Outcomes of children with life-threatening status asthmaticus requiring isoflurane therapy and extracorporeal life support.

BACKGROUND: Severe, refractory asthma is a life-threatening emergency that may be treated with isoflurane and extracorporeal life support. The objective of this study was to describe the clinical response to isoflurane and outcomes after discharge of children who received isoflurane and/or extracorporeal life-support for near-fatal asthma. METHODS: This was a retrospective descriptive study using electronic medical record data from two pediatric intensive care units within a single healthcare system in Atlanta, GA. RESULTS: Forty-five children received isoflurane, and 14 children received extracorporeal life support, 9 without a trial of isoflurane. Hypercarbia and acidosis improved within four hours of starting isoflurane. Four children died during the index admission for asthma. Twenty-seven percent had a change in Functional Status Score of three or more points from baseline to PICU discharge. Patients had median percent predicted FEV1 and FEV1/FVC ratios pre- and post-bronchodilator values below normal pediatric values. CONCLUSION: Children who received isoflurane and/or ECLS had a high frequency of previous PICU admission and intubation. Improvement in ventilation and acidosis occurred within the first four hours of starting isoflurane. Children who required isoflurane or ECLS may develop long-lasting deficits in their functional status. Children with near-fatal asthma are a high-risk group and require improved follow-up in the year following PICU discharge.

Omalizumab rescue therapy in refractory status asthmaticus.

INTRODUCTION: Refractory status asthmaticus (RSA) is a severe, life-threatening form of asthma exacerbation that persists despite aggressive treatment with systemic corticosteroids, bronchodilators, and other supportive measures. Omalizumab, a monoclonal antibody that targets IgE, has been approved for treating severe allergic asthma and is effective in reducing the frequency of exacerbations and improving asthma control. Limited evidence exists regarding the use of Omalizumab in RSA, but some studies have suggested that it may have a role in its management. CASE: A 39-year-old male with a decade-long history of asthma presented to the emergency department intubated and unresponsive to pharmacological therapy. The patient's IgE levels were elevated, and Omalizumab was administered after a comprehensive evaluation. The patient made a dramatic recovery and was successfully weaned off the ventilator within 24 h of receiving Omalizumab. He made an uneventful recovery and was discharged home on Omalizumab once every two weeks with regular follow-ups. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Per our literature search, only 3 cases have been reported where Omalizumab was administered to patients with RSA to wean them off ventilatory support successfully. This case study adds to the existing data on the potential benefits of Omalizumab in managing RSA. It suggests it may be a valuable treatment option for patients who do not respond to standard therapy. However, further research is needed to determine the efficacy and safety of Omalizumab in this population.

Adolescents' practical knowledge of asthma self-management and experiences in the context of acute asthma: a qualitative content analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize adolescents' practical knowledge of asthma self-management and experiences during acute asthma episodes, and compare practical knowledge between minority and non-minority groups. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis using a qualitative descriptive design of textual data collected from 126 adolescents that participated in a randomized controlled trial of an asthma self-management program. Directed content analysis was conducted using four constructs of asthma self-management including symptom prevention, symptom monitoring, acute symptom management, and symptom communication. RESULTS: Most of the adolescents knew how to prevent exercised-induced bronchoconstriction, but had limited understanding about how to assess and monitor the severity of acute symptoms, appropriately use bronchodilators, seek timely medical help, and communicate acute symptoms to caregivers or healthcare providers during a slow-onset and rapid-onset asthma attack. More minority participants monitored asthma using peak expiratory flow than non-minority participants, who often relied on symptom-based monitoring. Minority adolescents more frequently mentioned bronchodilator use to manage asthma attacks, while non-minority adolescents often reported use of complementary and alternative approaches. Minority youth mentioned accessing healthcare services for acute episodes more often than their non-minority counterparts. Minority participants mentioned communicating acute symptoms to their providers, or family members less frequently than non-minority youth. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents have insufficient practical knowledge about ways to prevent and manage acute asthma. Periodic assessment of learning needs related to asthma attacks should be considered a routine part of clinical visits for adolescents to provide targeted information support to address their identified needs.

