Junctional Epidermolysis Bullosa in Sprague Dawley Rats Caused by a Frameshift Mutation of Col17a1 Gene.

Junctional epidermolysis bullosa is an intractable cutaneous disorder in humans causing skin fragility and blistering due to mutations in genes encoding essential molecules adhering epidermis and dermis including collagen XVII. However, the pathogenesis still remains to be not fully understood perhaps because of a lack of appropriate animal models. In this study, we report novel mutant rats experiencing junctional epidermolysis bullosa, which was confirmed to be caused by a frameshift mutation of Col17a1 gene, as a rat model for investigating the underlying mechanism of pathogenesis. The mutant rats completely lacked the expression of collagen XVII and had blisters leading to infantile deaths as a homozygous condition, although their skin was apparently normal at birth by light microscopic evaluation except that immunohistochemical examination could not detect collagen XVII in any organs. These observations suggest that collagen XVII is not essential for the development of skin during the prenatal period but is indispensable for keeping epidermal-dermal connections stable after birth. Subsequent electron microscopic examinations further revealed an absence of hemidesmosomal inner plaques being composed of BP230, a binding partner of collagen XVII, and plectin in Col17a1-null newborns, albeit mRNA expressions of these molecules seemed to be unaffected at least during the fetal period. These results suggest that the lack of collagen XVII induces attenuation of hemidesmosomal inner plaques, which in turn destabilizes the epidermis-dermis connection and results in deterioration of epidermal physiology with formation of blisters after birth.

Transgenic Epidermal Cultures for Junctional Epidermolysis Bullosa - 5-Year Outcomes.

Inherited junctional epidermolysis bullosa is a severe genetic skin disease that leads to epidermal loss caused by structural and mechanical fragility of the integuments. There is no established cure for junctional epidermolysis bullosa. We previously reported that genetically corrected autologous epidermal cultures regenerated almost an entire, fully functional epidermis on a child who had a devastating form of junctional epidermolysis bullosa. We now report long-term clinical outcomes in this patient. (Funded by POR FESR 2014-2020 - Regione Emilia-Romagna and others.).

Patients suffering from dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa are prone to developing autoantibodies against skin proteins: A longitudinal confirmational study.

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a heritable skin blistering disease caused by variants in genes coding for proteins that secure cell-cell adhesion and attachment of the epidermis to the dermis. Interestingly, several proteins involved in inherited EB are also associated with autoimmune blistering diseases (AIBD). In this study, we present a long-term follow-up of 15 patients suffering from recessive dystrophic or junctional EB. From these patients, 62 sera were analysed for the presence of autoantibodies associated with AIBD. We show that patients suffering from recessive dystrophic EB (RDEB) are more susceptible to developing autoantibodies against skin proteins than patients suffering from junctional EB (70% vs. 20%, respectively). Interestingly, no correlation with age was observed. Most patients showed reactivity to Type XVII collagen/linear IgA bullous dermatosis autoantigen (n = 5; 33%), followed by BP230 (n = 4; 27%), Type VII collagen (n = 4; 27%) and laminin-332 (n = 1; 7%). The pathogenicity of these autoantibodies remains a subject for future experiments.

Junctional Epidermolysis Bullosa Linked to Homozygous Mutation in LAMC2 Gene: A Case Report With Eosinophil-Rich Inflammatory Infiltrate.

ABSTRACT: Junctional epidermolysis bullosa (JEB) is a rare, incurable, devastating, and mostly fatal congenital genetic disorder characterized by painful blistering of the skin and mucous membranes in response to minor trauma or pressure. JEB is classified roughly into 2 subtypes: JEB-Herlitz is caused by mutations on genes encoding laminin-332. The authors present a patient consulted with a suspicion of primary immunodeficiency due to skin sores that started at the age of 1 month and a history of 3 siblings who died with similar sores, who was diagnosed with JEB-Herlitz after detecting a homozygous LAMC2 gene mutation in WES analysis. Microscopic evaluation of hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections showed vesicle formation with subepidermal separation, which is accompanied by striking neutrophil and eosinophil leukocyte infiltration both in the vesicle and papillary dermis (eosinophil-rich inflammatory infiltrate). Such a histopathological finding has been rarely reported in this condition.

Gross motor development in children with epidermolysis bullosa.

