Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 61
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Asthma ; 61(6): 608-618, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38112563

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Work-related asthma has become a highly prevalent occupational lung disorder. OBJECTIVE: Our study aims to evaluate occupational exposure as a predictor for asthma exacerbation. METHOD: We performed a retrospective evaluation of 584 consecutive patients diagnosed and treated for asthma between October 2017 and December 2019 in four clinics from Western Romania. We evaluated the enrolled patients for their asthma control level by employing the Asthma Control Test (ACT < 20 represents uncontrolled asthma), the medical record of asthma exacerbations, occupational exposure, and lung function (i.e. spirometry). Then, we used statistical and data mining methods to explore the most important predictors for asthma exacerbations. RESULTS: We identified essential predictors by calculating the odds ratios (OR) for the exacerbation in a logistic regression model. The average age was 45.42 ± 11.74 years (19-85 years), and 422 (72.26%) participants were females. 42.97% of participants had exacerbations in the past year, and 31.16% had a history of occupational exposure. In a multivariate model analysis adjusted for age and gender, the most important predictors for exacerbation were uncontrolled asthma (OR 4.79, p < .001), occupational exposure (OR 4.65, p < .001), and lung function impairment (FEV1 < 80%) (OR 1.15, p = .011). The ensemble machine learning experiments on combined patient features harnessed by our data mining approach reveal that the best predictor is professional exposure, followed by ACT. CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning ensemble methods and statistical analysis concordantly indicate that occupational exposure and ACT < 20 are strong predictors for asthma exacerbation.


Assuntos
Asma , Mineração de Dados , Exposição Ocupacional , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Análise Multivariada , Adulto Jovem , Asma/fisiopatologia , Asma/diagnóstico , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Exposição Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Progressão da Doença , Asma Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Asma Ocupacional/fisiopatologia , Modelos Logísticos
2.
Am J Ind Med ; 67(6): 532-538, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38583075

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Work-related asthma (WRA), a preventable occupational disease, can result in adverse health outcomes and employment disability, including decreased productivity, lost workdays, and job loss. Early identification of WRA cases and avoidance of further exposures is crucial for optimal management. OBJECTIVE: We estimate WRA prevalence among US workers by selected sociodemographic characteristics, industry, and occupation groups and assess the differences in adverse health outcomes, preventive care, and lost workdays between persons with WRA and those with non-WRA. METHODS: The 2020 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data for working adults aged ≥18 years employed in the 12 months before the survey were analyzed. Prevalence, and adjusted prevalence ratios with 95% confidence intervals were estimated using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the estimated 170 million US adults working in the past year, 13.0 million (7.6%) had asthma. Among workers with asthma, an estimated 896,000 (6.9%) had WRA. WRA prevalence was highest among males, workers aged ≥55 years, those with no health insurance, those living in the Midwest, and those employed in the accommodation, food, and other services industry, and in production, installation, transportation, and material moving occupations. Workers with WRA were significantly more likely to use preventive medication and rescue inhalers, and to experience adverse health outcomes and lost workdays than workers with non-WRA. CONCLUSION: Early identification of WRA cases, assessment of workplace exposures, and implementation of targeted interventions that consider the hierarchy of controls are critical to preventing future WRA cases and associated adverse health consequences.


Assuntos
Asma Ocupacional , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente , Asma Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Asma/epidemiologia , Modelos Logísticos , Emprego/estatística & dados numéricos , Ocupações/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Indústrias/estatística & dados numéricos
3.
Am J Ind Med ; 66(6): 529-539, 2023 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36906884

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Work-related asthma (WRA) is the most prevalent occupational respiratory disease, and it has negative effects on socioeconomic standing, asthma control, quality of life, and mental health status. Most of the studies on WRA consequences are from high-income countries; there is a lack of information on these effects in Latin America and in middle-income countries. METHODS: This study compared socioeconomic, asthma control, quality of life, and psychological outcomes among individuals diagnosed with WRA and non-work-related asthma (NWRA) in a middle-income country. Patients with asthma, related and not related to work, were interviewed using a structured questionnaire to assess their occupational history and socioeconomic conditions, and with questionnaires to assess asthma control (Asthma Control Test and Asthma Control Questionnaire-6), quality of life (Juniper's Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire), and presence of anxiety and depression symptoms (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). Each patient's medical record was reviewed for exams and use of medication, and comparisons were made between individuals with WRA and NWRA. RESULTS: The study included 132 patients with WRA and 130 with NWRA. Individuals with WRA had worse socioeconomic outcomes, worse asthma control, more quality-of-life impairment, and a higher prevalence of anxiety and depression than individuals with NWRA. Among individuals with WRA, those who had been removed from occupational exposure had a worse socioeconomic impact. CONCLUSIONS: Consequences on socioeconomic, asthma control, quality of life, and psychological status are worse for WRA individuals when compared with NWRA.


