Impact of Tumor Size and Differentiation Grade on Survival After Lobectomy and Segmentectomy for Patients with Early-Stage Lung Adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of tumor size and differentiation grade on long term survival in patients with early-stage lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) after lobectomy and segmentectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage T1-2N0M0 LUAD who underwent lobectomy and segmentectomy were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Patients were stratified as grade I (well differentiated), grade II (moderately differentiated), and grade III/IV (poorly differentiated/undifferentiated) carcinomas. The effect of tumor size on overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) was evaluated using the multivariate Cox regression model, including the interaction between tumor size, type of surgery, and tumor differentiation grade. The inverse probability of treatment weighting method was used to adjust for bias between the groups. RESULTS: A total of 19,857 patients were identified, including 18,759 (94.4%) who underwent lobectomy and 1098 (5.5%) who underwent segmentectomy. A three-way interaction among tumor size, differentiation grade, and type of surgery was observed in the overall cohort. After stratifying by differentiation grade, plots of interaction revealed that lobectomy was associated with improved survival compared with segmentectomy when the tumor size exceeded 23 mm for grade I LUAD and 14 mm for grade II LUAD. No interaction was observed between the studied factors in grade III/IV carcinomas. CONCLUSIONS: This study interpreted the interaction between tumor size and type of surgery on long-term survival in patients with early stage LUAD and established a tumor size threshold beyond which lobectomy provided survival benefits compared with segmentectomy.

Effect of Resected Lung Volume on Pulmonary Function and Residual Lung Volume in Patients Undergoing Segmentectomy: A Retrospective Study.

PURPOSE: We elucidated the effects of planned resection volume on postoperative pulmonary function and changes in residual lung volume during segmentectomy. METHODS: This study included patients who underwent thoracoscopic segmentectomy between January 2017 and December 2022 and met eligibility criteria. Pre- and post-resection spirometry and computed tomography were performed. Three-dimensional reconstructions were performed by using computed tomography images to calculate the volumes of the resected, remaining, and nonoperative side regions. Based on the resected region volume, patients were divided into the higher and lower volume segmentectomy groups. Changes in lung volume and pulmonary function before and after the surgery were comparatively analyzed. RESULTS: The median percentage of resected lung volume was 10.9%, forming the basis for categorizing patients into the two groups. Postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) ratios to preoperative measurements in both groups did not differ significantly (FEV1, p = 0.254; FVC, p = 0.777). Postoperative FEV1 and FVC ratios to their predicted postoperative values were significantly higher in the higher volume segmentectomy group than in the lower volume segmentectomy group (FEV1, p = 0003; FVC, p < 0.001). The higher volume segmentectomy group showed significantly greater post-to-preoperative lung volume ratio in overall, contralateral, ipsilateral, residual lobe and residual segment than the lower volume segmentectomy group. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative respiratory function did not differ significantly between the higher- and lower-volume segmentectomy groups, indicating improved respiratory function because of substantial postoperative residual lung expansion. Our findings would aid in determining the extent of resection during segmentectomy.

Uniportal Thoracoscopic Complex Combined Seg-Sub-subsegmentectomy of RS9+10bii: Dual-Display Method and Combined Approaches (Trans-fissure and Trans-ligament).

BACKGROUND: Uniportal thoracoscopic lateral basal segmentectomy is the most technically challenging anatomic segmentectomy,1-3 especially when it involves combined subsegmentectomy or sub-subsegmentectomy. Therefore, there are very few reports detailing its technical aspect. PATIENT AND METHOD: In this multimedia article, we describe a very complex uniportal thoracoscopic combined seg-sub-subsegmentectomy of RS9+10bii through the oblique fissure approach and the inferior pulmonary ligament approach, following a single-direction strategy4,5 to advance the procedure, utilizing the stem-branch method3,6 for segmental/subsegmental/sub-subsegmental structure tracking, and employing dual-display method, which comprises the intravenous ICG injection method and the inflation/deflation method, to identify intersegmental and inter-seg-sub-subsegmental planes. RESULTS: The operation lasted 169 min, with approximately 20 mL of blood loss. The patient experienced an active hemothorax and two spontaneous pneumothoraxes on postoperative days 1, 4, and 19, respectively, all of which resolved promptly after treatment. Histopathological examination of the specimen documented invasive non-mucinous adenocarcinoma with negative surgical margins and lymph nodes. The staging was determined as pT1bN0M0, stage IA2. During the 14-month follow-up period, there were no signs of tumor recurrence or metastasis observed. The FVC, FEV1, and FEV1%pred decreased by 11.9%, 12.5%, and 12.8%, respectively, at postoperative month 6. CONCLUSIONS: Complex basal segmentectomies, which necessitate combined subsegmental or sub-subsegmental resections, such as RS9+10bii, are feasible using the dual-display and combined approaches method. This method simplifies the steps of the very complex combined subsegmentectomy, averting the need for extensive lung resection. In addition, when performing these combined segmentectomies, precise anatomical dissection is crucial to prevent complications such as minor bronchopleural fistulas.

