Implementation of Direct-to-Patient Mobile Teledermatology in VA.

BACKGROUND: Innovative technology can enhance patient access to healthcare but must be successfully implemented to be effective. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated Department of Veterans Affairs' (VA's) implementation of My VA Images, a direct-to-patient asynchronous teledermatology mobile application enabling established dermatology patients to receive follow-up care remotely instead of in-person. DESIGN /PARTICIPANTS/APPROACH: Following pilot testing at 3 facilities, the app was introduced to 28 facilities (4 groups of 7) every 3 months using a stepped-wedge cluster-randomized design. Using the Organizational Theory of Implementation Effectiveness, we examined the app's implementation using qualitative and quantitative data consisting of encounter data from VA's corporate data warehouse; app usage from VA's Mobile Health database; bi-monthly reports from facility representatives; phone interviews with clinicians; and documented communications between the operational partner and facility staff. KEY RESULTS: Implementation policies and practices included VA's vision to expand home telehealth and marketing/communication strategies. The COVID-19 pandemic dominated the implementation climate by stressing staffing, introducing competing demands, and influencing stakeholder attitudes to the app, including its fit to their values. These factors were associated with mixed implementation effectiveness, defined as high quality consistent use. Nineteen of 31 exposed facilities prepared to use the app; 10 facilities used it for actual patient care, 7 as originally intended. Residents, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants were more likely than attendings to use the app. Facilities exposed to the app pre-pandemic were more likely to use and sustain the new process. CONCLUSIONS: Considerable heterogeneity existed in implementing mobile teledermatology, despite VA's common mission, integrated healthcare system, and stakeholders' broad interest. Identifying opportunities to target favorable facilities and user groups (such as teaching facilities and physician extenders, respectively) while addressing internal implementation barriers including incomplete integration with the electronic health record as well as inadequate staffing may help optimize the initial impact of direct-to-patient telehealth. The COVID pandemic was a notable extrinsic barrier. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT03241589.

International expert recommendations on image acquisition for in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy of cutaneous tumors.

BACKGROUND: No international recommendations exist for a minimum imaging requirement per lesion using reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM). This may be beneficial given the increasing use of remote RCM interpretation internationally. OBJECTIVE: To develop international expert recommendations for image acquisition using tissue-coupled RCM for diagnosis of cutaneous tumors. METHODS: Using a modified Delphi approach, a core group developed the scope and drafted initial recommendations before circulation to a larger group, the Cutaneous Imaging Expert Resource Group of the American Academy of Dermatology. Each review round consisted of a period of open comment, followed by revisions. RESULTS: The recommendations were developed after 5 alternating rounds of review among the core group and the Cutaneous Imaging Expert Resource Group. These were divided into subsections of imaging personnel, recommended lesion criteria, clinical and lesion information to be provided, lesion preparation, image acquisition, mosaic cube settings, and additional captures based on lesion characteristics and suspected diagnosis. LIMITATIONS: The current recommendations are limited to tissue-coupled RCM for diagnosis of cutaneous tumors. It is one component of the larger picture of quality assurance and will require ongoing review. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations serve as a resource to facilitate quality assurance, economical use of time, accurate diagnosis, and international collaboration.

Does the Diagnostic Accuracy and Rates of Face-to-Face Visits Occurring Shortly after an Asynchronized Teledermatology Consultation Justify Its Implementation? An 18-Month Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: In 2019, Maccabi Health Services (MHS) rolled out the store-and-forward "Dermadetect" teledermatology consultation (TC) application. Study goal was to analyze MHS records of TCs (August 2019-February 2021) for the rate and reasons for face-to-face consultations (FTFC) occurring shortly after a TC with emphasis on FTFCs resulting in a different diagnosis for the same indication. METHODS: The records of FTFCs held up shortly after TCs were reviewed and classified into cases marked as unsuited for teledermatology, cases in which the indication differed, and cases with the same indication, which were analyzed for concordance of diagnoses. RESULTS: Dermadetect was used by 12,815 MHS beneficiaries. In 30% of cases, following FTFC occurred within the subsequent 5 months, and 901 of them occurred in the subsequent 2 weeks and were analyzed. Thirty percent were not suited for teledermatology, 15% were held for a different indication, and 55% occurred for the same indication. The diagnosis concordance between the TC and recurrent FTFC for the same indication was 97.4%, with full concordance at 68.1% and partial concordance at 29.3%. Overall, 13 patients (1.4%) of the 901 patients using the application only once had a subsequent FTFC within 2 weeks and received a different diagnosis than the one given in the TC. CONCLUSIONS: When considering the implementation of store-and-forward TC's, a 30% rate of following FTFC's during the next 5 months should be considered when planning the reimbursement model. Diagnosis discordance may be disregarded due to its low rates.