BACKGROUND: Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a group of rare, congenital skin disorders, characterized by skin fragility and formation of blisters. The gross motor outcomes of children with EB are not known. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of the study was to measure the proportion of gross motor delay in children with EB. The secondary objectives were to measure the difference in gross motor outcomes between EB sub-types and change in gross motor outcomes over time. METHODS: Children with EB, aged between one month and five and a half years of age, attending the Sydney Children's Hospital, Epidermolysis Bullosa Clinic, were eligible. Carers completed Ages and Stages Questionnaires, Third Edition, on behalf of their children. Questionnaires were scored, and outcomes were compared to age-expected norms. RESULTS: There were 24 participants to complete a questionnaire. Eleven participants completed additional questionnaires over the 24 month study duration. The proportion of children with EB with gross motor delay was greater than age-expected norms (29.17% vs. 2.5%). The delay occurred in children with recessive dystrophic (80%) and epidermolysis bullosa simplex (33.33%) sub-types, but not dominant dystrophic (0%). No children with Junctional EB or Kindler EB joined this study. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a difference in gross motor outcomes in children with EB. Children with recessive dystrophic and epidermolysis bullosa simplex should be prioritized for monitoring of, and intervention for, gross motor outcomes through multidisciplinary care. Further research investigating long-term outcomes for children with EB and the effectiveness of interventions would be beneficial.

Integrin alpha 6 homozygous splice-site mutation causes a new form of junctional epidermolysis bullosa in Charolais cattle.

BACKGROUND: Inherited epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a group of painful and life-threatening genetic disorders that are characterized by mechanically induced blistering of the skin and mucous membranes. Congenital skin fragility resembling EB was recently reported in three Charolais calves born in two distinct herds from unaffected parents. Phenotypic and genetic analyses were carried out to describe this condition and its molecular etiology. RESULTS: Genealogical, pathological and histological investigations confirmed the diagnosis of recessive EB. However, the affected calves showed milder clinical signs compared to another form of EB, which was previously reported in the same breed and is caused by a homozygous deletion of the ITGB4 gene. Homozygosity mapping followed by analysis of the whole-genome sequences of two cases and 5031 control individuals enabled us to prioritize a splice donor site of ITGA6 (c.2160 + 1G > T; Chr2 g.24112740C > A) as the most compelling candidate variant. This substitution showed a perfect genotype-phenotype correlation in the two affected pedigrees and was found to segregate only in Charolais, and at a very low frequency (f = 1.6 × 10-4) after genotyping 186,154 animals from 15 breeds. Finally, RT-PCR analyses revealed increased retention of introns 14 and 15 of the ITGA6 gene in a heterozygous mutant cow compared with a matched control. The mutant mRNA is predicted to cause a frameshift (ITGA6 p.I657Mfs1) that affects the assembly of the integrin α6ß4 dimer and its correct anchoring to the cell membrane. This dimer is a key component of the hemidesmosome anchoring complex, which ensures the attachment of basal epithelial cells to the basal membrane. Based on these elements, we arrived at a diagnosis of junctional EB. CONCLUSIONS: We report a rare example of partial phenocopies observed in the same breed and due to mutations that affect two members of the same protein dimer, and provide the first evidence of an ITGA6 mutation that causes EB in livestock species.

Regeneration of the entire human epidermis using transgenic stem cells.

Junctional epidermolysis bullosa (JEB) is a severe and often lethal genetic disease caused by mutations in genes encoding the basement membrane component laminin-332. Surviving patients with JEB develop chronic wounds to the skin and mucosa, which impair their quality of life and lead to skin cancer. Here we show that autologous transgenic keratinocyte cultures regenerated an entire, fully functional epidermis on a seven-year-old child suffering from a devastating, life-threatening form of JEB. The proviral integration pattern was maintained in vivo and epidermal renewal did not cause any clonal selection. Clonal tracing showed that the human epidermis is sustained not by equipotent progenitors, but by a limited number of long-lived stem cells, detected as holoclones, that can extensively self-renew in vitro and in vivo and produce progenitors that replenish terminally differentiated keratinocytes. This study provides a blueprint that can be applied to other stem cell-mediated combined ex vivo cell and gene therapies.

Paired nicking-mediated COL17A1 reframing for junctional epidermolysis bullosa.