Nebulizer versus metered dose inhaler with space chamber (MDI spacer) for acute asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation: attitudes of patients and healthcare providers in the COVID-19 era.

OBJECTIVE: Short-acting bronchodilators for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations are commonly delivered by nebulizers although administration using metered dose inhaler with space chamber (MDI spacer) has been shown to be equally efficacious. There are few studies examining patients' and healthcare providers' attitudes on the two administration methods in adults. This study explores patients' and healthcare providers' attitudes on the use of nebulizer versus MDI spacer for acute asthma and COPD exacerbations in adults. METHODS: Patients admitted for asthma or COPD exacerbations, doctors, and nurses in a university-affiliated hospital were surveyed from 1 April 2021 to 30 September 2021 regarding their views on the effectiveness, ease of use, preparation and administration, side effects, and infection risk of the two administration methods. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients, 103 doctors, and 650 nurses completed the survey. 60.6% of patients perceived nebulizer to be more effective. Patients who found nebulizer more comfortable were more likely to prefer nebulizer (OR 43.97, p = 0.01), while those who associated it with a greater infection risk were less likely to prefer nebulizer (OR 0.15, p = 0.03). 49.5% of doctors and 49.1% of nurses perceived nebulizer to be more effective, compared to 10.7% and 34.5%, respectively, for MDI spacer. Effectiveness and patient comfort influenced doctors' and nurses' preference for nebulizer while ease of preparation and administration influenced nurses' preference only. CONCLUSIONS: Patients and healthcare providers perceived nebulizer to be more effective. Factors unique to each group influenced their preference for nebulizer.

Antibiotic use among admitted pediatric patients in the United States with status asthmaticus before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: Hospital admission trends of children with status asthmaticus diminished during the Coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) pandemic of 2020, possibly secondary to several factors such as school closures and use of face masks. What effect this had on antibiotic prescribing practices has yet to be described. The objective of our study was to evaluate the use of antibiotics in hospitalized children with a diagnosis of status asthmaticus before and during the COVID pandemic.Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis was conducted using the TriNetX® cloud-based program with a national and institutional database. Each database was queried for all inpatient pediatric encounters from 3 to 18 years old, admitted with a diagnosis of status asthmaticus in the spring seasons of 2017-2019. Admission data and antibiotic usage were queried during the COVID-19 pandemic year of 2020 from both databases and compared amongst all study years.Results: In 2020, there was an overall decrease in the number of admissions as compared to the average number from 2017-2019, by 76.9% in the national database (p < 0.05) and 91.2% in the institutional database. The rates of antibiotic prescriptions significantly dropped among the national database (p < 0.001, z = 3.39) and remained non-significantly changed among the institutional database (p = 0.944 and z = 0.073).Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that the COVID-19 pandemic year of 2020 coincided with a significant decrease in hospital admissions and antibiotic prescribing prevalence among children with status asthmaticus on a national level. Nonetheless, our reported trends in antibiotic prescribing are still grossly similar to that of pre-pandemic times and may demonstrate a continued need for antimicrobial stewardship.

Early Intravenous Magnesium Sulfate Administration in the Emergency Department for Severe Asthma Exacerbations.

