a higher risk than the general population. CONCLUSIONS: This largest population-based cohort of verified SBTs revealed that women with noninvasive LGSC are significantly more likely to develop serous carcinoma than women with APST, which could not entirely be explained by invasive implants. Although invasive implants was a strong risk factor for serous carcinoma, even women with stage I APST were at increased risk compared with the general population.

Importance and outcome relevance of central pathology review in prostatectomy specimens: data from the SAKK 09/10 randomized trial on prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a central pathology review within a randomized clinical trial on salvage radiation therapy (RT) in the presence of biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy to assess whether this results in changes in histopathological prognostic factors, such as Gleason score. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 350 patients were randomized and specimens from 279 patients (80%) were centrally reviewed by a dedicated genitourinary pathologist. Gleason score, tumour classification and resection margin status were reassessed and compared with the results of local pathology review. Agreement was assessed using contingency tables and Cohen's kappa coefficient. The association between other histopathological features (e.g. largest diameter of carcinoma) and rapid biochemical progression (up to 6 months after salvage RT) was also investigated. RESULTS: There was good concordance between central and local pathology review for seminal vesicle invasion (pT3b: 91%; κ = 0.95 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.89, 1.00]), extraprostatic extension (pT3a/b: 94%; κ = 0.82 [95% CI 0.75, 0.89]) and positive surgical margin (PSM) status (87%; κ = 0.7 [95% CI 0.62, 0.79]). The rate of agreement was lower for Gleason score (78%; κ = 0.61 [95% CI 0.52, 0.70]). The median (range) largest diameter of carcinoma was 16 (3-38) mm. A total of 49 patients (18%) experienced rapid biochemical progression after salvage RT. Largest diameter of carcinoma (odds ratio [OR] 2.04 [95% CI 1.30, 3.20]; P = 0.002), resection margin status (OR 0.36 [95% CI 0.18, 0.72]; P = 0.004) and Gleason score (OR 1.55 [95% CI 1.00, 2.42]; P = 0.05) remained associated with rapid progression after salvage RT after backward selection. CONCLUSION: The results of the central pathology analyses showed concordance between central and local pathology review with regard to seminal vesicle invasion, extraprostatic extension and PSM status, but a lower rate of agreement for Gleason score. Largest diameter of carcinoma was found to be a potential prognostic factor for rapid biochemical progression after salvage RT.

Diagnostic dilemmas of high-grade transformation (Richter's syndrome) of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: results of the phase II National Cancer Research Institute CHOP-OR clinical trial specialist haemato-pathology central review.

AIMS: Richter's syndrome (RS) refers to high-grade transformation of B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), usually to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, as assessed according to strict World Health Organization (WHO)-defined histological criteria. Although this is a relatively evidence-poor area, the recommended clinical management of high-grade transformation differs considerably from that of relapsed CLL. The 'CHOP-OR' trial was a single-arm, multicentre, non-randomized phase II National Cancer Research Institute trial in patients with newly diagnosed RS, recruited from across the UK from April 2011 to December 2014. Forty-three patients were enrolled, of whom 37 were ultimately evaluable for response. The aim was to verify the presence of RS in the trial patients and identify pitfalls in the diagnosis of RS. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two independent, specialist haematopathologists reviewed histological material from 40 available cases enrolled in the CHOP-OR trial to determine whether the submitted diagnosis of RS was correct. Three cases were unavailable for central review. This series represents the largest central review of RS within a prospective trial in the literature to date. Thirty-three of the 40 (82.5%) submitted cases showed features consistent with WHO-defined RS. Reasons for diagnostic uncertainty in discrepant cases included large proliferation centres, variably confluent and serpiginous proliferation centres, and an apparently high proliferation index, sometimes attributable to a thick section or associated normal bone marrow proliferation. CONCLUSIONS: We discuss the importance of high-quality histological and immunohistochemical sections and strict adherence to WHO criteria in the diagnosis of RS. This study further reinforces the importance of centralized review of cases of haematological malignancy.

Results of central pathology review of prostatic biopsies in a contemporary series from a phase III, multicenter, randomized controlled trial (SHIP0804).

