Unraveling the Mechanisms of Valvular Heart Disease to Identify Medical Therapy Targets: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Valvular heart disease is a common cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and has no effective medical therapy. Severe disease is managed with valve replacement procedures, which entail high health care-related costs and postprocedural morbidity and mortality. Robust ongoing research programs have elucidated many important molecular pathways contributing to primary valvular heart disease. However, there remain several key challenges inherent in translating research on valvular heart disease to viable molecular targets that can progress through the clinical trials pathway and effectively prevent or modify the course of these common conditions. In this scientific statement, we review the basic cellular structures of the human heart valves and discuss how these structures change in primary valvular heart disease. We focus on the most common primary valvular heart diseases, including calcific aortic stenosis, bicuspid aortic valves, mitral valve prolapse, and rheumatic heart disease, and outline the fundamental molecular discoveries contributing to each. We further outline potential therapeutic molecular targets for primary valvular heart disease and discuss key knowledge gaps that might serve as future research priorities.

PROX1 Inhibits PDGF-B Expression to Prevent Myxomatous Degeneration of Heart Valves.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac valve disease is observed in 2.5% of the general population and 10% of the elderly people. Effective pharmacological treatments are currently not available, and patients with severe cardiac valve disease require surgery. PROX1 (prospero-related homeobox transcription factor 1) and FOXC2 (Forkhead box C2 transcription factor) are transcription factors that are required for the development of lymphatic and venous valves. We found that PROX1 and FOXC2 are expressed in a subset of valvular endothelial cells (VECs) that are located on the downstream (fibrosa) side of cardiac valves. Whether PROX1 and FOXC2 regulate cardiac valve development and disease is not known. METHODS: We used histology, electron microscopy, and echocardiography to investigate the structure and functioning of heart valves from Prox1ΔVEC mice in which Prox1 was conditionally deleted from VECs. Isolated valve endothelial cells and valve interstitial cells were used to identify the molecular mechanisms in vitro, which were tested in vivo by RNAScope, additional mouse models, and pharmacological approaches. The significance of our findings was tested by evaluation of human samples of mitral valve prolapse and aortic valve insufficiency. RESULTS: Histological analysis revealed that the aortic and mitral valves of Prox1ΔVEC mice become progressively thick and myxomatous. Echocardiography revealed that the aortic valves of Prox1ΔVEC mice are stenotic. FOXC2 was downregulated and PDGF-B (platelet-derived growth factor-B) was upregulated in the VECs of Prox1ΔVEC mice. Conditional knockdown of FOXC2 and conditional overexpression of PDGF-B in VECs recapitulated the phenotype of Prox1ΔVEC mice. PDGF-B was also increased in mice lacking FOXC2 and in human mitral valve prolapse and insufficient aortic valve samples. Pharmacological inhibition of PDGF-B signaling with imatinib partially ameliorated the valve defects of Prox1ΔVEC mice. CONCLUSIONS: PROX1 antagonizes PDGF-B signaling partially via FOXC2 to maintain the extracellular matrix composition and prevent myxomatous degeneration of cardiac valves.

Increased extracellular matrix stiffness regulates myofibroblast transformation through induction of autophagy-mediated Kindlin-2 cytoplasmic translocation.

The extracellular matrix (ECM) mechanical properties regulate biological processes, such as fibroblast-myofibroblast transformation (FMT), which is a crucial component in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) development. The 'Kindlin-2' protein, expressed by fibroblasts, plays an important role in the development of the mesoderm, which is responsible for connective tissue formation; however, the role of Kindlin-2 in FMT remains to be explored. In this study, we aimed to explore the role of Kindlin-2 in FMT as it relates to POP. We found that ECM stiffness induces autophagy to translocate Kindlin-2 to the cytoplasm of L929 cells, where it interacts with and degrades MOB1, thereby facilitating Yes-associated protein (YAP) entry into the nucleus and influencing FMT progression. Stiffness-induced autophagy was inhibited when using an autophagy inhibitor, which blocked the translocation of Kindlin-2 to the cytoplasm and partially reversed high-stiffness-induced FMT. In patients with POP, we observed an increase in cytoplasmic Kindlin-2 and nuclear YAP levels. Similar changes in vaginal wall-associated proteins were observed in a mouse model of acute vaginal injury. In conclusion, Kindlin-2 is a key gene affecting ECM stiffness, which regulates FMT by inducing autophagy and may influence the development of POP.

Silencing of cysteine and serine rich nuclear protein 1 inhibits apoptosis, senescence and collagen degradation in human-derived vaginal fibroblasts in response to oxidative stress or DNA damage.

