Endometriosis and mental health: a population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis is a chronic gynecologic disorder that leads to considerable pain and a reduced quality of life. Although its physiological manifestations have been explored, its impact on mental health is less well defined. Existing studies of endometriosis and mental health were conducted within diverse healthcare landscapes with varying access to care and with a primary focus on surgically diagnosed endometriosis. A single-payer healthcare system offers a unique environment to investigate this association with fewer barriers to access care while considering the mode of endometriosis diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to assess the association between endometriosis and the risk for mental health conditions and to evaluate differences between patients diagnosed medically and those diagnosed surgically. STUDY DESIGN: A matched, population-based retrospective cohort study was conducted in Ontario and included patients aged 18 to 50 years with a first-time endometriosis diagnosis between January 1, 2010, and July 1, 2020. Endometriosis exposure was determined through either medical or surgical diagnostic criteria. A medical diagnosis was defined by the use of the corresponding International Classification of Disease diagnostic codes from outpatient and in-hospital visits, whereas a surgical diagnosis was identified through inpatient or same-day surgeries. Individuals with endometriosis were matched 1:2 on age, sex, and geography to unexposed individuals without a history of endometriosis. The primary outcome was the first occurrence of any mental health condition after an endometriosis diagnosis. Individuals with a mental health diagnosis in the 2 years before study entry were excluded. Cox regression models were used to generate hazard ratios with adjustment for hysterectomy, salpingo-oophorectomy, infertility, pregnancy history, qualifying surgery for study inclusion, immigration status, history of asthma, abnormal uterine bleeding, diabetes, fibroids, hypertension, irritable bowel disorder, migraines, and nulliparity. RESULTS: A total of 107,832 individuals were included, 35,944 with a diagnosis of endometriosis (29.5% medically diagnosed, 60.5% surgically diagnosed, and 10.0% medically diagnosed with surgical confirmation) and 71,888 unexposed individuals. Over the study period, the incidence rate was 105.3 mental health events per 1000 person-years in the endometriosis group and 66.5 mental health events per 1000 person-year among unexposed individuals. Relative to the unexposed individuals, the adjusted hazard ratio for a mental health diagnosis was 1.28 (95% confidence interval, 1.24-1.33) among patients with medically diagnosed endometriosis, 1.33 (95% confidence interval, 1.16-1.52) among surgically diagnosed patients, and 1.36 (95% confidence interval, 1.2-1.6) among those diagnosed medically with subsequent surgical confirmation. The risk for receiving a mental health diagnosis was highest in the first year after an endometriosis diagnosis and declined in subsequent years. The cumulative incidence of a severe mental health condition requiring hospital visits was 7.0% among patients with endometriosis and 4.6% among unexposed individuals (hazard ratio, 1.56; 95% confidence interval, 1.53-1.59). CONCLUSION: Endometriosis, regardless of mode of diagnosis, is associated with a marginally increased risk for mental health conditions. The elevated risk, particularly evident in the years immediately following the diagnosis, underscores the need for proactive mental health screening among those newly diagnosed with endometriosis. Future research should investigate the potential benefits of mental health interventions for people with endometriosis with the aim of enhancing their overall quality of life.

What the Evolution of 1332 Waivers Tells Us about Their Innovative Potential.

Section 1332 of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) provides states unprecedented flexibility to alter federal health policy. The authors analyze state waiver activity from 2019 to 2023, applying a comparative approach to understand waivers proposed by Georgia, Colorado, Washington, Oregon, and Nevada. Much of the waiver activity during this period focused on reinsurance programs. During the Trump administration, the most innovative waiver application was from Georgia, which sought to restructure and decentralize its individual market, moving away from the framework established by the ACA. While the Biden administration suspended Georgia's efforts, Democratic-led states have focused implementing waiver programs supporting and expanding on the ACA. This has included adopting public-option insurance plans offered by private insurers and expanding eligibility for qualified health plans for previously ineligible groups. The authors' analysis offers insights into contemporary health politics, policy durability, and the role of the administrative presidency.

Equity of health care financing in South Korea: 1990-2016.