The Agreement between Consumer-Driven Self-Assessment of Psoriasis Severity and Physician-Assessed Severity Based on Patient-Taken Photographs Is Weak: A Cross-Sectional Study.

INTRODUCTION: Digital advancements have given access to huge amounts of real-world data (RWD) widely used for dermatological research. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to investigate the agreement between consumer-driven self-assessed psoriasis severity and physician-assessed severity based on photographs. METHODS: Customer IDs in the NØIE database (Danish skincare company) from 2009 to 2022 with a smartphone photograph of psoriasis vulgaris on the body and a corresponding completed questionnaire were included. Smartphone photographs were evaluated by a physician-assessing erythema, induration, and scaling on a scale from 0 to 4 based on Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI). Self-assessment was done on a scale from 0 to 10 and converted to 0-4 scale (0 converted to 0; 1-3 to 1; 4-6 to 2; 7-8 to 3; and 9-10 to 4). Intraclass correlation coefficients with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: In total, 187 patients (63% women) with mean age of 38 years were included. Self-assessment scores were higher than physicians' assessment scores for all groups, and scaling was closest to the physicians' assessment, while erythema and induration had a greater distance between the physicians' and patients' assessment. The correlation between self-assessed and physician-assessed psoriasis severity for all patients was 0.23 (95% CI: 0.0-0.92); 0.34 (95% CI: 0.0-0.95) for chronic patients; and 0.09 (-0.01 to 0.82) for non-chronic patients. The agreement was better for men (0.53 [-0.02 to 0.98]) than for women (0.12 [-0.01 to 0.84]). CONCLUSION: There was weak agreement between self-assessed psoriasis severity and photographically assessed severity by the physician. Consumer-driven RWD should be interpreted with caution.

Early diagnosis of melanoma: a randomized trial assessing the impact of the transmission of photographs taken with a smartphone from the general practitioner to the dermatologist on the time to dermatological consultation.

BACKGROUND: Difficulty obtaining a dermatological consultation is an obstacle to the early diagnosis of melanoma. On the one hand, patients survival depends on the lesion thickness at the time of diagnosis. On the other hand, dermatologists treat many patients with benign lesions. Optimizing patient care pathways is a major concern. The aim of the present study was to assess whether the e-mail transmission of photographs of suspected melanoma lesions between general practitioners (GPs) and dermatologists reduces the time to dermatological consultation for patients whose suspicious skin lesions ultimately require resection. METHODS: We conducted a cluster-randomized controlled study in primary care involving 51 French GPs between April 2017 and August 2019. A total of 250 patients referred to a dermatologist for a suspected melanoma lesion were included GPs were randomized to either the smartphone arm or the usual care arm. In the smartphone arm, the GPs referred patients to the dermatologist by sending 2 photographs of the suspicious lesion using their smartphone. The dermatologist then had to set up an appointment at an appropriate time. In the usual care arm, GPs referred patients to a dermatologist according to their usual practice. The primary outcome was the time to dermatological consultation for patients whose lesion ultimately required resection. RESULTS: 57 GPs volunteered were randomized (27 to the smartphone arm, and 30 to the usual care arm). A total of 125 patients were included in each arm (mean age: 49.8 years; 53% women) and followed 8 months. Twenty-three dermatologists participated in the study. The time to dermatological consultation for patients whose suspicious skin lesion required resection was 56.5 days in the smartphone arm and 63.7 days in the usual care arm (mean adjusted time reduction: -18.5 days, 95% CI [-74.1;23.5], p = .53). CONCLUSIONS: The e-mail transmission of photographs from GPs to dermatologists did not improve the dermatological management of patients whose suspicious skin lesions ultimately required resection. Further research is needed to validate quality criteria that might be useful for tele-expertise in dermatology. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under reference number NCT03137511 (May 2, 2017).