Assuntos
Asma Ocupacional , Asma , Doenças Profissionais , Exposição Ocupacional , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Transversais , Asma/epidemiologia , Asma/diagnóstico , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Doenças Profissionais/diagnóstico , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Controle de Qualidade , Asma Ocupacional/epidemiologia
4.
BMC Pulm Med ; 22(1): 170, 2022 Apr 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35488256

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cleaning workers represent a significant proportion of the active population worldwide, with poor remuneration, particularly in developing countries. Despite this, they remain a relatively poorly studied occupational group. They are constantly exposed to agents that can cause symptoms and respiratory problems. This study aimed to evaluate upper airway inflammation in professional cleaning workers in three different occupational settings by comparing nasal cytology inflammation and clinical profiles. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study on the prevalence of upper airway inflammation and symptoms of asthma/rhinitis related to cleaning work, according to workplace. A total of 167 participants were divided into four groups: hospital, university, housekeeper and control. A nasal swab was collected for upper airway inflammation evaluation. Clinical profiles and respiratory symptom employee evaluations were performed using specific questionnaires (European Community Respiratory Health Survey-ECRS and the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood-ISAAC). RESULTS: Cleaning workers showed increased neutrophils and lymphocytes; the hospital and university groups showed increased macrophages compared to the housekeeper and control groups. The hospital and housekeeper groups showed increased eosinophils when they performed cleaning services for up to one year and reported having more asthma symptoms than the control group. Cleaning workers showed increased rhinitis symptoms. The university group showed increased rhinitis symptoms aggravated by the workplace compared with the hospital and housekeeper groups. Cleaning workers showed an increased affirmative response when directly asked about rhinitis symptoms compared to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Cleaning workers showed airway inflammation, asthma symptoms and rhinitis, regardless of the occupational environment to which they were exposed, as well as showed increased rhinitis and asthma symptoms. Hospital cleaning workers showed increased macrophages, lymphocytes and eosinophils compared to the others. The length of time spent performing cleaning work was not related to nasal inflammation or respiratory symptoms in this population. However, there were differences in workplaces. Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03311048. Registration date: 10.16.2017. Retrospectively registered.


Assuntos
Asma , Doenças Profissionais , Rinite , Asma/complicações , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Inflamação/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/induzido quimicamente , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Rinite/complicações , Rinite/epidemiologia , Local de Trabalho
5.
Am J Ind Med ; 65(1): 12-19, 2022 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34671999

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Outbreaks of severe silicosis have affected workers who fabricate artificial stone countertops. Work-related asthma (WRA) has not been a prominent feature of those prior outbreaks. METHODS: This report describes an outbreak of WRA and silicosis at a facility that manufactures and fabricates chemical-resistant countertops comprised of sand, epoxy resin, and phthalic anhydride (PA), a known respiratory sensitizer. The multi-disciplinary investigation included clinical examinations of workers, an industrial hygiene survey with qualitative and quantitative exposure assessments, and a cross-sectional questionnaire. RESULTS: Engineering controls and personal protective equipment were inadequate. Some workers were exposed to PA or silica above permissible exposure limits established by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Clinical and epidemiologic investigations identified 16 workers with confirmed or suspected WRA. Two years later, after OSHA began to enforce its new silica standards, 12 workers received medical surveillance for silicosis. Of these 12 workers, four (33.3%) were diagnosed with silicosis based on abnormal chest computed tomography examinations. CONCLUSIONS: Artificial stone countertop workers can develop asthma or silicosis. Risk of asthma may be highest in workers exposed to asthmagens such as PA and epoxy resins while manufacturing the artificial stone material.