Left Upper Division Segmentectomy Compared with Lobectomy for Lung Expansion and Bronchus Tortuosity.

BACKGROUND: For patients with left upper lobe lesions, the functional benefit of left upper division segmentectomy over left upper lobectomy remains controversial. This study evaluated the clinical and functional outcomes after these two procedures. METHODS: This retrospective study included 135 patients with left upper lobe lesions (left upper lobectomy, 110; left upper division segmentectomy, 25). Propensity score matching was used to compare the two groups. Spirometry and computed tomography volume assessments were performed to evaluate bronchus angle and tortuosity. Short-term clinical respiratory symptoms were assessed via medical record reviews. RESULTS: Patients in both groups had similar preoperative characteristics, apart from tumor size (left upper division segmentectomy, 1.6 ± 0.9 cm; left upper lobectomy, 2.8 ± 1.7 cm; p = 0.002). After propensity score matching, both groups had similar preoperative spirometry and pathological results. The postoperative spirometry results were similar; however, the left upper division segmentectomy group had a significantly smaller decrease in left-side computed tomography lung volume compared with that in the left upper lobectomy group (left upper division segmentectomy, 323.6 ± 521.4 mL; left upper lobectomy, 690.7 ± 332.8 mL; p = 0.004). The left main bronchus-curvature index was higher in the left upper lobectomy group (left upper division segmentectomy, 1.074 ± 0.035; left upper lobectomy, 1.097 ± 0.036; p = 0.013), and more patients had persistent cough in the left upper lobectomy group (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Left upper division segmentectomy may be a promising option for preventing marked bronchial angulation and decreasing postoperative persistent cough in patients with left upper lobe lung cancer.

MIDOS: a novel stochastic model towards a treatment planning system for microsphere dosimetry in liver tumors.

PURPOSE: Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) procedures treat liver tumors by injecting radioactive microspheres into the hepatic artery. Currently, there is a critical need to optimize TARE towards a personalized dosimetry approach. To this aim, we present a novel microsphere dosimetry (MIDOS) stochastic model to estimate the activity delivered to the tumor(s), normal liver, and lung. METHODS: MIDOS incorporates adult male/female liver computational phantoms with the hepatic arterial, hepatic portal venous, and hepatic venous vascular trees. Tumors can be placed in both models at user discretion. The perfusion of microspheres follows cluster patterns, and a Markov chain approach was applied to microsphere navigation, with the terminal location of microspheres determined to be in either normal hepatic parenchyma, hepatic tumor, or lung. A tumor uptake model was implemented to determine if microspheres get lodged in the tumor, and a probability was included in determining the shunt of microspheres to the lung. A sensitivity analysis of the model parameters was performed, and radiation segmentectomy/lobectomy procedures were simulated over a wide range of activity perfused. Then, the impact of using different microspheres, i.e., SIR-Sphere®, TheraSphere®, and QuiremSphere®, on the tumor-to-normal ratio (TNR), lung shunt fraction (LSF), and mean absorbed dose was analyzed. RESULTS: Highly vascularized tumors translated into increased TNR. Treatment results (TNR and LSF) were significantly more variable for microspheres with high particle load. In our scenarios with 1.5 GBq perfusion, TNR was maximum for TheraSphere® at calibration time in segmentectomy/lobar technique, for SIR-Sphere® at 1-3 days post-calibration, and regarding QuiremSphere® at 3 days post-calibration. CONCLUSION: This novel approach is a decisive step towards developing a personalized dosimetry framework for TARE. MIDOS assists in making clinical decisions in TARE treatment planning by assessing various delivery parameters and simulating different tumor uptakes. MIDOS offers evaluation of treatment outcomes, such as TNR and LSF, and quantitative scenario-specific decisions.

