Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Ablation of the Sacroiliac Joint.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To evaluate the effectiveness of radiofrequency neurotomy in managing sacroiliac joint pain utilizing a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. RECENT FINDINGS: The prevalence of sacroiliac joint pain is estimated at around 25% of low back pain cases, and its diagnosis lacks a gold standard. Treatments include exercise therapy, injections, ablation, and fusion, with variable effectiveness. COVID-19 altered utilization patterns of interventions, including sacroiliac joint procedures, and the evidence for these interventions remains inconclusive. Recently, Medicare has issued its local coverage determinations (LCDs) in the United States, which provides noncoverage of sacroiliac joint radiofrequency neurotomy. Additionally, a recent systematic review of sacroiliac joint injections showed Level III or fair evidence. The sacroiliac joint, a critical axial joint linking the spine and pelvis, contributes to low back pain. Its complex innervation pattern varies among individuals. Sacroiliac joint dysfunction, causing pain and stiffness, arises from diverse factors.The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate radiofrequency neurotomy's effectiveness for sacroiliac joint pain management by applying rigorous methodology, considering both RCTs and observational studies. Despite methodological disparities, the evidence from this review, supported by changes in pain scores and functional improvement, suggests Level III evidence with fair recommendation for radiofrequency neurotomy as a treatment option. The review's strengths include its comprehensive approach and quality assessment. However, limitations persist, including variations in criteria and technical factors, underscoring the need for further high-quality studies in real-world scenarios.

Effect of revision sacroiliac joint fusion on unresolved pain and disability: a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: The sacroiliac (SI) joint is recognized as a source of low back pain in 15-30% of patients. Though randomized controlled trials have shown clinical improvement following SI joint fusion in 83.1% of patients, revision rates of 2.9% within 2 years have been reported. There is a paucity of literature reviewing this small yet significant population of patients requiring revision surgery. METHODS: Following IRB approval, retrospective review of patients, who underwent a revision SI joint fusion from 2009 to 2021 was completed. Patient-reported outcomes were measured before and at each clinic visit after surgery with visual analoge scale (VAS) for back pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Patient characteristics (chronic opiate use and prior lumbar fusion) and surgical factors (operative approach, type/number of implants and use of bone graft) were recorded. Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated with Paired t and Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression determined if patients met the minimally clinical important differences (MCID) for VAS-back pain and ODI scores at 1 year. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients (77% female) with an average age of 49.1 (SD ± 11.1) years met inclusion criteria. Forty-four had single sided revisions and eight bilateral revisions. At 1 year follow-up there was no significant improvement in VAS-Back (p = 0.06) or ODI (p = 0.06). Patients with chronic opioid use were 8.5 times less likely to achieve the MDC for ODI scores (OR 0.118, p = 0.029). There was no difference in outcomes when comparing the different surgical approaches (p = 0.41). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates patients undergoing revision surgery have moderate improvement in low back pain, however, few have complete resolution of their symptoms. Specific patient factors, such as chronic opiate use and female sex may decrease the expected improvement in patient-reported outcomes following surgery. Failure to obtain relief may be due to incorrect indications, lack of biologic fusion and/or presence of co-pathologies. Further clinical examination and consistent long-term follow-up, clarify the role revision surgery plays in long-term patient outcomes.

Implantation of S1AIS has priority as a sacroiliac joint fixation technique.

PURPOSE: The sacral alar-iliac screw (SAIS) fixation technique has evolved from spinopelvic fixation which originated from S2AIS to sacroiliac joint fixation, with more reports regarding its application of S2AIS than S1AIS. However, there is a lack of comparative evidence to determine which technique is superior for sacroiliac joint fixation. This study aimed to determine which of the screws was superior in terms of implantation safety and biomechanical stability for sacroiliac joint fixation. METHODS: CT data of 80 normal pelvises were analyzed to measure the insertable range, trajectory lengths and widths of both S1AIS and S2AIS on 3D reconstruction models. Φ 6.5 mm and 8.0 mm screws were implanted on the left and right sides of fifty 3D printed pelvic models respectively to observe for breach of screw implantation. Ten synthetic pelvis models were used to simulate type C Tile injuries, and divided into 2 groups with an anterior plate and posterior fixation using one S1AIS or S2AIS on each side. The stiffness and maximum load of the plated and fixated models were measured under vertical loading. RESULTS: The trajectory lengths and widths of the S1AIS and S2AIS were similar (p > 0.05) and there was no breach for Φ 6.5 mm SAIS. However, both the insertable range and trajectory length on the sacral side of S2AIS (234.56 ± 10.06 mm2, 40.97 ± 2.81 mm) were significantly less, and the breach rate of the posterior lateral cortex of the Φ 8.0 mm S2AIS (46%) was significantly higher than the S1AIS (307.55 ± 10.42 mm2, 42.16 ± 3.06 mm, and 2%, p < 0.05). The stiffness and maximum load of S2AIS were less than S1AIS but the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: S1AIS and S2AIS have similar screw trajectories and stability. However, S1AIS has a larger insertable range, less breach of the posterior lateral sacral cortex and longer trajectory length on the sacral side than S2AIS, which indicates S1AIS has higher implantation safety and a trend of better mechanical performance over S2AIS for sacroiliac joint fixation. Furthermore, S2AIS with an excessively large diameter should be used with caution for sacroiliac joint fixation.