Atopic Dermatitis Disease Education.

There has been an influx of new educational resources for atopic dermatitis (AD) patients in recent years. The two primary organizations in the United States offering educational materials, online resources, and other forms of support include the National Eczema Association (NEA) and the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD). Educational workshops and interventions have emerged as tools that can deliver comprehensive information on AD, such as symptoms, treatments, and disease management. In regard to these workshops, studies have proven longer interventions to be more effective. Studies have also found multidisciplinary teams, including psychologists, dietitians, and AD specialists, to be more effective in AD treatment and education. Additionally, video-based education was found to be the most effective delivery medium compared to various written modes of education. Given the psychosocial impacts of AD, support groups have been found to improve life quality and decrease disease severity, with age-specific groups offering the greatest benefits. Technology such as social media and smartphones has also improved education. Social media has allowed the rapid exchange of information to wider audiences, but due to its unregulated nature, false information has also been disseminated. Despite this, web-based interventions have still been found to be satisfying, convenient, and effective in increasing treatment awareness. The advent of smartphone applications has provided patients with access to information on AD symptoms and treatment on demand. While the effectiveness of these promising applications hasn't been confirmed by studies, patient provider interactions via smartphone (teledermatology) have been found to be as effective as in-person appointments. This chapter will discuss these different types of emerging resources available to AD patients including educational materials, interventions, support groups, organizational support, and technological resources and their effectiveness.

Attitudes Toward and Use of eHealth Technologies Among German Dermatologists: Repeated Cross-Sectional Survey in 2019 and 2021.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, legal and infrastructural conditions have been set to improve the adoption of digital applications in health care in Germany. The impact of these actions was amplified by the COVID-19 pandemic. So far, no studies have confirmed this progress in dermatology. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to measure changes in knowledge, interest, expectation, and use of digital applications in health care among dermatologists in Germany in 2019 and 2021. METHODS: We administered a repeated cross-sectional survey among dermatologists in medical practices and clinics in Germany at 2 time points: t1 (2019; before the COVID-19 pandemic) and t2 (2021; during the COVID-19 pandemic). We used a standardized questionnaire, including items on respondents' knowledge, interest, expectation, and use of digital applications, as well as their demographics. The survey was distributed by post and email. The data were analyzed descriptively as well as with multiple logistic regressions. RESULTS: At t1, 585 (272/571, 47.6% female; mean age 52.4, SD 8.9 years) dermatologists and at t2, 792 (360/736, 48.9% female; mean age 54.3, SD 8.6 years) dermatologists participated in this survey. Interest in digital medicine was higher at t1 than at t2 (381/585, 65.1% vs 458/792, 57.8%; P≤.001). Nevertheless, 38.6% (306/792) had used digital applications more often since the beginning of the pandemic. For example, real-time telemedicine with patients (12/585, 2.1% vs 160/792, 7.6%; P≤.001) and other specialists did increase (33/385, 5.7% vs 181/792, 22.8%; P≤.001). Almost one-third expressed great concerns about digitalization (272/792, 34.3% vs 294/792, 37.1%; P=.21). Spatial analysis revealed higher interest in, more positive expectations toward, and higher use of digital applications in urban areas in comparison to rural areas. For instance, dermatologists from urban areas assessed future applications as having less risk (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.51, 95% CI 0.35-0.76) than did dermatologists from rural areas. The situation was similar with the age groups, as, for example, dermatologists aged <50 years also expected lower risks (aOR 0.51, 95% CI 0.34-0.77) than those aged ≥50 years. There were no differences between sexes in use, but there were differences in knowledge and expectation; for example, male participants assessed their confidence in using digital applications as higher (aOR 1.44, 95% CI 1.01-2.04) than did female participants. CONCLUSIONS: During the pandemic, the use of digital applications in dermatology increased but still remained at a moderate level. The regional and age-related disparities identified indicate the need for further action to ensure equal access to digital care.

