Efficacy and safety of different cycles of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: There is no standard consensus on the optimal number of cycles of neoadjuvant immunotherapy prior to surgery for patients with locoregionally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We carried out a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy with different treatment cycles in order to provide valuable information for clinical decision-making. Methods: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched before May 2023. The included studies were categorized based on different treatment cycles of neoadjuvant immunotherapy to assess their respective efficacy and safety in patients with resectable NSCLC. Results: Incorporating data from 29 studies with 1331 patients, we found major pathological response rates of 43 % (95%CI, 34-52 %) with two cycles and 33 % (95%CI, 22-45 %) with three cycles of neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Radiological response rates were 39 % (95%CI, 28-50 %) and 56 % (95%CI, 44-68 %) for two and three cycles, respectively, with higher incidence rates of severe adverse events (SAEs) in the three-cycle group (32 %; 95%CI, 21-50 %). Despite similar rates of R0 resection between two and three cycles, the latter showed a slightly higher surgical delay rate (1 % vs. 7 %). Neoadjuvant treatment modes significantly affected outcomes, with the combination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy demonstrating superiority in improving pathological and radiological response rates, while the incidence of SAEs in patients receiving combination therapy remained within an acceptable range (23 %; 95%CI, 15-35 %). However, regardless of the treatment mode administered, an increase in the number of treatment cycles did not result in substantial improvement in pathological response rates. Conclusion: There are clear advantages of combining immunotherapy and chemotherapy in neoadjuvant settings. Increasing the number of cycles of neoadjuvant immunotherapy from two to three primarily may not substantially improve the overall efficacy, while increasing the risk of adverse events. Further analysis of the outcomes of four cycles of neoadjuvant immunotherapy is necessary.

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy cycle number selection for non-small cell lung cancer and clinical outcomes: a real-world analysis.

Objectives: Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy is the optimal choice in the treatment of NSCLC; however, the optimal number of therapeutic cycles remains unclear. The primary aim of this study was to determine the optimal number of neoadjuvant therapeutic cycles in NSCLC. Methods: This study was a real-world clinical analysis that included patients who received neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy followed by surgery from January 2020 to August 2022. Patients were divided into two groups based on the number of therapeutic cycles: 2-cycle group and 3-4-cycles group. The primary endpoint was the major pathological response (MPR) rate. Results: A total of 251 patients were included: 150 in the 2-cycle group and 101 in the 3-4-cycles group. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the groups. The MPR in the 2-cycle group was 57.3% and not significantly different from that of 57.4% in the 3-4-cycles group (p=0.529). Thirty-two patients (31.7%) in the 3-4-cycles group underwent surgery > 42 days after the final cycle of neoadjuvant therapy, significantly more than the 24 patients (16.0%) in the 2-cycle group (p=0.003). The incidence of adverse events related to neoadjuvant therapy was higher in the 3-4-cycles vs 2-cycle groups (72.3% versus 58.0%, respectively; p=0.021), while the 2-cycle group had a higher rate of postoperative morbidities (28.0% versus 12.9%, respectively; p=0.004). Additionally, for patients with ≤ 44.2% regression in diameter on computed tomography after two cycles of treatment, the MPR rate was higher in the 3-4-cycles vs 2-cycle group (47.3% versus 29.9%, respectively; p=0.048). For cases with programmed death-ligand 1 expression, regarding tumor proportion score ≤ 10%, 3-4 cycles of neoadjuvant treatment increased the MPR rate compared with 2 cycles (37.5% versus 9.5%, respectively; p=0.041). Conclusion: Our data support the positive role of chemoimmunotherapy in the neoadjuvant treatment of NSCLC. Extending to 3-4 cycles instead of 2 cycles of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy may improve the safety of surgery and result in a lower incidence of postoperative morbidities; however, the MPR rate may not increase significantly. CT re-evaluation during treatment and PD-L1 expression at initial diagnosis are potential indicators to guide the choice of the number of therapeutic cycles.

ECCO Topical Review on Biological Treatment Cycles in Crohn's Disease.