BACKGROUND: Severe asthma exacerbations in pediatric patients occur frequently and can require pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission. OBJECTIVE: To determine if early administration of intravenous magnesium sulfate (IVMg) to pediatric patients experiencing severe asthma exacerbations, defined as a respiratory clinical score (RCS) of 9 to 12, resulted in fewer PICU admissions. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of pediatric patients aged from 2 to 17 years presenting with a severe asthma exacerbation to a single tertiary care pediatric emergency department. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to determine if admission to the PICU was associated with early IVMg treatment, within 60 minutes of registration. RESULTS: A total of 1911 patients were included in the study, of which 1541 received IVMg. The average time to IVMg was 79 minutes, with 35% of the patients receiving it within 60 minutes of arrival. Two hundred forty-eight (13%) were admitted to the PICU, 641 (34%) were admitted to the general inpatient floor, and 1022 (53%) were discharged home. Factors associated with increased odds ratio (OR) of PICU admission were: early IVMg (OR, 1.63; 95% CI: 1.16-2.28), arrival mode to the emergency department via ambulance (OR, 2.23; 95% CI: 1.45-3.43), history of PICU admission for asthma (OR, 1.73; 95% CI: 1.22-2.44), and diagnosis of status asthmaticus (OR, 8.88; 95% CI: 3.49-30.07). Calculated OR of PICU admission subcategorized by RCS for early IVMg patients, after controlling for PICU risk factors, are as follows: RCS 9 (reference), RCS 10 (OR, 2.52; 95% CI: 0.89-2.23), RCS 11 (OR, 2.19; 95% CI: 1.3-3.70), and RCS 12 (OR, 4.12; 95% CI: 2.13-7.95). CONCLUSIONS: Early administration of IVMg to pediatric patients experiencing severe asthma exacerbations does not result in fewer PICU admissions.

Methylprednisolone, dexamethasone or hydrocortisone for acute severe pediatric asthma: does it matter?

OBJECTIVE: Various intravenous (IV) corticosteroids are available for acute severe asthma (ASA) treatment. The choice of IV corticosteroids varies broadly and depends on institution, country, or physician preferences. In this study, we compared the efficacy of IV methylprednisolone, hydrocortisone and dexamethasone in ASA treatment during pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission. METHODS: The study was a prospective randomized clinical trial. We enrolled patients of 1-21 years after they were admitted to the PICU requiring continuous beta-2 agonist treatment. Patients were randomized into three groups: Group A: IV Methylprednisolone, Group B: IV Hydrocortisone and Group C: IV Dexamethasone. The primary outcomes measured were durations of beta-2 agonist continuous nebulization treatment. Secondary outcomes, included PICU and hospital length of stay (LOS), pediatric asthma severity score (PASS), need for mechanical ventilation and maximum dose of beta-2 agonist treatment. RESULTS: 61 patients were included in the analysis. 22 patients recruited in Group A, 20 in group B and 19 group C. Median durations of beta-2-agonist treatment were 23 h (QR 16-38) for methylprednisolone, 27 h (QR 16-40) for hydrocortisone, and 32 h (QR 16-48) for dexamethasone (p = 0.90). There was no difference in PICU LOS, hospital LOS, PASS score, B2 agonist maximum dose, or need for ventilation support. CONCLUSIONS: The use of IV methylprednisolone, hydrocortisone, and dexamethasone have equivalent efficacy when used at the appropriate doses. Studies with larger cohorts are needed to compare the effectiveness of IV corticosteroids in the management of ASA in the PICU setting.

Intravenous methylprednisolone versus intravenous methylprednisolone combined with inhaled budesonide in acute severe pediatric asthma.

INTRODUCTION: Corticosteroids are important part of acute severe asthma (ASA) management in pediatric intensive care units. Few studies look at the efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in critical care settings. We aimed to investigate the potential beneficial effects of ICS when added to intravenous corticosteroids in pediatric patients with ASA admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). METHODS: This was a randomized controlled trial involving pediatric patients aged 1-21 years admitted to PICU with ASA. Patients were randomized into 2 groups using block randomization. Patients in Group A received intravenous methylprednisolone (2 mg/kg/day) alone and patients in Group B received intravenous methylprednisolone (2 mg/kg/day) plus budesonide nebulization (0.5 mg every 12 h). Main outcomes were duration of continuous albuterol treatment, PICU and hospital length of stay (LOS), and need and duration of respiratory support. Kruskal-Wallis and Chi-square tests were used for statistical analysis, in which a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Duration of continuous albuterol treatment was not different between the 2 groups median/(QR), 30/(18-51) vs. 25/(14-49). (p = 0.38) PICU and hospital LOS between the 2 groups was similar, median/(QR), 44/(30-64) vs. 46/(30-62), (p = 0.75) and 78/(65-95) vs.72/(58-92), (p = 0.19). Number of patients requiring respiratory support was 22(58%) in Group A and 25(64%) in Group B (p = 0.19). CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill children with ASA, intravenous methylprednisolone combined with inhaled budesonide did not shorten the duration of continuous albuterol inhalation treatment, the PICU and hospital LOS, and the need for respiratory support.

