Anatomical changes in the male pelvis between the supine and upright positions-A feasibility study for prostate treatments in the upright position.

Treating and imaging patients in the upright orientation is gaining acceptance in radiation oncology and radiology and has distinct advantages over the recumbent position. An IRB approved study to investigate the positions and orientations of the male pelvic organs between the supine and upright positions was conducted. The study comprised of scanning 15 male volunteers (aged 55-75 years) on a 0.6 T Fonar MRI scanner in the supine and upright positions with a full bladder and in the upright position with an empty bladder. The Pelvic study revealed that in the upright position the 1. Position and shape of the prostate are not impacted significantly by bladder fill. 2. Distance between the sacrum and the anterior bladder wall is significantly smaller. 3. Anterior-Posterior length and the bladder width is significantly larger. 4. Seminal vesicles are pushed down by the bladder. 5. Top of the penile bulb is further away from the apex of the prostate. These observed differences could positively impact upright prostate treatments by 1. Reducing the risk of small bowel approximating the treatment volume. 2. Prostate treatments can be done with a reduced focus on bladder fill. 3. Radiation beams for treating intermediate risk prostrate can be made smaller or a larger portion of the seminal vesicles can be treated with the same beam size than typically used for supine treatments. 4. Reducing the average dose to the penile bulb.

The use of image synthesis techniques in target and roi delineation in the upright position.

The use of multi-modality imaging technologies such as CT, MRI, and PET imaging is state of the art for radiation therapy treatment planning. Except for a limited number of low magnetic field MR scanners the majority of such imaging technologies can only image the patient in a recumbent position. Delivering radiation therapy treatments with the patient in an upright orientation has many benefits and several companies are now developing upright patient positioners combined with upright diagnostic helical CT scanners to facilitate upright radiation therapy treatments. Due to the directional changes in the gravitational forces on the patient's body, most structures and organs will change position and shape between the recumbent and upright positions. Detailed knowledge about such structures and organs are therefore often only available in the recumbent position. The problem statement is therefore well defined, that is, how do we know where such structures and organs, that is, the target or region at risk volumes, are in the upright position if those cannot be identified and or delineated accurately enough using the upright diagnostic quality CT images only? This paper outlines two methods based on synthetic CT or MR images to overcome this problem.

Comparison Between Prone and Upright Imaging of the Inferior Wall Using 201TlCl Myocardial Perfusion SPECT.

Because it suppresses attenuation artifacts from the diaphragm, prone SPECT is suitable for evaluating the cardiac inferior wall. A solid-state dedicated cardiac camera allows upright imaging, which can also be used to avoid attenuation artifacts from the diaphragm. We compared prone and upright imaging for inferior wall evaluation using 201TlCl myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS). Methods: The study targeted 45 patients. The prone imaging group included 23 subjects who underwent additional prone imaging because supine imaging indicated that the inferior wall had reduced uptake. The upright imaging group included 22 subjects who, in the past, had shown reduced uptake in the inferior wall during supine imaging. Using the MPS stress images and analysis software, we created a polar map showing the incorporation of the radioisotope throughout the whole of the myocardium; this polar map was then classified into 17 segments. The percentage uptake ratios of the inferior/anterior wall were calculated for the prone and upright acquisitions. These ratios were used as the ratio of percentage uptake in each segment of the anterior wall to percentage uptake in each segment of the inferior wall. In addition, 6 reviewers visually evaluated the uniformity within the inferior wall for both the prone and the upright imaging. Results: There was a significant difference in percentage uptake ratios between the prone and upright images in segments 4/1 (basal inferior/basal anterior; P < 0.05), 11/12 (mid inferolateral/mid anterolateral; P < 0.001), and 15/13 (apical inferior/apical anterior; P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the prone and upright images in visual evaluations of uniformity within the inferior wall. Conclusion: In comparison with upright imaging, prone imaging has a higher rate of suppression of attenuation artifacts from the diaphragm. However, this difference does not seem to affect the images visually. Therefore, upright and prone imaging can be used interchangeably to evaluate the inferior wall.

Concept of an upright wearable positron emission tomography imager in humans.

BACKGROUND: Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is traditionally used to image patients in restrictive positions, with few devices allowing for upright, brain-dedicated imaging. Our team has explored the concept of wearable PET imagers which could provide functional brain imaging of freely moving subjects. To test feasibility and determine future considerations for development, we built a rudimentary proof-of-concept prototype (Helmet_PET) and conducted tests in phantoms and four human volunteers. METHODS: Twelve Silicon Photomultiplier-based detectors were assembled in a ring with exterior weight support and an interior mechanism that could be adjustably fitted to the head. We conducted brain phantom tests as well as scanned four patients scheduled for diagnostic F(18-) FDG PET/CT imaging. For human subjects the imager was angled such that field of view included basal ganglia and visual cortex to test for typical resting-state pattern. Imaging in two subjects was performed ~4 hr after PET/CT imaging to simulate lower injected F(18-) FDG dose by taking advantage of the natural radioactive decay of the tracer (F(18) half-life of 110 min), with an estimated imaging dosage of 25% of the standard. RESULTS: We found that imaging with a simple lightweight ring of detectors was feasible using a fraction of the standard radioligand dose. Activity levels in the human participants were quantitatively similar to standard PET in a set of anatomical ROIs. Typical resting-state brain pattern activation was demonstrated even in a 1 min scan of active head rotation. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of imaging a human subject with a novel wearable PET imager that moves with robust head movements. We discuss potential research and clinical applications that will drive the design of a fully functional device. Designs will need to consider trade-offs between a low weight device with high mobility and a heavier device with greater sensitivity and larger field of view.