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a group of diseases caused by extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation in pelvic supportive tissues. Cysteine and serine rich nuclear protein 1 (CSRNP1) is involved in cell proliferation and survival regulation, and reportedly facilitates collagen breakdown in human chondrocytes. The present study aimed to probe the effect of CSRNP1 on collagen metabolism in human-derived vaginal fibroblasts. High expression of CSRNP1 was found in POP patient-derived vaginal fibroblasts in comparison to normal-derived vaginal fibroblasts. Following functional experiments revealed that CSRNP1 overexpression led to proliferation inhibition, apoptosis and collagen degradation in normal vaginal fibroblasts. In line with this, silencing of CSRNP1 inhibited hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)-triggered apoptosis, ROS generation and collagen loss in normal vaginal fibroblasts. Silencing of CSRNP1 also reduced the expression of cell senescence markers p21 and γ-H2Ax (the histone H2Ax phosphorylated at Ser139), as well as curbed collagen breakdown in normal vaginal fibroblasts caused by a DNA damage agent etoposide. Transcriptomic analysis of vaginal fibroblasts showed that differentially expressed genes affected by CSRNP1 overexpression were mainly enriched in the Wnt signaling pathway. Treatment with a Wnt pathway inhibitor DKK1 blocked CSRNP1 knockdown-caused collagen deposition. Mechanistically, CSRNP1 was identified to be a target of Snail family transcriptional repressor 2 (SNAI2). Forced expression of CSRNP1 reversed the anti-apoptotic, anti-senescent and anti-collagen loss effects of SNAI2 in normal vaginal fibroblasts exposed to H2O2 or etoposide. Our study indicates that the SNAI2/CSRNP1 axis may be a key driver in POP progression, which provides a potential therapeutic strategy for POP.

Degenerative mitral regurgitation due to flail leaflet: sex-related differences in presentation, management, and outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Presentation, outcome, and management of females with degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) are undefined. We analysed sex-specific baseline clinical and echocardiographic characteristics at referral for DMR due to flail leaflets and subsequent management and outcomes. METHODS: In the Mitral Regurgitation International Database (MIDA) international registry, females were compared with males regarding presentation at referral, management, and outcome (survival/heart failure), under medical treatment, post-operatively, and encompassing all follow-up. RESULTS: At referral, females (n = 650) vs. males (n = 1660) were older with more severe symptoms and higher MIDA score. Smaller cavity diameters belied higher cardiac dimension indexed to body surface area. Under conservative management, excess mortality vs. expected was observed in males [standardized mortality ratio (SMR) 1.45 (1.27-1.65), P < .001] but was higher in females [SMR 2.00 (1.67-2.38), P < .001]. Female sex was independently associated with mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.29 (1.04-1.61), P = .02], cardiovascular mortality [adjusted HR 1.58 (1.14-2.18), P = .007], and heart failure [adjusted HR 1.36 (1.02-1.81), P = .04] under medical management. Females vs. males were less offered surgical correction (72% vs. 80%, P < .001); however, surgical outcome, adjusted for more severe presentation in females, was similar (P ≥ .09). Ultimately, overall outcome throughout follow-up was worse in females who displayed persistent excess mortality vs. expected [SMR 1.31 (1.16-1.47), P < .001], whereas males enjoyed normal life expectancy restoration [SMR 0.92 (0.85-0.99), P = .036]. CONCLUSIONS: Females with severe DMR were referred to tertiary centers at a more advanced stage, incurred higher mortality and morbidity under conservative management, and were offered surgery less and later after referral. Ultimately, these sex-related differences yielded persistent excess mortality despite surgery in females with DMR, while males enjoyed restoration of life expectancy, warranting imperative re-evaluation of sex-specific DMR management.

Mitral valve prolapse: arrhythmic risk during pregnancy and postpartum.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse (AMVP) is linked to life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias (VAs), and young women are considered at high risk. Cases of AMVP in women with malignant VA during pregnancy have emerged, but the arrhythmic risk during pregnancy is unknown. The authors aimed to describe features of women with high-risk AMVP who developed malignant VA during the perinatal period and to assess if pregnancy and the postpartum period were associated with a higher risk of malignant VA. METHODS: This retrospective international multi-centre case series included high-risk women with AMVP who experienced malignant VA and at least one pregnancy. Malignant VA included ventricular fibrillation, sustained ventricular tachycardia, or appropriate shock from an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. The authors compared the incidence of malignant VA in non-pregnant periods and perinatal period; the latter defined as occurring during pregnancy and within 6 months after delivery. RESULTS: The authors included 18 women with AMVP from 11 centres. During 7.5 (interquartile range 5.8-16.6) years of follow-up, 37 malignant VAs occurred, of which 18 were pregnancy related occurring in 13 (72%) unique patients. Pregnancy and 6 months after delivery showed increased incidence rate of malignant VA compared to the non-pregnancy period (univariate incidence rate ratio 2.66, 95% confidence interval 1.23-5.76). CONCLUSIONS: The perinatal period could impose increased risk of malignant VA in women with high-risk AMVP. The data may provide general guidance for pre-conception counselling and for nuanced shared decision-making between patients and clinicians.

PER2/P65-driven glycogen synthase 1 transcription in macrophages modulates gut inflammation and pathogenesis of rectal prolapse.