Effectiveness and diagnostic accuracy of teledermatology for the assessment of skin conditions.

BACKGROUND: Teledermatology provides a platform for swift specialist advice without the potential need for face-to-face review. Our objectives were to investigate the effectiveness, accuracy and diagnostic concordance of the platform with regard to the remote management of skin conditions. METHODS: We undertook a single-centre, retrospective chart review over a 1-year period, comprising a total of 1703 teledermatology referrals. Two physicians independently assessed the diagnostic concordance between telederm diagnosis (TD), in-person diagnosis (ID) and histopathological diagnosis (HD). RESULTS: There were a total of 1703 TD referrals, of which 341 were rejected, leaving 1362 referrals for evaluation. Sixty-five per cent of these referrals were managed remotely and discharged with advice, although 4.6% of these were later re-referred for an in-person review. A total of 20% of referrals were rejected, of which the majority was due to a lack of appropriate imaging. The total concordance of TD compared to ID was 76.4%. When comparing the TD and ID/HD, we obtained a Kappa value of 0.636 indicating substantial agreement. In terms of accuracy, there were 49 biopsy-proven skin cancers picked up by the service in this cohort of data. Of these, 61.2% were given an accurate diagnosis on first impression via teledermatology, 14.3% were given a different diagnosis but correctly categorised as skin cancer and 24.5% could not be assessed; however, they were triaged and escalated based upon clinical suspicion. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that teledermatology is an effective platform in terms of diagnosis and remote management, with adequate diagnostic accuracy and concordance to in-person diagnosis.

Teledermatology Versus In-Person Visits for the Follow-Up of Atopic Dermatitis Patients.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, teledermatology has rapidly emerged as a healthcare delivery method with potential implications for managing chronic inflammatory dermatoses like atopic dermatitis (AD). OBJECTIVES: This study assesses the utility of telemedicine in the management of AD by comparing virtual care with traditional in-office visits with the aim of identifying differences in clinical outcomes between these 2 healthcare delivery modalities. METHODS: Patients of all ages with AD were recruited from 2 dermatology practices. Consecutive patients presenting to the clinics who met the inclusion criteria were invited to enrol in the study. Those who consented to participate were randomly assigned to the virtual or in-person arm of the study, with the opportunity to decline care in either study arm. The inclusion criteria required participants to have a confirmed diagnosis of AD. Exclusion criteria included significant comorbidity that might affect the course of treatment, inaccessibility to teleconsults such as not having a camera for video conferences, and self-declared limitations in operating Zoom. Patients were assessed at baseline (week 0), 4 to 6 weeks, and 8 to 12 weeks using 6 efficacy parameters. RESULTS: In the virtual group, all 6 dermatological measures suggested improved outcomes. Average Body Surface Area scores decreased (ß = -.07, 95% CI = -0.1, -0.3) over the course of follow-up. Virtual care patients had 80% lower odds of moderate-to-severe uncontrolled disease (OR = 0.2; 95% CI = 0.06, 0.5) and pruritus (OR = 0.2, 95% CI = 0.05, 0.7) over time. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports teledermatology as a feasible and effective option for providing follow-up care for atopic dermatitis patients of various demographic standings.

Teledermatology in Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review.