Junctional epidermolysis bullosa (JEB) is a debilitating hereditary skin disorder caused by mutations in genes encoding laminin-332, type XVII collagen (C17), and integrin-α6ß4, which maintain stability between the dermis and epidermis. We designed patient-specific Cas9-nuclease- and -nickase-based targeting strategies for reframing a common homozygous deletion in exon 52 of COL17A1 associated with a lack of full-length C17 expression. Subsequent characterization of protein restoration, indel composition, and divergence of DNA and mRNA outcomes after treatment revealed auspicious efficiency, safety, and precision profiles for paired nicking-based COL17A1 editing. Almost 46% of treated primary JEB keratinocytes expressed reframed C17. Reframed COL17A1 transcripts predominantly featured 25- and 37-nt deletions, accounting for >42% of all edits and encoding C17 protein variants that localized accurately to the cell membrane. Furthermore, corrected cells showed accurate shedding of the extracellular 120-kDa C17 domain and improved adhesion capabilities to laminin-332 compared with untreated JEB cells. Three-dimensional (3D) skin equivalents demonstrated accurate and continuous deposition of C17 within the basal membrane zone between epidermis and dermis. Our findings constitute, for the first time, gene-editing-based correction of a COL17A1 mutation and demonstrate the superiority of proximal paired nicking strategies based on Cas9 D10A nickase over wild-type Cas9-based strategies for gene reframing in a clinical context.

IgA nephropathy in adults with epidermolysis bullosa.

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a devastating genetic condition caused by mutations in genes that give rise to aberrant proteins. There are 16 different such proteins implicated in EB that are important in maintaining the integrity of the dermoepidermal junction. It is classified into four major subtypes: (i) EB simplex; (ii) junctional EB (JEB); (iii) dystrophic EB (DEB); and (iv) Kindler EB. Renal disease is a recognized complication of EB and the aetiology is complex. We describe our experience of managing five patients with EB and IgA nephropathy. We recommend that patients with recessive DEB and JEB routinely have the following monitored: renal function, urinary albumin/creatinine ratio, urine analysis, serum albumin levels and immunoglobulins; specifically serum IgA. Management of IgA nephropathy in the context of EB should be tailored to the individual and be carried out within a specialist multidisciplinary team. Our case series provides important insights into the treatment of IgA nephropathy in patients with EB and will help inform treatment in this rare genetic disease. Case series and reports like ours are key in gaining real-life data to quantify the actual risk of morbidity and mortality from each of the treatment modalities discussed.

Epidemiology of inherited epidermolysis bullosa in Germany.

BACKGROUND: Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a rare genetic disorder manifesting with skin and mucosal membrane blistering in different degrees of severity. OBJECTIVE: Epidemiological data from different countries have been published, but none are available from Germany. METHODS: In this population-based cross-sectional study, people living with EB in Germany were identified using the following sources: academic hospitals, diagnostic laboratories and patient organization. RESULTS: Our study indicates an overall EB incidence of 45 per million live births in Germany. With 14.23 per million live births for junctional EB, the incidence is higher than in other countries, possibly reflecting the availability of early molecular genetic diagnostics in severely affected neonates. Dystrophic EB was assessed at 15.58 cases per million live births. The relatively low incidence found for EB simplex, 14.93 per million live births, could be explained by late or missed diagnosis, but also by 33% of cases remaining not otherwise specified. Using log-linear models, we estimated a prevalence of 54 per million for all EB types, 2.44 for junctional EB, 12.16 for dystrophic EB and 28.44 per million for EB simplex. These figures are comparable to previously reported data from other countries. CONCLUSIONS: Altogether, there are at least 2000 patients with EB in the German population. These results should support national policies and pharmaceutical companies in decision-making, allow more precise planning of drug development and clinical trials, and aid patient advocacy groups in their effort to improve quality of life of people with this orphan disease.

A heterozygous mutation in ITGB4 causing a mild phenotype of junctional epidermolysis bullosa.

Mutations in ITGB4 are known to cause autosomal recessive junctional epidermolysis bullosa (JEB), which is manifested by severe blistering and granulation tissue, usually complicating pyloric atresia and even leading to death. ITGB4-associated autosomal dominant epidermolysis bullosa has rarely been documented. Herein, we identified a heterozygous pathogenic variant (c.433G>T; p.Asp145Tyr) in ITGB4 causing a mild phenotype of JEB in a Chinese family.