There are now a growing number of licensed biological therapies for patients with Crohn's disease. However, there can be significant costs associated with long-term maintenance treatment, as well as some concerns about potential side-effects. As a result, there has been increasing interest in elective biological treatment discontinuation in selected patients, after a sustained period of remission. Following discontinuation, in cases of relapse, evidence to date has suggested that remission may often be regained by re-treatment with the same biological agent. Therefore, a concept has emerged in which cycles of biological therapy might be used. If this treatment strategy were to be applied in a subgroup of patients at low risk of relapse, cycling might allow a substantial number of patients to have a lower, overall therapeutic burden-ensuring decreased exposure to biological therapy but still enabling appropriate disease control. Currently, there remains uncertainty about the benefit-risk balance for using cycles of biological treatment for patients with Crohn's disease. Accordingly, an expert panel was convened by the European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation [ECCO] to review the published literature and agree a series of consensus practice points. The panel aimed to provide evidence-based guidance on multiple aspects of biological treatment discontinuation and cycling, including the risk of relapse after elective treatment discontinuation, predictors of probable relapse or remission, safety, patient preferences, and pharmacoeconomic aspects. Crucially, discussions about biological treatment discontinuation and cycling should be individualized, to enable shared decision-making by patients with their clinicians.

Effects of the number of neoadjuvant therapy cycles on clinical outcomes, safety, and survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer undergoing metastasectomy.

The controversial outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) highlight the need for developing effective systemic neoadjuvant treatment strategies to improve clinical results. The optimal treatment cycles in patients with mCRC for metastasectomy remain undefined. This retrospective study compared the efficacy, safety, and survival of cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy/targeted therapy for such patients. Sixty-four patients with mCRC who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy/targeted therapy following metastasectomy were enrolled between January 2018 and April 2022. Twenty-eight patients received 6 cycles of chemotherapy/targeted therapy, whereas 36 patients received ≥7 cycles (median, 13; range, 7-20). Clinical outcomes, including response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events, were compared between these two groups. Of the 64 patients, 47 (73.4%) were included in the response group, and 17 (26.6%) were included in the nonresponse group. The analysis revealed chemotherapy/targeted therapy cycle and pretreatment serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level as independent predictors of the response as well as overall survival and chemotherapy/targeted therapy cycle as an independent predictor of progression (all p < 0.05). Furthermore, our results revealed shorter operation time, lower estimated operative blood loss, higher response rate, lower progression rate, and higher survival rate in ≥7 cycles of chemotherapy/targeted therapy group (all p < 0.05), but no statistical differences in adverse events were observed between the two groups (all p > 0.05). The median OS and PFS were 48 months (95% CI, 40.855-55.145) and 28 months (95% CI, 18.952-37.48) in the ≥7-cycle group and 24 months (95% CI, 22.038-25.962) and 13 months (95% CI, 11.674-14.326) in the 6-cycle group, respectively (both p < 0.001). The oncological outcomes in the ≥7-cycle group were significantly better than those in the 6-cycle group, without significant increases in adverse events. However, prospective randomized trials are mandatory to confirm the potential advantages of cycle numbers of neoadjuvant chemotherapy/targeted therapy.

Praziquantel Treatment of Schistosoma mansoni Infected Mice Renders Them Less Susceptible to Reinfection.

Beyond transient control of the infection, additional benefits of mass drug administration of praziquantel in endemic communities have been suggested in communities but not mechanistically investigated experimentally. The present study sought to evaluate the additional and hitherto unreported benefits of repeated mass drug administration of praziquantel. We used a tractable mouse model of Schistosoma mansoni infection to assess the effects of repeated infection-treatment cycles on the host susceptibility to reinfection. Parasitaemia was assessed by quantification of Schistosoma egg burden in liver tissues and morbidity was followed up by histological observation of liver lesions by microscopy and using biochemical measurement of liver transaminases. Immune responses were further determined by serum probing of schistosoma-specific antibodies, cytokines and quantification of liver cellular and soluble mediator responses by flow cytometry and ELISA, respectively. At similar ages and comparable gender distribution, groups of mice undergoing higher number of infections treatment cycles over a longer period, remained susceptible to reinfection by the parasite, as judged by the presence of eggs and the associated increasing pathology in the liver tissues. However, notably, there was a clear and significantly higher propensity to lower egg burden upon reinfection when compared to counterparts undergoing a lower number of infection-treatment cycles. This relative reduction of susceptibility to infection was paralleled by a more robust humoral response against parasite antigens, elevated serum IL-4 and liver cytokines. Of note, praziquantel treatment of infected mice left them at a higher baseline of serum IL-4, IgE and liver cytokines but lower CD4+ T cell -derived cytokines when compared to infected non-treated mice supporting an immunological treatment-induced advantage of previously infected mice over naïve mice and infected/not treated mice. Notably, repeated infection-treatment cycles did not preclude the infection-driven aggravation of collagen deposition in the livers over time and was corroborated by a more robust local production of inflammatory cytokines in the most exposed livers. Taken together, our data reveal that treatment of S. mansoni-infected hosts with praziquantel rewires the immune system to a conformation less permissive to subsequent reinfection in mice. Provided the data are translatable from mouse to human, our findings may provide mechanistic support to the potential benefits of more frequent MDAs in high transmission areas to allow rapid acquisition of protective immunity against reinfection.