Rectal prolapse in serious inflammatory bowel disease is caused by abnormal reactions of the intestinal mucosal immune system. The circadian clock has been implicated in immune defense and inflammatory responses, but the mechanisms by which it regulates gut inflammation remain unclear. In this study, we investigate the role of the rhythmic gene Period2 (Per2) in triggering inflammation in the rectum and its contribution to the pathogenesis of rectal prolapse. We report that Per2 deficiency in mice increased susceptibility to intestinal inflammation and resulted in spontaneous rectal prolapse. We further demonstrated that PER2 was essential for the transcription of glycogen synthase 1 by interacting with the NF-κB p65. We show that the inhibition of Per2 reduced the levels of glycogen synthase 1 and glycogen synthesis in macrophages, impairing the capacity of pathogen clearance and disrupting the composition of gut microbes. Taken together, our findings identify a novel role for Per2 in regulating the capacity of pathogen clearance in macrophages and gut inflammation and suggest a potential animal model that more closely resembles human rectal prolapse.

The MIDA-Q Mortality Risk Score: A Quantitative Prognostic Tool for the Mitral Valve Prolapse Spectrum.

BACKGROUND: Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is responsible for a considerable disease burden but is widely heterogeneous. The lack of a comprehensive prognostic instrument covering the entire MVP spectrum, encompassing the quantified consequent degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR), hinders clinical management and therapeutic trials. METHODS: The new Mitral Regurgitation International Database Quantitative (MIDA-Q) registry enrolled 8187 consecutive patients (ages 63±16 years, 47% women, follow-up 5.5±3.3 years) first diagnosed with isolated MVP, without or with DMR quantified prospectively (measuring effective regurgitant orifice [ERO] and regurgitant volume) in routine practice of 5 tertiary care centers from North America, Europe, and the Middle East. The MIDA-Q score ranges from 0 to 15 by accumulating guideline-based risk factors and DMR severity. Long-term survival under medical management was the primary outcome end point. RESULTS: MVP was associated with DMR absent/mild (ERO <20 mm2) in 50%, moderate (ERO 20-40 mm2) in 25%, and severe or higher (ERO ≥40 mm2) in 25%, with mean ERO 24±24 mm2, regurgitant volume 37±35 mL. Median MIDA-Q score was 4 with a wide distribution (10%-90% range, 0-9). MIDA-Q score was higher in patients with EuroScore II ≥1% versus <1% (median, 7 versus 3; P < 0.0001) but with wide overlap (10%-90% range, 4-11 versus 0-7) and mediocre correlation (R2 0.18). Five-year survival under medical management was strongly associated with MIDA-Q score, 97±1% with score 0, 95±1% with score 1 to 2, 82±1% with score 3 to 4, 67±1% with score 5 to 6, 60±1% with score 7 to 8, 44±1% with score 9 to 10, 35±1% with score 11 to 12, and 5±4% with MIDA-Q score ≥13, with hazard ratio 1.31 [1.29-1.33] per 1-point increment. Excess mortality with higher MIDA-Q scores persisted after adjustment for age, sex, and EuroScore II (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.13 [1.11-1.15] per 1-point increment). Subgroup analysis showed persistent association of MIDA-Q score with mortality in all possible subsets, in particular, with EuroScore II<1% (hazard ratio, 1.08 [1.02-1.14]) or ≥1% (hazard ratio, 1.11 [1.08-1.13]) and with no/mild DMR (hazard ratio, 1.14 [1.10-1.19]) or moderate/severe DMR (hazard ratio, 1.13 [1.10-1.16], all per 1-point increment with P<0.0001). Nested-model and bootstrapping analyses demonstrated incremental prognostic power of MIDA-Q score (all P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This large, international cohort of isolated MVP, with prospective DMR quantification in routine practice, demonstrates the wide range of risk factor accumulation and considerable heterogeneity of outcomes after MVP diagnosis. The MIDA-Q score is strongly, independently, and incrementally associated with long-term survival after MVP diagnosis, irrespective of presentation, and is therefore a crucial prognostic instrument for risk stratification, clinical trials, and management of patients diagnosed with all forms of MVP.

Early growth response 2, a novel target of pelvic organ prolapse, is highly expressed in anterior vaginal wall tissues with pelvic organ prolapse.

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common disorder among women that negatively affects women's quality of life. Early growth response 2 (EGR2) is a transcription factor that regulates cell growth. The present study aimed to explore the role of EGR2 in POP progression and provided a new target for the treatment and prevention of POP. Firstly, we extracted primary vaginal anterior wall fibroblasts from POP tissues and non-POP tissues and then constructed an EGR2-silencing lentivirus for further study. Immunoblotting, qPCR, TUNEL assay, CCK-8 assay, dual luciferase assay, and ELISA assay were carried out. EGR2 expression was much higher in POP tissues than in control tissues, and EGR2 expression positively correlated with cytokine signaling 3 (SOCS3) expression. Knockdown of EGR2 increased cell proliferation, upregulated PCNA expression, and reduced apoptosis in POP fibroblasts. Moreover, we found that the knockdown of EGR2 increased COL1A1, COL3A1, and Elastin expression and decreased MMP2 and MMP9 activities, and knockdown of EGR2 increased TGF-ß/Smad pathway activity in POP fibroblasts. Interestingly, the results of dual luciferase assay demonstrated that EGR2 was able to increase SOCS3 transcriptional activity. EGR2 knockdown alleviated the apoptosis of POP fibroblasts by reducing SOCS3 expression and improving the proliferation and collagen synthesis of POP fibroblasts. Overall, our study illustrated that EGR2 was highly expressed in POP tissues, and knockdown of EGR2 alleviated apoptosis and reduced matrix degradation in POP fibroblasts. This study might provide a new insight into the pathogenesis of POP.