Is Lobectomy Actually Worse Than Segmentectomy for All Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer?

INTRODUCTION: The recent results of the JCOG 0802 and CALGB 140503 studies suggest that segmentectomy should be considered instead of lobectomy for patients with peripheral <2 cm node-negative non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to test this hypothesis in a retrospective analysis of a larger dataset of patients with stage I NSCLC recorded in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. METHODS: Patients with all stage I NSCLC (≤4 cm in size) who underwent either segmentectomy or lobectomy from 2000 to 2017 were analyzed. The primary endpoints were overall survival and lung cancer-specific survival, while the secondary endpoints were the 30-day and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: Overall, 32,673 patients treated by lobectomy and 2166 patients treated by segmentectomy were included in the initial data collection. After 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), 2016 patients in each group were enrolled in the final analysis with well-balanced baseline characteristics. After PSM, there was no difference between segmentectomy and lobectomy for all stage IA NSCLC (≤3 cm in size) in both overall survival and lung cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio: 0.87 [0.74-1.02], P value: 0.09 and hazard ratio: 0.81 [0.4-1.03], P value: 0.09, respectively). Furthermore, lobectomy had higher 30-day mortality than segmentectomy: 1.1% versus 2.1%, P value: 0.01. However, this difference was not significant for 90-day mortality, even after PSM (3.9% versus 3.0%, P value: 0.17). CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence to support the use of lobectomy rather than segmentectomy in stage IA NSCLC in terms of either overall or lung cancer-specific long-term survival. The choice of lobectomy may also be detrimental to early postoperative recovery.

Oncological Outcomes of Sub-Lobar Resection Versus Lobectomy for Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Although lobectomy has been the treatment of choice for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), sub-lobar resection (i.e., segmentectomy or wedge resection) has emerged as an alternative over time due to its ability to preserve additional lung function. This meta-analysis explores the survival outcomes of sub-lobar resection versus lobectomy in patients with stage I NSCLC (tumor size: ≤2 cm). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from inception up to July 28, 2023. The hazard ratios and odds ratios for overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and mortality were calculated using the random effects model. RESULTS: A total of 27 studies, comprising 10,449 patients, were included. Sub-lobar resection demonstrated comparable OS and DFS to that of lobectomy. Similarly, there was no significant risk of mortality associated with any of the groups. However, the subgroup analysis according to patient selection (intentional, compromised, not specified, and both [intentional and compromised]) showed that the patients in the compromised subgroup had a poor DFS with sub-lobar resection as compared to lobectomy (hazard ratio: 1.52, confidence interval: 1.14-2.02, P = 0.004). Additionally, there was no significant difference in OS, DFS, or overall mortality in the results stratified by surgical procedure or patient selection. CONCLUSIONS: The patients with stage I NSCLC who underwent sub-lobar resection showed a significantly worse DFS and OS in the "compromised group." However, there was no overall significant difference in OS, DFS, or mortality in the sub-lobar resection group as compared to lobectomy.

Comparing Robotic, Thoracoscopic, and Open Segmentectomy: A National Cancer Database Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive approaches to lung resection have become widely acceptable and more recently, segmentectomy has demonstrated equivalent oncologic outcomes when compared to lobectomy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, studies comparing outcomes following segmentectomy by different surgical approaches are lacking. Our objective was to investigate the outcomes of patients undergoing robotic, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), or open segmentectomy for NSCLC using the National Cancer Database. METHODS: NSCLC patients with clinical stage I who underwent segmentectomy from 2010 to 2016 were identified. After propensity-score matching (1:4:1), multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine predictors of 30-d readmissions, 90-d mortality, and overall survival. RESULTS: 22,792 patients met study inclusion. After matching, approaches included robotic (n = 2493; 17%), VATS (n = 9972; 66%), and open (n = 2493; 17%). An open approach was associated with higher 30-d readmissions (7% open versus 5.5% VATS versus 5.6% robot, P = 0.033) and 90-d mortality (4.4% open versus 2.2% VATS versus 2.5% robot, P < 0.001). A robotic approach was associated with improved 5-y survival (50% open versus 58% VATS versus 63% robot, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with clinical stage I NSCLC undergoing segmentectomy, compared to the open approach, a VATS approach was associated with lower 30-d readmission and 90-d mortality. A robotic approach was associated with improved 5-y survival compared to open and VATS approaches when matched. Additional studies are necessary to determine if unrecognized covariates contribute to these differences.

