Respiratory distress observation scales to predict weaning outcome.

BACKGROUND: Whether dyspnea is present before starting a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) and whether it may affect the outcome of the SBT is unknown. Mechanical Ventilation-Respiratory Distress Observation Scale (MV-RDOS) has been proposed as a reliable surrogate of dyspnea in non-communicative intubated patients. In the present study, we sought (1) to describe the evolution of the MV-RDOS during a SBT and (2) to investigate whether MV-RDOS can predict the outcome of the SBT. METHODS: Prospective, single-center study in a twenty-two bed ICU in a tertiary center. Patients intubated since more 48 h who had failed a first SBT were eligible if they meet classical readiness to wean criteria. The MV-RDOS was assessed before, at 2-min, 15-min and 30-min (end) of the SBT. The presence of clinically important dyspnea was inferred by a MV-RDOS value ≥ 2.6. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients (age 63 [51-70], SAPS II 66 [51-76]; med [IQR]) were included. Thirty-three (57%) patients failed the SBT, whose 18 (55%) failed before 15-min. Twenty-five (43%) patients successfully passed the SBT. A MV-RDOS ≥ 2.6 was present in ten (17%) patients before to start the SBT. All these ten patients subsequently failed the SBT. A MV-RDOS ≥ 2.6 at 2-min predicted a SBT failure with a 51% sensibility and a 88% specificity (AUC 0.741 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.616-0.866, p = 0.002). Best cut-off value at 2-min was 4.3 and predicted SBT failure with a 27% sensibility and a 96% specificity. CONCLUSION: Despite patients met classical readiness to wean criteria, respiratory distress assessed with the MV-RDOS was frequent at the beginning of SBT. Measuring MV-RDOS before to initiate a SBT could avoid undue procedure and reduce patient's exposure to unnecessary mechanical ventilation weaning failure and distress.

Assessment of Dyspnea in Critically Ill Patients: A Comparative Analysis of Evaluation Scales.

Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the Respiratory Distress Observation Scale (RDOS), Intensive Care RDOS (IC-RDOS), and Mechanical Ventilation RDOS (MV-RDOS) as potential markers of dyspnea in ICU patients by describing their relationship with the Dyspnea Visual Analog Scale (D-VAS). Materials and methods A researcher and a trained nurse independently assessed ICU patients simultaneously. One researcher assessed the RDOS (IC/MV-RDOS) and the depth of sedation. An objective evaluation using the observational D-VAS was simultaneously performed by a trained nurse. Results The correlation coefficients for each scale were 0.338 for the D-VAS and RDOS, 0.239 for the IC-RDOS, and 0.237 for the MV-RDOS, indicating a low correlation. The prediction of self-reported dyspnea showed that each scale's area under the curve (AUC) as a predictor of D-VAS ≥4 was 0.79 (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.71-0.87) for RDOS, 0.77 (95% CI 0.68-0.84) for IC-RDOS, and 0.73 (95% CI 0.64-0.81) for MV-RDOS. Conclusions The objective rating scales RDOS, IC-RDOS, and MV-RDOS can predict subjective dyspnea to a certain extent; however, they have limitations in accurately discriminating dyspnea intensity.

Palliative Care and Population Management Compassionate Extubation of the ICU Patient and the Use of the Respiratory Distress Observation Scale.

End of life (EOL) can be an extremely stressful experience for patients, their families, and health care staff. Critical care nurses are trained to help patients survive acute episodes and assist in restoring their health. Unfortunately, not all ICU patients are able to fully recover or obtain previous quality of life before hospitalization. In these situations, the focus moves to transitioning patients from restorative care to palliative care. This article will explain EOL care guidelines for critical care nurses using the Respiratory Distress Observation Scale to ensure patient comfort during compassionate extubation.

Validity, Reliability, and Diagnostic Accuracy of the Respiratory Distress Observation Scale for Assessment of Dyspnea in Adult Palliative Care Patients.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence and severity of dyspnea increase at the end of life. Many of these patients have difficulty in reporting their symptoms. Accurate surrogate measures are needed for appropriate assessment and treatment. The Respiratory Distress Observation Scale (RDOS) is proposed as a possible scale although more external validation is needed. We set out to validate the RDOS in the context of palliative care patients near the end of life. MEASURES: We prospectively studied 122 palliative care patients in a tertiary hospital in Singapore. Prior RDOS training was done using a standardized instructional video. Dyspnea was assessed by RDOS, Dyspnea Numerical Rating Scale, and Dyspnea Categorical Scale. Pain was assessed by Pain Numerical Rating Scale. We measured RDOS inter-rater reliability, convergent validity, and divergent validity. We used area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) analysis to examine the discriminant properties of RDOS using dyspnea self-report as benchmark. RESULTS: RDOS had good inter-rater reliability with an intraclass correlation of 0.947 (95% CI 0.919-0.976). It showed moderate-to-strong correlation with Dyspnea Numerical Rating Scale (r = 0.702) and Dyspnea Categorical Scale (r = 0.677) and negligible correlation to Pain Numerical Rating Scale (r = 0.080). It showed good discriminant properties of identifying patients with moderate and severe dyspnea with an AUC of 0.874 (95% CI 0.812-0.936). RDOS ≥ 4 predicted patients with moderate and severe dyspnea with a sensitivity of 76.6%, specificity of 86.2%, positive predictive value of 86.0%, and negative predictive value of 76.9%. CONCLUSIONS: The RDOS shows promise and clinical utility as an observational dyspnea assessment tool. Further studies in uncommunicative patients are needed to determine clinical usefulness and generalizability of results.