Clinical and molecular features in a cohort of Middle Eastern patients with epidermolysis bullosa.

BACKGROUND: Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) features skin and mucosal fragility due to pathogenic variants in genes encoding components of the cutaneous basement membrane. Based on the level of separation within the dermal-epidermal junction, EB is sub-classified into four major types including EB simplex (EBS), junctional EB (JEB), dystrophic EB (DEB), and Kindler EB (KEB) with 16 EB-associated genes reported to date. METHODS: We ascertained a cohort of 151 EB patients of various Middle Eastern ethnic backgrounds. RESULTS: The cohort was comprised of EBS (64%, 97/151), DEB (21%, 31/151), JEB (12%, 18/151), and KEB (3%, 5/151). KRT14 and KRT5 variants were most common among EBS patients with 43% (42/97) and 46% (45/97) of EBS patients carrying mutations in either of these two genes, respectively. Truncal involvement was more common in KRT14-associated EBS as compared to EBS due to KRT5 mutations (p < .05). Mutations in COL17A1 and laminin 332-encoding genes were identified in 55% (10/18) and 45% (8/18) of JEB patients. Scarring alopecia, caries, and EB nevi were most common among JEB patients carrying COL17A1 mutations as compared to laminin 332-associated JEB (p < .05). Abnormal nails were evident in most DEB and JEB patients while poikiloderma was exclusively observed in KEB (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: EB patients of Middle Eastern origin were found to feature specific phenotype-genotype correlations of relevance to the diagnosis and genetic counseling of patients in this region.

A Novel Fluorescence-Based Screen of Gene Editing Molecules for Junctional Epidermolysis Bullosa.

Junctional epidermolysis bullosa (JEB) is a severe blistering skin disease caused by mutations in genes encoding structural proteins essential for skin integrity. In this study, we developed a cell line suitable for gene expression studies of the JEB-associated COL17A1 encoding type XVII collagen (C17), a transmembrane protein involved in connecting basal keratinocytes to the underlying dermis of the skin. Using the CRISPR/Cas9 system of Streptococcus pyogenes we fused the coding sequence of GFP to COL17A1 leading to the constitutive expression of GFP-C17 fusion proteins under the control of the endogenous promoter in human wild-type and JEB keratinocytes. We confirmed the accurate full-length expression and localization of GFP-C17 to the plasma membrane via fluorescence microscopy and Western blot analysis. As expected, the expression of GFP-C17mut fusion proteins in JEB keratinocytes generated no specific GFP signal. However, the CRISPR/Cas9-mediated repair of a JEB-associated frameshift mutation in GFP-COL17A1mut-expressing JEB cells led to the restoration of GFP-C17, apparent in the full-length expression of the fusion protein, its accurate localization within the plasma membrane of keratinocyte monolayers as well as within the basement membrane zone of 3D-skin equivalents. Thus, this fluorescence-based JEB cell line provides the potential to serve as a platform to screen for personalized gene editing molecules and applications in vitro and in appropriate animal models in vivo.

The epidemiology of epidermolysis bullosa in England and Wales: data from the national epidermolysis bullosa database.

BACKGROUND: The National Health Service (NHS) epidermolysis bullosa (EB) service, established in 2002, offers comprehensive, free care to all patients in England and Wales. OBJECTIVES: To quantify prevalence, incidence and mortality of EB in England and Wales. METHODS: Demographic data for patients in England and Wales were collected on a secure electronic database, prospectively from January 2002 to April 2021 and retrospectively for cases prior to 2002. Vital status was verified using central NHS data. RESULTS: By March 2021, 2594 individuals were registered, of whom 2361 were living, which yielded a prevalence of 34·8 per million of the population for all EB types [EB simplex (EBS) 17 per million, dystrophic EB (DEB) 10·7 per million, junctional EB (JEB) 1 per million and Kindler EB 0·3 per million]. We recorded 1200 babies with EB born since 2002. The average incidence per million live births for EBS, DEB, JEB and Kindler EB was 32·5, 26·1, 8·9 and 0·9, respectively (total incidence for all types of EB was 67·8 per million). Birth rates fell progressively over the 19-year period for JEB-severe (JEB-S) (r = -0·56) and recessive DEB-severe (r = -0·44) and also for milder types of EB. We observed longer survival in JEB-S over the 19-year period (r2 = 0·18) with a median survival of 12·7 months over the past 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we provide the first accurate epidemiological data for EB in England and Wales. We believe the observed reduction in birth incidence of severe types of EB reflects an uptake of genetic counselling advice, whereas the reduction in milder types may be due to delayed presentation. A potential small trend towards longer survival of babies with JEB-S may reflect improved multidisciplinary care.