Assuntos
Asma , Exposição Ocupacional , Silicose , Asma/epidemiologia , Asma/etiologia , Estudos Transversais , Surtos de Doenças , Humanos , Exposição Ocupacional/análise , Exposição Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Dióxido de Silício , Silicose/epidemiologia , Silicose/etiologia
6.
Am J Ind Med ; 65(5): 382-395, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35267214

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Health workers (HWs) are exposed to diverse cleaning agents in large hospitals. This study determined the prevalence of work-related symptoms, allergic sensitization, and lung function abnormalities in HWs of two tertiary hospitals in Southern Africa. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 699 HWs (South Africa: SAH, n = 346; Tanzania: TAH, n = 353) was conducted. Health outcomes were assessed using a standardized ECRHS questionnaire, immunological tests (specific IgE antibody to common aero-allergens and to occupational allergens: natural rubber latex [NRL]  Hev b5 and Hev b6.02, chlorhexidine, and ortho-phthalaldehyde [OPA]), spirometry [pre-and post- bronchodilator], methacholine challenge, and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO). RESULTS: A large proportion of participants (78%) were women. Median age was 42 years, with 76% nurses, 12% cleaners, and 5% administrative workers. Current smoking was more common in SAHWs (12%) than TAHWs (1%). The overall prevalence of doctor-diagnosed asthma was 7%. Atopy was present in 43% of HWs, while 4% were sensitized to OPA, 2% to NRL, and 1% to chlorhexidine. Prevalence of work-related ocular-nasal symptoms (16%) was higher than skin (12%) and chest (7%) symptoms. TAHWs had significantly lower mean lung volumes, higher degrees of significant airflow obstruction and impaired lung function. The prevalence of bronchial hyperresponsiveness in SAHWs (14%) was high. Overall, 23% of HWs had abnormal FeNO; 6% having high (>50 ppb) levels. FeNO was positively associated with sensitization to occupational allergens, primarily OPA and NRL. CONCLUSIONS: HWs from both hospitals had similar prevalence of work-related respiratory symptoms. Sensitization to OPA and NRL appears to be contributing to allergic airway inflammation in these HWs.


Assuntos
Asma , Hipersensibilidade , Adulto , Alérgenos , Asma/diagnóstico , Clorexidina , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade/epidemiologia , Óxido Nítrico , Borracha , Centros de Atenção Terciária
7.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 148(4): 1072-1080, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34331994

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Work exposures play a significant role in adult-onset asthma, but the mechanisms of work-related asthma are not fully elucidated. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to reveal the molecular mechanisms of work-related asthma associated with exposure to flour (flour asthma), isocyanate (isocyanate asthma), or welding fumes (welding asthma) and identify potential biomarkers that distinguish these groups from each other. METHODS: We used a combination of clinical tests, transcriptomic analysis, and associated pathway analyses to investigate the underlying disease mechanisms of the blood immune cells and the airway epithelium of 61 men. RESULTS: Compared with the healthy controls, the welding asthma patients had more differentially expressed genes than the flour asthma and isocyanate asthma patients, both in the airway epithelia and in the blood immune cells. In the airway epithelia, active inflammation was detected only in welding asthma patients. In contrast, many differentially expressed genes were detected in blood cells in all 3 asthma groups. Disease-related immune functions in blood cells, including leukocyte migration and inflammatory responses, and decreased expression of upstream cytokines such as TNF and IFN-γ were suppressed in all the asthma groups. In transcriptome-phenotype correlations, hyperresponsiveness (R ∼ |0.6|) had the highest clinical relevance and was associated with a set of exposure group-specific genes. Finally, biomarker subsets of only 5 genes specifically distinguished each of the asthma exposure groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides novel data on the molecular mechanisms underlying work-related asthma. We identified a set of 5 promising biomarkers in asthma related to flour, isocyanate, and welding fume exposure to be tested and clinically validated in future studies.