Survival and pulmonary function in stage IA non-small cell lung cancer after sublobar resection versus lobectomy: An updated meta-analysis.

Traditionally, lobectomy was standard for stage IA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recent RCTs suggest sublobar resection's comparable outcomes. Our meta-analysis, incorporating 30 studies (including four RCTs), assessed sublobar resection's efficacy. Employing a random-effects model and I2 statistics for heterogeneity, we found sublobar resection reduced DFS (HR 1.31, p < 0.01) and OS (HR 1.27, p < 0.01) overall. However, RCT subgroup analysis showed no significant differences in DFS (p = 0.28) or OS (p = 0.62). Sublobar resection is a viable option for well-selected patients.

Resectability versus Operability in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: With increased detection of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) owing to screening, determining optimal management increasingly hinges on assessing resectability and operability. Resectability refers to the feasibility of achieving microscopically negative margins based on tumour size, location and degree of local invasion and achieving an anatomical lobar resection. Operability reflects the patient's tolerance for resection based on comorbidities, cardiopulmonary reserve and frailty. Standardized criteria help guide these assessments, but application variability contributes to practice inconsistencies. This review synthesizes a strategic approach to evaluating resectability and operability in contemporary practice. Standardization promises reduced care variability and optimized patient selection to maximize curative outcomes in this new era of early detection. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent pivotal trials demonstrate equivalency of sublobar resection to lobectomy for small, peripheral, node-negative NSCLC, expanding options for parenchymal preservation in borderline surgical candidates. Furthermore, recent phase 3 trials have highlighted the benefit of chemoimmunotherapy as a neoadjuvant treatment with an excellent pathological response and a down staging of the tumour, improving the resectability of the early-stage NSCLC. A good assessment of the operability and resectability is paramount in order to offer the best course of treatment for our patients. European and American societies have issued recommendations to help clinicians assess the cardiopulmonary function and predict the extension of pulmonary resection that could afford the patient. This operability assessment is closely linked with the evaluated tumour resectability which will determine the extension of pulmonary resection that is needed for the patient in order to achieve a good oncological outcome. Some major progresses have been done recently to improve the operability and resectability of patients. For instance, prehabilitation program allows better postoperative morbidity. Some studies have shown a potential good oncological outcome with sublobar resection expending access to surgery for patient with reduced lung function. Some others have identified the neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy as a potential solution for downstaging tumours. Work-up of early-stage NSCLC is a key moment and has to be done thoroughly and in full knowledge of the recent findings in order to propose the most appropriate treatment for the patient.

Evaluation of radiofrequency identification tag accuracy using bronchoscopy with fluoroscopy and virtual navigation guidance before segmentectomy.

BACKGROUND: The use of sublobar resection has increased with advances in imaging technologies. However, it is difficult for thoracic surgeons to identify small lung tumours intraoperatively. Radiofrequency identification (RFID) lung-marking systems are useful for overcoming this difficulty; however, accurate placement is essential for maximum effectiveness. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent RFID tag placement via fluoroscopic bronchoscopy under virtual bronchoscopic navigation (VBN) guidance before our institution's sublobar resection of lung lesions. Thirty-one patients with 31 lung lesions underwent RFID lung-marking with fluoroscopic bronchoscopy under VBN guidance. RESULTS: Of the 31 procedures, 26 tags were placed within 10 mm of the target site, 2 were placed more than 10 mm away from the target site, and 3 were placed in a different area from the target bronchus. No clinical complications were associated with RFID tag placement, such as pneumothorax or bleeding. The contribution of the RFID lung-marking system to surgery was high, particularly when the RFID tag was placed at the target site and tumour was located in the intermediate hilar zone. CONCLUSIONS: An RFID tag can be placed near the target site using fluoroscopic bronchoscopy in combination with VBN guidance. RFID tag placement under fluoroscopic bronchoscopy with VBN guidance is useful for certain segmentectomies.

Effective division of the intersegmental plane using a robotic stapler in robotic pulmonary segmentectomy.