To investigate contemporary rates of variation in the biopsy Gleason grading in prostate cancer, between local and central pathologists, based on central review of the pathological slides from Seed and Hormone for Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer (SHIP) 0804, a phase III, multicenter, randomized, controlled study. From April 2008 to May 2011, 18 Japanese institutions participated. All H&E slides were reviewed independently, without clinical information, and a tumor grade was assigned according to the modified Gleason grading system proposed by the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP). Prostate biopsy specimens of 642 cases were available for evaluation. An exact concordance rate of Gleason score (GS) between local and central pathologists was determined to be 65.3%; with the under-grading and over-grading of grades to be 14.6% and 20.1%, respectively. The central review resulted in numbers of tumor-bearing cores reassigned in 99 of 616 cases in which such information by the local pathologists was available (16.1%). Discordance in biopsy Gleason grading was still found in one third of the cases in the SHIP0804 study. This information is valuable in extrapolating the diagnostic error range in contemporary clinical studies conducted without central pathological review.

Lymphoma diagnosis at an academic centre: rate of revision and impact on patient care.

Few studies have examined the value of a mandatory second review of outside pathology material for haematological malignancies. Therefore, we compared diagnoses on biopsies referred to an academic medical centre to determine the rate and therapeutic impact of revised diagnoses resulting from a second review. We reviewed 1010 cases referred for lymphoma during 2009-2010. For each case, referral diagnosis and second review diagnosis were compared. Revised diagnoses were grouped into major and minor discrepancies and all major discrepancies were reviewed by a haematologist to determine the effect the diagnostic change would have on therapy. There was no change in diagnosis in 861 (85·2%) cases. In 149 (14·8%) cases, second review resulted in major diagnostic change, of which 131 (12·9%) would have resulted in a therapeutic change. The highest rates of revision were for follicular, high-grade B-cell, and T-cell lymphomas. We found higher rates of major discrepancy in diagnoses from non-academic centres (15·8%) compared to academic centres (8·5%; P = 0·022), and in excisional biopsies (17·9%) compared to smaller biopsies (9·6%; P = 0·0003). Mandatory review of outside pathology material prior to treatment of patients for lymphoma will identify a significant number of misclassified cases with a major change in therapy.

A nationwide study of serous "borderline" ovarian tumors in Denmark 1978-2002: centralized pathology review and overall survival compared with the general population.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the study population and estimate overall survival of women with a serous "borderline" ovarian tumor (SBT) in Denmark over 25 years relative to the general population. METHODS: The Danish Pathology Data Bank and the Danish Cancer Registry were used to identify 1487 women diagnosed with SBTs from 1978 to 2002. The histologic slides were collected from Danish pathology departments and reviewed by expert pathologists and classified as SBT/atypical proliferative serous tumor (APST) or noninvasive low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC). Associated implants were classified as noninvasive or invasive. Medical records were collected from hospital departments and reviewed. Data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and relative survival was estimated with follow-up through September 2, 2013. RESULTS: A cohort of 1042 women with a confirmed SBT diagnosis was identified. Women with stage I had an overall survival similar to the overall survival expected from the general population (p=0.3), whereas women with advanced stage disease had a poorer one (p<0.0001). This was evident both in women with noninvasive (p<0.0001) and invasive implants (p<0.0001). Only among women with advanced stage, overall survival of women with SBT/APST (p<0.0001) and noninvasive LGSC (p<0.0001) was poorer than expected from the general population. CONCLUSIONS: To date this is the largest nationwide cohort of SBTs where all tumors have been verified by expert pathologists. Only in women with advanced stage SBT, overall survival is poorer than in the general population which applies both to women with noninvasive and invasive implants as well as to women with SBT/APST and noninvasive LGSC.