BACKGROUND: The National Health Insurance in Korea has been in operation for more than 30 years since having achieved universal health coverage in 1989 and has gone through several policy reforms. Despite its achievements, the Korean health insurance has some shortfalls, one of which concerns the fairness of paying for health care. METHOD: Using the population representative Household Income and Expenditure Survey data in Korea, this study examined the yearly changes in the vertical equity of paying for health care between 1990 and 2016 by the source of financing using the Kakwani index, considering health insurance and other related policy reforms in Korea during this period. RESULTS: The study results suggest that direct tax was the most progressive mode of health care financing in all years, whereas indirect tax was proportional. The out-of-pocket payments were weakly regressive in all years. The Kakwani index for health insurance contributions was regressive but now is proportional to the ability to pay, whereas the Kakwani index for private health insurance premiums turned from progressive to weakly regressive. The Kakwani index for overall health care financing showed a weak regressivity during the study period. DISCUSSION: The overall health care financing in Korea has transformed from a slight regressivity to proportional over time between 1990 and 2016. It is expected that these changes were closely related to the improved equity of health insurance contributions from 1998 to 2008, which was the result of a merger of the health insurance societies and an amendment in the health insurance contribution structure. These results suggest that standardizing insurance managing organizations and financing rules potentially has positive implications for the equity of healthcare financing in a country where the major method of health care financing is social health insurance.

Single-payer or a multipayer health system: a systematic literature review.

OBJECTIVES: Healthcare systems worldwide are actively exploring new approaches for cost containment and efficient use of resources. Currently, in a number of countries, the critical decision to introduce a single-payer over a multipayer healthcare system poses significant challenges. Consequently, we have systematically explored the current scientific evidence about the impact of single-payer and multipayer health systems on the areas of equity, efficiency and quality of health care, fund collection negotiation, contracting and budgeting health expenditure and social solidarity. STUDY DESIGN: This is a systematic review based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. METHODS: A search for relevant articles published in English was performed in March 2015 through the following databases: Excerpta Medica Databases, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online through PubMed and Ovid, Health Technology Assessment Database, Cochrane database and WHO publications. We also searched for further articles cited by eligible papers. RESULTS: A total of 49 studies were included in the analysis; 34 studied clinical outcomes of patients enrolled in different health insurances, while 15 provided a qualitative assessment in this field. CONCLUSION: The single-payer system performs better in terms of healthcare equity, risk pooling and negotiation, whereas multipayer systems yield additional options to patients and are harder to be exploited by the government. A multipayer system also involves a higher administrative cost. The findings pertaining to the impact on efficiency and quality are rather tentative because of methodological limitations of available studies.

Medicare Expansion Steps Into the Political Limelight.

Democrats think that they've got a winning issue. Sen. Bernie's Sanders Medicare for All bill is gaining backers, but expanding access to coverage by the public payer may be more practicable. Sander's is just one of a bunch of Medicare expansion plans. They all have pros and cons, a major con being how to pay for it.

Contemporary Practice Patterns of Voiding Cystourethrography Use at a Large Tertiary Care Center in a Single Payer Health Care System.

PURPOSE: Voiding cystourethrogram involves radiation exposure and is invasive. Several guidelines, including the 2011 AAP (American Academy of Pediatrics) guidelines, no longer recommend routine voiding cystourethrogram after the initial urinary tract infection in children. The recent trend in voiding cystourethrogram use remains largely unknown. We examined practice patterns of voiding cystourethrogram use and explored the impact of these guidelines in a single payer system in the past 8 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified all voiding cystourethrograms performed at a large pediatric referral center between January 2008 and December 2015. Patients 2 to 24 months old who underwent an initial voiding cystourethrogram for the diagnosis of a urinary tract infection in the first 6 months of 2009 and 2014 were identified. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: During the study period 8,422 voiding cystourethrograms were performed and the annual number declined over time. In the pre-AAP and post-AAP cohorts 233 and 95 initial voiding cystourethrograms were performed, respectively. While there was no statistically significant difference in the vesicoureteral reflux detection rate between 2009 and 2014 (37.3% vs 43.0%, p = 0.45), there was a threefold increase in high grade vesicoureteral reflux in 2014 (2.6% vs 8.4%, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: A clear trend toward fewer voiding cystourethrograms was noted at our institution. This decrease started before 2011 and cannot be attributed to the AAP guidelines alone. While most detected vesicoureteral reflux remains low grade, there was a greater detection rate of high grade vesicoureteral reflux in 2014 compared to 2009. This may reflect a favorable impact of a more selective approach to obtaining voiding cystourethrograms.