Arrhythmic risk profile in mitral valve prolapse: A systematic review and metanalysis of 1715 patients.

INTRODUCTION: Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is a common clinical condition in the general population. A subgroup of patients with MVP may experience ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death ("arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse" [AMVP]) but how to stratify arrhythmic risk is still unclear. Our meta-analysis aims to identify predictive factors for arrhythmic risk in patients with MVP. METHODS: We systematically searched Medline, Cochrane, Journals@Ovid, Scopus electronic databases for studies published up to December 28, 2022 and comparing AMVP and nonarrhythmic mitral valve prolapse (NAMVP) for what concerns history, electrocardiographic, echocardiographic and cardiac magnetic resonance features. The effect size was estimated using a random-effect model as odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD). RESULTS: A total of 10 studies enrolling 1715 patients were included. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) (OR: 16.67; p = .005), T-wave inversion (TWI) (OR: 2.63; p < .0001), bileaflet MVP (OR: 1.92; p < .0001) and mitral anulus disjunction (MAD) (OR: 2.60; p < .0001) were more represented among patients with AMVP than in NAMVP. Patients with AMVP were shown to have longer anterior mitral leaflet (AML) (MD: 2.63 mm; p < .0001), posterior mitral leaflet (MD: 2.96 mm; p < .0001), thicker AML (MD: 0.49 mm; p < .0001), longer MAD length (MD: 1.24 mm; p < .0001) and higher amount of LGE (MD: 1.41%; p < .0001) than NAMVP. AMVP showed increased mechanical dispersion (MD: 8.04 ms; 95% confidence interval: 5.13-10.96; p < .0001) compared with NAMVP. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis proved that LGE, TWI, bileaflet MVP, and MAD are predictive factors for arrhythmic risk in MVP patients.

Insights into malignant mitral valve degenerative disease from a sudden cardiac death cohort highlighting significant measurement differences from normal.

AIMS: Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is an accepted cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in most autopsy series. Diagnosis at autopsy relies upon subjective assessment with no established objective pathological criteria. This study set out to establish objective measurements to help pathologists dealing with SCD. METHODS: We diagnosed 120 (1.5%) cases of MVP in 8108 cases of SCD. We measured the mitral annulus, anterior and posterior leaflets, rough zone and mitral annular disjunction (MAD) in 27 MVP cases and compared them to 54 age- and sex-matched normal mitral valves. RESULTS: Age of death was 39 ± 16 years, with 59 females and 61 males. History of mild MV disease was present in 19 (16%). Eleven (9%) died associated with exertion. Left ventricular hypertrophy was present in nine (15%) females and 10 (16%) males. Both MV leaflets showed thickening and ballooning in all individuals. MVP showed highly significantly increased annular circumference, elongation and thickening of both leaflets as well as increased MAD (all P < 0.001). Left ventricular fibrosis was present in 108 (90%), with interstitial fibrosis in the posterolateral wall and papillary muscle in 88 (81%) and coexisting replacement fibrosis in 40 (37%). CONCLUSION: This is the largest MVP associated with SCD series highlighting a young cohort with equal representation of males and females. There is involvement of both leaflets with significant annular dilatation, elongation and thickening of both leaflets with MAD. Left ventricular fibrosis explains arrhythmia. Our quantitative measurements should serve as a reference for pathologists assessing post-mortem hearts for MVP.

Outcomes of Mitral Valve Repair for Posterior Leaflet Prolapse, Anterior Leaflet Prolapse, and Bileaflet Prolapse.