PURPOSES: Robot-assisted thoracoscopic (RATS) segmentectomy is becoming increasingly common because of the expanded indications for segmentectomy and the widespread adoption of robotic surgery. The precise division of the intersegmental plane is necessary to ensure oncologic margins from the tumor and to preserve the lung function. In this study, we present a strategy for accurately dividing the intersegmental plane using a robotic stapler and review the surgical outcomes. METHODS: RATS portal segmentectomy was performed using the Da Vinci Xi system and the intersegmental plane was dissected using a robotic stapler. We evaluated the perioperative outcomes in 92 patients who underwent RATS portal segmentectomy between May 2020 and January 2023. These results were compared with those of 82 patients who underwent complete video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (CVATS) during the same period. RESULTS: The operative and console times were 162 and 97 min, respectively. No intraoperative complications occurred, and postoperative complications were observed in four cases (4.3%). The operative time, blood loss, postoperative complications, and maximum incision size were significantly lower in the RATS group than in the CVATS group. However, RATS requires a significantly higher number of staplers than CVATS. CONCLUSIONS: The division of the intersegmental plane using a robotic stapler in RATS portal segmentectomy was, therefore, found to be safe and effective.

Clinical outcomes of left upper segmentectomy vs. lobectomy for early non-small-cell lung cancer: a nationwide database study in Japan.

PURPOSE: Given that left upper lobe and right upper and middle lobes share a similar anatomy, segmentectomy, such as upper division and lingulectomy, should yield identical oncological clearance to left upper lobectomy. We compared the prognosis of segmentectomy with that of lobectomy for early stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the left upper lobe. METHODS: We retrospectively examined 2115 patients who underwent segmentectomy or lobectomy for c-stage I (TNM 8th edition) NSCLC in the left upper lobe in 2010. We compared the oncological outcomes of segmentectomy (n = 483) and lobectomy (n = 483) using a propensity score matching analysis. RESULTS: The 5-year recurrence-free and overall survival rates in the segmentectomy and lobectomy groups were comparable, irrespective of c-stage IA or IB. Subset analyses according to radiological tumor findings showed that segmentectomy yielded oncological outcomes comparable to those of lobectomy for non-pure solid tumors. In cases where the solid tumor exceeded 20 mm, segmentectomy showed a recurrence-free survival inferior to that of lobectomy (p = 0.028), despite an equivalent overall survival (p = 0.38). CONCLUSION: Segmentectomy may be an acceptable alternative to lobectomy with regard to the overall survival of patients with c-stage I NSCLC in the left upper lobe.

Feasibility and Safety of Uniportal Thoracoscopic Segmentectomy Using a Unidirectional Dissection Approach without Dissecting a Fissure.

Background: Few original articles describe the perioperative outcomes of uniportal thoracoscopic segmentectomy using a unidirectional dissection approach. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the feasibility and safety of this procedure. Methods: This study included 119 patients who underwent uniportal thoracoscopic segmentectomy in our department between February 2019 and December 2022. The patients were divided into unidirectional (group U, n = 28) and conventional (group C, n = 91) dissection approach groups. While the dominant pulmonary vessels and bronchi were transected at the hilum without dissecting a fissure in the unidirectional (U) group, the dominant pulmonary artery was exposed and divided at a fissure in the conventional (C) group. Patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes were compared between groups U and C. Results: The proportions of simple and complex segmentectomies were statistically similar between the groups. The operating time was shorter (group U: 110 [interqurtile range: 90-140] min, group C: 135 [interqurtile range: 105-166] min, p = 0.012) and there was less blood loss (group U: 0 [interqurtile range: 0-0] g, group C: 0 [interqurtile range: 0-50] g, p = 0.003) in group U than in group C. However, there were no significant intergroup differences in other perioperative outcomes. Conclusions: The unidirectional dissection approach in uniportal thoracoscopic pulmonary segmentectomy is safe and feasible and enables a smoother operation.