Assuntos
Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar/efeitos adversos , Asma Ocupacional/genética , Farinha/efeitos adversos , Exposição por Inalação/efeitos adversos , Isocianatos/efeitos adversos , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Soldagem , Adulto , Asma Ocupacional/sangue , Asma Ocupacional/imunologia , Asma Ocupacional/fisiopatologia , Biomarcadores , Biópsia , Movimento Celular , Citocinas/sangue , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica , Humanos , Imunoglobulina E/sangue , Leucócitos/imunologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mucosa Nasal/patologia , Óxido Nítrico/metabolismo , Testes de Função Respiratória
8.
J Asthma ; 58(8): 1032-1041, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32308078

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Workers exposed to cobalt may develop two lung conditions, asthma or lung fibrosis. There is a relative lack of awareness of the risk of lung disease from cobalt exposure. METHODS: The state of Michigan requires physicians, and hospitals to report work-related asthma (WRA). A standardized telephone interview of each reported case was conducted. An industrial hygienist evaluated the reported cases's workplace, and a physician reviewed the results to confirm the diagnosis. This is a population-based case series of all workers in whom the exposure to cobalt was confirmed as likely responsible for WRA from 1988 to 2017. We also included an illustrative case report and data on the workplace evaluations. RESULTS: Of the 35 cases identified, 77% were males, 97.1% were white, and 62.9% had a history of smoking cigarettes. Fifteen (44%) cases were involved in manufacturing cutting tools and machine tool accessories. Symptoms improved in 28 cases (80%) when away from work. Fourteen cases (40%) had emergency department visits, while 10 (28.6%) had been hospitalized for breathing problems. Spirometry had been performed for 33 (94.3%) cases. Only 13 (37.1%) reported they were informed by a doctor that their asthma was work-related. Twenty-six inspections were conducted at 21 different workplaces, where 498 coworkers were interviewed, 55 (11%) of which had respiratory symptoms at work. Six workplaces were cited for cobalt air level higher than permissible limits. These inspections resulted in $29,380 in penalties. CONCLUSIONS: WRA secondary to cobalt is associated with significant morbidity. Most of the cases were unaware of their medical diagnosis.


Assuntos
Asma/induzido quimicamente , Cobalto/efeitos adversos , Doenças Profissionais/induzido quimicamente , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Asma/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Humanos , Pulmão/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Profissionais/fisiopatologia , Adulto Jovem
9.
Am J Ind Med ; 64(3): 165-169, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33373055

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The objective was to update the 2011 Cochrane systematic review on the effectiveness of workplace interventions for the treatment of occupational asthma. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted with the selection of articles and reports through 2019. The quality of extracted data was evaluated, and meta-analyses were conducted using techniques recommended by the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. RESULTS: Data were extracted from 26 nonrandomized controlled before-and-after studies. The mean number of participants per study was 62 and the mean follow-up time was 4.5 years. Compared with continued exposure, removal from exposure had an increased likelihood of improved symptoms and change in spirometry. Reduction of exposure also had more favorable results for symptom improvement than continued exposure, but no difference for change in spirometry. Comparing exposure removal to reduction revealed an advantage for removal with both symptom improvement and change in spirometry for the larger group of patients exposed to low-molecular-weight agents. Also, the risk of unemployment was greater for exposure removal versus reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure removal and reduction had better outcomes than continued exposure. Removal from exposure was more likely to improve symptoms and spirometry than reduction among patients exposed to low-molecular-weight agents. The potential benefits associated with exposure removal versus reduction need to be weighed against the potential for unemployment that is more likely with removal from exposure. The findings are based on data graded as very low quality, and additional studies are needed to generate higher quality data.


Assuntos
Asma Ocupacional/terapia , Exposição Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Serviços de Saúde do Trabalhador/métodos , Adulto , Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar/efeitos adversos , Asma Ocupacional/etiologia , Recuperação e Remediação Ambiental , Feminino , Redução do Dano , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Espirometria , Local de Trabalho
10.
Allergy ; 75(11): 2753-2763, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32279350

RESUMO

Women's work has traditionally been considered less hazardous to health in comparison with men's work. The increased women's participation in the workforce has led to an increased attention to women's working conditions. Women and men are unequally represented in individual professions or sectors (horizontal segregation), with women also under-represented in leadership positions (vertical segregation). The selection of specific occupations can result in differences between types and levels of occupational exposures among women and men and can affect prevalence of occupational allergy. Gender distribution of work-related asthma appears to vary across countries without clear global difference. Occupational rhinitis tends to be higher in women, although is not clear if this is related to a sex/gender effect or to differences in work exposure. Women are more likely to have occupational contact dermatitis, mainly due to wet work. No clear effects of gender on rates of hypersensitivity pneumonitis have been shown. Besides variation in exposures, physical and physiological characteristics, different behaviours and health consciousness have an impact on the occupational health hazards of women and men. Occupational allergy health promotion strategies need to consider approaches for women and men adjusted by gender, and legislative actions similarly could be implemented in a more gender-sensitive way.


