An Interleukin-33-Mast Cell-Interleukin-2 Axis Suppresses Papain-Induced Allergic Inflammation by Promoting Regulatory T Cell Numbers.

House dust mite-derived proteases contribute to allergic disorders in part by disrupting epithelial barrier function. Interleukin-33 (IL-33), produced by lung cells after exposure to protease allergens, can induce innate-type airway eosinophilia by activating natural helper (NH) cells, a member of group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2), to secrete Th2 type-cytokines. Because IL-33 also can induce mast cells (MCs) to secrete Th2 type-cytokines, MCs are thought to cooperate with NH cells in enhancing protease or IL-33-mediated innate-type airway eosinophilia. However, we found that MC-deficient Kit(W-sh/W-sh) mice exhibited exacerbated protease-induced lung inflammation associated with reduced numbers of regulatory T (Treg) cells. Moreover, IL-2 produced by IL-33-stimulated MCs promoted expansion of numbers of Treg cells, thereby suppressing development of papain- or IL-33-induced airway eosinophilia. We have thus identified a unique anti-inflammatory pathway that can limit induction of innate-type allergic airway inflammation mediated by NH cells.

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. Part II diagnosis and management.

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome, also known as drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, is a severe cutaneous adverse reaction characterized by an exanthem, fever, and hematologic and visceral organ involvement. The differential diagnosis includes other cutaneous adverse reactions, infections, inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, and neoplastic disorders. Three sets of diagnostic criteria have been proposed; however, consensus is lacking. The cornerstone of management is immediate discontinuation of the suspected drug culprit. Systemic corticosteroids remain first-line therapy, but the literature on steroid-sparing agents is expanding. Longitudinal evaluation for sequelae is recommended. Adjunctive tests for risk stratification and drug culprit identification remain under investigation. Part II of this continuing medical education activity begins by exploring the differential diagnosis and diagnosis of drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms and concludes with an evidence-based overview of evaluation and treatment.

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. Part I. Epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinicopathological features, and prognosis.

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DiHS), also known as drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), is a severe cutaneous adverse reaction (SCAR) characterized by an exanthem, fever, and hematologic and visceral organ involvement. Anticonvulsants, antibiotics, and allopurinol are the most common triggers. The pathogenesis involves a complex interplay between drugs, viruses, and the immune system primarily mediated by T-cells. DiHS/DRESS typically presents with a morbilliform eruption 2-6 weeks after drug exposure, and is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and risk of relapse. Long-term sequelae primarily relate to organ dysfunction and autoimmune diseases. Part I of this continuing medical education activity on DiHS/DRESS provides an update on epidemiology, novel insights into pathogenesis, and a description of clinicopathological features and prognosis.

Characterization of drug-induced liver injury associated with drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms in two prospective DILI registries.

Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) associated with drug reactions with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is poorly characterized among patients of Western countries. We aimed to comprehensively assess the clinical characteristics, outcomes, and causative agents in a prospective, well-vetted cohort of DILI patients with DRESS (DILI-DRESS). We identified 53 DILI-DRESS cases from the Spanish DILI Registry and the Latin American DILI Network. For comparison purposes, we defined a group of DILI patients (n = 881). DILI-DRESS cases were younger (47 vs. 53 years, respectively; p = 0.042) and presented more frequently with cholestatic/mixed damage (p = 0.018). Most DILI-DRESS patients showed moderate liver injury, 13% developed severe damage, and only one patient (with hepatocellular injury due to anti-tuberculosis drugs) progressed to acute liver failure and died. DILI-DRESS cases showed a distinctive causative drug pattern compared to DILI cases. The most frequent drugs were carbamazepine (13%), anti-tuberculosis drugs (13%), amoxicillin-clavulanate (11%), and allopurinol and lamotrigine (7.6% each). Among all cases of DILI due to allopurinol and lamotrigine, 67% presented with a DILI-DRESS phenotype, respectively. Higher total bilirubin (TBL) levels at DILI recognition (odds ratio [OR] 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.45) and absence of eosinophilia (OR 8.77; 95% CI 1.11-69.20) increased the risk for developing a severe-fatal injury in DILI-DRESS patients. DILI-DRESS patients have a more frequent cholestasis/mixed pattern of injury at presentation, with antiepileptics as distinctive causative drug class. Most of the lamotrigine and allopurinol cases present with this phenotype. Higher TBL levels and absence of eosinophilia at DILI recognition are markers of poor outcomes.