A 2-center review of histopathology of variants of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma and their impact on clinical outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Similar to bladder cancer, about one third of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) present variant histology (VH). We aim to evaluate the incidence, clinical characteristics and the impact on outcomes of VH in UTUC. METHODS: We consecutively enrolled 77 patients treated between 2009 and 2022 by radical surgery for UTUC from a secondary and a tertiary referral center. A pathology review of all specimens was performed by 1 independent uropathologist for each center. We compared pure UTUC and UTUC with VH and the accuracy of endoscopic biopsy. Descriptive and comparative analysis was performed to assess the association with clinical characteristics and the Kaplan-Meier estimator to compare outcomes. RESULTS: Median follow-up after surgery was 51 months. VH was present in 21/77 (28%) patients and 4/21 (19%) patients had multiple variants. The most frequent VH was squamous 12/21 (57%), followed by glandular 7/21 (33%) and micropapillary 3/21 variants (14%). Neuroendocrine carcinoma was present in 2 patients. Nested variant was found in 1 patient. Muscle invasive tumor (≥pT2) was present in 30/56 (54%) patients with pure UTUC and in 18/21 (86%) patients with VH (P < 0.05). Presence of carcinoma in situ was seen in 24/56 (43%) patients with pure UTUC and in 16/21 (76%) with VH (P < 0.05). Cumulative 8/56 (14%) with pure UTUC had a nonintravesical recurrence (6 patients with local and 2 distant recurrence) compared to 8/21 (38%) (3 local, 3 nodal, 2 distant) in the subgroup with VH (P < 0.05). Opposite effect was noted for bladder recurrence: 60% for pure UTUC vs. 29% for tumors with VH (P < 0.05). Review of preoperative endoscopic biopsy did not show the presence of VH in any patients. Differences in outcomes did not reach significance: 3yr-OS 63% vs. 42% (P 0.28) and 3yr-CSS 77% vs. 50% (P 0.7). CONCLUSION: Almost a third of UTUC present VH. Presence of VH is related to more aggressive tumor characteristics and associated with unfavorable outcomes. Due to a higher rate of extravesical recurrences in UTUC with VH, Follow-up controls should include cross sectional imaging and cystoscopy.

Accelerating type-specific ovarian carcinoma research: Calculator for Ovarian Subtype Prediction (COSP) is a reliable high-throughput tool for case review.

AIMS: The recent recognition that ovarian carcinoma is composed of five distinct disease entities has served to increase the value of accurate histotyping. Reliable identification of histotypes is essential for the success of studies testing novel therapies, as well as for biomarker discovery research. The aim of this study was to examine the utility of a nine-marker immunohistochemical (IHC) panel, designated the Calculator for Ovarian Subtype Prediction (COSP), to reliably reproduce the consensus diagnosis of two expert gynaecological pathologists. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 423 cases from the AGO-OVAR11 trial were evaluated using the COSP IHC panel, and compared to original diagnoses from >100 local contributing pathologists and independent expert gynaecopathology review. The overall concordance between COSP and expert review was 89%; in cases where a local pathologist's diagnosis was confirmed by COSP, the expert gynaecopathologist also agreed in 97.5% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: The incorporation of COSP into a high-throughput diagnostic review algorithm will decrease the need for expert review by identifying a small number of difficult cases that truly require expert review. This modification will serve to increase the efficiency of the diagnostic review process, which will probably serve to reduce operational costs and expedite translational studies on ovarian carcinoma.

A triage assessment strategy for the management of women with endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined a risk-factor-based assignment to either a subspecialist or a general gynaecologist for the management of women with endometrial cancer. METHODS: At diagnosis, all women with a diagnosis of endometrial cancer in four community hospitals were referred to a central cancer centre and stratified into low- and high-risk groups. Risk stratification was based primarily on central pathology review, with low-risk disease defined as grade 1, clinical stage 1. Women with low-risk disease were triaged back to the referring gynaecologist for surgery. Women with high-risk disease were managed at the cancer centre. The main outcome measures included risk status and pathology review, treatment and treatment location, and acceptability to patients and gynaecologists. RESULTS: Seventy-three women participated in this pilot study between November 2009 and 2010. Risk stratification was performed in all women: 37 were classified as high risk and 36 as low risk. Ninety-seven percent of women with high-risk disease were managed at the cancer centre, and 83% of these women underwent surgical staging compared with 8% for women with low-risk disease. This approach was acceptable to both patients and gynaecologists. CONCLUSION: This structured pattern of care for women with endometrial cancer resulted in a shift in management, with more women managed in accordance with oncologic guidelines, meaning that women at high risk for metastases had a lymphadenectomy performed.