Assuntos
Alveolite Alérgica Extrínseca , Hipersensibilidade , Exposição Ocupacional , Feminino , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade/epidemiologia , Hipersensibilidade/etiologia , Masculino , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Prevalência , Opinião Pública , Fatores Sexuais
11.
J Asthma ; 57(11): 1179-1187, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31303076

RESUMO

Objective: Concurrent asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) diagnoses occur in 15%-20% of patients, and have been associated with worse health outcomes than asthma or COPD alone. Work-related asthma (WRA), asthma that is caused or made worse by exposures in the workplace, is characterized by poorly controlled asthma. The objective of this study was to assess the proportion of ever-employed adults (≥18 years) with current asthma who have been diagnosed with COPD, by WRA status.Methods: Data from 23 137 respondents to the 2012-2014 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Asthma Call-back Survey from 31 states and the District of Columbia were examined. Logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted prevalence ratios (PRs), examining six disjoint categories of WRA-COPD overlap with non-WRA/no COPD as the referent category.Results: An estimated 51.9% of adults with WRA and 25.6% of adults with non-WRA had ever been diagnosed with COPD. Adults with WRA/COPD were more likely than those with non-WRA/no COPD to have an asthma attack (PR = 1.77), urgent treatment for worsening asthma (PR = 2.85), an asthma-related emergency room visit (PR = 4.21), overnight stay in a hospital because of asthma (PR = 6.57), an activity limitation on 1-13 days (PR = 2.01) or ≥14 days (PR = 5.02), and very poorly controlled asthma (PR = 3.22).Conclusions: COPD was more frequently diagnosed among adults with WRA than those with non-WRA, and adults diagnosed with both WRA and COPD appear to have more severe adverse asthma outcomes than those with non-WRA and no COPD.


Assuntos
Asma Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Adulto , Antiasmáticos/uso terapêutico , Asma Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Asma Ocupacional/tratamento farmacológico , Sistema de Vigilância de Fator de Risco Comportamental , Broncodilatadores/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Prevalência , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/etiologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
12.
Biomed Eng Online ; 19(1): 93, 2020 Dec 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33298072

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Fractional-order (FrOr) models have a high potential to improve pulmonary science. These models could be useful for biomechanical studies and diagnostic purposes, offering accurate models with an improved ability to describe nature. This paper evaluates the performance of the Forced Oscillation (FO) associated with integer (InOr) and FrOr models in the analysis of respiratory alterations in work-related asthma (WRA). METHODS: Sixty-two individuals were evaluated: 31 healthy and 31 with WRA with mild obstruction. Patients were analyzed pre- and post-bronchodilation. The diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). To evaluate how well do the studied models correspond to observed data, we analyzed the mean square root of the sum (MSEt) and the relative distance (Rd) of the estimated model values to the measured resistance and reactance measured values. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Initially, the use of InOr and FrOr models increased our understanding of the WRA physiopathology, showing increased peripheral resistance, damping, and hysteresivity. The FrOr model (AUC = 0.970) outperformed standard FO (AUC = 0.929), as well as InOr modeling (AUC = 0.838) in the diagnosis of respiratory changes, achieving high accuracy. FrOr improved the curve fitting (MSEt = 0.156 ± 0.340; Rd = 3.026 ± 1.072) in comparison with the InOr model (MSEt = 0.367 ± 0.991; Rd = 3.363 ± 1.098). Finally, we demonstrated that bronchodilator use increased dynamic compliance, as well as reduced damping and peripheral resistance. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, these results show clear evidence of the utility of FO associated with fractional-order modeling in patients with WRA, improving our knowledge of the biomechanical abnormalities and the diagnostic accuracy in this disease.