[Indocyanine green fluorescence in thoracoscopic segmentectomy: indications and benefits]. / Flyuorestsentnaya torakoskopiya s indotsianinom zelenym pri vypolnenii segmentektomii: pokazaniya i preimushchestva.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the role of ICG fluorescence in segmentectomies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One surgical team performed 178 thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomies in two hospitals between 2017 and 2023. Of these, 93 (52.2%) patients underwent ICG fluorescence perfusion tests. This study was retrospective and consecutive. Intraoperative and early postoperative results were analyzed. Patients were divided into 3 equal periods. Ventilation and perfusion methods were used to navigate the intersegmental planes in the first period. In the second one, only ventilation methods were used due to the absence of ICG. In the third period, the choice of navigation method was determined by «surgical complexity of segment¼. RESULTS: In 74% of patients, surgeries were performed for primary or metastatic lung tumors. The scheduled procedure was performed in all patients. However, 2 ones required lobectomy for total resection. Uneventful postoperative period was observed in 69.7% of patients. Other ones had complications grade I-IIIA. No reoperations or mortality were recorded. CONCLUSION: ICG perfusion is not inferior to ventilation methods in identification of intersegmental planes. This method is also more convenient for thoracoscopy. ICG fluorescence thoracoscopy is the only method in patients with COPD scheduled for thoracoscopic segmentectomy with two or more intersegmental planes.

Three-Dimensional Guided Cone-Shaped Segmentectomy Versus Lobectomy for Small-sized Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Middle Third of the Lung Field.

BACKGROUND: Segmentectomy has been recommended for peripheral small-sized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to evaluate whether three dimensionally (3D) guided cone-shaped segmentectomy can achieve long-term outcomes comparable with lobectomy for small-sized NSCLC in the middle third of the lung parenchyma. METHODS: This study retrospectively screened patients with small NSCLC (≤2 cm) who underwent segmentectomy or lobectomy between January 2012 and June 2019. Tumor location was determined by 3D multiplanar reconstruction. The cone-shaped segmentectomy was performed with the guidance of 3D computed tomographic bronchography and angiography. The log-rank test, Cox hazard proportional regression, and propensity score-matching analyses were adopted for prognostic evaluation. RESULTS: After screening, 278 patients with segmentectomy and 174 subjects undergoing lobectomy were selected. All the patients had R0 resection, and no 30- or 90-day mortality was observed. The median follow-up time was 47.3 months. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 99.6 %, and the disease-free survival (DFS) was 97.5 % for the patients undergoing segmentectomy. After propensity score-matching, the patients with segmentectomy (n = 112) had an OS (P = 0.530) and a DFS (P = 0.390) similar to those of the patients who underwent lobectomy (n = 112). The multivariable Cox regression analysis indicated no significant survival differences between segmentectomy and lobectomy [DFS: hazard ratio, 0.56 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.16-1.97, P = 0.369); OS: HR, 0.35 (95 % CI 0.06-2.06, P = 0.245)] after adjustment for other factors. Further analysis showed that segmentectomy achieved comparable OS (P = 0.540) and DFS (P = 0.930) for NSCLC in the middle-third and peripheral lung parenchyma (n = 454). CONCLUSIONS: For selected NSCLCs size 2 cm or smaller in the middle third of the lung field, 3D-guided cone-shaped segmentectomy was able to achieve long-term outcomes comparable with lobectomy.

The Importance of Segment 4 Anatomy on Outcomes Following Living Donor Left Lateral Segmentectomy.

BACKGROUND: During left lateral section (LLS) resection for live liver donation, the vascular inflow and the bile drainage of segment 4 (S4) are compromised. We investigated the long-term changes of S4 after donation and their potential prognostic impact on living liver donors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of 42 consecutive left lateral (LLS, S2/3) liver resections for living donation. RESULTS: There were 25 female and 17 male donors. Median age was 33 y and median body mass index was 26. Median LLS, S2/3, volume was 262 cc, and median sS4 volume was 160 cc. Complications were encountered in three donors (7%). An independent extrahepatic S4 artery (S4A) (with a proximal left heptic artery or a right hepatic artery origin) was identified in 41% of the donors. Ligation of the independent S4A was not associated with the rate of post resection liver dysfunction, complications, or the degree of S4 atrophy. Having a dominant S4 portal triad pedicle feeding the right anterior sectors, segment 5/8, of the liver was associated with increased parenchymal damage as evidenced by a higher peak of alanine aminotransferase but was not associated with postoperative complications. The median degree of atrophy of S4 at 1 y post donation as noted on imaging was 66%. The presence of a dominant S4 portal triad pedicle and the peak alanine aminotransferase early postoperatively were both predictors of the degree of S4 atrophy post donation. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of an independent S4A or dominant S4 portal triad pedicle feeding the liver right anterior sectors, segment 5/8, should not be a contraindication for left lateral segment living donation.