Objectif : Cette étude s'est penchée sur une approche fondée sur des facteurs de risque en ce qui concerne l'orientation vers un sous-spécialiste ou un gynécologue généraliste pour ce qui est de la prise en charge des femmes présentant un cancer de l'endomètre. Méthodes : Au moment du diagnostic, toutes les femmes ayant obtenu un diagnostic de cancer de l'endomètre au sein de quatre hôpitaux communautaires ont été orientées vers un établissement anticancéreux centralisé et ont été stratifiées en groupes « risques faibles ¼ et « risques élevés ¼. La stratification du risque a été principalement fondée sur l'évaluation pathologique centrale, la maladie à faible risque ayant été définie comme étant de grade 1, stade clinique 1. Les femmes qui présentaient une maladie ne les exposant qu'à de faibles risques ont été réorientées vers le gynécologue orienteur à des fins de chirurgie. Les femmes qui présentaient une maladie les exposant à des risques élevés ont été prises en charge par le centre anticancéreux. Parmi les principaux critères d'évaluation, on comptait l'analyse de l'état du risque et de la pathologie, le traitement et l'emplacement du traitement, ainsi que l'acceptabilité aux yeux des patientes et des gynécologues. Résultats : Soixante-treize femmes ont participé à cette étude pilote entre novembre 2009 et 2010. La stratification du risque a été menée chez toutes les femmes : 37 d'entre elles ont été classées comme étant exposées à des risques élevés et 36, comme n'étant exposées qu'à de faibles risques. Quatre-vingt-dix-sept pour cent des femmes qui présentaient une maladie les exposant à des risques élevés ont été prises en charge par le centre anticancéreux : 83 % de ces femmes ont subi une stadification chirurgicale, par comparaison avec 8 % des femmes qui présentaient une maladie ne les exposant qu'à de faibles risques. Cette approche s'est avérée acceptable tant pour les patientes que pour les gynécologues. Conclusion : Ce profil structuré de soins pour les femmes présentant un cancer de l'endomètre a donné lieu à une modification de la prise en charge, un nombre plus important de femmes ayant été prises en charge conformément aux lignes directrices oncologiques, ce qui signifie que les femmes exposées à des risques élevés de métastases en sont venues à subir une lymphadénectomie.

Comprehensive global collaboration in the care of 1182 pediatric oncology patients over 12 years: The Iraqi-Italian experience.

BACKGROUND: Iraq's health care system has gradually declined after several decades of wars, terrorism, and UN economic sanctions. The Oncology Unit at Children's Welfare Teaching Hospital (CWTH) in Baghdad was lacking basic facilities and support. To address this shortcoming, a humanitarian and educational partnership was established between CWTH and Sapienza University of Rome (SUR). METHODS: We investigated the outcomes of 80 online and 16 onsite educational sessions and 142 teleconsultation sessions from 2006 to 2014. We also determined the outcomes of pathology reviews by SUR of 1216 tissue specimens submitted by CWTH from 2007 until 2019 for second opinions. The primary outcomes were discordance, concordance, and changes among clinical diagnoses and pathology review findings. The measures included the frequency of teleconsultation and tele-education sessions, the topics discussed in these sessions, and the number of pathology samples requiring second opinions. FINDINGS: A total of 500 cases were discussed via teleconsultations during the study period. The median patient age was 7 years (range, 24 days to 16·4 years), and the cases comprised 79 benign tumors, 299 leukemias, 120 lymphomas, and 97 solid tumors. The teleconsultation sessions yielded 27 diagnostic changes, 123 confirmed diagnoses, and 13 equivocal impacts. The pathology reviews by SUR were concordant for 996 (81·9%) cases, discordant for 186 (15·3%), and inconclusive for 34 (2·8%). The major cause of discordance was inadequate immunohistochemical staining. The percentage of discordance markedly decreased over time (from 40% to 10%). The cause of the improvement is multifactorial: training of two CWTH pathologists at SUR, better immunohistochemical staining, and the ongoing clinical and pathologic telemedicine activities. The partnership yielded 12 publications, six posters, and three oral presentations by CWTH investigators. INTERPRETATION: The exchange of knowledge and expertise across continental boundaries meaningfully improved the diagnoses and management of pediatric cancer at CWTH.

Toxoplasmosis in Zoo Animals: A Retrospective Pathology Review of 126 Cases.