A retrospective analysis of diagnostic testing in a large North American cohort of patients with epidermolysis bullosa.

BACKGROUND: Accurate diagnosis of epidermolysis bullosa (EB) has significant implications for prognosis, management, and genetic counseling. OBJECTIVE: To describe diagnostic testing patterns and assess diagnostic concordance of transmission electron microscopy (TEM), immunofluorescence mapping (IFM), and genetic analysis for EB. METHODS: A retrospective cohort included patients enrolled in the Epidermolysis Bullosa Clinical Characterization and Outcomes Database from January 1, 2004, to July 8, 2019. Tests concluding the same EB type (EB simplex, junctional EB, dominant dystrophic EB, and recessive dystrophic EB) were considered concordant; those concluding different EB types were considered discordant; and those with nonspecific/nondefinitive results were equivocal. RESULTS: A total of 970 diagnostic tests were conducted from 1984 to 2018 in 771 patients. Genetic analyses were performed chronologically later than IFM or TEM (P < .001). The likelihood of undergoing genetic analysis was greater for junctional EB and recessive dystrophic EB, and the same for dominant dystrophic EB as compared with EB simplex. TEM results in 163 patients were equivocal (55%), concordant (42%), and discordant (3%). IFM results in 185 patients were equivocal (54%), concordant (42%), and discordant (4%). LIMITATIONS: Retrospective design. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic testing has shifted in favor of genetic analysis. TEM and IFM frequently offer equivocal findings when compared to the specificity afforded by genetic analysis.

Junctional epidermolysis bullosa with extensive lung involvement in three patients with a LAMB3 Mutation.

Junctional epidermolysis bullosa (JEB) is characterized by skin and mucous membrane fragility leading to easy blistering. Blistering may be the result of multiple genetic mutations, including the LAMB3 gene encoding a subunit of laminin 332, an important protein in the basement membrane zone. The clinical presentation of JEB includes blistering and granulation tissue forming anywhere on the skin including around oral and nasal cavities, fingers, toes, and within mucous membranes such as the upper respiratory tract. Lung pathology associated with JEB is less commonly reported; we describe three children with LAMB3 pathogenic variants with extensive lung injury contributing to decline in clinical status and likely leading to their demise early in life.

Whole exome sequencing in a sample of Peruvian patients diagnosed with epidermolysis bullosa.

BACKGROUND: Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a complex and heterogeneous dermatological disease. Four main types of EB have been described, each of them with distinct characteristics: EB simplex (EBS), dystrophic EB (DEB), junctional EB (JEB) and Kindler EB (KEB). Each main type varies in its manifestations, severity, and genetic abnormality. METHODS: We sought mutations in 19 genes known to cause EB and 10 genes associated with other dermatologic diseases in 35 Peruvian pediatric patients of a rich Amerindian genetic background. Whole exome sequencing and bioinformatics analysis was performed. RESULTS: Thirty-four of 35 families revealed an EB mutation. Dystrophic EB was the most frequently diagnosed type, with 19 (56%) patients, followed by EBS (35%), JEB (6%), and KEB (3%). We found 37 mutations in seven genes; 27 (73%) were missense mutations; 22 (59%) were novel mutations. Five cases changed their initial diagnosis of EBS. Four were reclassified as DEB and one as JEB. Inspection into other non-EB genes revealed a variant, c.7130C>A, in the gene FLGR2, which was present in 31 of the 34 patients (91%). CONCLUSION: We were able to confirm and identify pathological mutations in 34 of 35 patients.

Successful kidney transplantation in a patient with neonatal-onset ILNEB.

BACKGROUND: ILNEB constitute an autosomal recessive disorder caused by homozygous or compound heterozygous mutation of the gene for the ITGA3. To date, 8 ILNEB patients have been reported, but all 6 neonatal-onset ILNEB patients suffered early death within 2 years. The most common cause of death among previously reported ILNEB patients was exacerbation of the respiratory condition. METHODS: In this study, we describe a case of ILNEB with neonatal onset in a female patient and the genetic and histopathological testing performed. RESULTS: Our patient had a compound heterozygous mutation in ITGA3. Compared to previously reported patients, this patient exhibited milder clinical and histopathological characteristics. After experiencing a life-threatening respiratory infection at 8 months old, the patient started periodic subcutaneous immunoglobulin treatment once every 1-2 weeks for nephrotic-range proteinuria-induced secondary hypogammaglobulinemia. At the age of 3 years, proteinuria gradually increased with severe edema despite strict internal management. Therefore, our patient underwent unilateral nephrectomy and insertion of a peritoneal dialysis catheter followed by another unilateral nephrectomy. One month later, she underwent an ABO-compatible living-donor kidney transplantation at the age of 4 years. CONCLUSIONS: Our patient is a neonatal-onset ILNEB patient who survived for more than 2 years and underwent successful kidney transplantation.

Gentamicin Induces Laminin 332 and Improves Wound Healing in Junctional Epidermolysis Bullosa Patients with Nonsense Mutations.

Generalized severe junctional epidermolysis bullosa (GS-JEB) is an incurable and fatal autosomal recessively inherited blistering skin disease caused by mutations in the LAMA3, LAMB3, or LAMC2 genes. Most of these mutations are nonsense mutations that create premature termination codons that lead to impaired production of functional laminin 332, a protein needed for epidermal-dermal adherence. Gentamicin induces readthrough of nonsense mutations and restores the full-length protein in various genetic diseases. Using primary keratinocytes from three GS-JEB patients, we showed that gentamicin induced functional laminin 332 that reversed a JEB-associated, abnormal cell phenotype. In a subsequent open-label trial involving the same patients, we examined whether 0.5% gentamicin ointment applied topically to open skin wounds could promote nonsense mutation readthrough and create new laminin 332 in the patients' skin. Gentamicin-treated wounds exhibited increased expression of laminin 332 at the dermal-epidermal junction for at least 3 months and were associated with improved wound closure. There were no untoward side effects from topical gentamicin. The newly induced laminin 332 did not generate anti-laminin 332 autoantibodies in either the patients' blood or skin. Gentamicin readthrough therapy may be a treatment for GS-JEB patients with nonsense mutations.

Immunofluorescence mapping, electron microscopy and genetics in the diagnosis and sub-classification of inherited epidermolysis bullosa: a single-centre retrospective comparative study of 87 cases with long-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) comprises a heterogeneous group of skin fragility disorders, classified in four major types based on skin cleavage level, i.e. EB simplex (EBS), junctional EB (JEB), dystrophic EB (DEB), Kindler EB, and in more than 30 subtypes defined by the combination of laboratory and clinical data, including disease course. OBJECTIVES: Our aims were to address whether, in the age of genomics, electron microscopy (TEM) has still a role in diagnosing EB, and whether the genotype per se may be sufficient to sub-classify EB. METHODS: A thoroughly characterized single-centre EB case series was retrospectively evaluated to compare the power of TEM with immunofluorescence mapping (IFM) in establishing the EB type, and the ability of TEM, IFM and genetics to predict selected EB subtypes, i.e. severe dominant EBS (DEBS), severe JEB, severe recessive DEB (RDEB) and DEB self-improving, using genetic and final diagnosis, respectively, as gold standard. RESULTS: The series consisted of 87 patients, including 44 newborns, with a median follow-up of 54 months. Ninety-five mutations were identified in EB-associated genes, including 25 novel variants. Both IFM and TEM were diagnostic in about all cases of JEB (21/21 for both) and DEB (43/44 for IFM, 44/44 for TEM). TEM sensitivity was superior to IFM for EBS (19/20 vs. 16/19). As to EB subtyping, IFM performed better than genetics in identifying severe JEB cases due to laminin-332 defect (14/14 vs. 10/14) and severe RDEB (eight/nine vs. seven/nine). Genetics had no role in self-improving DEB diagnosis; it almost equalled TEM in predicting severe DEBS (eight/nine vs. nine/nine) and enabled to discriminate dominant from recessive non-severe DEB phenotypes and to identify special subtypes, e.g. DEBS with KLHL24 mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Transmission electron microscopy remains relevant to the diagnosis of EBS. IFM and genetics are essential and complementary tools in the vast majority of EB cases.