Assuntos
Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/fisiopatologia , Modelos Biológicos , Mecânica Respiratória , Adulto , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Pulmão/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
13.
Am J Ind Med ; 63(5): 417-428, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32154609

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Asthma-related health outcomes are known to be associated with indoor moisture and renovations. The objective of this study was to estimate the frequency of these indoor environmental quality (IEQ) factors in healthcare facilities and their association with asthma-related outcomes among workers. METHODS: New York City healthcare workers (n = 2030) were surveyed regarding asthma-related symptoms, and moisture and renovation factors at work and at home during the last 12 months. Questions for workplace moisture addressed water damage (WD), mold growth (MG), and mold odor (MO), while for renovations they addressed painting (P), floor renovations (FR), and wall renovations (WR). Regression models were fit to examine associations between work and home IEQ factors and multiple asthma-related outcomes. RESULTS: Reports of any moisture (n = 728, 36%) and renovations (n = 1412, 70%) at work were common. Workplace risk factors for asthma-related outcomes included the moisture categories of WD by itself, WD with MO (without MG), and WD with MG and MO, and the renovation category with the three factors P, FR, and WR. Reports of home IEQ factors were less frequent and less likely to be associated with health outcomes. Data analyses suggested that MG and/or MO at work and at home had a synergistic effect on the additive scale with a symptom-based algorithm for bronchial hyperresponsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: The current study determined that moisture and renovation factors are common in healthcare facilities, potentially putting workers at risk for asthma-related outcomes. More research is needed to confirm these results, especially prospective studies.


Assuntos
Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/análise , Asma Ocupacional/etiologia , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Exposição Ocupacional/análise , Local de Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Arquitetura Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Umidade/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cidade de Nova Iorque , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Análise de Regressão , Fatores de Risco
14.
Allergy ; 74(10): 1852-1871, 2019 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30953601

RESUMO

Occupational exposure to foods is responsible for up to 25% of cases of occupational asthma and rhinitis. Animal and vegetable high-molecular-weight proteins present in aerosolized foods during food processing, additives, preservatives, antioxidants, and food contaminants are the main inhalant allergen sources. Most agents typically cause IgE-mediated allergic reactions, causing a distinct form of food allergy (Class 3 food allergy). The allergenicity of a food protein, allergen exposure levels, and atopy are important risk factors. Diagnosis relies on a thorough medical and occupational history, functional assessment, assessment of sensitization, including component-resolved diagnostics where appropriate, and in selected cases specific inhalation tests. Exposure assessment, including allergen determination, is a cornerstone for establishing preventive measures. Management includes allergen exposure avoidance or reduction (second best option), pharmacological treatment, assessment of impairment, and worker's compensation. Further studies are needed to identify and characterize major food allergens and define occupational exposure limits, evaluate the relative contribution of respiratory versus cutaneous sensitization to food antigens, evaluate the role of raw versus cooked food in influencing risk, and define the absolute or relative contraindication of patients with ingestion-related food allergy, pollinosis, or oral allergy syndrome continuing to work with exposure to aerosolized food allergens.


Assuntos
Manipulação de Alimentos , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/imunologia , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Hipersensibilidade Respiratória/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade Respiratória/etiologia , Asma Ocupacional , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Gerenciamento Clínico , Suscetibilidade a Doenças , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/epidemiologia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/terapia , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade Respiratória/epidemiologia , Hipersensibilidade Respiratória/terapia , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco
15.
Allergy ; 73(3): 653-663, 2018 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28960398