Leukemoid reaction in minocycline-induced drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome: A brief report.

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is an idiosyncratic drug reaction hallmarked by cutaneous eruption, fever, lymphadenopathy, multiorgan involvement, and hematological abnormalities, most often eosinophilia and atypical lymphocytosis. Leukemoid reactions have rarely been described in DRESS syndrome and here we describe a 16-year-old male who was admitted to the hospital with DRESS syndrome due to minocycline, who had a severe leukocytosis up to 52.08 K/µL. He improved with cessation of minocycline and initiation of systemic steroids. We report this case to add to the literature on hematological abnormalities in pediatric DRESS syndrome.

Eosinophilia highly probable induced by carbapenems: A case report.

Eosinophilia is a challenge to our everyday clinical practice. There are multiple causes to consider when diagnosing eosinophilia, and drug hypersensitivity must be taken into account. It is especially difficult to manage it in hospitalized patients with multiple complications and infections. Allergy tests are not always as helpful as we would like, so we rely on clinical observation and laboratory analysis to establish our diagnosis. We present a unique clinical case because the same patient presented two clinical episodes of eosinophilia after the administration of Carbapenems in the context of abdominal infection.

DRESS syndrome: More than just a rash.

ABSTRACT: Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is rare but carries significant mortality and morbidity, making early identification and definitive management crucial. The diagnosis of DRESS is made clinically and involves consideration of a broad list of differential diagnoses. Given variable clinical presentations among patients with DRESS syndrome, clinicians should look for common findings and other hallmarks of the syndrome while monitoring for known complications. Additionally, clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion to avoid missing more mild presentations, such as in this case patient with DRESS syndrome minor.

Long-term clinical outcomes of aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease: Real-world data from an adult asthma cohort.

BACKGROUND: Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) is a phenotype of severe asthma, but its disease course has not been well documented compared with that of aspirin-tolerant asthma (ATA). OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the long-term clinical outcomes between AERD and ATA. METHODS: AERD patients were identified by the diagnostic code and positive bronchoprovocation test in a real-world database. Longitudinal changes in lung function, blood eosinophil/neutrophil counts, and annual numbers of severe asthma exacerbations (AEx) were compared between the AERD and the ATA groups. Within a year after baseline, two or more severe AEx events indicated severe AERD, whereas less than two AEx events indicated nonsevere AERD. RESULTS: Among asthmatics, 353 had AERD in which 166 and 187 patients had severe and nonsevere AERD, respectively, and 717 had ATA. AERD patients had significantly lower FEV1%, higher blood neutrophil counts, and higher sputum eosinophils (%) (all p < .05) as well as higher levels of urinary LTE4 and serum periostin, and lower levels of serum myeloperoxidase and surfactant protein D (all p < .01) than those with ATA. In a 10-year follow-up, the severe AERD group maintained lower FEV1% with more severe AEs than the nonsevere AERD group. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: We demonstrated that AERD patients presented poorer long-term clinical outcomes than ATA patients in real-world data analyses.

Cefotaxime-induced drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptom in a child with cross-reactivity to other cephalosporins and cosensitization to teicoplanin.