Telemedicine use has been increasing especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Various studies have outlined benefits of telemedicine including improving health equity, reducing wait times, and cost-effectiveness. Skin diseases such as atopic dermatitis (AD) may potentially be managed via telemedicine. However, there are no evidence-based recommendations for best practices in telemedicine for assessing AD patients. The objective of this review is to assess and summarize current evidence on telemedicine modalities for AD. This review will assess patient outcomes from various telemedicine models for AD. A review protocol was developed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Two reviewers independently screened potential studies and extracted data. Studies were included if they evaluated any telemedicine assessment for AD. Of 2719 identified records, 5 reports were included. Two reports used the direct-access online model, 1 used web-based consultation, 1 used e-health through a personal eczema portal, and 1 used an online platform and mobile application. All models were variations of the asynchronous, store and forward model. In all the included reports, teledermatology for the follow-up of patients with AD was effective and equivalent when compared to in-person appointments or standard treatment for their respective key outcome measures. However, it is unclear what the most effective teledermatology model is due to significant heterogeneity between studies. Teledermatology may serve as an important tool for triaging and follow-up of patients with AD. More studies are needed to determine which teledermatology models are most effective for virtual assessment of AD.

Patient Learning Pathway: Identifying Patient Competencies in Teledermatology for Effective Management of Dermatological Conditions.

BACKGROUND: Dermatology consultations in Québec, Canada, face accessibility challenges, with most dermatologists concentrated in urban areas. Teledermatology, offering remote diagnosis and treatment, holds promise in overcoming these limitations. However, concerns regarding patient-doctor relationships and logistical issues exist. OBJECTIVES: This article aims to introduce a dermatology patient learning pathway (PLP) developed by the Centre of Excellence on Partnership with Patients and the Public (CEPPP), focusing on knowledge, abilities, and skills mobilized by patients and their loved ones at key moments of the life course with an illness, as well as emerging educational needs. METHODS: The PLP development was co-developed with dermatology patient and caregiver partners, stakeholders, and the CEPPP team. The process encompassed stakeholder engagement, exploration, recruitment of patient and caregiver partners, co-development of the PLP draft, and validation through consensus building. RESULTS: The PLP methodology led to the creation of 44 learning objectives, comprising a total of 107 subobjectives. These objectives were organized into 8 phases of the patient life course with a dermatological condition: (1) prevention and predisposition; (2) discovery, self-examination, or observation of a change; (3) first consultation; (4) wandering; (5) consultation with a dermatologist; (6) diagnosis; (7) treatments; and (8) living with it. CONCLUSIONS: The dermatology PLP serves as a resource outlining patient competency across different stages of managing a dermatological condition throughout their life course. In the context of teledermatology, the PLP might facilitate patient and caregiver engagement by helping select appropriate information and tools to support active participation in care.

Emerging therapies and innovations in vitiligo management: a comprehensive review.

Vitiligo is a common skin disorder where melanocytes, the cells that produce skin pigment, are destroyed by the immune system, leading to white patches on the skin and mucous membranes. This condition affects 0.4% to 2.0% of the global population, with a higher prevalence in females and often beginning in childhood. In India, about 1% of the population is affected, particularly in northern regions, with a higher incidence in females and links to other autoimmune diseases. This review examines recent progress in understanding vitiligo and its treatment. It focuses on the genetic, autoimmune, and environmental factors involved in the disease and highlights new therapies, such as targeted molecular treatments and advanced repigmentation methods. Current research shows that oxidative stress and genetic predispositions contribute to the autoimmune destruction of melanocytes. Novel drug delivery systems, including liposomes, nanoemulsions, and nanostructured lipid carriers, have improved treatment effectiveness. Clinical trials are exploring new treatments like Ruxolitinib cream and melanocyte transplantation, while teledermatology is becoming useful for managing patients. Vitiligo also poses a significant economic burden due to its impact on patients' quality of life. Continued research is essential to develop better, more accessible treatments and reduce the economic impact of vitiligo.

Melanoma Detected Through Teledermatology Versus In-Person Visits.