Background: Mitral valve repair (MVr) is an effective treatment for degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR).And the outcomes and repair rates for posterior leaflet prolapse (PLP), anterior leaflet prolapse (ALP), and bileaflet prolapse (BLP) vary. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of mitral valve repair for patients with PLP, ALP, and BLP. Methods: From 2010 to 2019, 1192 patients with degenerative mitral valve regurgitation underwent surgery at our hospital. And 1069 patients were identified. The average age of all patients was (54.74 ± 12.17) years old for all patients. 273 patients (25.5%) had ALP, 148 patients (13.8%) had BLP, and 648 patients (60.6%) had PLP. All patients were followed up for an average duration of 5.1 years. We compared the outcomes of patients with ALP, PLP, and BLP. Results: Patients with ALP were the youngest of the 3 groups and had the highest prevalence of atrial fibrillation. Patients with PLP had the highest prevalence of hypertension, whereas patients with BLP and ALP had larger left ventricular end-diastolic and left ventricular end-systolic diameters. ALP and BLP repairs had a longer cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp time.10 patients dead in-hospital, 5 patients had PLP, 3 had ALP, and 2 had BLP. The 10-year survival cumulative incidences of reoperation among ALP, BLP, and PLP repairs were not significantly different. ALP repair still had higher cumulative incidences of recurrent mitral regurgitation (MR) compared to PLP. Conclusions: The rates of long-term survival and freedom from reoperation were not significantly different among patients with ALP, BLP, and PLP. ALP repair has higher cumulative incidences of recurrent MR compared to PLP.

Valvulopathies and Genetics: Where are We?

Valvulopathies are among the most common cardiovascular diseases, significantly increasing morbidity and mortality. While many valvular heart diseases are acquired later in life, an important genetic component has been described, particularly in mitral valve prolapse and bicuspid aortic valve. These conditions can arise secondary to genetic syndromes such as Marfan disease (associated with mitral valve prolapse) or Turner syndrome (linked to the bicuspid aortic valve) or may manifest in a non-syndromic form. When cardiac valve disease is the primary cause, it can appear in a familial clustering or sporadically, with a clear genetic component. The identification of new genes, regulatory elements, post-transcriptional modifications, and molecular pathways is crucial to identify at-risk familial carriers and for developing novel therapeutic strategies. In the present review we will discuss the numerous genetic contributors of heart valve diseases.

Mitral Annulus Disjunction: A Comprehensive Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Phenotype and Clinical Outcomes Study.

BACKGROUND: Clinical importance of mitral annulus disjunction (MAD) is not well established. PURPOSE: Characterize a population of MAD all-comers diagnosed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. POPULATION: MAD confirmed in 222 patients, age of 49.2 ± 19.3 years, 126 (56.8%) males. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 1.5 T and 3 T/steady-state free precession and inversion recovery. ASSESSMENT: Clinical history, outcomes, imaging, and arrhythmia data. MAD defined as a separation ≥2 mm between left ventricular myocardium and mitral annulus. Presence and pattern of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) were analyzed. LGE in the papillary muscles and adjacent to MAD were identified as MAD related. Ventricular arrhythmias (VA) were grouped into non-sustained ventricular arrhythmias (NSVA) or sustained. Cardiovascular death assessed. STATISTICAL TESTS: Differences between baseline characteristics were compared. Univariate regression was used to investigate possible associations between ventricular arrhythmia and cardiovascular death with characteristics associated with the severity of MAD. A multivariable logistic regression included significant variables from the univariate analysis and was performed for MAD-related and global LGE. RESULTS: MAD extent 5.0 ± 2.6 mm. MV annulus expanded during systole for MAD ≥6 mm. Systolic expansion associated with prolapse, billowing, and curling. LGE present in 82 patients (36.9%). Twenty-three patients (10.4%) showed MAD-related LGE by three different observers. No association of LGE with MAD extent (P = 0.545) noted. Follow-up 4.1 ± 2.4 years. No sustained VA observed. In univariable analysis, NSVA was more prevalent in patients with MAD ≥6 mm (33.3% vs. 9.9%), but this was attenuated on multivariate analysis (P = 0.054). The presence of NSVA was associated with global LGE but not MAD-related LGE in isolation (P = 0.750). Three patients died of cardiovascular causes (1.4%) and none had MAD-related LGE. None died of sudden cardiac arrest. CONCLUSION: In patients referred for cardiac MRI, mitral valve dysfunction was associated with MAD severity. Scar was not related to the extent of MAD, but associated with NSVA. The risk of sustained arrhythmias and cardiovascular death was low in this population. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Palatal prolapse during nasal expiration in patients with myasthenia gravis.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: We have encountered patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) who exhibited palatal prolapse (PP) during nasal expiration in the supine position while awake. This may be an overlooked cause of dyspnea in MG patients. This study aimed to examine and describe the characteristics of MG patients with PP. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 183 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with MG in our hospital from 2012 to 2021. Thirty-two patients underwent laryngoscopy because of bulbar symptoms. Eight of these patients (25%) exhibited PP on laryngoscopy. Clinical features of these eight patients were retrospectively characterized. RESULTS: Median age of the eight patients with PP was 70 years. Six were men. Median body mass index was 21.6 kg/m2 . All patients exhibited PP in the supine position but not the sitting position. Although no patient had abnormal findings on spirometry nor chest computed tomography, six reported dyspnea or difficulty with nasal expiration only in the supine position. PP improved in all four patients who underwent edrophonium testing. All eight patients eventually improved after immunotherapy. DISCUSSION: PP during nasal expiration may be a cause of dyspnea in MG patients, along with respiratory muscle impairment, lung disease, and vocal cord paralysis. Laryngoscopy in the supine position is required to confirm.