Toxoplasma gondii is an extremely successful zoonotic protozoan parasite that has been demonstrated in a wide range of endo- and poikilothermic species. Although infection is widespread amongst domestic animals, overt disease other than abortion in small ruminants is sporadic. This survey evaluates toxoplasmosis in zoo animals based on a systematic review of pathology archive material (n = 33,506 submissions) over a 16-year study period. A total of 126 submissions, deriving from 32 zoos, two educational facilities and two private owners, were included in the study, based on gross lesions, cytological, histological and immunohistological diagnosis of toxoplasmosis. Clinical history, signalment, annual distribution and post-mortem findings were evaluated. A total of 31 species (mammalian 97%/avian 3%) were represented in the study material. Ring-tailed lemurs, slender tailed meerkats, Pallas' cats, and squirrel monkeys were most affected. An unusual outbreak occurred in Asian small-clawed otters, in which toxoplasmosis has not been reported to date. Clinically, animals over 12 months of age presented with non-specific symptoms (anorexia, weight loss, lethargy, debilitation), neurological, gastrointestinal or respiratory signs and sudden death. Systemic disease predominated, with a propensity for encephalitis in meerkats and Pallas' cats and systemic disease involving lymphoid tissues in ring-tailed lemurs. Cases in the UK occurred year-round, with species-specific peaks and increases between August and November. This study reinforces the importance of toxoplasmosis as a significant cause of sporadic and epizootic mortalities in a wide range of zoo animals. Feral cat control is crucial to reduce infection pressure.

Impact of Pathology Review in Adverse Histological Characteristics and pT Stages of Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer in a Multicenter Study.

PURPOSE: Pathology reviews for upper urinary tract cancer (UTUC) remained scarce in the literature. Here, we reported the interobserver variation among the review and local pathologies of featured histologic characteristics for UTUC. METHODS: Patients who underwent definitive surgical treatments for UTUC were retrospectively reviewed for eligibility of pathology review. In the Taiwan UTUC Collaboration cohort, 212 cases were reviewed, of which 154 cases were eligible for pathology review. Agreement between original pathology and review pathology was measured by the total percentage of agreement and by simple kappa statistics. The prognostic impact was analyzed by the Cox regression model with the estimation of hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: There were 80 women and 74 men enrolled in this study, and the median age at treatment was 71.7 years. The agreement is moderate agreement for surgical margin status (87.7%; κ = 0.61), tumor grade (82.5%; κ = 0.43), tumor invasiveness (76.6%; κ = 0.45), lymphovascular invasion (70.8%; κ = 0.42) and T stage (67.5%; κ = 0.52). The interobserver agreements for perineural invasion and variant histology identification were slight. Kaplan-Meier analysis for disease-free survival revealed comparable results in local and review pathology for localized (Tis, Ta, T1-2) or advanced T stage (T3-4). CONCLUSIONS: Pathology review of UTUC had minimal impact on clinical practice based on current available disease treatment guidelines. However, significant interobserver variations were observed in featured adverse histopathological characters.

Relevance of routine pathology review in cervical carcinoma.

To determine the impact of pathology review on the management of patients with cervical carcinoma, 264 reports of pathology review from 230 patients referred to Erasmus MC (2010-2012) were studied retrospectively. Discrepancies between pathologic diagnoses were classified as 'major' if they led to changes in treatment, and as 'minor' where there was no change. Patient and tumor characteristics were analyzed to identify the factors influencing these discrepancies. Fifty-eight (25.2%) discrepancies were identified; 28 (12.2%) were major, these resulted frequently from missing essential information, or discordant assessment of tumor invasion. Pathology review prevented under-treatment of 3.5%, over-treatment of 1.3%, treatment for incorrect malignancy of 1.3%, and enabled definitive treatment of 6.1% of patients. This highlights the importance of pathology review for appropriate management. Major discrepancies were rare (1%) for patients with macroscopic tumor and histologic diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma (n = 100). For these patients, yield of pathology review may be limited.

Central pathology review of salivary gland adenoid cystic carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: To assess the role of a central pathology review in the diagnosis of salivary gland adenoid cystic carcinoma (AdCC). METHODS: Surgically resected salivary gland tumors diagnosed as AdCC (n = 219) in 15 reference hospitals in Japan were subjected to a retrospective pathological re-evaluation. RESULTS: After the review, the AdCC diagnosis was revised in 21/219 cases (9.6%). The six benign tumors (2.7%) comprised five basal cell adenomas and one pleomorphic adenoma, and among these six patients, three received postoperative radiotherapy. The remaining 15 malignant tumors (6.8%) comprised nine basal cell adenocarcinomas and six other carcinomas. All revised basal cell adenoma/adenocarcinoma cases were of rare cribriform variants. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of AdCC pathology reports were revised after the central pathology review. It should be emphasized that the greatest attention should be paid in differentiating AdCC from cribriform variant basal cell adenoma/adenocarcinoma, which is very rare in salivary gland tumors.