Background: Early detection of melanoma improves survival; however, patients face long wait times to receive dermatology care. Teledermatology (TD) is a promising tool to optimize access to care and has shown promise for the identification of malignancies but has not been well studied for melanoma. We evaluated the utility of TD as a triage tool to allow high-risk lesions of concern to be seen more expeditiously. Methods: Patient sociodemographic factors and histological characteristics of 836 melanomas biopsied between March 2020 and November 2022 in the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center health system were retrospectively evaluated, stratified by initial appointment type of TD versus in-person visit. Results: Patients first seeking care through teledermatology had shorter wait times to initial evaluation (p < 0.001) and eventual biopsy (p < 0.001), and these melanomas had higher Breslow thickness (p < 0.001), were more ulcerated (p = 0.002), invasive (p = 0.001), and of a more aggressive subtype (p = 0.007) than those initially evaluated in-person. TD was also utilized by a higher proportion of younger (p = 0.001) and non-white (p = 0.03) patients who identified their own lesion (p < 0.001). Conclusions: TD may be a strategy to improve melanoma outcomes by providing an accessible avenue of expedited care for high-risk lesions associated with worse clinical prognosticators of disease.

Automated Image Quality and Protocol Adherence Assessment of Examinations in Teledermatology: First Results.

Introduction: Image quality and acquisition protocol adherence assessment is a neglected area in teledermatology. We examine if it is feasible to use deep learning methods to automate the assessment of the adherence of examinations to image acquisition protocols. In this study, we focused on the quality criteria of two image acquisition protocols: (1) approximation image and (2) panoramic image, as these are present in all teledermatology examination protocols currently used by the Santa Catarina State Integrated Telemedicine and Telehealth System (STT/SC). Methods: We use a data set of 36,102 teledermatological examinations performed at the STT/SC during 2021. As our validation process, we adopted standard machine learning metrics and an inter-rater agreement (IRA) study with 11 dermatologists. For the approximation image protocol, we used the Mask-Region based Convolutional Neural Network (RCNN) Object Detection Deep Learning (DL) architecture to identify the presence of a lesion identification tag and a ruler used to provide a frame reference of the lesion. For the panoramic image protocol, we used DensePose, a pose estimation DL, architecture to assess the presence of a whole patient body and its orientation. A combination of the two approaches was additionally validated through an IRA study between specialists. Results: Mask-RCNN achieved a score of 96% mean average precision (mAP), while DensePose presented 75% mAP. IRA achieved a level of agreement of 96.68% with the Krippendorff alpha score. Conclusions: Our results show the feasibility of using deep learning to automate the image quality and protocol adherence assessment in teledermatology, before the specialist's manual analysis of the examination.

An Investigation of Teledermatology Trends in the State of Texas: A Multicenter, Retrospective Cohort Review of an eConsult Service Line.

Background: An eConsult is a growing teledermatology tool that has the potential to address health disparities. Trends in teledermatology usage are still being defined in the context of the pandemic, postpandemic recovery, and a growing nonphysician primary care provider population. Objective: The aim was to understand teledermatology utilization trends for asynchronous dermatology eConsults in the geographically expansive state of Texas. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study examined the eConsult tool within a large, nonprofit health system, comparing characteristics of 893 eConsult visits with 27,189 in-person dermatology encounters from January 2022 to March 2023. Results: When comparing the demographics of patients seen through eConsult versus traditional in-person visits, eConsults demonstrated a significantly higher prevalence of pediatric (22.5% vs. 7.6%, p < 0.001), Hispanic/Latino (20.5% vs. 10.4%, p < 0.001), African American (12.5% vs. 6.9%, p < 0.001), Asian (4.6% vs. 2.1%, p < 0.001), and American Indian (1.0% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.049) patients compared with in-person visits. eConsult users came from areas with a lower percentage of bachelor's degree holders, reduced average household income, and an increased proportion of Medicaid and Tricare users. Physicians (MD/DO) submitted more eConsult cases than nonphysician providers (NPPs), with comparable diagnostic agreement with teledermatologists and similar recommendation rates for in-person dermatology visits. Conclusions: While the limitation of this study was that it was a descriptive data analysis in a single health care system with limited generalizability, eConsults hold promise to broaden dermatologic access for underserved groups, especially children, individuals from underrepresented backgrounds, and Medicaid and Tricare members. While no significant diagnostic or referral differences were seen for eConsults initiated by primary care physician and NPPs, these changing trends should continue to be examined.

Comparison of Costs in Teledermatology Using PC and Camera Versus Smartphone.

Introduction: One of the challenges faced by the Colombian Health System is to improve access to health services for the dispersed and isolated rural population, particularly in the field of dermatology. This article examines the implementation of a teledermatology service using a PC and camera versus smartphone technology. Methods: A total of 542 teledermatology visits were conducted, involving 478 patients, in addition to 64 visits for clinical follow-up for patients as per the dermatologist's recommendation. Out of the 478 patients, 461 met the inclusion criteria and agreed to participate in the study. The data collection instrument from the general practitioner or referring provider covered three consultation moments: (1) sending an initial consultation, (2) providing a response to the patient, and (3) sending a follow-up consultation. Seven hundred forty-seven records were completed by the general practitioner for the three consultation moments. Furthermore, 372 consultations were documented by the dermatologist or referring provider for two moments: (1) response to the initial consultation by the dermatologist, and (2) response to the follow-up consultation by the dermatologist. After validating the information reported in the instruments, a descriptive analysis of the data was conducted, utilizing absolute frequencies and percentages for qualitative variables and measures of central tendency (mean, median, standard deviation, and interquartile range) for quantitative variables. The data were analyzed from 747 records of the referring provider instrument related to 461 patients, between 18 and 98 years of age, with a predominantly female representation. Results: The results indicated that for teleconsultations conducted using a mobile device, the average total duration of the teleconsultation was longer on the traditional platform compared with the mobile device (13.03 vs. 8.27 min). Additionally, it was observed that the time taken to store, send, and capture a single image (clinical or dermoscopic) using the mobile device was three times lower than that on the conventional platform (25 vs. 75 s). Similar findings were noted for teleconsultations carried out by the dermatologist, predominantly utilizing a mobile device. The average consultation time was shorter for the mobile device compared with the traditional platform (8.14 vs. 12 min). Conclusions: The cost reduction suggests that the operation of the service is more efficient with smartphone technology in comparison to the use of a PC and camera. Teledermatology with smartphones provides a streamlined, efficient, and technically sound process for obtaining clinical and dermoscopic images.

Teledermatology Use in the Elderly: An Analysis of Teledermatology Utilization Patterns Across Age Groups.

Introduction: Telehealth is an emerging tool used to improve access to care for patients. However, there is a lack of literature comparing the use of telehealth between patients of different age groups in dermatology. Our study aims to determine whether differences exist in teledermatology usage between elderly and younger dermatology patients. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study using the 2020-2021 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Our study population included a weighted total of 150,290,604 patients: Of these, 16.35% were young adults (18-44 years old), 26.32% were midlife adults (45-64 years old), and 57.33% were elderly (65+ years old). Results: Our results showed that elderly patients had significantly lower rates of teledermatology use than young adults (odds ratio [OR] = 0.184, (confidence interval [CI]: 0.081-0.421)), p < 0.000) and midlife adults (OR = 0.193, [CI: 0.091-0.406], p < 0.000). Midlife adults had similar rates of telehealth use when compared with young adults (OR = 1.044, [CI: 0.508-2.145], p = 0.907). Our results were adjusted for sex, race, ethnicity, insurance type, education level, income, travel time, and medical comorbidities. Discussion: We found that elderly patients seeking dermatology care are less likely to use telehealth than younger dermatology patients. Our results demonstrate that barriers to telehealth use for the elderly may be more prohibitive than expected. Understanding these differences in teledermatology use is essential for improving teledermatology delivery across all age groups.

Direct to Patient Synchronous Teledermatology During COVID-19 Pandemic.