A systematic review and update on diagnosis and treatment of new onset sacroiliac joint dysfunction after lumbar fusion.

BACKGROUND: Sacroiliac joint dysfunction (SIJD) after lumbar/lumbosacral fusion has become increasingly recognized as the utilization of lumbar fusion has grown. Despite the significant morbidity associated with this condition, uncertainty regarding its diagnosis and treatment remains. We aim to update the current knowledge of the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of post-lumbar surgery SIJD. METHODS: PRISMA guidelines were used to search the PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Reviews, Embase, and OVID databases for literature published in the last 10 years. The ROBIS tool was utilized for risk of bias assessment. Statistical analyses were performed using the R foundation. A Fisher's exact test was performed to determine the risk of SIJD based on operative technique, gender, and symptom onset timeline. Odds ratios were reported with 95% confidence intervals. A p-value [Formula: see text] 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Seventeen publications were included. The incidence of new onset SIJD was 7.0%. The mean age was 56 years, and the follow-up length was 30 months. SIJD was more common with fixed lumbar fusion vs floating fusion (OR = 1.48 [0.92, 2.37], p = 0.083), fusion of [Formula: see text] 3 segments (p < 0.05), and male gender increased incidence of SIJD (OR = 1.93 [1.27, 2.98], p = 0.001). Intra-articular injection decreased the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score by 75%, while radiofrequency ablation (RFA) reduced the score by 90%. An open approach resulted in a 13% reduction in VAS score versus 68 and 29% for SIJ fixation using the iFuse and DIANA approaches, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Lumbar fusion predisposes patients to SIJD, likely through manipulation of the SIJ's biomechanics. Definitive diagnosis of SIJD remains multifaceted and a newer modality such as SPECT/CT may find a future role. When conservative measures are ineffective, RFA and SIJ fixation using the iFuse System yield the greatest improvement VAS and ODI.

Short-term and Long-term Efficacy Evaluation of Drug-Loaded Osteoset Artificial Bone Grafting Fusion in the Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Tuberculosis.