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptom (DRESS) is a severe adverse drug-induced reaction. Commonly related to anticonvulsant and allopurinol, DRESS can affect both adults and children. Cefotaxime is rarely associated with DRESS, especially with children. We report a cefotaxime-induced DRESS in a child and emphasize the role of allergological work-up to point out the culprit drug in exploring cross-reactivity and identifying a possible cosensitization. A 2-year-old boy was treated with cefotaxime, vancomycin and metronidazole for acute otomastoiditis. Metronidazole was withdrawn and vancomycin was changed by teicoplanin 10 and 15 days later, respectively. Nineteen days after ongoing cefotaxime and 4 days after teicoplanin intake, the patient developed hyperthermia, a widespread exanthema, facial oedema with neither mucosal involvement nor palpable lymphadenopathy. Biological tests revealed eosinophilia, atypical lymphocytes, mild cytolysis and a high lactate dehydrogenase level. Serological tests for viral and bacterial infections were negative. DRESS was suspected and the 2 antibiotics were withdrawn. Intradermal tests (IDT) were carried out 2 months later with cefotaxime and teicoplanin. They revealed a positive result at 48-hour reading. To assess cross-reactivity among ß-lactams, IDT to penicillins (benzylpenicillin, amoxicillin and oxacillin) was performed showing negative results at 48-hour reading. Nevertheless, IDT to cephalosporins (cefazolin, cefuroxime, ceftazidime and ceftriaxone) displayed positive results at 48-hour reading. As a result, IDT are of great interest and should be performed to confirm the role of cefotaxime and detect a potential cross-reactivity with chemically similar drugs and drugs taken before and during the episode of DRESS.

IL-33 induces histidine decarboxylase, especially in c-kit+ cells and mast cells, and roles of histamine include negative regulation of IL-33-induced eosinophilia.

OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: IL-33 is present in endothelial, epithelial, and fibroblast-like cells and released upon cell injury. IL-33 reportedly induces mast-cell degranulation and is involved in various diseases, including allergic diseases. So, IL-33-related diseases seem to overlap with histamine-related diseases. In addition to the release from mast cells, histamine is newly formed by the induction of histidine decarboxylase (HDC). Some inflammatory and/or hematopoietic cytokines (IL-1, IL-3, etc.) are known to induce HDC, and the histamine produced by HDC induction is released without storage. We examined the involvement of HDC and histamine in the effects of IL-33. RESULTS: A single intraperitoneal injection of IL-33 into mice induced HDC directly and/or via other cytokines (including IL-5) within a few hours in various tissues, particularly strongly in hematopoietic organs. The major cells exhibiting HDC-induction were mast cells and c-kit+ cells in the bone marrow. HDC was also induced in non-mast cells in non-hematopoietic organs. HDC, histamine, and histamine H4 receptors (H4Rs) contributed to the suppression of IL-33-induced eosinophilia. CONCLUSION: IL-33 directly and indirectly (via IL-5) induces HDC in various cells, particularly potently in c-kit+ cells and mature mast cells, and the newly formed histamine contributes to the negative regulation of IL-33-induced eosinophilia via H4Rs.

DRESS/DiHS syndrome induced by Propylthiouracil: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), also known as Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DiHS), is a severe adverse drug reaction. Propylthiouracil, a member of thiouracils group, is widely used in medical treatment of hyperthyroidism. Propylthiouracil is associated with multiple adverse effects such as rash, agranulocytosis hepatitis and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis, but rarely triggers DRESS/DiHS syndrome. Here, we describe a severe case of propylthiouracil-induced DRESS/DiHS syndrome. CASE PRESENTATION: A 38-year-old female was treated with methimazole for hyperthyroidism at first. 4 weeks later, the patient developed elevated liver transaminase so methimazole was stopped. After liver function improved in 2 weeks, medication was switched to propylthiouracil therapy. The patient subsequently developed nausea and rash followed by a high fever, acute toxic hepatitis and multiple organ dysfunction (liver, lung and heart), which lasted for 1 month after propylthiouracil was started. According to the diagnostic criteria, the patient was diagnosed of DRESS/DiHS syndrome which was induced by propylthiouracil. As a result, propylthiouracil was immediately withdrawn. And patient was then treated with adalimumab, systematic corticosteroids and plasmapheresis in sequence. Symptoms were finally resolved 4 weeks later. CONCLUSIONS: Propylthiouracil is a rare cause of the DRESS/DiHS syndrome, which typically consists of severe dermatitis and various degrees of internal organ involvement. We want to emphasize through this severe case that DRESS/DiHS syndrome should be promptly recognized to hasten recovery.

Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis developed after dupilumab administration in patients with eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis and asthma: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is a form of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) associated vasculitis characterized by eosinophil-rich granulomatous inflammation and small-to-medium vessel vasculitis associated with asthma, rhinosinusitis, and eosinophilia. EGPA is often difficult to distinguish from severe asthma and eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (ECRS) in cases when there are no findings that suggest vasculitis. Dupilumab, an anti-IL-4Rα monoclonal antibody, is expected to be effective in eosinophilic airway inflammatory diseases, such as refractory asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Although transient eosinophilia and eosinophilic pneumoniae have been reported in patients with refractory asthma and CRS associated with dupilumab, few studies have examined the development of EGPA. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of a 61-year-old woman treated with dupilumab for refractory ECRS and eosinophilic otitis media (EOM) complicated by severe asthma. Although she had a previous history of eosinophilic pneumoniae and myeloperoxidase (MPO) ANCA positivity, there were no apparent findings of vasculitis before the initiation of dupilumab. After the second administration of dupilumab, several adverse events developed, including worsening of ECRS, EOM and asthma, and neuropathy. A blood test showed an eosoinophilia and re-elevation of MPO-ANCA levels after the administration of dupilumab. Therefore, dupilumab was discontinued owing to the development of EGPA, and prednisolone and azathioprine administration was initiated for a remission induction therapy. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report that suggests that dupilumab may directly trigger the manifestation of vasculitis in patients who were previously MPO-ANCA-positive. Although the precise mechanism of how dupilumab could trigger the development of EGPA requires further elucidation, measuring MPO-ANCA in patients with multiple eosinophilic disorders before the initiation of dupilumab might be helpful when considering the possibility of a latent EGPA. When administering dupilumab to patients with a previous history of MPO-ANCA positivity, clinicians must carefully monitor and collaborate with other specialists in the pertinent fields of study for appropriate usage.

Gemcitabine-associated DRESS syndrome: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Gemcitabine is a well-tolerated pyrimidine antimetabolite chemotherapeutic that is increasingly utilized to treat non-small cell lung carcinoma, breast, pancreatic, and urogenital cancers. Myelosuppression is a common side effect and skin rashes can be observed. We discuss a case of the exceedingly rare DRESS syndrome, which appeared following Gemcitabine treatment. CASE REPORT: A 60-year-old patient with pancreatic cancer and liver metastases received therapy with Gemcitabine as a single agent. Fever, itching, and redness started to be reported on the third day of receiving Gemcitabine treatment. The patient's diffuse maculopapular rash steadily got worse, leading to hospitalization. MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME: In the patient's physical examination, a high fever, hepatomegaly, and a diffuse macular papular rash were detected, an increase in eosinophils in the complete blood count and peripheral blood. A skin biopsy was performed. It was determined that the patient had Gemcitabine-associated DRESS syndrome. Antihistamines and local steroids were administered. On the fifth day following treatment, skin lesions and eosinophilia decreased. DISCUSSION: The most common cause of DRESS syndrome, a disorder marked by extensive skin eruption, fever, eosinophilia, and systemic symptoms, is medication use. Infections including HHV-6, EBV, and CMV can occasionally be the reason. Gemcitabine is one of the medications that is frequently used in cancer, and a case was provided because the literature review did not mention Gemcitabine-related DRESS syndrome.

Cycle-dependent eosinophilia due to adjuvant nivolumab for malignant melanoma.