What is Single-Payer Health Care? A Review of Definitions and Proposals in the U.S.

BACKGROUND: Single-payer systems have been proposed as a health care reform alternative in the United States. However, there is no consensus on the definition of single-payer. Most definitions characterize single-payer as one entity that collects funds and pays for health care on behalf on an entire population. Increased flexibility for state health care reform may provide opportunities for state-based single-payer systems to be considered. OBJECTIVE: To explore the concept of single-payer and to describe the contents of single-payer health care proposals. DESIGN: We compared single-payer definitions and proposals. We coded the proposal text for provisions that would change how the health care system functions and could impact health care access, quality, and cost. MAIN MEASURES: The share of proposals that include changes to the financing, pooling, purchasing, and delivery of health care; and possible impact on access, quality, and costs. KEY RESULTS: We identified 25 proposals for national or state single-payer plans from journal and legislative databases. The proposals typically call for wide-ranging reform; nearly all include changes across the financing, pooling, purchasing, and delivery of health care services. Many provisions aiming to improve access, quality, and cost containment are also included, but the proposals vary in how they plan to achieve these improvements. Common provisions are related to comprehensive benefits, patient choice of providers, little or no cost sharing, the role of private insurance, provider guidelines and standards, periodic reviews of the benefits package, electronic medical records and billing, prescription drug formulary, global budgets, administrative cost thresholds, payment reform and studies, and the authority to implement cost-containment strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Single-payer systems are heterogeneous. Acknowledgment of what is considered as single-payer and the characteristics that are variable is important for nuanced policy discussions on specific reform proposals.

Open access phone triage for veterans with suspected malignant pleural mesothelioma.

BACKGROUND: Phone triaging patients with suspected malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) within the Veterans Healthcare Administration (VHA) system offers a model for rapid, expert guided evaluation for patients with rare and treatable diseases within a national integrated healthcare system. To assess feasibility of national open access telephone triage using evidence-based treatment recommendations for patients with MPM, measure timelines of the triage and referral process and record the impact on "intent to treat" for patients using our service. METHODS: A retrospective study. The main outcome measures were: (1) ability to perform long distance phone triage, (2) to assess the speed of access to a mesothelioma surgical specialist for patients throughout the entire VHA, and (3) to determine if access to a specialist would alter the plan of care. RESULTS: Sixty veterans were screened by our phone triage program, 38 traveled an average of 997 miles to VA Boston Healthcare system. On average, 14 d elapsed from initial phone contact until the patient was physically evaluated in our general thoracic clinic in Boston. The treatment plan was altered for 71% of patients evaluated at VA Boston Healthcare system based on 2012 International Mesothelioma Interest Group guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Our initial experience demonstrates that in-network centralized care for Veterans with MPM is feasible within the VHA. National open access phone triage improves access to expert surgical advice and can be delivered in a timely manner for Veterans using our service. Guideline-based treatment recommendations ("intent to treat") changed the therapeutic course for the majority of patients who used our service.

Medicare for All - If It Were Politically Possible - Would Necessarily Replicate the Defects of Our Current System.

Medicare for All, ideally implemented, could offer powerful advantages over our current health care financial system. Unfortunately, the political obstacles to such a system are formidable and are likely to remain so for decades. More to the point, a politically viable single-payer system would not replace our currently dysfunctional health care politics. It would be a product of that same legislative process and political economy and thus be disfigured by the same interest group politics, path dependence, and fragmentation that Laurence Seidman rightly laments.

The Little State That Couldn't Could? The Politics of "Single-Payer" Health Coverage in Vermont.

In May 2011, a year after the passage of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), Vermont became the first state to lay the groundwork for a single-payer health care system, known as Green Mountain Care. What can other states learn from the Vermont experience? This article summarizes the findings from interviews with nearly 120 stakeholders as part of a study to inform the design of the health reform legislation. Comparing Vermont's failed effort to adopt single-payer legislation in 1994 to present efforts, we find that Vermont faced similar challenges but greater opportunities in 2010 that enabled reform. A closely contested gubernatorial election and a progressive social movement opened a window of opportunity to advance legislation to design three comprehensive health reform options for legislative consideration. With a unified Democratic government under the leadership of a single-payer proponent, a high-profile policy proposal, and relatively weak opposition, a framework for a single-payer system was adopted by the legislature - though with many details and political battles to be fought in the future. Other states looking to reform their health systems more comprehensively than national reform can learn from Vermont's design and political strategy.

The Affordable Care Act versus Medicare for All.

Many problems facing the Affordable Care Act would disappear if the nation were instead implementing Medicare for All - the extension of Medicare to every age group. Every American would be automatically covered for life. Premiums would be replaced with a set of Medicare taxes. There would be no patient cost sharing. Individuals would have free choice of doctors. Medicare's single-payer bargaining power would slow price increases and reduce medical cost as a percentage of gross domestic product (GDP). Taxes as a percentage of GDP would rise from below average to average for economically advanced nations. Medicare for All would be phased in by age.

A five-year assessment of the affordable care act: market forces still trump the common good in U.S. Health care.

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) was enacted in 2010 as the signature domestic achievement of the Obama presidency. It was intended to contain costs and achieve near-universal access to affordable health care of improved quality. Now, five years later, it is time to assess its track record. This article compares the goals and claims of the ACA with its actual experience in the areas of access, costs, affordability, and quality of care. Based on the evidence, one has to conclude that containment of health care costs is nowhere in sight, that more than 37 million Americans will still be uninsured when the ACA is fully implemented in 2019, that many more millions will be underinsured, and that profiteering will still dominate the culture of U.S. health care. More fundamental reform will be needed. The country still needs to confront the challenge that our for-profit health insurance industry, together with enormous bureaucratic waste and widespread investor ownership throughout our market-based system, are themselves barriers to health care reform. Here we consider the lessons we can take away from the ACA's first five years and lay out the economic, social/political, and moral arguments for replacing it with single-payer national health insurance.

Optimizing Physician Payment for a Single-Payer Healthcare System.

Current forms of payment of independent physicians in U.S. health care may incentivize more care (fee-for-service) or less care (capitation), be inequitable across specialties (resource-based relative value scale [RBRVS]), and distract from clinical care (value-based payments [VBP]). Alternative systems should be considered as part of health care financing reform. We propose a "Fee-for-Time" approach that would pay independent physicians using an hourly rate based on years of necessary training applied to time for service delivery and documentation. RBRVS overvalues procedures and undervalues cognitive services. VBP shifts insurance risk onto physicians, introducing incentives to game performance metrics and to avoid potentially expensive patients. The administrative requirements of current payment methods introduce large administrative costs and undermine physician motivation and morale. We describe a Fee-for-Time payment scenario. A combination of single-payer financing and payment of independent physicians using the Fee-for-Time proposal would be simpler, more objective, incentive-neutral, fairer, less easily gamed, and less expensive to administer than any system with physician payment based on fee-for-service using RBRVS and VBP.

"Comprehensive Healthcare for America": Using the Insights of Behavioral Economics to Transform the U. S. Healthcare System.

"Comprehensive Healthcare for America" is a largely single-payer reform proposal that, by applying the insights of behavioral economics, may be able to rally patients and clinicians sufficiently to overcome the opposition of politicians and vested interests to providing all Americans with less complicated and less costly access to needed healthcare.

Does Universal Health Insurance in Korea provide a Lesson for U.S. Health Care Financing?

This note provides a commentary on Lee, C. "Is Universal Health Insurance Superior in Terms of Healthcare Payment? Estimating the Financial Burden of Healthcare in Korea: 2009 to 2019." INQUIRY, 2022, 59:1-8. Lee, using a unique data set, shows that the Korean single payer system is regressive, despite previous attempts to increase public expenditures. The policy recommendation, to improve access by making public payments even more progressive to household income, is examined. This note concludes that making health expenditures progressive to household income does not solve the root cause of the demand for health care, a key factor in health care access, nor can the policy implications generalize to the multi-payer U.S. system.

Single-payer Health Care: Financial Implications for a Physician.