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, teledermatology became a popular mode of health care delivery. Thus, deciphering which diagnoses are best suited for synchronous video visits is important to guide providers on appropriate patient care. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 1,647 submitted synchronous video visits from September 1, 2020 to March 31, 2021 at a single, large academic institution. Results: Video visits' follow-up rate was significantly associated with diagnosis subtype (p < 0.001). Compared with patients with skin lesions and nonskin dermatologic conditions, patients with a rash had higher odds of being recommended to have their follow-up visit as a video visit (odds ratio [OR] = 0.222, p < 0.001; OR = 0.296, p < 0.001). Patients with a rash had lower odds of being recommended to have their follow-up visit as an in-person office visit when compared with skin lesions (OR = 9.679, p < 0.001), nonskin dermatologic conditions (OR = 4.055, p < 0.001), and other skin dermatologic conditions (OR = 2.23, p < 0.01). Demographically, employed, middle-aged patients with private insurance made up the majority of video visit usage. African American patients were less likely to utilize a video visit compared with Asian patients (OR = 2.06, p < 0.038). Conclusions: Certain dermatologic diagnoses, most notably rashes, are more conducive to video visit management. Rashes made up 86% of new patient video visits, were more likely to have video visit follow-up if needed and were more likely to not require further follow-up indicating that the management of rashes from initial diagnosis to completion in care is suitable for video visit management.

Creation and Validation of a Spanish Questionnaire for Evaluating Pediatricians' Satisfaction with Teledermatology.

Introduction: In 2021, we introduced a program to promote the use of teledermatology among pediatricians. In the present study, we created and validated a satisfaction questionnaire to assess pediatricians' perceptions of teledermatology. We used this questionnaire to evaluate the efficacy of the program. Methods: First, a provisional questionnaire, based on questionnaires available in the literature, was drafted. A group of experts evaluated the clarity, coherence, relevance and sufficiency of the questions, and we calculated a content validity index (CVI). Only questions with a CVI above 0.78 were acceptable. Based on these results and on the experts' comments, we revised the questionnaire and then sent it to a population of pediatricians. We used their responses to validate the revised questionnaire using statistical methods. A Cronbach's alpha above 0.7 indicated adequate internal consistency, and an intraclass correlation coefficient above 0.75 indicated adequate reproducibility. We used the Varimax method to measure construct validity. Results: We clarified and reformulated some questions from the provisional questionnaire based on the experts' comments. All questions had a CVI above 0.78, so no other changes were needed. Although the statistical validation showed suboptimal construct validity, the revised questionnaire had good internal consistency and reliability, and high content validity index. Discussion: The validated questionnaire is a robust tool for assessing pediatricians' satisfaction with teledermatology.

Emerging Trends in Teledermatology Research: A Scientometric Analysis from 2002 to 2021.

Background: With advances in technology, teledermatology (TD) research has increased. However, an updated comprehensive quantitative analysis of TD research, especially one that identifies emerging trends of TD research in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) era, is lacking. Objective: To conduct a scientometric analysis of TD research documents between 2002 and 2021 and explore the emerging trends. Methods: CiteSpace was used to perform scientometric analysis and yielded visualized network maps with corresponding metric values. Emerging trends were identified mainly through burst detection of keywords/terms, co-cited reference clustering analysis, and structural variability analysis (SVA). Results: A total of 932 documents, containing 27,958 cited references were identified from 2002 to 2021. Most TD research was published in journals from the "Dermatology" and "Health Care Sciences & Services" categories. American, Australian, and European researchers contributed the most research and formed close collaborations. Keywords/terms with strong burst values to date were "primary care," "historical perspective," "emerging technique," "improve access," "mobile teledermoscopy (TDS)," "access," "skin cancer," "telehealth," "recent finding," "artificial intelligence (AI)," "dermatological care," and "dermatological condition." Co-cited reference clustering analysis showed that the recently active cluster labels included "COVID-19 pandemic," "skin cancer," "deep neural network," and "underserved population." The SVA identified two reviews (Tognetti et al. and Mckoy et al.) that may be highly cited in the future. Conclusion: During and after the COVID-19 era, emerging trends in research on TD (especially mobile TDS) may be related to skin cancer and AI as well as further exploration of primary care in underserved areas.