A second expert pathology review of cutaneous melanoma in multidisciplinary meetings: Impact on treatment decisions.

Melanoma causes substantial burden of medical costs and years of life lost. Wide variations in melanoma diagnosis and treatment have been identified at least in the United States, Australia, Germany, Italy and France [1]. The variation especially in the quality of reporting on pathological specimens has been reported. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the impact of expert pathology review of melanoma on the staging and thus treatment decisions in cutaneous melanoma patients in a multidisciplinary tumor board. A total of 567 patients were referred to the multidisciplinary meeting with a diagnosis of new invasive or in situ melanoma from 14.10.2014 to 31.5.2018. Among these patients, a second expert histopathologic review resulted in changes in interpretation for 46 out of 567 (8%) patients. Of patients originally diagnosed with melanoma, pathologic review led to a change in diagnosis to benign lesions in 19 cases. The Breslow thickness changed >0.3 mm in 22 cases leading changes in staging and thus treatment. Minor changes (≤0.3 mm) in Breslow thickness was found in 5 cases. Our data suggest that review of melanoma by an expert dermatopathologist results in frequent, clinically meaningful alterations in diagnosis, staging and surgical treatment. The confirmation of a cancer diagnosis should be the first step in the initiation of multidisciplinary monitoring especially in patients younger than 40 years old and early-stage tumors.

Prognostic Factors in a Large Nationwide Cohort of Histologically Confirmed Primary and Secondary Angiosarcomas.

Angiosarcoma (AS) is a rare sarcoma of endothelial origin, arising spontaneously (primary AS) or after external damage such as radiation therapy or UV exposure (secondary AS). To date, reliable assessment of prognostic factors has proven difficult, due to disease rarity and heterogeneity of study cohorts. Although large registries provide relatively large AS patient series, these cases often lack histological confirmation. This study aimed to analyze AS prognostic factors in a large nationwide cohort of histologically confirmed cases, established through linkage of clinical data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry and pathology data from the Dutch pathology registry (PALGA). All cases were reviewed by an expert pathologist, showing a 16% discordance rate. Multivariable Cox regression survival analysis among 479 confirmed AS patients revealed remarkably poorer overall survival (OS) for primary AS compared to secondary AS (7 vs 21 months, Hazard ratio (HR) = 1.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.2-1.9). Age above 65 years, male gender, and no surgical treatment also significantly correlated to worse OS. Overall, OS was relatively poor, with a median of 13 months (95% CI = 10-16 months) and 22% five-year survival rate. With this study, we illustrate AS heterogeneity in clinical behavior and show for the first time better survival for secondary AS compared to primary AS.

Consistent Biopsy Quality and Gleason Grading Within the Global Active Surveillance Global Action Plan 3 Initiative: A Prerequisite for Future Studies.

Within the Movember Foundation's Global Action Plan Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance (GAP3) initiative, 25 centers across the globe collaborate to standardize active surveillance (AS) protocols for men with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa). A centralized PCa AS database, comprising data of more than 15000 patients worldwide, was created. Comparability of the histopathology between the different cohorts was assessed by a centralized pathology review of 445 biopsies from 15 GAP3 centers. Grade group 1 (Gleason score 6) in 85% and grade group ≥2 (Gleason score ≥7) in 15% showed 89% concordance at review with moderate agreement (κ=0.56). Average biopsy core length was similar among the analyzed cohorts. Recently established highly adverse pathologies, including cribriform and/or intraductal carcinoma, were observed in 3.6% of the reviewed biopsies. In conclusion, the centralized pathology review of 445 biopsies revealed comparable histopathology among the 15 GAP3 centers with a low frequency of high-risk features. This enables further data analyses-without correction-toward uniform global AS guidelines for men with low-risk PCa. PATIENT SUMMARY: Movember Foundation's Global Action Plan Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance (GAP3) initiative combines data from 15000 men with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) across the globe to standardize active surveillance protocols. Histopathology review confirmed that the histopathology was consistent with low-risk PCa in most men and comparable between different centers.