The choice of a neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycle for breast cancer has significance in clinical practice: results from a population-based, real world study.

OBJECTIVE: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is currently used in both early stage and locally advanced breast cancers. The survival benefits of standard vs. non-standard NAC cycles are still unclear. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between NAC cycles and survival based on real world data. METHODS: We identified patients diagnosed with invasive primary breast cancers who underwent NAC followed by surgery. Patients who received at least 4 NAC cycles were defined as having received standard cycles, while patients who received less than 4 NAC cycles were defined as having received non-standard cycles. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of the 1,024 included patients, 700 patients received standard NAC cycles and 324 patients received non-standard NAC cycles. The DFS estimates were 87.1% and 81.0% (P = 0.007) and the OS estimates were 90.0% and 82.6% (P = 0.001) in the standard and non-standard groups, respectively. Using multivariate analyses, patients treated with standard NAC cycles showed significant survival benefits in both DFS [hazard ratio (HR): 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.44-0.88] and OS (HR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.37-0.79). Using stratified analyses, standard NAC cycles were associated with improved DFS (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.36-0.96) and OS (HR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.28-0.86) in the HER2 positive group. Similar DFS (HR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.25-0.98) and OS (HR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.22-0.91) benefits were shown for the triple negative group. CONCLUSIONS: Standard NAC cycles were associated with a significant survival benefit, especially in patients with HER2 positive or triple negative breast cancer.

Time to next pregnancy in spontaneous pregnancies versus treatment cycles in fertile patients with recurrent pregnancy loss.

BACKGROUND: The current standard of care for management of patients with recurrent pregnancy loss is expectant management. However, the emotional impact of pregnancy losses and the urgency to conceive often leads couples to consider a variety of fertility treatments. The objective of this study is to report the time to next pregnancy and subsequent live birth and miscarriage rates in fertile patients with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) who choose to attempt spontaneous conception compared to those that opt to pursue fertility treatment. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of one hundred and fifty-eight fertile RPL patients treated at a university-based fertility center. Patients were followed for a minimum of 6 months. Patients were encouraged to attempt spontaneous conception, but allowed to initiate fertility treatments (ovarian stimulation, insemination, IVF or PGS) according to their preferences. Main outcome measures were time to next pregnancy and pregnancy outcome. RESULTS: For those patients who achieved a spontaneous conception, 88% conceived within 6 months, with a median time of 2 months and range of 1-10 months. Patients using IUI, IVF and PGS conceived in a median of 3, 4 and 5 months, respectively. The live birth rate and clinical miscarriage rate was not improved with any fertility treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In the fertile RPL patient population, there does not appear to be a benefit to proceeding directly with fertility treatment. Patients should be encouraged to attempt spontaneous conception for at least 6 months.

5-Fluorouracil for the treatment of intraepithelial neoplasia and squamous cell carcinoma of the conjunctiva, and cornea.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and risks of complications of pulse dosing of topical 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in the treatment of corneal intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), and conjunctival squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). DESIGN: Prospective, noncomparative case series. PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen patients with histological evidence CIN or SCC of the conjunctiva and cornea were identified by tumor biopsy. METHODS: All patients clinically evident of CIN, or SCC were evaluated, with maximum 30 months of follow-up were treated with pulsed dosing of 1% 5-FU. Treatment cycles were defined as four times per day for 4 days using the medication followed by 30 days without medication. The number of initial treatment was six cycles. RESULTS: The mean age of the 15 patients was 50.8 years (range 25-78 years). Excision biopsy proved seven cases as CIN, and eight cases as locally invasive SCC. All patients remained disease free with a mean follow-up of 14.53 months (range 6-30 months). Additional chemotherapy was given after the initial treatment cycles, only for one case. 5-FU caused mild temporary local irritation, but no long-term intraocular or extra ocular complications. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant 1% topical 5-FU appears to be effective in the prevention of recurrence of conjunctival or corneal CIN and SCC after excision biopsy. Our results indicate that at least six cycles of topical 1% 5-FU is required to prevent local recurrence in the long term. It is well-tolerated and an effective method of treatment. No complications that would preclude use of our dose regimen were noted.