Learning curve for total thoracoscopic segmentectomy in treating pediatric patients with congenital lung malformation.

BACKGROUND: Total thoracoscopic segmentectomy (TTS) is a technically challenging procedure in children but results in more parenchyma preservation, better pain control, better cosmetic results, and a shorter hospital stay. However, definitive data describing the learning curve of TTS has yet to be obtained. Here, we review the safety and efficiency of our initial experiences with pediatric TTS and evaluate our learning curve. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of all pediatric patients undergoing TTS between December 2016 and January 2020. Pediatric patients who underwent TTS were included, while those undergoing lobectomy or wedge resection were excluded. RESULTS: One hundred and twelve patients were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate the learning curve and were divided chronologically into three phases, the ascending phase (A), plateau phase (B) and descending phase (C), through cumulative summation (CUSUM) of the operative time (OT). Phases A, B, and C comprised 28, 51, and 33 cases, respectively. OT decreased significantly from phases A to B (p < 0.001) and from phase B to C (p = 0.076). No significant differences were observed in the demographic factors among the three phases. The conversion rate was zero, and the complication rate was 0.9%. Differences in technical parameters, such as length of stay and chest tube duration, were statistically insignificant between phases A and B or B and C. There were no mortalities. CONCLUSION: CUSUMOT indicates that the learning curve of at least 79 cases is required for TTS in our institute. We emphasize that the learning curve should be cautiously interpreted because many factors in different institutions may influence the exact parabola and actual learning curve.

Initial experience of thoracoscopic segmentectomy of basal segment through the inferior pulmonary ligament approach in treating congenital lung malformations in children.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and limitations of thoracoscopic segmentectomy of the basal segment (S10). METHODS: Clinical data of 15 children with congenital lung malformations (CLM) who underwent thoracoscopic segmentectomy of S10 via the inferior pulmonary ligament approach from January to October 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The demographics, clinical presentation, intraoperative time, blood loss, postoperative events, and follow-up duration were assessed. RESULTS: There were 15 patients in this group (nine males and six females). Age ranges from 4.3 to 96.0 months (median, 7.7 months). Fourteen patients underwent S10 segmentectomy, with one undergoing right S10 segmentectomy and right S6 partial wedge resection. The surgical time was 57-125 min (median, 80 min), intraoperative bleeding volume (5-20 ml; median, 10 ml), postoperative drainage tube indwelling (2-4 d; median, 3 d), and postoperative hospitalization time (4-7 d; median, 5 d). No intraoperative conversions, surgical mortalities, or major complications were observed among these patients. Subcutaneous emphysema appeared in three patients; however, it disappeared following conservative observation without pneumothorax or bronchopleural fistula occurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracoscopic segmentectomy of S10 via the inferior pulmonary ligament approach is technically feasible for treating CLM; however, this surgical approach may have certain limitations for CLM with large cysts.

Uniportal versus multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

It remains controversial whether one-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) or multiportal VATS is better for segmentectomy in patients with early non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We conducted this meta-analysis of eight published studies to compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of the two surgical approaches. The uniportal group had a shorter postoperative hospital stay (mean difference (MD): - 0.40, 95% CI [- 0.71 to - 0.08] days, p = 0.01), lower postoperative pain scores on day 3 (MD: - 0.90, 95% CI [- 1.26 to - 0.54], p < 0.00001) and day 7 (MD: - 0.33, 95% CI [- 0.62 to - 0.04], p = 0.02), fewer days of chest tube drainage (MD: - 0.47, 95% CI [- 0.78 to - 0.15] days, p = 0.004), and a smaller wound (MD: - 0.73, 95% CI [- 1.00 to - 0.46] cm, p < 0.00001) than the multiportal group. However, there were no significant differences between the groups in complications, operative times, resected lymph nodes, resected lymph node stations, blood loss, postoperative pain scores on days 1, 2, 30, overall survival (OS), or disease-free survival (DFS). The most common complications were prolonged air leakage (10.29%), bleeding (8.82%), vascular injury (7.14%), empyema (5.88%), and arrhythmia (5.26%) in the uniportal group. Overall, uniportal VATS appears to be better than multiportal VATS for segmentectomy in patients with NSCLC, with better postoperative outcomes and similar survival rates.