Objective: To analyze the short-term and long-term efficacy of Osteoset artificial bone graft fusion mixed with rifampicin for injection in the treatment of sacroiliac joint tuberculosis. Methods: A retrospective analysis was carried out on 70 patients diagnosed with sacroiliac joint tuberculosis who were admitted and underwent surgical treatment in our orthopedics department between April 2014 and May 2020. The patients were divided into three groups based on the different bone graft materials used: autogenous bone graft group (25 cases), simple lesion removal group (18 cases), and drug-loaded calcium sulfate bone graft group (27 cases). General information and surgical details of the three groups were compared. Sacroiliac X-ray and CT scans were performed at regular intervals to record pre- and post-treatment erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, bone graft fusion rates at 6, 12, and 18 months post-surgery, Majeed score for functional evaluation, and postoperative complications. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in operation time, intraoperative bleeding, and intraoperative pus removal volume among the three groups of patients (P > .05). Postoperatively, 70 patients were followed up, and the serum levels of ESR and CRP in all three groups of patients were significantly reduced at 3 months after surgery (P < .05). In the autogenous bone graft group, the bone graft fusion rates were 24.00% (6/25) at 6 months postoperatively, 76.00% (18/25) at 12 months, and 96.00% (24/25) at 18 months. In the simple lesion removal group, the bone graft fusion rates were 16.67% (3/18) at 6 months postoperatively, 27.78% (5/18) at 12 months, and 55.56% (10/18) at 18 months. In the drug-loaded calcium sulfate bone graft group, the bone graft fusion rates were 18.52% (5/27) at 6 months postoperatively, 55.56% (15/27) at 12 months, and 81.48% (22/27) at 18 months. In the autogenous bone graft group, the postoperative Majeed score averaged (91.47±4.13) points, with 13 cases rated as excellent and 10 cases rated as good, resulting in an excellent and good rate of 92.00% (23/25). The Majeed scores at 6, 12, and 18 months postoperatively were (67.19±4.22) points, (80.28±5.83) points, and (91.47±4.13) points, respectively. Among them, there were 4 excellent and 3 good cases at 6 months postoperatively, with an excellent and good rate of 28.00% (7/25). At 12 months postoperatively, there were 8 excellent and 10 good cases, with an excellent and good rate of 72.00% (18/25). At 18 months postoperatively, there were 13 excellent and 10 good cases, with an excellent and good rate of 92.00% (23/25). In the simple lesion removal group, the Majeed scores at 6, 12, and 18 months postoperatively were (59.17±3.95) points, (69.84±5.16) points, and (76.22±8.76) points, respectively. There were 2 excellent and 2 good cases at 6 months postoperatively, with an excellent and good rate of 22.22% (4/18). At 12 months postoperatively, there were 4 excellent and 3 good cases, with an excellent and good rate of 38.89% (7/18). At 18 months postoperatively, there were 5 excellent and 5 good cases, with an excellent and good rate of 55.56% (10/18). In the drug-loaded calcium sulfate bone graft group, the Majeed scores at 6, 12, and 18 months postoperatively were (63.24±4.17) points, (77.39±5.50) points, and (86.64±7.03) points, respectively. There were 3 excellent and 3 good cases at 6 months postoperatively, with an excellent and good rate of 22.22% (6/27). At 12 months postoperatively, there were 9 excellent and 7 good cases, with an excellent and good rate of 59.26% (16/27). At 18 months postoperatively, there were 10 excellent and 12 good cases, with an excellent and good rate of 81.48% (22/27). The Majeed scores for all three groups of patients showed a significant increase in the three follow-up evaluations compared to pre-treatment (P < .05). Conclusion: Drug-loaded Osteoset artificial bone graft fusion is a safe and effective method for treating bone defects after the debridement of sacroiliac joint tuberculosis lesions. It has fewer postoperative complications and achieves bone graft fusion in a shorter time compared to simple lesion removal methods.

Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular titanium implants versus nonsurgical management for sacroiliac joint dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint (MISIJ) fusion is a surgical option to relieve SIJ pain. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare MISIJ fusion with triangular titanium implants (TTI) to nonoperative management of SIJ dysfunction. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We included prospective clinical trials that compared MISIJ fusion to nonoperative management in individuals with chronic low back pain attributed to SIJ dysfunction. We evaluated pain on visual analogue scale, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) physical component (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores, patient satisfaction, and adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 8 articles representing 3 trials that enrolled 423 participants were deemed eligible. There was a significant reduction in pain score with MISIJ fusion compared with nonoperative management (standardized mean difference [SMD] -1.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.03 to -1.39). Similarly, ODI scores (SMD -1.03, 95% CI -1.24 to -0.81), SF-36 PCS scores (SMD 1.01, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.19), SF-36 MCS scores (SMD 0.72, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.9), and patient satisfaction (odds ratio 6.87, 95% CI 3.73 to 12.64) were significantly improved with MISIJ fusion. No significant difference was found between the 2 groups with respect to adverse events (SMD -0.03, 95% CI -0.28 to 0.23). CONCLUSION: Our analysis showed that MISIJ fusion with TTI shows a clinically important and statistically significant improvement in pain, disability score, HRQoL, and patient satisfaction with a similar adverse event profile to nonoperative management in patients with chronic low back pain attributed to SIJ dysfunction.

Anterior peri-sacroiliac joint osteotomy in the treatment of malunion and nonunion of complex pelvic ring fracture: techniques and preliminary results.

PURPOSE: To introduce anterior peri-sacroiliac joint osteotomy (APSJO) through the lateral-rectus approach (LRA) for treating pelvic fracture malunion and nonunion, and to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and potential effectiveness. METHODS: Data of 15 patients with pelvic fracture malunion and nonunion who underwent treatment by APSJO were selected and analyzed. The reduction quality was assessed using the Mears and Velyvis criteria, while the pre-operative and post-operative function was revealed by the Majeed scoring system. The British Medical Research Council (BMRC) grading system was recruited for the evaluation of lumbosacral plexus function. RESULTS: The average operative duration was 264.00 ± 86.75 min, while the intra-operative blood loss was 2000 (600, 3000) mL. Anatomical reduction was complete in three cases, satisfactory in ten cases, and unsatisfactory in two cases. Among the seven patients with lumbosacral plexus injury, the pre-operative Majeed grades were good in two cases, fair in two cases, and poor in three cases, while the post-operative Majeed grades were excellent in three cases, good in three cases, and fair in one case. Muscle strength recovered to M5 in two cases, M4 in three cases, and showed no recovery in two cases. The pre-operative Majeed grades were good in five cases, fair in two cases, and poor in one case of the series without lumbosacral plexus injury, while the post-operative Majeed grades were excellent in seven cases and good in one case. CONCLUSION: APSJO through LRA may be a feasible strategy for treating pelvic fracture malunion and nonunion with promising application.