Restrictive opioid prescribing after surgery for prolapse and incontinence: a randomized, noninferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Opioids are routinely prescribed for postoperative pain control after gynecologic surgery with growing evidence showing that most prescribed opioids go unused. Restrictive opioid prescribing has been implemented in other surgical specialties to combat the risk for opioid misuse and diversion. The impact of this practice in the urogynecologic patient population is unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine if a restrictive opioid prescription protocol is noninferior to routine opioid prescribing in terms of patient satisfaction with pain control after minor and major surgeries for prolapse and incontinence. STUDY DESIGN: This was a single-center, randomized, noninferiority trial of opioid-naïve patients who underwent minor (eg, colporrhaphy or mid-urethral sling) or major (eg, vaginal or minimally invasive abdominal prolapse repair) urogynecologic surgery. Patients were excluded if they had contraindications to all multimodal analgesia and if they scored ≥30 on the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Subjects were randomized on the day of surgery to the standard opioid prescription protocol (wherein patients routinely received an opioid prescription upon discharge [ie, 3-10 tablets of 5 mg oxycodone]) or to the restrictive protocol (no opioid prescription unless the patient requested one). All patients received multimodal pain medications. Participants and caregivers were not blinded. Subjects were asked to record their pain medication use and pain levels for 7 days. The primary outcome was satisfaction with pain control reported at the 6-week postoperative visit. We hypothesized that patient satisfaction with the restrictive protocol would be noninferior to those randomized to the standard protocol. The noninferiority margin was 15 percentage points. Pain level scores, opioid usage, opioid prescription refills, and healthcare use were secondary outcomes assessed for superiority. RESULTS: A total of 133 patients were randomized, and 127 (64 in the standard arm and 63 in the restrictive arm) completed the primary outcome evaluation and were included in the analysis. There were no statistically significant differences between the study groups, and this remained after adjusting for the surgery type. Major urogynecologic surgery was performed in 73.6% of the study population, and minor surgery was performed in 26.4% of the population. Same-day discharge occurred for 87.6% of all subjects. Patient satisfaction was 92.2% in the standard protocol arm and 92.1% in the restrictive protocol arm (difference, -0.1%; P=.004), which met the criterion for noninferiority. No opioid usage in the first 7 days after hospital discharge was reported by 48.4% of the patients in the standard protocol arm and by 70.8% in the restrictive protocol arm (P=.009). Opioid prescription refills occurred in 8.5% of patients with no difference between the study groups (9.4% in the standard arm vs 6.7% in the restrictive arm; P=.661). No difference was seen in the rate of telephone calls and urgent visits for pain control between the study arms. CONCLUSION: Among women who underwent minor and major surgery for prolapse and incontinence, patient satisfaction rates were noninferior after restrictive opioid prescribing when compared with routine opioid prescribing.

Effectiveness and safety of a novel, collapsible pessary for management of pelvic organ prolapse.

BACKGROUND: Pessaries are an effective treatment for pelvic organ prolapse, yet currently available pessaries can cause discomfort during removal and insertion. An early feasibility trial of an investigational, collapsible pessary previously demonstrated mechanical feasibility during a brief 15-minute office trial. Longer-term, patient-centered safety and efficacy data are needed. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of the investigational vaginal pessary for pelvic organ prolapse at 3 months. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective, 7-center, open-label equivalence study with participants serving as their own controls. Subjects were current users of a Gellhorn or ring pessary with ≥stage 2 prolapse. Subjective and objective data were collected at baseline for 1 month while subjects used their current pessary. Data were then collected throughout a 3-month treatment phase with the study pessary. The primary outcome was change in Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 score. Secondary outcome measures included objective assessment of prolapse support, changes in the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7, and pain with insertion and removal, measured using a visual analog scale. Data from subjects fitted with the study pessary were analyzed using an intention-to-treat approach, and those who dropped out were assigned scores at the upper limit of the predefined equivalence limits. Secondary per protocol analyses included subjects who completed treatment. The study was powered to 80% with a minimal important change equivalence limit of 18.3 points on the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 scale. Square root transformations were used for nonparametric data, and P values were adjusted for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: A total of 78 subjects were enrolled, however, 16 withdrew before study pessary placement. The study pessary was fitted in 62 subjects (50 ring and 12 Gellhorn pessary users), and 48 (62%) completed the 3-month intervention. The change in Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 scores at 3 months demonstrated equivalence when compared with the subjects' baseline scores (mean difference, -3.96 [improvement]; 90% confidence interval, -11.99 to 4.08; P=.002). Among those completing study, the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 scores, equivalence was not demonstrated and scores favored the study pessary (mean difference, -10.45; 90% confidence interval, -20.35 to 0.54; P=.095). Secondary outcomes included objective measures of support, which were similar (mean difference: Ba, 0.54 cm; Bp, 0.04 cm, favoring study pessary; improvement in mean Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7 scores for those who completed the trial: before, 32.23; after, 16.86; P=.019), and pain with insertion and removal, which was lower with the study pessary than with the subject's own pessary (mean difference visual analog scale score insertion, 9.91 mm; P=.019; removal, 11.23 mm; P=.019). No serious adverse events related to the pessary were reported. CONCLUSION: Equivalence was demonstrated in the primary outcome of the study pessary when compared with current, noncollapsible pessaries in terms of change in severity and bother of pelvic floor symptoms. Among participants who completed the trial, the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7 improved with study pessary use and change in Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 scores were nonequivalent, favoring the study pessary. Subjects reported significantly lower pain scores with both pessary insertion and removal with the novel collapsible pessary when compared with their standard pessary.