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The mechanisms of work-related asthma (WRA) are incompletely delineated. Nasal cell samples may be informative about processes in the lower airways. Our aim was to determine the nasal protein expression profiles of WRA caused by different kind of exposures. METHODS: We collected nasal brush samples from 82 nonsmoking participants, including healthy controls and WRA patients exposed to (i) protein allergens, (ii) isocyanates and (iii) welding fumes the day after relevant exposure. The proteome changes in samples were analysed by two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis, and the differentially regulated proteins found were identified by mass spectrometry. Immunological comparison was carried out using Western blot. RESULTS: We detected an average of 2500 spots per protein gel. Altogether, 228 protein spots were chosen for identification, yielding 77 different proteins. Compared to the controls, exposure to protein allergens had the largest effects on the proteome. Hierarchical clustering revealed that protein allergen- and isocyanate-related asthma had similar profiles, whereas asthma related to welding fumes differed. The highly overrepresented functional categories in the asthma groups were defence response, protease inhibitor activity, inflammatory and calcium signalling, complement activation and cellular response to oxidative stress. Immunological analysis confirmed the found abundance differences in galectin 10 and protein S100-A9 between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Work-related asthma patients exposed to protein allergens and isocyanates elicit similar nasal proteome responses and the profiles of welders and healthy controls were alike. Revealed biological activities of the protein expression changes are associated with allergic inflammation and asthma.


Assuntos
Asma Ocupacional/etiologia , Asma Ocupacional/imunologia , Mucosa Nasal/imunologia , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Alérgenos/imunologia , Asma Ocupacional/metabolismo , Humanos , Isocianatos/efeitos adversos , Isocianatos/imunologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mucosa Nasal/metabolismo , Proteoma , Soldagem
16.
Am J Ind Med ; 61(11): 952-958, 2018 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30232809

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cellulose is an insoluble plant polysaccharide produced from soft-wood pulp. Although chronic respiratory effects associated with high cellulose-based dust levels have been previously described, occupational asthma has not. A 37 year old machine operator in a sanitary pad production factory presented with new-onset work-related asthma symptoms for two years. METHODS: The worker underwent clinical, pulmonological and immunological (skin prick tests, serum specific IgE determinations) evaluation using standardised procedures. The cellulose product was subjected to scanning electron microscopy (SEM) examination. A specific inhalation challenge test performed with the cellulose product ensured that dust concentrations were kept below 5 mg/m3 . RESULTS: The subject was not atopic and did not have elevated IgE to pine wood or xylanase. The cellulose product appeared to be free of protein contaminants on SEM. The Work Effect Index computed on serial PEF recordings was elevated (WEI = 3.8).Specific inhalational challenge with the cellulose product dust revealed a late bronchial response (39% drop in FEV1 at 3 hours post challenge). CONCLUSION: This is the first reported case of occupational asthma to a cellulose fibre product. A non-specific immune reaction or irritant response seems likely. These fibres may therefore not be biologically inert. The occupational exposure limit of 10 mg/m3 generally used for cellulose dust appears to be non-protective.


Assuntos
Asma Ocupacional/induzido quimicamente , Celulose , Poeira/análise , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Clareadores , Testes de Provocação Brônquica , Humanos , Masculino , Instalações Industriais e de Manufatura , Testes Cutâneos
17.
J Asthma ; 54(5): 537-542, 2017 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27494107

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: In Canada, asthma is the third leading cause of work loss, yet little is known about the associated productivity loss. The goal of this study was to look at the relationship between asthma control and productivity loss, particularly contrasting those with work-related asthma (WRA) and non-work-related asthma (NWRA). METHODS: A population-based random sample of adults with asthma in British Columbia, Canada, was prospectively recruited. Asthma control was graded according to Global Initiative for Asthma classification, while productivity loss and presence of WRA was assessed using questionnaires. Ordinal regression models were then used to associate WRA with asthma control. Generalized linear models were applied to estimate the average productivity loss associated with different levels of asthma control among those with WRA and NWRA. RESULTS: The study included 300 employed adults. Sixty (20%) had WRA. The odds of being controlled were significantly lower in those with WRA (OR = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.09, 0.56; P < 0.01). Those with WRA and uncontrolled asthma had a significant difference in productivity loss due to presenteeism ($659.1 [95% CI: 12.9, 1581.5; P = 0.04]), but not absenteeism ($88.7 [95% CI: -86.5, 279.6; P = 0.35]), when compared to those with NWRA and uncontrolled asthma. There was no significant difference when a similar comparison was made for those with controlled or partially controlled asthma. CONCLUSIONS: WRA is associated with worse asthma control and increased productivity loss. Presenteeism makes a significant contribution to productivity loss and should be considered when evaluating the overall economic burden of asthma, particularly WRA.