Pediatric asthma severity scores distinguish suitable inpatient level of care for children admitted for status asthmaticus.

Objective: To determine if the Pediatric Asthma Severity Score (PASS) can distinguish "late-rescues" (transfer to the pediatric intensive care unit [PICU] within 24-hours of general pediatric floor admission), "PICU readmissions" (readmission within 24-h after transfer to a lower inpatient level of care), and unplanned 30-day hospital readmission in children admitted with status asthmaticus.Methods: We performed a single center, retrospective cohort study in 328 children admitted for asthma exacerbation aged 5-18 years from May 2015 to October 2017. We sought to determine if PASS values preceding admission from the emergency department or transfer to the general pediatric unit will be greater in children with late rescues and PICU readmissions and if a cutoff PASS values exist to discriminate these events prior to intrafacility transfer.Results: Nine (5%) late-rescues and 5 (3%) PICU readmissions accounted for 14/328 (4%) composite outcomes. PASS values were greater in children with these events (8 [IQR:5-8] vs. 5 [IQR:3-6], p < .01). Logistic regression of PASS on composite outcome yielded an odds ratio of 1.4 (1.1-1.8, p < .01) and ROC curve of PASS on a composite outcome yielded an AUC of 0.74 (0.61-0.87) with a threshold of ≥ 9. Nine (3%) children experienced unplanned 30-day hospital readmissions but PASS preceding hospital discharge was neither discriminative nor associated with hospital readmission.Conclusions: PASS values ≥ 9 identify children at increased risk for late-rescue and PICU readmission. Applied with traditionally criteria for selection of inpatient level of care, PASS may assist providers in reducing acute inpatient disposition errors.

Salbutamol-induced lactic acidosis in status asthmaticus survivor.

BACKGROUND: Salbutamol-induced lactic acidosis is a rare presentation that could manifest in specific clinical context as acute asthmatic attack treatment. An increase of glycolysis pathway leading to pyruvate escalation is the mechanism of hyperlactatemia in ß2-adrenergic agonist drug. CASE PRESENTATION: A 40-year-old man who had poor-controlled asthma, presented with progressive dyspnea with coryza symptom for 6 days. He was intubated and admitted into medical intensive care unit due to deteriorated respiratory symptom. Severe asthmatic attack was diagnosed and approximate 1.5 canisters of salbutamol inhaler was administrated within 24 h of admission. Initial severe acidosis consisted of acute respiratory acidosis from ventilation-perfusion mismatch and acute metabolic acidosis resulting from bronchospasm and hypoxia-related lactic acidosis, respectively. The lactate level was normalized in 6 h after hypoxemia and ventilation correction. Given the lactate level re-elevated into a peak of 4.6 mmol/L without signs of tissue hypoxia nor other possible etiologies, the salbutamol toxicity was suspected and the inhaler was discontinued that contributed to rapid lactate clearance. The patient was safely discharged on the 6th day of admission. CONCLUSION: The re-elevation of serum lactate in status asthmaticus patient who had been administrated with the vast amount of ß2-adrenergic agonist should be considered for salbutamol-induced lactic acidosis and promptly discontinued especially when there were no common potentials.

Stress ulcer prophylaxis in children with status asthmaticus receiving systemic corticosteroids: a descriptive study assessing frequency of clinically important bleeding.