Three-year outcomes of a randomized clinical trial of perioperative vaginal estrogen as adjunct to native tissue vaginal apical prolapse repair.

BACKGROUND: As the muscular and connective tissue components of the vagina are estrogen responsive, clinicians may recommend vaginal estrogen to optimize tissues preoperatively and as a possible means to reduce prolapse recurrence, but long-term effects of perioperative intravaginal estrogen on surgical prolapse management are uncertain. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of perioperative vaginal estrogen vs placebo cream in reducing composite surgical treatment failure 36 months after native tissue transvaginal prolapse repair. STUDY DESIGN: This was an extended follow-up of a randomized superiority trial conducted at 3 tertiary US sites. Postmenopausal patients with bothersome anterior or apical vaginal prolapse were randomized 1:1 to 1-g conjugated estrogen cream (0.625 mg/g) or placebo, inserted vaginally twice weekly for ≥5 weeks preoperatively and continued twice weekly for 12 months postoperatively. All participants underwent vaginal hysterectomy (if the uterus was present) and standardized uterosacral or sacrospinous ligament suspension at the surgeon's discretion. The primary report's outcome was time to failure by 12 months postoperatively, defined by a composite outcome of objective prolapse of the anterior or posterior walls beyond the hymen or the vaginal apex descending below one-third the total vaginal length, subjective bulge symptoms, and/or retreatment. After 12 months, participants could choose to use-or not use-vaginal estrogen for atrophy symptom bother. The secondary outcomes included Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification points, subjective prolapse symptom severity using the Patient Global Impression of Severity and the Patient Global Impression of Improvement, and prolapse-specific subscales of the 20-Item Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory and the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-Short Form 7. Data were analyzed as intent to treat and "per protocol" (ie, ≥50% of expected cream use per medication diary). RESULTS: Of 206 postmenopausal patients, 199 were randomized, and 186 underwent surgery. Moreover, 164 postmenopausal patients (88.2%) provided 36-month data. The mean age was 65.0 years (standard deviation, 6.7). The characteristics were similar at baseline between the groups. Composite surgical failure rates were not significantly different between the estrogen group and the placebo group through 36 months, with model-estimated failure rates of 32.6% (95% confidence interval, 21.6%-42.0%) and 26.8% (95% confidence interval, 15.8%-36.3%), respectively (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.90-2.66; P=.11). The results were similar for the per-protocol analysis. Objective failures were more common than subjective failures, combined objective and subjective failures, or retreatment. Using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement, 75 of 80 estrogen participants (94%) and 72 of 76 placebo participants (95%) providing 36-month data reported that they were much or very much better 36 months after surgery (P>.99). These data included reports from 51 of 55 "surgical failures." Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification measurements, Patient Global Impression of Severity scores, and prolapse subscale scores of the 20-Item Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-Short Form 7 all significantly improved for both the estrogen and placebo groups from baseline to 36 months postoperatively without differences between the groups. Of the 160 participants providing data on vaginal estrogen usage at 36 months postoperatively, 40 of 82 participants (49%) originally assigned to the estrogen group were using prescribed vaginal estrogen, and 47 of 78 participants (60%) assigned to the placebo group were using vaginal estrogen (P=.15). CONCLUSION: Adjunctive perioperative vaginal estrogen applied ≥5 weeks preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively did not improve surgical success rates 36 months after uterosacral or sacrospinous ligament suspension prolapse repair. Patient perception of improvement remained very high at 36 months.

Topical Lidocaine for Pessary Removal and Reinsertion Pain Reduction: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Vaginal pessaries are an inexpensive non-surgical treatment for pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. Pessary maintenance includes periodic removal, cleaning, and reinsertion, which can be painful. Lidocaine-prilocaine cream has been shown to significantly reduce pain during pessary maintenance exams. In some practices, Lidocaine HCl 2% jelly may be more readily available and serve as an alternative to lidocaine-prilocaine cream. However, the effect of Lidocaine HCl 2% jelly use during pessary maintenance exams has not been tested. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect of Lidocaine HCl 2% jelly versus lubricating jelly on pain at the time of office pessary removal and reinsertion. STUDY DESIGN: This study is a single-blind, randomized clinical trial among patients presenting to a urogynecology office at a tertiary care center. Participants were randomized to the application of 5cc of Lidocaine HCl 2% jelly or a water-based lubricating jelly five minutes before pessary removal. Visual analog scale pain scores were collected from the participants at baseline, at pessary removal, and at pessary reinsertion. The primary outcome was the visual analog scale pain score at the time of pessary removal. A sample size of 33 per group (n=66) was planned to estimate an absolute mean difference in visual analog pain scale of 2.05 cm at the time of pessary removal. RESULTS: Between September 2022 and June 2023, 192 women were screened, and 66 were enrolled. Thirty-three participants were randomized into the lubricating jelly group and 33 participants were randomized into the Lidocaine HCl 2% jelly group. The two groups were similar in baseline characteristics. Most participants were postmenopausal, using vaginal estrogen, wearing a 70 mm ring pessary with support for pelvic organ prolapse, and reported being very satisfied with the pessary. Other pessaries worn included ring without support, incontinence rings with and without support, Gellhorn, and donut. The pessary sizes ranged from 51 mm to 96 mm. There was no significant difference in pessary type and size between groups. Visual analog scale pain scores at pessary removal were low in both groups: 3.23±3.00 cm in the lubricating group and 2.66±2.77 cm in the lidocaine group. After adjusting for baseline pain, there was no significant difference in pain at pessary removal between the lidocaine jelly and the lubricating jelly groups (mean difference=-0.56 cm, 95% CI: -1.97 to 0.85; p=0.44). Despite no significant difference in visual analog scale pain scores, 71.2% of participants reported a desire for numbing jelly at future pessary examinations. CONCLUSION: Pain during pessary removal and reinsertion is low. Compared to lubricating jelly, lidocaine jelly did not further reduce pain during pessary examinations.

Patient perspectives in adverse event reporting after vaginal apical prolapse surgery.

BACKGROUND: Many clinical trials use systematic methodology to monitor adverse events and determine grade (severity), expectedness, and relatedness to treatments as determined by clinicians. However, patient perspectives are often not included in this process. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare clinician vs patient grading of adverse event severity in a urogynecologic surgical trial. Secondary objectives were to estimate the association of patient grading of adverse events with decision-making and quality of life outcomes and to determine if patient perspective changes over time. STUDY DESIGN: This was a planned supplementary study (Patient Perspectives in Adverse Event Reporting [PPAR]) to a randomized trial comparing 3 surgical approaches to vaginal apical prolapse. In the parent trial, adverse events experienced by patients were collected per a standardized protocol every 6 months during which clinicians graded adverse event severity (mild, moderate, severe/life-threatening). In this substudy, we obtained additional longitudinal patient perspectives for 19 predetermined "PPAR adverse events." Patients provided their own severity grading (mild, moderate, severe/very severe/life-threatening) at initial assessment and at 12 and 36 months postoperatively. Clinicians and patients were masked to each other's reporting. The primary outcome was the interrater agreement (kappa statistic) for adverse event severity between the initial clinician and patient assessment, combining patient grades of mild and moderate. The association between adverse event severity and the Decision Regret Scale, Satisfaction with Decision Scale, the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey, and Patient Global Impression of Improvement scores was assessed using the Spearman correlation coefficient (ρ) for continuous scales, the Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test for Patient Global Impression of Improvement, and t tests or chi-square tests comparing the assessments of patients who rated their adverse events or symptoms as severe with those who gave other ratings. To describe patient perspective changes over time, the intraobserver agreement was estimated for adverse event severity grade over time using weighted kappa coefficients. RESULTS: Of the 360 randomly assigned patients, 219 (61%) experienced a total of 527 PPAR adverse events (91% moderate and 9% severe/life-threatening by clinician grading). Mean patient age was 67 years; 87% were White and 12% Hispanic. Among the patients reporting any PPAR event, the most common were urinary tract infection (61%), de novo urgency urinary incontinence (35%), stress urinary incontinence (22%), and fecal incontinence (13%). Overall agreement between clinician and participant grading of severity was poor (kappa=0.24 [95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.34]). Of the 414 adverse events that clinicians graded as moderate, patients graded 120 (29%) as mild and 80 (19%) as severe. Of the 39 adverse events graded as severe by clinicians, patients graded 15 (38%) as mild or moderate. Initial patient grading of the most severe reported adverse event was mildly correlated with worse Decision Regret Scale (ρ=0.2; P=.01), 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (ρ=-0.24; P<.01), and Patient Global Impression of Improvement (P<.01) scores. There was no association between adverse event severity and Satisfaction with Decision Scale score. Patients with an initial grading of "severe" had more regret, lower quality of life, and poorer global impressions of health than those whose worst severity grade was mild (P<.05). Agreement between the patients' initial severity ratings and their ratings at 12 months (kappa=0.48 [95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.58]) and 36 months (kappa=0.45 [95% confidence interval, 0.37-0.53]) was fair. CONCLUSION: Clinician and patient perceptions of adverse event severity are discordant. Worse severity from the patient perspective was associated with patient-centered outcomes. Including the patient perspective provides additional information for evaluating surgical procedures.