Assuntos
Asma/economia , Asma/terapia , Eficiência , Doenças Profissionais/economia , Doenças Profissionais/terapia , Absenteísmo , Adulto , Asma/epidemiologia , Canadá/epidemiologia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Econométricos , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
18.
Occup Med (Lond) ; 67(6): 477-483, 2017 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28898964

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Work-related asthma (WRA) is a prevalent occupational lung disease that is associated with undesirable effects on psychological status, quality of life (QoL), workplace activity and socioeconomic status. Previous studies have also indicated that clinic structure may impact outcomes among patients with asthma. AIMS: To identify the impact of clinic structure on psychological status, QoL, workplace limitations and socioeconomic status of patients with WRA among two different tertiary clinic models. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis between two tertiary clinics: clinic 1 had a traditional referral base and clinical staffing while clinic 2 entirely comprised Worker's Compensation System referrals and included an occupational hygienist and a return-to-work coordinator. Beck Anxiety and Depression II Inventories (BAI and BDI-II), Marks' Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (M-AQLQ) and Work Limitation Questionnaire (WLQ) were used to assess outcomes for patients with WRA. RESULTS: Clinic 2 participants had a better psychological status across the four instruments compared with clinic 1 (for Beck 'Anxiety': P < 0.001 and 'Depression': P < 0.01, 'Mood' domain of M-AQLQ: NS and 'Mental Demands' domain of WLQ: P < 0.01). Clinic 2 had a greater proportion of participants with reduced income. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that clinic structure may play a role in outcomes. Future research should examine this in larger sample sizes.


Assuntos
Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/normas , Asma Ocupacional/psicologia , Asma Ocupacional/reabilitação , Doenças Profissionais/psicologia , Doenças Profissionais/reabilitação , Adulto , Idoso , Transtornos de Ansiedade , Estudos Transversais , Depressão , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida , Retorno ao Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricos , Classe Social , Inquéritos e Questionários , Centros de Atenção Terciária/normas , Indenização aos Trabalhadores , Local de Trabalho
19.
Pak J Med Sci ; 33(5): 1230-1235, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29142570

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Work-related asthma (WRA) is one of the most common occupational diseases. In this study, we aimed to review diagnosing procedures and the characteristics of patients who were diagnosed with WRA. METHODS: Between November 2013 and June 2016; 214 patients were referred to our clinic with WRA suspicion by an occupational health specialist, personal visit, chest disease specialists [61 (28%), 51 (23%), and 102 (47%) respectively]. Occupational history, functional and radiological assessment, skin prick test, PEF monitoring were done. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients (25%) were diagnosed with OA, and 24 (11%) with WEA, total 78 workers were diagnosed with WRA. Twenty-five (32.1%) had allergic rhinitis, 13 (16.7%) had allergic dermatitis, and 8 (10%) had both diseases. CONCLUSION: WRA can be seen in many areas. Complaints are the basic route for admission to physician, and the diagnosis can be delayed for a long time as one year. Lower rates of referral by occupational health physicians are the signs of limitations on management of cases. Non-specific BPT and skin prick test for selected cases would be sufficient besides occupational history and clinical examination for the diagnosis of WRA. PEF assessment, one of the most important tests for the diagnosis of WRA, must be performed.

20.
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep ; 16(9): 63, 2016 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27520939

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Work-related asthma is a common disorder among adult asthma patients, and in the case of occupational asthma, it is induced by workplace exposures. RECENT FINDINGS: Occupational asthma provides an excellent model and benchmark for identifying and testing different allergy or inflammatory biomarkers associated with its inception or progression. Moreover, specific inhalation challenge with the incriminated agent represents an experimental setting to identify and validate potential systemic or local biomarkers. Some biomarkers are mainly blood-borne, while local airway biomarkers are derived from inflammatory or resident cells. Genetic and gene-environment interaction studies also provide an excellent framework to identify relevant profiles associated with the risk of developing these work-related conditions. Despite significant efforts to identify clinically relevant inflammatory and genomic markers for occupational asthma, apart from the documented utility of airway inflammatory biomarkers, it remains elusive to define specific markers or signatures clearly associated with different endpoints or outcomes in occupational asthma.


Assuntos
Asma Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Biomarcadores/química , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Asma/complicações , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA