Verification of acromion marker cluster and scapula spinal marker cluster methods for tracking shoulder kinematics: a comparative study with upright four-dimensional computed tomography.

BACKGROUND: This study validated the accuracy of the acromion marker cluster (AMC) and scapula spinal marker cluster (SSMC) methods compared with upright four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) analysis. METHODS: Sixteen shoulders of eight healthy males underwent AMC and SSMC assessments. Active shoulder elevation was tracked using upright 4DCT and optical motion capture system. The scapulothoracic and glenohumeral rotation angles calculated from AMC and SSMC were compared with 4DCT. Additionally, the motion of these marker clusters on the skin with shoulder elevation was evaluated. RESULTS: The average differences between AMC and 4DCT during 10°-140° of humerothoracic elevation were - 2.2° ± 7.5° in scapulothoracic upward rotation, 14.0° ± 7.4° in internal rotation, 6.5° ± 7.5° in posterior tilting, 3.7° ± 8.1° in glenohumeral elevation, - 8.3° ± 10.7° in external rotation, and - 8.6° ± 8.9° in anterior plane of elevation. The difference between AMC and 4DCT was significant at 120° of humerothoracic elevation in scapulothoracic upward rotation, 50° in internal rotation, 90° in posterior tilting, 120° in glenohumeral elevation, 100° in external rotation, and 100° in anterior plane of elevation. However, the average differences between SSMC and 4DCT were - 7.5 ± 7.7° in scapulothoracic upward rotation, 2.0° ± 7.0° in internal rotation, 2.3° ± 7.2° in posterior tilting, 8.8° ± 7.9° in glenohumeral elevation, 2.0° ± 9.1° in external rotation, and 1.9° ± 10.1° in anterior plane of elevation. The difference between SSMC and 4DCT was significant at 50° of humerothoracic elevation in scapulothoracic upward rotation and 60° in glenohumeral elevation, with no significant differences observed in other rotations. Skin motion was significantly smaller in AMC (28.7 ± 4.0 mm) than SSMC (38.6 ± 5.8 mm). Although there was smaller skin motion in AMC, SSMC exhibited smaller differences in scapulothoracic internal rotation, posterior tilting, glenohumeral external rotation, and anterior plane of elevation compared to 4DCT. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that AMC is more accurate for assessing scapulothoracic upward rotation and glenohumeral elevation, while SSMC is preferable for evaluating scapulothoracic internal rotation, posterior tilting, glenohumeral external rotation, and anterior plane of elevation, with smaller differences compared to 4DCT.

Clinical effect of modified anterolateral acromioarthroplasty during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the clinical effect of modified anterolateral and traditional acromioplasty in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. METHODS: The clinical data of 92 patients with total rotator cuff tears admitted to the Department of Joint Surgery of Jinhua Central Hospital from January 2016 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 42 patients underwent traditional acromioplasty during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, and 50 underwent modified anterolateral acromioplasty. Patients were evaluated for preoperative and postoperative shoulder function, pain and critical shoulder angle, and incidence of rotator cuff re-tear at 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The preoperative general data of patients in the classic and modified anterolateral acromioplasty groups did not differ significantly (P > 0.05) and were comparable. The UCLA, ASES, and Constant shoulder joint scores were significantly improved in both groups. The VAS score was significantly decreased at 12 months postoperative than preoperative, with a statistically significant difference (P ≤ 0.05). Shoulder function and pain scores did not differ significantly between the two groups at 12 months postoperatively (P > 0.05). The CSA did not differ significantly between preoperative and postoperative 12 months in the traditional acromioplasty group (P > 0.05). However, 12 months postoperative CSA in the modified anterolateral acromioplasty group was significantly smaller than the preoperative CSA, with a statistically significant difference (P ≤ 0.05). The rates of rotator cuff re-tears were 16.67% (7/42) and 4% (2/50) in the two groups at 12 months postoperatively, respectively, with statistically significant differences (P ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Traditional and modified anterolateral acromioplasty while treating total rotator cuff tears using arthroscopic rotator cuff repair significantly improves shoulder joint function. However, modified anterolateral acromioplasty significantly reduced the CSA value and decreased the incidence of rotator cuff re-tears.

Subacromial Surgery for Irreparable Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears.

The irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tear describes a tear of the supraspinatus and/or infraspinatus tendon that is massive, contracted, and immobile in both the anterior-posterior and medial-lateral directions. Patients with an intact subscapularis and preserved forward elevation are challenging to treat because there is not a consensus treatment algorithm. For low-demand, elderly patients, several subacromial surgical options are available that can provide pain relief without the risks or burden of rehabilitation posed by reverse total shoulder arthroplasty or a complex soft-tissue reconstruction (e.g., superior capsular reconstruction, tendon transfer, bridging grafts). Debridement, more specifically the "smooth-and-move" procedure, offers a reliable outcome with documented improvements in pain and function at long-term follow-up. Similarly, the biodegradable subacromial balloon spacer (InSpace; Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI) has been shown to significantly improve pain and function in patients who are not responsive to nonoperative treatment. Disease progression with these options is possible, with a small percentage of patients progressing to rotator cuff arthropathy. Biologic tuberoplasty and bursal acromial reconstruction are conceptually similar to the balloon spacer but instead use biologic grafts to prevent bone-to-bone contact between the humeral head and the acromion. Although there is no single gold standard treatment, the variety of surgical techniques allows patients and surgeons to effectively manage these challenging situations.

A Posterior Acromial Bone Block Augmentation Is Biomechanically Effective at Restoring the Force Required To Translate the Humeral Head Posteriorly in a Cadaveric, Posterior Glenohumeral Instability Model.

PURPOSE: To assess the biomechanical utility of a posterior acromial bone block (PABB) for the treatment of posterior glenohumeral instability. METHODS: Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens were obtained based upon an a priori power analysis. A 2.5-cm scapular spine autograft was harvested from all shoulders. A custom robot device was used to apply a 50-N compressive force to the glenohumeral joint. The humeral head was translated 10 mm posteroinferiorly at 30 degrees from the center of the glenoid at a rate of 1.0 mm/s in 6 consecutive conditions: (1) intact specimen, (2) intact with PABB, (3) posterior capsulolabral tear, (4) addition of the PABB, (5) removal of the PABB and repair of the capsulolabral tear (LR), and (6) addition of the PABB with LR. The maximum force required to obtain this translation was recorded. Paired t tests were performed to compare relevant testing conditions. RESULTS: Ten cadavers with a mean ± SD age of 54.4 ± 13.1 years and mean ± SD glenoid retroversion of 6.5 ± 1.0 degrees were studied. The PABB provided greater resistance force to humeral head translation compared to the instability state (instability, 29.3 ± 15.3 N vs PABB, 47.6 ± 21.0 N; P = .001; 95% confidence interval [CI], -27.6 to -10.0). When comparing PABB to LR, the PABB produced higher resistance force than LR alone (PABB, 47.6 ± 21.0 N; LR, 34.2 ± 20.5 N; P = .012; 95% CI, -23.4 to -4.1). An instability lesion treated with the PABB, with LR (P = .056; 95% CI, -0.30 to 20.4) or without LR (P = .351; 95% CI, -6.8 to 15.7), produced resistance forces similar to the intact specimen. CONCLUSIONS: A PABB is biomechanically effective at restoring the force required to translate the humeral head posteriorly in a cadaveric, posterior glenohumeral instability model. A posterior acromial bone block is a biomechanically feasible option to consider in patients with recurrent posterior instability. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Augmentation of the posterior acromion may be a biomechanically feasible option to treat posterior shoulder instability.

Editorial Commentary: Lower Trapezius Transfer May Be Indicated for Surgical Management of Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears in Younger, Non-Arthritic Patients.

Although shoulder rotator cuff repair fixation constructs and suture anchor design have evolved, repair of massive or functionally irreparable tears historically has relied on tendon mobilization and compression, optimizing footprint biology, and attempting a tension-free repair. However, despite these efforts, rates of failure of complete healing may be high, ranging from 20% to 94%. This has led to a search for alternative approaches, including bridging grafts, subacromial balloons, superior capsular reconstructions, biologic tuberoplasties, bursal acromial grafts, and, ultimately, renewed interest in tendon transfers. The latissimus dorsi transfer was traditionally a preferred tendon-transfer technique for posterosuperior massive cuff tears, but inconsistent outcomes have resulted in declining popularity. Recently, the lower trapezius transfer (LTT) has gained acceptance for the treatment of posterosuperior tears, particularly with external rotation weakness and lag signs. The LTT is biomechanically superior to the latissimus dorsi transfer, offering a more native vector of pull and in-phase activation. LTT could be indicated for younger patients with massive cuff tears. However, LTT is relatively contraindicated in patients with cuff tear arthropathy; combined loss of elevation and external rotation; irreparable subscapularis tear; teres minor involvement; and/or those of advanced age or unable to comply with rigid rehabilitation guidelines.

Acromion fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty occur in predictable clusters.

BACKGROUND: Acromion and scapular spine fractures (ASFs) following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) have been reported at a rate of 3.9%. The location of the fracture has been shown to be an important factor in determining the outcomes of nonoperative treatment, with medial fractures having worse outcomes than lateral fractures. As the debate between operative and nonoperative treatment continues, a more precise understanding of the location of the fracture is necessary for effective management. The purpose of this study was to use 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT) reconstruction to characterize the exact location of ASFs after RSA. METHODS: A retrospective review of 2 separate institutional shoulder and elbow repositories was performed. Patients with post-RSA ASFs documented by post-fracture CT scans were included. The query identified 48 patients who sustained postoperative ASFs after RSA between July 2008 and September 2021. CT scans of patients with ASFs were segmented using Mimics software. Eight patients were excluded because of poor image quality. Each bone model was manipulated using 3-Matic Medical software to align the individual scapula with an idealized bone model to create a view of scapular fracture locations on a normalized bone model. This model was used to classify the fractures using the modified Levy classification. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 40 patients with a diagnosis of postoperative ASF after RSA. The median age at the time of surgery was 76 years (interquartile range, 73-79 years). The cohort comprised 32 women (80%) and 8 men (20%), with a median body mass index of 27.8. Only 10 patients (25%) had a previous diagnosis of osteoporosis and 6 (13%) had a diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis; 53% of patients underwent RSA owing to rotator cuff tear arthropathy. The distribution of fracture locations was similar within the cohort. However, lateral fractures were slightly more prevalent. The most common fracture location was the type I zone, with 12 fracture lines (29%). There were 11 fracture lines (26%) in the type IIa zone, 10 (23%) in the type IIb zone, 0 in the type IIc zone, and 9 (21%) in the type III zone. CONCLUSION: ASFs after RSA occur in 4 predictable clusters. No fractures appeared to distinctly cluster in the type IIc zone, which may not represent a true fracture zone. Understanding the distribution of these fractures will help to enable the future design of implants and devices to stabilize the fractures that require fixation.

The Kouvalchouk procedure vs. distal tibial allograft for treatment of posterior shoulder instability: the deltoid "hammock" effect exists.

BACKGROUND: In 1993, Kouvalchouk described an acromial bone block with a pedicled deltoid flap for the treatment of posterior shoulder instability. This procedure provides a "double blocking" effect in that the acromial autograft restores posterior glenoid bone loss and the deltoid flap functions as a muscular "hammock" resembling the sling effect of the conjoint in the Latarjet procedure. The primary aim of this study was to compare the Kouvalchouk procedure to distal tibial allograft (DTA) reconstruction for the management of posterior shoulder instability with associated bone loss, while the secondary aim was to evaluate the deltoid hammock effect. METHODS: Ten upper extremity cadavers were evaluated using a validated shoulder testing apparatus in 0° and 60° of glenohumeral abduction in the scapular plane. Testing was first performed on the normal shoulder state and was followed by the creation of a 20% posterior glenoid defect. Subsequently, the Kouvalchouk and DTA procedures were conducted. Forces of 0N, 5N, 10N, and 15N were applied to the posterior deltoid tendinous insertion on the Kouvalchouk graft along the physiological muscle line-of-action to evaluate the 'hammock" effect of this procedure. Testing was additionally performed on the Kouvalchouk bone graft with the deltoid muscle sectioned from its bony attachment. For all test states, a posteriorly directed force was applied to the humeral head perpendicular to the direction of the glenoid bone defect, with the associated translation quantified using an optical tracking system. The outcome variable was posterior translation of the humeral head at an applied force magnitude of 30N. RESULTS: The Kouvalchouk procedure with the loaded deltoid flap (10N: P = .039 and 15N: P < .001) was significantly better at reducing posterior humeral head translation than the DTA. Overall, increased glenohumeral stability was observed with increased force applied to the posterior deltoid flap in the Kouvalchouk procedure. The 15 N Kouvalchouk was most effective at preventing posterior humeral translation, and the difference was statistically significant compared with the 20% glenoid defect (P = .003), detached Kouvalchouk (P < .001), and 0N Kouvalchouk (P < .001). The 15 N Kouvalchouk procedure restored posterior shoulder joint stability to near normal levels, such that it was not significantly different from the intact state (P = .203). CONCLUSIONS: The Kouvalchouk procedure with load applied to the deltoid was found to be biomechanically superior to the DTA for the management of posterior shoulder instability with associated bone loss. Additionally, the results confirmed the presence and effectiveness of the deltoid "hammock" effect.

Robert H. Cofield, MD, Award for Best Oral Presentation 2023: Up to 8 mm of glenoid-sided lateralization does not increase the risk of acromial or scapular spine stress fracture following reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a 135° inlay humeral component.

BACKGROUND: Glenoid-sided lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) decreases bony impingement and improves rotational range of motion, but has been theorized to increase the risk of acromial or scapular spine fractures (ASFs). The purpose of this study was to assess if glenoid-sided lateralization even up to 8 mm increases the risk for stress fracture following RSA with a 135° inlay humeral component. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed from a multicenter prospectively collected database on patients who underwent primary RSA from 2015 to 2021. All RSAs were performed with a 135° inlay humeral component. Varying amounts of glenoid lateralization were used from 0 to 8 mm. Preoperative radiographs were reviewed for the presence of acromial thinning, acromiohumeral distance (AHD), and inclination. Postoperative implant position (distalization, lateralization, and inclination) as well as the presence of ASF was evaluated on minimum 1-year postoperative radiographs. Regression analyses were performed on component and clinical variables to assess for factors predictive of ASF. RESULTS: Acromial or scapular spine fractures were identified in 26 of 470 shoulders (5.5%). Glenoid-sided lateralization was not associated with ASF risk (P = .890). Furthermore, the incidence of fracture did not vary based on glenoid-sided lateralization (0-2 mm, 7.4%; 4 mm, 5.6%; 6 mm, 4.4%; 8 mm, 6.0%; P > .05 for all comparisons). RSA on the dominant extremity was predictive of fracture (odds ratio [OR] 2.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20-5.75; P = .037), but there was no relationship between patient age, sex, preoperative acromial thinning, or diagnosis and risk of fracture. Although there was no difference in mean postoperative AHD between groups (P = .443), the pre- to postoperative delta AHD was higher in the stress fracture group (2.0 ± 0.7 cm vs. 1.7 ± 0.7 cm; P = .015). For every centimeter increase in delta AHD, there was a 121% increased risk for fracture (OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.33-3.68; P = .012). Additionally, for every 1-mm increase in inferior glenosphere overhang, there was a 19% increase in fracture risk (P = .025). CONCLUSION: Up to 8 mm of glenoid-sided metallic lateralization does not appear to increase the risk of ASF when combined with a 135° inlay humeral implant. Humeral distalization increases the risk of ASF, particularly when there is a larger change between pre- and postoperative AHD or higher inferior glenosphere overhang. In cases of pronounced preoperative superior humeral migration, it may be a consideration to avoid excessive postoperative distalization, but minimizing bony impingement via glenoid-sided lateralization appears to be safe.

Superior approach to the glenoid for treating acromion fractures combined with ideberg type III scapular glenoid fractures: a technical note.

PURPOSE: Scapular glenoid fractures, categorized based on the Ideberg classification, are commonly addressed surgically through approaches like the anterior deltoid-pectoral approach, posterior Judet approach, modified Judet approach, or posterior axillary approach. However, these methods present limitations in exposing the superior part of the glenoid. Therefore, we propose an approach for patients with concomitant acromion fractures, involving the anterior lateral flipping of the fractured acromion, allowing direct superior visualization of the superior and posterior superior parts of the glenoid. METHOD: Retrospective analysis was conducted on the data of five patients with shoulder fractures combined with scapular Ideberg III fractures between June 2018 and May 2023. All patients were treated using the shoulder approach above the scapular spine. There were four males and one female, aged 23-54 years with an average age of 36.6 years. One case involved the left shoulder, and four cases involved the right shoulder. X-rays and CT were taken before and after surgery to assess the location of the fractures and the healing status. Clinical evaluation included the assessment of efficacy using the Constant-Murley scoring criteria and analysis of surgical complications. RESULTS: All five patients were followed up for a duration of 14-36 months. All fractures healed completely, with an average healing time of 4.3 months (range: 3-6 months). There were no complications such as suprascapular nerve injury, nonunion, wound infection, or shoulder joint instability observed postoperatively. At the final follow-up, the Constant-Murley shoulder joint function score ranged from 84 to 98 points, with an average of 91.4 points. Three patients achieved an excellent rating in shoulder joint function score, while two patients achieved a good rating. CONCLUSION: The shoulder approach above the scapular spine exhibits advantages such as easy exposure and reduction, minimal intraoperative trauma, and clear visualization.

Optimising safe margins in shoulder surgeries: a cadaveric study on brachial plexus nerves with anthropometric and movement correlation.

PURPOSE: Shoulder surgeries, vital for diverse pathologies, pose a risk of iatrogenic nerve damage. Existing literature lacks diverse bone landmark-specific nerve position data. The purpose of this study is to address this gap by investigating such relationships. METHOD: This cadaveric study examines axillary, radial and suprascapular nerves' relation with acromion, coracoid and greater tuberosity of the humerus (GT). It also correlates this data with humeral lengths and explores nerve dynamics in relation to arm positions. RESULTS: The mean distance from the axillary nerve to (i) GT was 4.38 cm (range 3.32-5.44, SD 0.53), (ii) acromion was 6.42 cm (range 5.03-7.8, SD 0.694) and (iii) coracoid process was 4.3 cm (range 2.76-5.84, SD 0.769). Abduction brought the nerve closer by 0.36 cm, 0.35 cm and 0.53 cm, respectively. The mean distance from radial nerve to (i) GT was 5.46 cm (range 3.78-7.14, SD 0.839), (ii) acromion was 7.82 cm (range 5.4-10.24, SD 1.21) and (iii) tip of the coracoid process was 6.09 cm (range 4.07-8.11 cm, SD 1.01). The mean distance from the suprascapular nerve to the acromion was 4.2 cm (range 3.1-5.4, SD 0.575). The mean humeral length was noted to be 27.83 cm (range 25.3-30.7, SD 1.13). There was no significant correlation between these distances and humeral lengths. CONCLUSION: It is essential to exercise caution to avoid axillary nerve damage during the abduction manoeuvre, as its distance from the greater tuberosity and tip of the coracoid process has shown a significant reduction. The safe margins, in relation to the length of the humerus and consequently the patient's stature, exhibit no significant variation. In situations where the greater tuberosity (GT) and the border of the acromion are inaccessible due to reasons such as trauma, the tip of the coracoid process can serve as a dependable bone landmark for establishing a secure surgical margin.

Interobserver reliability of shoulder radiographic findings and correlation to MRI: a preliminary case series.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the interobserver reliability of measurements of the Acromiohumeral Distance (AHD) first described by Golding et al., the Critical Shoulder Angle (CSA), the Acromion Index with Glenoid Humeral (GH) and Glenoid Acromial (GA) distances, following the measuring method by Nyffeler et al., the Lateral Acromion Angle (LAA), as well as the morphology of the acromion according to Bigliani and the humeral head position according to Maloney in X-rays and MRI. Furthermore, the study assessed the correlation of measurement results in X-ray with those in MRI for AHD, CSA, GA, GH, AI, and LAA. METHODS: A total of 187 patients who underwent shoulder joint X-ray and MRI examinations from 09/2016 to 05/2023 were included in the study. Patients with poor imaging quality, arthrosis or radical prior surgeries, like shoulder prosthetic surgery, status post humerus fractures, that have undergone surgery and therefore changed the anatomical features were excluded, what lead to a total study population of 78. X-ray measurements were performed by two observers in the true anteroposterior view, so that the humeral head and the glenoid are shown without overlap, providing a clear view into the joint space. MRI measurements were performed in oblique coronal MRI slices, using the most accurately depicted glenoid surface as a landmark. RESULTS: Interobserver measurement results showed a significance with p < 0.001 for the assessment of acromion type according to Bigliani, humeral head offset assessment according to Maloney, and AHD. No significance was found for interobserver reliability in measuring LAA. Additionally, there was a high correlation of measurement results in X-ray with measurements in MRI for, CSA, GH/GA, and consequently AI, a good correlation for AHD but no correlation could be shown for LAA. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide valuable insights into the robustness of radiological parameters for evaluating shoulder pathology, offering promising prospects for clinical applications and further research. Nevertheless, the specific methodological considerations and patient characteristics should be taken into account when interpreting the results to ensure their accurate application in clinical practice.

3D C-arm navigated acromioclavicular joint stabilization.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical treatment options for acromioclavicular joint separations are varied. Frequently, suspension devices (SD) are inserted for stabilization under arthroscopic view. This study investigates the feasibility and accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) digital-volume-tomography (DVT) C-arm navigated implantation with regard to the general trend toward increasingly minimally invasive procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The implantation of a TightRope® suture button system (SD) via a navigated vertical drill channel through the clavicle and coracoid was investigated in 10 synthetic shoulder models with a mobile isocentric C-arm image intensifier setup in the usual parasagittal position. Thereby, in addition the placement of an additive horizontal suture cerclage via a navigated drill channel through the acromion was assessed. RESULTS: All vertical drill channels in the Coracoclavicular (CC) direction could be placed in a line centrally through the clavicle and the coracoid base. The horizontal drill channels in the Acromioclavicular (AC) direction ran strictly in the acromion, without affecting the AC joint or lateral clavicle. All SD could be well inserted and anchored. After tensioning and knotting of the system, the application of the horizontal AC cerclage was easily possible. The image quality was good and all relevant structures could be assessed well. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative 3D DVT imaging of the shoulder joint using a mobile isocentric C-arm in the usual parasagittal position to the patient is possible. Likewise, DVT navigated SD implantation at the AC joint in CC and AC direction on a synthetic shoulder model. By combining both methods, the application in vivo could be possible. Further clinical studies on feasibility and comparison with established methods should be performed.

Ipsilateral fractures of the acromion and coracoid processes of the scapula.

A fracture of the acromion and coracoid processes of scapula is rarely seen in the outpatient clinic, due to the acromion's anatomical position and shape, as well as the strong ligaments and muscles that are attached to it. These fractures are caused by either direct or indirect high-energy trauma injuries to the shoulder joint, leading to severe pain and a grossly restricted range of motion. Several acromial classifications were reported, but this type of longitudinal plane fracture of the acromion process in our case is yet to be described in the current literature. We present a rare combination of the coracoid process and unstable acromion bony projection fractures that have not previously been noted for this type of fracture. The closest to this is Kuhn's type III classification. A 51-year-old male presented to our emergency department complaining of the right shoulder pain and difficulty raising his arm following a 2-wheeler accident. The patient was managed by open reduction and internal fixation with 3 cannulated cancellous screws fixation and progressed well with no postoperative complications. He was asymptomatic postoperatively and regained full range of motion after 4 months.

[Clinical effect of modified anterolateral acromioplasty in rotator cuff repair under shoulder arthroscope].

Objective: To compare the clinical effect of modified anterolateral and traditional acromioplasty in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Methods: The clinical data of 92 patients with total rotator cuff tears admitted to the Department of Joint Surgery of Jinhua Central Hospital from January 2016 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Of the patients, 42 were male, 50 were female, with a mean age of (57.1±13.2) years. Among them, 42 patients underwent traditional acromioplasty during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (traditional group), and 50 underwent modified anterolateral acromioplasty (modified group). The preoperative and postoperative shoulder function of the patients in the two groups were evaluated and compared by using the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), the rating scale of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and the constant Murley shoulder score scale. And the preoperative and postoperative pain of patients was evaluated with visual analog scale (VAS). The incidence of rotator cuff retears 12 months after operation was counted. Results: There was no statistically significant differences in general information such as gender, age, affected side and course of disease between the two groups before the surgery (all P<0.05). All patients were followed up for (12.9±1.1) months. There was no significant differences in the UCLA score (31.4±3.0 vs 32.0±2.5), ASES score (13.1±0.7 vs 13.3±0.6), Constant Murley shoulder score (92.1±6.6 vs 94.3±4.6) and VAS score (1.5±0.8 vs 1.2±1.1) between the traditional group and the modified group 12 months after the operation (all P>0.05). The preoperative CSA (36.0°±1.7°) in the traditional group did not differ significantly from that at 12 months postoperatively (35.5°±1.2°) (P=0.270); the postoperative CSA at 12 months (30.8°±2.5°) in the modified group was significantly smaller than that before the operation (36.5°±1.9°), and also was smaller than that in the traditional group 12 months after the operation (35.5°±1.2°) (both P<0.05). At 12 months after operation, the rate of rotator cuff tears in the traditional group and modified group was 16.7% (7/42) and 4.0% (2/50), respectively (P=0.045). Conclusions: Traditional and modified anterolateral acromioplasty in treating total rotator cuff tears using arthroscopic rotator cuff repair can significantly improve shoulder joint function. However, modified anterolateral acromioplasty significantly reduces the CSA value and decreases the incidence of rotator cuff re-tears.

The Association between SLAP Lesions and Critical Shoulder Angle and Glenoid Depth.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The critical shoulder angle (CSA) is formed by the combination of glenoid inclination and acromial index and has been shown related to rotator cuff tears and glenohumeral osteoarthritis. SLAP lesions today have an important place among bicipitolabral pathologies that cause intensive shoulder pain. We aimed to investigate the relationship between CSA and glenoid depth and SLAP lesions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between March 2017 and January 2022, 279 consecutive shoulder arthroscopy patients' MRI images were retrospectively examined. After the exclusion criteria, 191 patients were eligible. Patients with SLAP lesions (n=37) were assembled as the study group (Group 1), and patients with intact superior labrum (n=154) were named as the control group (Group 2). Critical shoulder angle (CSA) and glenoid depth measurements were performed using the preoperative MRI images. RESULTS: A total of 191 patients, of whom 84 were male (44%) were included. The mean age was 49.9±14.96 (range 18-79). There was a statistically signifi cant difference between the SLAP group (Group 1) and the control group (Group 2) in terms of CSA (p=0.032). The mean CSA was 31.66°±3.51° in Group 1 and 33.57° ±5.01° in Group 2. The cut-off value for CSA in patients with SLAP lesions was calculated as 32.85° and the area under the curve was 0.61, therefore a satisfactory association was observed between the groups. The mean glenoid depth was 4.32 ±1.25 mm in Group 1, and 4.39 ±0.32 mm in Group 2. There was no statistically signifi cant difference between the groups in terms of glenoid depth (p=0.136) and also no association between the glenoid depth and SLAP lesions was observed (cut-off=4.45 mm, AUC=0.32). CONCLUSIONS: Low CSA is associated with SLAP lesions, just as in glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Further prospective clinical studies are needed to enlighten the predisposing effect of CSA to SLAP lesions and the success of superior labral repairs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective comparative study, Level III.

Evaluation of the Relationship between Acromiohumeral Distance and Supraspinatus Tendon Thickness Measured by Ultrasonography and Rotator Cuff Pathologies, Pain, and Function.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: In this study, we aimed to evaluate acromiohumeral distance (AHD) and supraspinatus tendon (ST) thickness measurements and their relationship with pain and function in ST pathologies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 111 patients and 25 healthy controls (HC). Patients were divided into 3 groups according to their diagnosis: non-tear tendinopathy (NTT), partial thickness tear (PTT), and full thickness tear (FTT). The AHD and ST thickness of the participants were measured with ultrasound. The pain and functional status of the patients were evaluated with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), The QuickDASH shortened version of the DASH Outcome Measure - Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (QDASH), and Simple Shoulder Test (SST). RESULTS: The AHD value was significantly higher in the NTT group (p=0.000). The AHD value was significantly lower in the FTT group (p=0.000). ST thickness value was significantly lower in the PTT group compared to the NTT group (p=0.000). There was a positive correlation between ST thickness and BMI (r=0.553,p<0.01). There was a negative correlation between ST thickness and SST and a positive correlation between ST thickness (r=-0.223,p<0.05) and QDASH (r=0.276,p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We found that AHD and SST thicknesses significantly differed in the NTT, PTT, FTT, and HC groups. This difference may be important for diagnosis. In addition, the effect of obesity on ST thickness and the relationship between ST thickness and functional scores may be considered. Weight control may be effective at this point. KEY WORDS: acromiohumeral distance, supraspinatus tendon thickness, ultrasound.

Optimizing hook implantation angle of the clavicular hook plate: a cadaveric study.

PURPOSE: While Clavicle hook plates have demonstrated favorable results regarding bone and shoulder function, their design can potentially lead to complications due to pressure concentration at the plate's tip. This study aims to investigate the impact of different hook implantation angles on the contact surface area between the hook plate and acromion, with the goal of minimizing mismatch and maximizing contact surface area. METHODS: Twenty soft shoulder cadavers were included in the study, and the contact surface area of the hook plate was measured in different positions based on the hook implantation angle. RESULTS: The results showed variations in compatibility, width, and length of the contact surface area depending on the hook implantation angle and the medial or lateral row placement. The lateral row generally demonstrated superior compatibility (84.0% vs 46.67%, p-value < 0.001), with a broader contact area (3.55 ± 0.08 mm vs 3.09 ± 0.10 mm, p-value = 0.004) and a longer contact area (7.36 ± 0.19 mm vs 5.10 ± 0.23 mm, p-value < 0.001) at specific angles. A detailed analysis of the lateral position revealed that the zero angle of implantation resulted in the greatest contact surface area, measuring 3.91 ± 0.70 mm in width (p value = 0.083) and 8.85 ± 1.24 mm in length (p value < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Placing the hook laterally and at the zero position according to the hook implantation angle can maximize contact surface area, may reduce stress concentration, and minimize complications in hook plate fixation. Further research and consideration of anatomical variations are warranted to refine the placement technique and enhance patient outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V evidence.

High Acromial Slope and Low Acromiohumeral Distance Increase the Risk of Retear of the Supraspinatus Tendon After Repair.

BACKGROUND: Retearing of the supraspinatus (SSP) tendon after repair is relatively common, but its cause is rarely clear. Although the role of acromion morphology and glenoid orientation in the pathogenesis of primary SSP tendon tears have frequently been analyzed, their association with the risk of rerupture of a repaired SSP tendon is poorly understood. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Is acromial morphology associated with the risk of retear after SSP tendon repair? (2) Is there an association between inclination and version of the glenoid and the odds for retear of the SSP tendon after repair? (3) Are there differences in outcome scores between patients who had intact cuff repairs and those who had retears? METHODS: Between August 2012 and December 2015, we treated 92 patients for SSP tendon tears; all of these patients were considered for inclusion in the present study. We considered patients with complete tear of the SSP that was reconstructed with a double-row repair and a minimum follow-up of 2 years as potentially eligible. Based on these criteria, 28% (26 of 92) were excluded because they had a partial rupture and did not receive a double-row reconstruction. A further 9% (eight of 92) were excluded because of missing planes or slices (such as sagittal, axial, or frontal) on MRI, and another 3% (three of 92) were lost before the minimum study follow-up interval or had incomplete datasets, leaving 60% (55 of 92) for inclusion in the present analysis. All included patients had a minimum follow-up of 2 years; follow-up with MRI occurred at a mean duration of 2.3 ± 0.4 years postoperatively. All patients were asked to complete the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index and Oxford Shoulder Scores, and they underwent MRI of the operated-on shoulder. Preoperative true AP radiographs and MR images of the affected shoulders were retrospectively assessed by measuring the acromiohumeral interval, critical shoulder angle, acromial slope, acromial tilt, acromial index, lateral acromial angle, and glenoid version and inclination. The patients also underwent acromioplasty, in which the underface of the acromion was flattened. To rule out any change in the above parameters because of acromioplasty, these parameters were compared using preoperative and postoperative MR images and showed no difference. In addition, the tendon integrity and quality on postoperative MRI were analyzed independently of one another by the same two observers using the Sugaya and Castricini classifications, accounting for atrophy and fatty degeneration of the SSP muscle. To assess interobserver reliability, the two observers took measurements independently from each other. They were orthopaedic residents who completed a training session before taking the measurements. All measurements had excellent intrarater (Cronbach alpha 0.996 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.99 to 1.00; p > 0.01) and interrater (interrater correlation coefficient 0.975 [95% CI 0.97 to 0.98]; p > 0.01) reliabilities. To answer the study's first question, SSP integrity on postoperative MRI was compared with acromial morphologic parameters measured on preoperative AP radiographs and MR images. To answer the second question, the postoperative integrity and quality of the SSP tendon were correlated with glenoid inclination and glenoid version. To answer our third question, we compared outcome scores between patients with intact SSP tendons and those with reruptured SSP tendons. To investigate any correlation among the acromial morphology, glenoid orientation, and postoperative outcomes, a binomial logarithmic regression analysis was performed. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine cutoff points for the radiologic parameters that showed a correlation in the binomial regression analysis. RESULTS: After controlling for potentially confounding variables such as acromioplasty or preoperative fatty infiltration as well as muscle atrophy, the only morphological parameters associated with a higher risk (adjusted odds ratio) of SSP tendon rerupture were the acromiohumeral interval (adjusted OR 0.9 [95% CI 0.9 to 0.99]; p < 0.01) and acromial slope (adjusted OR 1.4 [95% CI 1.1 to 1.8]; p < 0.01). The critical shoulder angle, acromial tilt, acromial index, and lateral acromial angle were not associated with the risk of rerupture. The cutoff values for acromial slope and acromiohumeral interval were 24.5° and 7.4 mm, respectively. Patients with an acromiohumeral interval smaller than 7.4 mm or an acromial slope greater than 24.5° had higher odds (acromiohumeral interval: OR 11 [95% CI 2 to 46]; p = 0.01 and acromial slope: OR 9 [95% CI 2 to 46]; p = 0.04) for rerupture of the SSP. No difference was found between patients with intact SSP tendons and those with reruptured SSP tendons in terms of glenoid inclination (6° ± 4° versus 6° ± 3°, mean difference 0.8° [-1° to 3°]; p < 0.48) and glenoid version (-2° ± 3° versus -3° ± 3°, mean difference 1° [-1° to 3°]; p < 0.30). No difference was found between the intact and reruptured SSP groups regarding clinical outcomes (Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index: 98 ± 2 versus 97 ± 3, mean difference 0.73 [95% CI -0.30 to 0.31]; p = 0.96; Oxford Shoulder Score: 26 ± 13 versus 23 ± 10, mean difference 2.80 [95% CI -4.12 to 9.72]; p = 0.41). CONCLUSION: The preoperative acromiohumeral interval and acromial slope are associated with SSP tendon rerupture after repair. Conversely, the critical shoulder angle, acromial tilt, lateral acromial angle, and acromial index had no association with the postoperative outcome. Additionally, glenoid inclination and version were not associated with the rerupture rate after SSP tendon repair. A detailed analysis of the acromiohumeral interval and acromial slope is recommended in clinical practice in patients undergoing SSP tendon repair. Surgeons should consider measuring the acromiohumeral interval and acromial slope preoperatively when performing SSP repair, especially in the context of planned acromioplasties. Future studies should investigate the role of acromioplasty during SSP repair in patients with a pathologic acromial slope and acromiohumeral interval. In this context, it should be determined whether a more-radical acromioplasty could reduce the risk of rerupture of the SSP in these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Anatomy features of the shoulder joint in asymptomatic chinese Han adults.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the shoulder anatomical characteristics in asymptomatic Chinese adults. METHODS: The prospective study enrolled individuals without shoulder pain at Beijing Tiantan Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University between January 2019 and January 2020. Six radiographic parameters were measured and analyzed, including glenoid plane to the acromion (GA), glenoid plane to the lateral aspect of the humeral head (GH), acromion index (AI), lateral acromial angle (LAA), acromion-humeral interval (AHI), and critical shoulder angle (CSA). RESULTS: 103 participants (51 males and 52 females) were enrolled. The mean values of GA, GH, AI, CSA, LAA, and AHI were 32.88 ± 5.68 mm, 47.16 ± 4.82 mm, 0.70 ± 0.11, 37.45 ± 6.00°, 6.32 ± 3.99°, and 9.611.86 mm, respectively. Females had lower GA (30.78 ± 5.06 vs. 35.01 ± 5.51 mm, P < 0.001) and GH (44.28 ± 3.67 vs. 50.11 ± 4.02 mm, P < 0.001) than males and LAA was significantly smaller in the Bigliani flat type compared with the curved type and the hooked type (5.07 ± 2.31° vs 12.33 ± 5.46°vs 10.00 ± 3.37, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Females had lower GA and GH than males in asymptomatic Chinese Han adults. Asymptomatic Chinese Han subjects with Bigliani flat type had lower LAA. CSA appears lager in Chinese Han individuals. Curve type of acromion performed lager LAA. The results may help establish an anatomical model of the shoulder joint and elucidate the anatomy features of the shoulder joint in asymptomatic Chinese Han adults.

The role of bone morphology of the greater tuberosity and lateral acromion on subacromial space during scaption: a three-dimensional dynamic simulation analysis.

BACKGROUND: The bone morphology of the greater tuberosity and lateral acromion plays a central role in subacromial impingement syndrome. The critical shoulder angle (CSA) and greater tuberosity angle (GTA) are two-dimensional measurement parameters that have been validated to evaluate it radiologically. These markers are, however, static and don't consider the dynamic effect of glenohumeral motion. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to better understand the biomechanics in subacromial impingement with a dynamic simulation based on a validated 3D biomechanical model coupling joint kinematics and 3D reconstructed computed tomography. STUDY DESIGN & METHODS: Sixty-one patients were included in this study: a case group of 44 patients with degenerative rotator cuff tears involving only the supraspinatus, and a control group of 17 without a rotator cuff tear. Patients with previous surgeries, traumatic cuff tears, and cuff tear arthropathy were excluded. CSA, GTA, and impingement-free range of motion (IF-ROM) of the glenohumeral joint in scaption were calculated. Correlation tests were used to determine the relationship between ROM and CSA, GTA, and combined CSA and GTA values. RESULTS: CSA and GTA were significantly higher in the rotator cuff tear group (p = 0.001 and < 0.001), while IF-ROM was significantly higher in the control group (p = 0.001). There was no overall correlation between CSA and GTA (R = 0.02, p = 0.8). Individual correlation between both angles with IF-ROM was negatively weak for CSA (R = -0.4, p < 0.001) and negatively moderate for GTA and IF-ROM (R = -0.5, p < 0.001). However, combining both angles resulted in a negatively high correlation with IF-ROM (R = -0.7, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Subacromial space narrowing during scaption is highly correlated to the cumulative values of GTA and CSA. These findings suggest that the combined bony morphology of the lateral acromion and greater tuberosity plays an important role in subacromial impingement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.