How to Model Optimal Group Size in Social Carnivores.

AbstractModels of optimal group size need to identify the currency that correctly captures the fitness consequences of foraging. Although daily intake or daily net energy gain per animal are widely used as currencies, they are not ideal. They predict that all available time should be spent hunting and do not reflect performance during a hunt. We argue that the net rate while hunting is a better currency. Using an example based on the African wild dog, we illustrate the difference between maximizing daily net energy and net rate. Using the same example, we show that if foraging is limited by constraints on energy expenditure, then the optimal group size can be different from the size that maximizes the net rate while hunting. The direction of the effect depends on whether costs increase or decrease with group size. Furthermore, the proportion of time spent resting can be predicted. We suggest two novel approaches for future models: to consider the optimal hunting group size given a fixed group size and to investigate how the presence of dependent young may affect foraging behavior. We hope this will lead to meaningful conclusions on the role cooperative hunting has played in the evolution of sociality in social carnivores.

Long-term movements and home-range changes: Rapid territory shifts in meerkats.

Territoriality and stable home ranges are a common space-use pattern among animals. These ranges provide its inhabitants with important resources and thus favourable territories are associated with an increased fitness. While the role of territory quality and changes of territory ownership have often been investigated, the changes of territorial boundaries have been less studied. Here, we investigated space-use changes in a social mammal species, applying a novel analytical approach, calculating long-term dissimilarity in space use using distancematrices based on periodic utilization distributions. This approach makes it possible to identify different space-use patterns, which cannot be distinguished by only considering changes between consecutive time periods. We analysed meerkat (Suricata suricatta) movements of a total of 24 different groups over a 16-year period, resulting in 134 group years. We then correlated the identified home-range changes to life-history events and possible environmental drivers. Groups had stable territories for several years before they abandoned their home range mostly to move quickly to new areas where they again remained for several years. Of 26 identified sudden shifts, 22 occurred in the summer months and often involved distances larger than the original home-range size. Home-range movements that were close together in time were often also spatially clustered and moved in a similar direction. These shifts were often preceded by more frequent interactions between groups, but did not seem to be a product of direct displacements by other groups. The normalized difference vegetation index as a measure of food production and social factors such as dominance changes did not correlate to changes. Against our expectation space-use changes were not accumulations of small changes, but more often involved long-distance moves into unknown ranges. This means that the groups enter areas where they cannot profit from local knowledge. The methods used identify episodes of long stability alternated by sudden changes in meerkats and in general provides insight into long-term space use. Our methods can be used to analyse long-term space use, either within or across species.

Territoriality and home-range dynamics in meerkats, Suricata suricatta: a mechanistic modelling approach.

Multiple approaches exist to model patterns of space use across species, among them resource selection analysis, statistical home-range modelling and mechanistic movement modelling. Mechanistic home-range models combine the benefits of these approaches, describing emergent territorial patterns based on fine-scale individual- or group-movement rules and incorporating interactions with neighbours and the environment. These models have not, to date, been extended to dynamic contexts. Using mechanistic home-range models, we explore meerkat (Suricata suricatta) territorial patterns, considering scent marking, direct group interactions and habitat selection. We also extend the models to accommodate dynamic aspects of meerkat territoriality (territory development and territory shift). We fit models, representing multiple working hypotheses, to data from a long-term meerkat study in South Africa, and we compare models using Akaike's and Bayesian Information Criteria. Our results identify important features of meerkat territorial patterns. Notably, larger groups do not seem to control larger territories, and groups apparently prefer dune edges along a dry river bed. Our model extensions capture instances in which 1) a newly formed group interacts more strongly with its parent groups over time and 2) a group moves its territory core out of aversive habitat. This extends our mechanistic modelling framework in previously unexplored directions.