Fluoroscopically-assisted closed reduction and percutaneous fixation of sacroiliac luxations in cats using 2.4 mm headless cannulated compression screws: Description, evaluation and clinical outcome.

OBJECTIVE: To describe fluoroscopically-assisted closed reduction and percutaneous fixation of sacroiliac-luxation (SIL) in cats and report radiographic results and long-term functional outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective clinical study. ANIMALS: Eleven cats. METHODS: Percutaneous fixation of 17 SILs in 11 cats was performed with 2.4 mm headless cannulated compression screws under fluoroscopic guidance. Luxation-reduction, screw placement and purchase within the sacral body, pelvic canal diameter ratio (PCDR) and hemipelvic canal width ratio (HCWR) were assessed on pre- and postoperative radiographs. Radiographic follow-up was performed to assess the same parameters when available. Long-term clinical outcome was evaluated with an owner questionnaire. Wilcoxon paired-test was performed for comparison. RESULTS: Mean age and bodyweight of the cats were 3.3 ± 2.6 years and 4.0 ± 0.82 kg, respectively. Nine cats presented with concurrent pelvic injuries. Median luxation-reduction was 94.1% (IQR = 13.9) and median screw-purchase within the sacral body was 73.3% (IQR = 17.0) immediately postoperatively. One screw exited the sacral body caudally. Upon 7-week radiographic follow-up, luxation-reduction (88.3%, IQR = 20.1) and screw-purchase (70.7%, IQR = 12.8) had decreased compared to immediately postoperatively (p = .008 and p = .013 respectively). Screw migration was not observed. PCDR and HCWR measured on postoperative radiographs indicated successful restoration of the pelvic canal width. Owners reported an excellent long-term functional outcome (mean postoperative time: 19 ± 5 months). CONCLUSION: Fluoroscopically-assisted closed reduction and fixation of feline SIL using 2.4 mm headless cannulated compression screws allowed good reduction and optimal screw purchase within the sacral body. An excellent functional outcome was reported. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Minimally invasive reduction and fixation with headless compression screws should be considered in cats with SIL.

Patient-reported outcomes after minimally invasive sacro-iliac joint surgery: a cohort study based on the Swedish Spine Registry.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is conflicting evidence regarding treatment outcomes after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion for long-lasting severe sacroiliac joint pain. The primary aim of our cohort study was to investigate change in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint surgery in daily practice in the Swedish Spine Registry. Secondary aims were to explore the proportion of patients reaching a patient acceptable symptom score (PASS) and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for pain scores, physical function, and health-related quality of life outcomes; furthermore, to evaluate self-reported satisfaction, walking distance, and changes in proportions of patients on full sick leave/disability leave and report complications and reoperations. METHODS: Data from the Swedish Spine Registry was collected for patients with first-time sacroiliac joint fusion, aged 21 to 70 years, with PROMs available preoperatively, at 1 or 2 years after last surgery. PROMs included Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for low back pain (LBP) and leg pain, and EQ-VAS, in addition to demographic variables. We calculated mean change from pre- to postoperative and the proportion of patients achieving MCID and PASS. RESULTS: 68 patients had available pre- and postoperative data, with a mean age of 45 years (range 25-70) and 59 (87%) were female. At follow-up the mean reduction was 2.3 NRS points (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6-2.9; P < 0.001) for LBP and 14.8 points (CI 10.6-18.9; P < 0.001) for ODI. EQ-VAS improved by 22 points (CI 15.4-30.3, P < 0.001) at follow-up. Approximately half of the patients achieved MCID and PASS for pain (MCID NRS LBP: 38/65 [59%] and PASS NRS LBP: 32/66 [49%]) and physical function (MCID ODI: 27/67 [40%] and PASS ODI: 24/67 [36%]). The odds for increasing the patient's walking distance to over 1 km at follow-up were 3.5 (CI 1.8-7.0; P < 0.0001), and of getting off full sick leave or full disability leave was 0.57 (CI 0.4-0.8; P = 0.001). In the first 3 months after surgery 3 complications were reported, and in the follow-up period 2 reoperations. CONCLUSION: We found moderate treatment outcomes after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion when applied in daily practice with moderate pain relief and small improvements in physical function.

Chronic sacroiliac joint dysfunction and CT-guided percutaneous fixation: a 6-year experience.

PURPOSE: Reporting the clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and complications following an imaging-guided percutaneous screw fixation in the treatment of sacroiliac joint dysfunction and evaluating the safety and effectiveness of this method. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study on a prospectively gathered cohort of patients with physiotherapy-resistant pain due to sacroiliac joint incompetence that underwent percutaneous screw fixation, between 2016 and 2022 in our center. A minimum of two screws were used in all patients to obtain fixation of the sacroiliac joint, using percutaneous screw insertion under CT guidance, coupled with a C-arm fluoroscopy unit. RESULTS: The mean visual analog scale significantly improved at 6 months of follow-up (p < 0.05). One hundred percent of the patients reported significant improvement in pain scores at the final follow-up. None of our patients experienced intraoperative or postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: The use of percutaneous sacroiliac screws provides a safe and effective technique for the treatment of sacroiliac joint dysfunction in patients with chronic resistant pain.

Effects of manipulations of oblique pulling on the biomechanics of the sacroiliac joint: a cadaveric study.

BACKGROUND: There are many reports on the treatment of sacroiliac joint dysfunction by manipulation of oblique pulling (MOP). However, the specific mechanism of MOP on the sacroiliac joint remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effect of MOP on the biomechanics of the sacroiliac joint and the effect of the anterior sacroiliac ligament on the stability of the sacroiliac joint. METHODS: First, MOP-F1 (F: force) and MOP-F2 were applied to nine cadaveric pelvises. Then, segmental resection of the anterior sacroiliac ligament was performed. The range of motion of the sacroiliac joint was observed in all procedures. RESULTS: Under MOP-F1 and F2, the average total angles were 0.84° ± 0.59° and 1.52° ± 0.83°, and the displacements were 0.61 ± 0.21 mm and 0.98 ± 0.39 mm, respectively. Compared with MOP-F1, MOP-F2 caused greater rotation angles and displacements of the sacroiliac joint (p = 0.00 and p = 0.01, respectively). In addition, the rotation angles and displacements of the sacroiliac joint significantly increased after complete resection of the anterior sacroiliac ligament (p = 0.01 and p = 0.02, respectively). The increase was mainly due to the transection of the upper part of the anterior sacroiliac ligament. CONCLUSIONS: MOP-F2 caused greater rotation angles and displacements of the sacroiliac joint and was a more effective manipulation. The anterior sacroiliac ligament played an important role in maintaining the stability of the sacroiliac joint; the upper part of the anterior sacroiliac ligament contributed more to the stability of the joint than the lower part.

Application of the pedicle axis view in percutaneous screw placement for type III fracture dislocation of the sacroiliac joint.

AIM: To investigate the clinical application of axial view projection of the pedicle in percutaneous screw placement for type III fracture dislocation of the sacroiliac joint. METHODS: Percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation was performed in 29 patients with type III sacroiliac joint fractures under X-ray fluoroscopy (C-arm) using axial view projection of the pedicle after preoperative traction reduction and preoperative preparation. The study included 19 males and 10 females, aged 20 to 75 years old, with a mean age of 42.1 ± 3.4 years. RESULTS: The total operative time ranged between 44 and 135 min, with a mean of 95.5 ± 9.4 min. The intraoperative fluoroscopy time ranged between 15 and 42 s, with a mean of 25 ± 4.7 s. The intraoperative blood loss ranged between 5 and 10 ml, with a mean of 7.1 ± 1.3 ml. According to the Matta scoring system, excellent outcomes were achieved in 25 cases, whereas good outcomes were achieved in 4 cases. Based on the definition by Neo et al., pedicle screw positions were categorized into four grades: grade 0 (33 screws), grade I (2 screws), grade II (2 screws), and grade III (0 screws). Excellent outcomes were achieved in 94.6% of Grade 0 and I screws. According to Majeed's functional score, 21 cases achieved excellent outcomes, whereas 8 cases achieved good outcomes. The 29 patients were followed between 3 and 18 months, with a mean of 7.1 ± 1.2 months. All patients achieved anatomical reduction with accurate screw placement and successful healing of their fractures, with no cases of bone penetration or neurovascular injury. CONCLUSION: Axial view imaging of the pedicle using fluoroscopy is a convenient and rapid fluoroscopy method for percutaneous screw placement for type III fracture dislocation of the sacroiliac joint, with a high rate of success, good safety, and short fluoroscopy time.

Cooled radiofrequency ablation of the sacroiliac joint a retrospective case series.

BACKGROUND: Sacroiliac (SI) joint dysfunction is a common source of back pain. Recent evidence from different parts of the world suggest that cooled radiofrequency ablation of sacral nerves supplying the SI joints has superior pain alleviating properties than currently available treatment options for SI joint dysfunction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After obtaining institutional review board approval, the medical records of 81 patients who underwent cooled radiofrequency ablation in a single institution and by a single surgeon were analyzed retrospectively. The recurrence of pain, progression to fusion and functional outcomes were noted. The patients were operated on between June 2020 and December 2021, they include 59 females and 22 males, the average age was 55.4 ± 17.3. Follow up was at least 6 months postoperative. RESULTS: 22 of the patients had previously underwent lumbar fusions. Follow up period ranged from 6 to 18 months. After radiofrequency ablation, 7 patients progressed to fusions, and 6 patients had to have the procedure done again to relieve their pain. Student t-test was used to compare between preoperative and postoperative values of NPRS (numerical pain rating score) and ODI (Oswestry disability index). It showed significance with P-value < 0.001 in both. CONCLUSIONS: Sacroiliac joint radiofrequency ablation is a good option in the treatment of SI joint pain showing good results in the short term follow up period. It is a simple procedure that can be done in less than 30 min and is capable of providing significant pain relief for patients with sacroiliac joint dysfunction.

Sacroiliac joint fusion navigation: how accurate is pin placement?

OBJECTIVE: Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) fusion utilizing intraoperative navigation requires a standard reference frame, which is often placed using a percutaneous pin. Proper placement ensures the correct positioning of SIJ fusion implants. There is currently no grading scheme for evaluation of pin placement into the pelvis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the occurrence of ideal percutaneous pin placement into the posterior ilium during navigated SIJ fusion. METHODS: After IRB approval was obtained, electronic medical records and intraoperative computed tomography images of patients who underwent navigated SIJ fusion by the senior author between October 2013 and January 2020 were reviewed. A pin placement grading scheme and the definition of "ideal" placement were developed by the authors and deemed acceptable by fellow attending surgeons. Six attending surgeons completed two rounds of pin placement grading, and statistical analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Of 90 eligible patients, 73.3% had ideal pin placement, 17.8% medial/lateral breach, and 8.9% complete miss. Male patients were 3.7 times more likely to have ideal placement than females (p < 0.05). There was no relationship between BMI, SIJ fusion laterality, or pin placement laterality and ideal placement. Interobserver reliability was 0.72 and 0.70 in the first and second rounds, respectively, and defined as "substantial agreement." Intraobserver reliability ranged from 0.74 (substantial agreement) to 0.92 (almost perfect agreement). CONCLUSIONS: Nonideal pin placement occurred in 26.7% of cases, but a true "miss" into the sacrum was rare. Ideal pin placement was more likely in males and was not associated with BMI, SIJ fusion laterality, or pin placement laterality. The grading scheme developed has high intraobserver and interobserver reliability, indicating that it is reproducible and can be used for future studies. When placing percutaneous pins, surgeons must be aware of factors that can decrease placement accuracy, regardless of location.

Bilateral sacroiliac joint fusion in long constructs using self-harvesting porous S2-alar iliac screws with an integrated tulip: technical considerations and early clinical and radiographic experience.

OBJECTIVE: The incidence of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction after lumbosacral fusion is high. Upfront bilateral SIJ fusion using novel fenestrated self-harvesting porous S2-alar iliac (S2AI) screws could reduce the incidence of SIJ dysfunction and need for subsequent SIJ fusion. In this study, the authors report their early clinical and radiographic results of SIJ fusion using this novel screw. METHODS: The authors began using self-harvesting porous screws in July 2022. This is a retrospective review of consecutive patients at a single institution who underwent long thoracolumbar surgery with extension to the pelvis using this porous screw. Radiographic parameters of regional and global alignment were collected preoperatively and at the time of last follow-up. The incidence of intraoperative complications and need for revision were collected. The incidences of mechanical complications, including screw breakage, implant loosening/pullout, and screw cap dislocation at the time of last follow-up were also collected. RESULTS: Ten patients with a mean age of 67 years were included, 6 of whom were male. Seven patients had a thoracolumbar construct with extension to the pelvis. Three patients had upper instrumented vertebrae at the proximal lumbar spine. Intraoperative breach was not encountered in any of the patients (0%). Postoperatively, 1 patient (10%) had screw breakage at the neck of the tulip of the modified iliac screw discovered at routine follow-up without clinical sequalae. CONCLUSIONS: Use of self-harvesting porous S2AI screws incorporated into long thoracolumbar constructs was safe and feasible, demanding unique technical considerations. Long-term clinical and radiographic follow-up with a large patient cohort is necessary to determine their durability and efficacy to achieve SIJ arthrodesis and prevent SIJ dysfunction.

Robotic versus nonrobotic sacroiliac joint fusion.

OBJECTIVE: Robot-assisted pedicle screw placement in spinal fusion has been well studied. However, few studies have evaluated robot-assisted sacroiliac joint (SIJ) fusion. The aim of this study was to compare surgical characteristics, accuracy, and complications between robot-assisted and fluoroscopically guided SIJ fusion. METHODS: A retrospective review of 110 patients with 121 SIJ fusions done at a single academic institution was conducted from 2014 to 2023. Inclusion criteria included adult age and a robot- or fluoroscopically guided approach to SIJ fusion. Patients were excluded if the SIJ fusion was part of a longer fusion construct, not minimally invasive, and/or had missing data. Demographics, approach type (robotic vs fluoroscopic), operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), number of screws, intraoperative complications, 30-day complications, number of intraoperative fluoroscopic images (as a surrogate for radiation exposure), implant placement accuracy, and pain status at the first follow-up were recorded. Primary endpoints were SIJ screw placement accuracy and complications. Secondary endpoints were operative time, radiation exposure, and pain status at the first follow-up. RESULTS: Ninety patients were included who underwent a total of 101 SIJ fusions, of which 78 were robotic and 23 were fluoroscopic. The mean age of the cohort at the time of surgery was 55.9 ± 13.8 years; 46 patients were females (51.1%). No difference was found in screw placement accuracy between robotic and fluoroscopic fusion (1.3% vs 8.7%, p = 0.06). Chi-square analysis of robotic versus fluoroscopic fusion found no difference in the presence of 30-day complications (p = 0.62). Mann-Whitney U-test analysis found that robotic fusion had a significantly longer operative time than fluoroscopic fusion (72.0 vs 61.0 minutes, p = 0.01); however, robot-assisted fusions involved significantly lower radiation exposure (26.7 vs 187.4 fluoroscopic images, p < 0.001). No difference in EBL was noted (p = 0.17). No intraoperative complications were present in this cohort. Subgroup analysis comparing the 23 most recent robotic cases against the 23 fluoroscopic cases found that robotic fusion still was associated with significantly longer operative times than fluoroscopic fusion (74.0 ± 26.4 vs 61.0 ± 14.9 minutes, respectively; p = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: SIJ screw placement accuracy did not significantly differ between robot-assisted and fluoroscopic SIJ fusion. Complications overall were low and similar between the two groups. The operative time was longer with robotic assistance, but there was markedly less radiation exposure to the surgeon and staff.

Fusion and patient-reported outcomes after navigated decortication and direct arthrodesis in minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using cylindrical threaded implants: a case series and literature review.

OBJECTIVE: Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction is a significant cause of back pain. Despite recent advances in minimally invasive (MIS) SIJ fusion, the fusion rate remains controversial. This study sought to demonstrate that a navigated decortication and direct arthrodesis technique in MIS SIJ fusion would result in satisfactory fusion rates and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients who underwent MIS SIJ fusion from 2018 to 2021. SIJ fusion was performed using cylindrical threaded implants and SIJ decortication employing the O-arm surgical imaging system and StealthStation. The primary outcome was fusion, evaluated using CT at 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included revision surgery, time to revision surgery, visual analog scale (VAS) score for back pain, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), measured preoperatively and 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Patient demographics and perioperative data were also collected. PROs over time were analyzed using ANOVA followed by a post hoc analysis. RESULTS: One hundred eighteen patients were included in this study. The mean (± SD) patient age was 58.56 ± 13.12 years, and most patients were female (68.6% vs 31.4% male). There were 19 smokers (16.1%) with an average BMI of 29.92 ± 6.73. One hundred twelve patients (94.9%) underwent successful fusion on CT. The ODI improved significantly from baseline to 6 months (Δ7.73, 95% CI 2.43-13.03, p = 0.002) and from baseline to 12 months (Δ7.54, 95% CI 1.65-13.43, p = 0.008). Similarly, VAS back pain scores improved significantly from baseline to 6 months (Δ2.31, 95% CI 1.07-3.56, p < 0.001) and from baseline to 12 months (Δ1.63, 95% CI 0.25-3.00, p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: MIS SIJ fusion with navigated decortication and direct arthrodesis was associated with a high fusion rate and significant improvement in disability and pain scores. Further prospective studies examining this technique are warranted.