INTRODUCTION: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been widely used in the contemporary anticancer armamentarium. However, new side effects due to these agents have continued to emerge. CASE REPORT: We describe herein a 71-year-old patient who received nivolumab as adjuvant therapy for malignant melanoma of the skin. He developed eosinophilia starting at 4 weeks of therapy. Eosinophilia increased progressively during the first six nivolumab cycles, then stabilized. Cycle-dependent increments were observed. Subsequently, the patient experienced well-known side effects of ICIs such as grade 1 diarrhea, arthralgias, and erythematous papular rash. MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME: Nivolumab was continued, and absolute eosinophil counts were monitored. Prednisone 10 mg PO daily was required for moderate gastroenteritis, dermatitis, and arthritis, which all subsequently improved. Eosinophil levels gradually downtrended after starting prednisone. Causality assessment between nivolumab and eosinophilia via adverse drug reaction (ADR) probability scale revealed a score of 9. DISCUSSION: Physicians and pharmacists need to be aware of this important side effect of ICI therapy. Eosinophilia in the context of ICI use has been previously reported in clinical trials. Our case is unique as eosinophilia was cumulative, showed increments every 8 weeks, and exhibited a trend toward cycle dependency. Extensive and expensive workup does not appear warranted, and simple monitoring of complete blood count is appropriate in most patients. Further studies are necessary to assess the true incidence, pattern, and severity of eosinophilia related to ICIs as well as its association with clinical outcomes.

Multiple Drug Hypersensitivity in a Small Child with DRESS Syndrome - A Case Report.

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) belongs to the group of severe cutaneous adverse reactions. Here we report a case of drug hypersensitivity against multiple antibiotics with DRESS in a young child with necrotizing pneumonia.

Comparison of cyclosporine and systemic corticosteroid for treating drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome: A retrospective 20-year single-centre study in South Korea.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a potentially life-threatening hypersensitive disorder. Cyclosporine has been indicated for adverse cutaneous drug eruptions. However, studies evaluating its clinical effectiveness in DRESS syndrome have been rare. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of cyclosporine in DRESS syndrome compared to that of systemic corticosteroids. METHODS: In the cyclosporine group, oral cyclosporine was administered twice a day for a total of 2-3 mg/kg/day for 1 week, and subsequently reduced to 1-1.5 mg/kg/day for extended treatment. In the corticosteroid group, intravenous or oral methylprednisolone was administered at 1-1.5 mg/kg/day for 1 week, with variable tapering plans. Laboratory changes before and after treatment, hospitalized days, treatment periods, and time to normalization from clinical manifestations in each group were statistically evaluated. Adverse effects of these regimens were observed during the entire treatment period. RESULTS: Eighty patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. The cyclosporine and corticosteroid group had 27 and 53 patients, respectively. Total leucocyte and eosinophil counts, liver enzymes, and C-reactive proteins were significantly decreased after treatment in both groups. There were no statistically significant differences observed in hospitalized days, treatment period, and time to normalization from clinical manifestations between the two groups. The corticosteroid group experienced relatively more adverse effects than the cyclosporine group. CONCLUSIONS: Cyclosporine was discovered to be clinically effective in DRESS syndrome and this study suggests that cyclosporine could be a feasible primary therapeutic option for DRESS syndrome.

Immunopathogenic Insights on Preferential Human Herpesvirus-6 Reactivation in Drug Rash With Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms: A Scoping Review.

INTRODUCTION: Human herpesvirus-6 (HHV-6) is a ubiquitous lymphotropic betaherpesvirus that can reactivate in drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS). Despite recent publications advancing our understanding of HHV-6 in DRESS, the exact role of HHV-6 in disease pathogenesis remains unclear. METHODS: A scoping review with the PubMed query "(HHV 6 AND (drug OR DRESS OR DIHS)) OR (HHV6 AND (drug OR DRESS OR DIHS))" was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Articles containing original data on at least one DRESS patient with HHV-6 testing were included. RESULTS: Our search returned a total of 373 publications, of which 89 met eligibility criteria. HHV-6 reactivation occurred in 63% of DRESS patients (n = 748), which was significantly more often than other herpesviruses. HHV-6 reactivation was associated with worse outcomes and greater severity in controlled studies. Case reports have demonstrated sometimes fatal HHV-6-related multi-organ involvement. Temporally, HHV-6 reactivation typically occurs 2 to 4 weeks after DRESS onset and has been linked to markers of immunologic signaling, such as OX40 (CD134), an HHV-6 entry receptor. Efficacy of antiviral or immunoglobulin treatment has only been demonstrated anecdotally, and steroid use may affect HHV-6 reactivation. CONCLUSION: HHV-6 is implicated in DRESS more than in any other dermatologic condition. It is still unclear whether HHV-6 reactivation is cause or consequence of DRESS dysregulation. Similar pathogenic mechanisms precipitated by HHV-6 in other contexts may be relevant in DRESS. Future randomized controlled studies to assess effects of viral suppression on clinical outcomes is needed.

Tofacitinib-induced eosinophilia.

Tofacitinib is an oral small molecule JAK inhibitor approved for the treatment of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). Its efficacy and safety have been demonstrated in phase III clinical trials and supported by real-life data. We report the case of an 18-year-old woman with a 1-year diagnosis of left-sided UC, with multiple admissions due to disease exacerbation or infections, refractory to infliximab (with azathioprine) and currently under treatment with vedolizumab and tacrolimus. She was admitted due to a severe disease exacerbation and, because of a previous history of neuropsychiatric side effects to corticotherapy, tofacitinib was initiated. In the following 6 days, there was no clinical improvement of UC, and serial blood work-up revealed moderate grade persistent peripheral eosinophilia (3000 cells/mm3) and acute kidney injury grade 1 KDIGO. Tofacitinib temporary suspension was decided, with a rapid normalization of renal function/eosinophil levels. Tofacitinib was restarted 2 days after its suspension. However, she developed moderate eosinophilia (2000 cells/mm3) again, which was considered an adverse effect (AE) to tofacitinib, leading to its suspension with eosinophilia resolution. Given the severity of the disease, after a multidisciplinary discussion, it was decided to start high-dose corticotherapy and ustekinumab with maintenance therapy every 4 weeks, and to add tacrolimus. Clinical and biochemical remission were achieved, and the patient was discharged. Three-month follow-up after tofacitinib suspension showed no recrudescence of eosinophilia. Tofacitinib represents a significant advance in the management of UC patients. The drug has a good safety profile with few related AE. This case aims to warn about an adverse reaction to tofacitinib not reported so far, including in a multicenter real-life setting recently published by Hernández et al where eosinophilia is also not described, thus emphasizing the rarity of this AE. To our knowledge this is the first case of tofacitinib-induced eosinophilia in the context of UC. .

DRESS syndrome secondary to carbamazepine.

DRESS syndrome is a multisystem disorder that appears in the context of an adverse drug reaction, characterized by fever, rash and peripheral eosinophilia with involvement of other organs such as the liver. The typical liver involvement is acute toxic hepatitis (DILI), showing improvement and a tendency to resolution when corticotherapy is started. We must not forget this manifestation in the clinical context of a DRESS syndrome.

Eosinophilic fasciitis in a young male auto mechanic exposed to organic solvents.

We report a case of eosinophilic fasciitis in a teenage auto mechanic who was most likely affected by occupational exposure to organic solvents, including the aromatic hydrocarbons benzene, trimethylbenzene, naphthalene, toluene, and xylene. The patient presented with an 8-month history of painful induration of his extremities and an abnormal gait. A deep excisional biopsy of the fascia was obtained, demonstrating subcutaneous fibrosis with perivascular and interstitial inflammation, with lymphocytes and plasma cells spilling into the sclerosed fascia, and focal fibrinoid necrosis. Treatment was begun with intravenous pulse doses of methylprednisolone, prednisone (20 mg daily), and subcutaneous methotrexate (25 mg weekly), and the patient's painful induration had resolved and gait had normalized at the 6-month follow-up. Our case suggests that exposure to organic solvents could be implicated in the pathogenesis of eosinophilic fasciitis and highlights the importance of a thorough occupational history to prevent repeat exposures to potentially causative agents.