When considering proposed reforms of the U.S. health care system, some physicians dismiss the single-payer model (Medicare for All or state-based universal health care proposals) out of concern that their reimbursement and thus their income would be reduced. This study is an effort to quantitate that concern in the case of state-based plans and, in so doing, to suggest a template for evaluating the financial consequences for physicians of single-payer health care reform in general. To put the data into concrete, practical terms, I envision a hypothetical primary care physician's practice and develop its plausible financial components in the present multi-payer system and in five proposed state-based, single-payer systems. The calculations reveal that in all five single-payer plans evaluated, the hypothetical physician's Total Net Income (take-home pay) would exceed that in the current multi-payer system. Whether these results apply to actual practices or not, they suggest that, when considering the financial impact of single-payer reform on their practices, physicians should consider all the financial consequences of such reform, not just the proposed reimbursement level. More quantitative analyses of these important financial variables in different practice settings must be pursued.

A retrospective analysis of pain changes and opioid use patterns temporally associated with a course of chiropractic care at a publicly funded inner-city facility.

Background: Non-pharmacologic treatment, including chiropractic care, is now recommended instead of opioid prescriptions as the initial management of chronic spine pain by clinical practice guidelines. Chiropractic care, commonly including spinal manipulation, has been temporally associated with reduced opioid prescription in veterans with spine pain. Purpose: To determine if chiropractic management including spinal manipulation was associated with decreased pain or opioid usage in financially disadvantaged individuals utilizing opioid medications and diagnosed with musculoskeletal conditions. Methods: A retrospective analysis of quality assurance data from a publicly funded healthcare facility was conducted. Measures included numeric pain scores of spine and extremity regions across three time points, opioid utilization, demographics, and care modalities. Results: Pain and opioid use significantly decreased concomitant with a course of chiropractic care. Conclusions: A publicly funded course of chiropractic care temporally coincided with statistically and clinically significant decreases in pain and opioid usage in a financially disadvantaged inner-city population.

Contexte: Conformément aux directives de pratique clinique, un traitement non pharmacologique, notamment des soins chiropratiques, à la place de prescriptions d'opioïdes est désormais recommandé dans le traitement initial de la douleur chronique à la colonne vertébrale. Les soins chiropratiques, qui comprennent habituellement la manipulation vertébrale, ont été liés de manière provisoire à une consommation réduite d'opioïdes sur ordonnance chez les vétérans souffrant de douleurs à la colonne vertébrale. Objectif: Déterminer si un traitement chiropratique, y compris la manipulation vertébrale, était lié à une diminution de la douleur ou de la consommation d'opioïdes chez les personnes défavorisées sur le plan financier utilisant des médicaments à base d'opioïdes et souffrant de problèmes musculosquelettiques. Méthodologie: Une analyse rétrospective des données sur l'assurance de la qualité provenant d'un établissement de soins de santé financé par l'État a été menée. Les mesures portaient sur des résultats numériques de la douleur à la colonne vertébrale et des extrémités des membres à trois moments différents, la consommation d'opioïdes, des données démographiques et les modes de soins. Résultats: La douleur et la consommation d'opioïdes ont sensiblement diminué dans le cadre de soins chiropratiques. Conclusions: Une diminution importante de la douleur et de la consommation d'opioïdes observée de façon statistique et clinique a coïncidé de manière provisoire avec des soins chiropratiques financés par l'État dans un groupe de personnes défavorisées sur le plan financier vivant au centre-ville.

Values-Based Foundation for a U.S. Single Payer Health System Model.

A universal, single payer model for the American health system aligns with and should emanate from commonly held values contained within the country's foundational religious teachings, morals, ethics and democratic heritage. The Affordable Care Act in its attempt to create expanded health access has met with significant challenges. The conservative Supreme Court decreases the likelihood of a federal mandated single payer model. As uncertainty of the structure of the healthcare system increases, this paper supports its transformation to a single payer model. Healthcare should be considered a duty within the framework of a Kantian approach to ethics and a social good. Evidently ignoring this duty, the American health system perpetuates a healthcare underclass, with underserved portions of the population, with unequal access to quality care and persistent health status and outcome disparities. The COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated the effect of social determinants on optimal health outcome. A health insurance system based on the nation's commonly held values has the potential to eliminate these disparities.