Clinical study of modified INFIX combined with sacroiliac joint screws for pelvic instable injuries.

OBJECTIVE: The INFIX technique is becoming one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures for anterior pelvic ring instability injuries. The purpose of this article is to compare the clinical outcomes of modified anterior subcutaneous internal fixation (M-INFIX) with conventional anterior subcutaneous internal fixation (C-INFIX) for anterior pelvic ring instability injuries. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 36 cases of unstable pelvic injuries treated operatively at our institution, 20 of which were treated with C-INFIX and 16 with M-INFIX. Data collected included age, gender, ISS score, fracture typing, operative time, operative bleeding, postoperative complications, fracture healing time, Matta score, Majeed score, and follow-up time. Statistical sub-folding of each variable between the two groups was performed. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference between the C-INFIX and M-INFIX groups in terms of age, gender, ISS (Injury Severity Score), follow-up time, fracture typing, fracture healing time, and Majeed score (P > 0.05). the M-INFIX had a significantly lower incidence of postoperative complications than the C-INFIX group, especially in the incidence of Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) injury (P < 0.05). In contrast, the M-INFIX group had statistically higher operative time, intraoperative bleeding, and Matta score than the C-INFIX group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study was based on a modified application of the surgical experience with C-INFIX and showed better clinical outcomes in terms of complication rates and quality of repositioning than the conventional surgical approach. These findings indicate that further analytical studies of this study would be valuable.

Increased Dislocation Rates After Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Prior Isolated Sacroiliac Joint Arthrodesis.

BACKGROUND: While stiffness of the lumbosacral spine is a known predictor of instability following total hip arthroplasty (THA), little is known about the medical- and surgical-related outcomes following THA in patients who have prior isolated sacroiliac (SI) joint arthrodesis. METHODS: 197 patients who had a history of isolated SI joint arthrodesis who subsequently underwent elective primary THA for a diagnosis of osteoarthritis (THA-SI) from 2015 to 2021 were identified in a national administrative database. Using propensity score matching and logistic regression analyses, this cohort was compared to two groups of patients: patients who did not have any history of lumbar or SI arthrodesis and patients undergoing primary THA who had a history of lumbar arthrodesis without extension into the SI joint (THA-LF). RESULTS: The THA-SI group had a significantly higher incidence of dislocation (odds ratio 2.06, 95% confidence interval 1.04-4.04, P = .037) with no increased incidence of medical complications or other surgical complications when compared to patients without a history of SI or lumbar arthrodesis. There were no significant differences in any complications in THA-SI patients when compared to THA-LF patients. CONCLUSION: Patients who had prior isolated SI joint arthrodesis undergoing primary THA demonstrated a two-fold increased incidence of dislocation when compared to those who did not have prior SI arthrodesis, although the risk of complications in this population was similar to that observed in patients who had prior isolated lumbar spine arthrodesis.

Treatment of sacroiliac joint laxity-induced coronal imbalance with the kickstand rod technique.

BACKGROUND: Considerations of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) and its role in causing lower back and limb pain have taken a secondary role ever since Mixter and Barr's hallmark article in 1934 on the herniated nucleus pulposus. However, recent literature has highlighted the contribution of sacroiliac joint degeneration in the development of failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS), especially in patients undergoing lumbar or lumbosacral spinal fusion surgeries. Many reports have studied the anatomy, physiology, and clinical significance of the sacroiliac joint, but none have linked its dysfunction with other spinal deformities. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 63-year-old female with a history of multiple complex instrumented spinal fusions presented to our institution with progressive leftward coronal imbalance despite successful arthrodesis from T3 through S1. She was initially treated with decompression and reimplantation, but adjacent segment disease at the SIJ led to laxity, distal failure, and a worsening coronal deformity. A mechanical fall after her decompression surgery led to a dramatically increased coronal imbalance, which was ultimately treated using Lenke's kickstand rod technique. At 3.5 years follow up, the patient's coronal balance remains stable. CONCLUSION: Few studies have related SIJ degeneration and laxity with spinal deformity. Our case describes SIJ degeneration that evolved to joint laxity, which ultimately produced a leftward coronal imbalance according to the adjacent segment disease mechanism. Additionally, we describe the use of a kickstand rod to effectively correct the coronal imbalance, reduce pain levels, promote SIJ arthrodesis, and prevent further SIJ-related issues without significant complications over 3 years post-operation.