Comparison of Graphic Organizers Versus Online Flash Cards as Study Aids in an Elective Veterinary Cardiology Course.

The ideal study aid format for veterinary students remains unknown. Both graphic organizers (GOs) and flash cards (FCs) have shown utility for enhancing learning in specific contexts. A mixed-methods prospective randomized crossover trial was undertaken with veterinary students (n = 59) in an elective cardiology course. All students received identical content presented via weekly in-class lectures and were given study aids in either GO or FC format. One week later, students completed quizzes of content knowledge for each lesson and indicated amount of time spent studying. Crossover occurred such that groups of students alternated between receiving GOs and FCs. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected in the form of in-depth pre- and post-course surveys. Overall, there was no significant difference in quiz scores (p = .26) or time spent studying (p = .33) based on study aid type. Time spent studying for each quiz, as well as other measures of study habits, decreased significantly throughout the semester. Post-course survey responses showed overall higher student satisfaction for GOs compared to FCs (p = .022), as well as a shift in preference away from FCs throughout the semester (p = .03). Free-text survey responses revealed that individual students had strong preferences either for or against FCs in the context of their particular study habits. In an elective veterinary cardiology course, use of GO format compared to FC format study aids resulted in equivalent short-term learning outcomes and time spent studying, with each study aid format appealing to specific learning preferences of individual students.

Comparison of Instructor-Provided Versus Student-Generated Graphic Organizers in an Elective Veterinary Cardiology Course.

Graphic organizers (GOs) are visual and spatial displays that facilitate learning by making conceptual relationships between content more apparent. It remains unknown whether GOs are more effective when completed by the teacher (instructor-provided [IP]) versus the learner (student-generated [SG]). A mixed-methods prospective randomized crossover trial was undertaken with veterinary students (n = 60) in an elective cardiology course. All students received identical content presented via weekly in-class lectures and were subsequently given study aids in either IP or SG format. One week later, students completed quizzes of content knowledge for each lesson and indicated amount of time spent studying. Crossover occurred such that groups of students alternated between receiving IP and SG. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected in the form of in-depth pre- and post-course surveys. Overall, there was no significant difference in quiz scores based on study aid type (p = .06). Students spent an average of 25% less time studying per lesson when using IP GOs compared with SG GOs (p < .001). Time spent studying for each quiz, as well as time period between date of studying and date of quiz, decreased significantly throughout the semester. Overall, students strongly preferred IP to SG format (p < .001); reasons listed included confidence in accuracy and completeness of information, as well as increased study efficiency. In an elective veterinary cardiology course, use of IP compared to SG format study aids resulted in higher study efficiency and student satisfaction with equivalent short-term learning outcomes.

The Effect of Graphic Organizers on Learning Outcomes, Study Efficiency, and Student Satisfaction in an Elective Veterinary Cardiology Course.

Graphic organizers (GOs) are visual and spatial displays, such as tables or charts, which facilitate learning by making conceptual relationships between content more apparent. We hypothesized that study aids in the form of GOs would lead to improved learning outcomes, study efficiency, and student satisfaction compared to traditional outline (OUT) format. A mixed-methods prospective randomized crossover trial was undertaken with veterinary students (n = 31) in an elective cardiology course. All students received identical content presented via weekly in-class lectures. Following 8 pre-designated lectures, students were given instructor-prepared study aids in either GO or OUT format. Students completed quizzes of content knowledge for each lesson and indicated amount of time spent studying. Crossover occurred such that groups of students alternated between receiving GO and OUT. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected in the form of in-depth pre- and post-course surveys. Quiz scores did not differ (p = .42) based on type of study aid provided (GO vs. OUT). Students spent an average of 17% less time studying per lesson when using GO compared to OUT (p = .05). Student satisfaction with both study aid formats was high, but students preferred GO over OUT in terms of study efficiency (p = .002), visual appeal (p < .001), ease of use (p < .004), and likelihood of referencing in the future (p < .001). In an elective veterinary cardiology course, use of GO compared to OUT format study aids resulted in higher study efficiency and student satisfaction with equivalent short-term learning outcomes.