Objective: To determine the frequency of clinically important bleeding (CIB) among children hospitalized for status asthmaticus with and without exposure to stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP).Methods: We performed a single-center, retrospective cohort in 217 children admitted for asthma exacerbation aged 5-18 years from May 2015 to May 2017. We assessed cohorts with and without exposure to SUP to determine if differences in frequency of CIB exist. Study outcomes included frequency of CIB, gastrointestinal complications (occult bleeding, macroscopic bleeding, gastric perforation, and acquired gastritis), and SUP-related adverse events (ventilator associated pneumonia, C. difficile colitis, necrotizing enterocolitis, and acute thrombocytopenia).Results: Ninety-two (42%) children received SUP of which 82 were admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). There were no differences in asthma severity or known risk factors for CIB in children with and without SUP in the PICU subcohort. We observed no CIB or SUP-related adverse events. Two subjects acquired gastritis in the no-SUP cohort and one additional subject experienced occult gastrointestinal bleeding with spontaneous symptom resolution.Conclusion: Children admitted for status asthmaticus with and without SUP had no observed incidence of CIB. In this specific population, we propose a prerequisite assessment for the presence of known stress ulcer related gastrointestinal bleeding risk factors prior to the blanket administration of SUP.

Comparison of two continuous nebulized albuterol doses in critically ill children with status asthmaticus.

Objectives: Continuous nebulized albuterol is frequently used to treat children with status asthmaticus in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) but can have cardiovascular side effects. Limited data exist comparing different dosages. The purpose of this study was to compare hemodynamic side effects of two continuous albuterol doses (10 vs. 25 mg/h). Our hypothesis was that lower dose albuterol would be associated with lower toxicity without increased need for adjunctive therapies.Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all children over 2 years old receiving continuous nebulized albuterol for status asthmaticus in our PICU from 2011 to 2013. Standard initial therapy was intravenous steroids and continuous nebulized albuterol. Patients receiving 10 mg/h albuterol were compared to those receiving 25 mg/h. Clinical outcomes, including the need for additional asthma therapies as well as hypotension requiring fluid resuscitation, were evaluated.Results: About 632 patients were studied (342 received 10 mg/h, 290 received 25 mg/h). Children in the lower-dose group received less fluid resuscitation without increased adjunctive therapies when adjusted for confounders. Those in the 25 mg/h group receiving 17% higher bolus volume. Those receiving lower-dose albuterol had shorter adjusted PICU and hospital lengths of stay.Conclusions: In our PICU cohort of children with status asthmaticus, use of 10 mg/h continuous albuterol was associated with lower fluid bolus resuscitation without more adjunctive therapies. These findings support the safety of lower doses in this population. Prospective studies evaluating the efficacy and toxicity of specific continuous albuterol dosages in critically ill children with status asthmaticus are warranted.

Standardized Protocol Is Associated With a Decrease in Continuous Albuterol Use and Length of Stay in Critical Status Asthmaticus.

OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of this study was to reduce duration of continuous albuterol and hospital length of stay in critically ill children with severe status asthmaticus. DESIGN: Observational prospective study from September 2012 to May 2016. SETTING: Medicine ICU and intermediate care unit. PATIENTS: Children greater than 2 years old with admission diagnosis of status asthmaticus admitted on continuous albuterol and managed via a standardized protocol. INTERVENTIONS: The protocol was an iterative algorithm for escalation and weaning of therapy. The algorithm underwent three revisions. Iteration 1 concentrated on reducing duration on continuous albuterol; iteration 2 concentrated on reducing hospital length of stay; and iteration 3 concentrated on reducing helium-oxygen delivered continuous albuterol. Balancing measures included adverse events and readmissions. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Three-hundred eighty-five patients were treated as follows: 123, 138, and 124 in iterations 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Baseline data was gathered from an additional 150 patients prior to protocol implementation. There was no difference in median age (6 vs 8 vs 7 vs 7 yr; p = 0.130), asthma severity score (9 vs 9 vs 9 vs 9; p = 0.073), or female gender (42% vs 41% vs 43% vs 48%; p = 0.757). Using statistical process control charts, the mean duration on continuous albuterol decreased from 24.9 to 17.5 hours and the mean hospital length of stay decreased from 76 to 49 hours. There was no difference in adverse events (0% vs 1% vs 4% vs 0%; p = 0.054) nor in readmissions (0% vs 0% vs 1% vs 2%; p = 0.254). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a quality improvement protocol in critically ill patients with status asthmaticus was associated with a decrease in continuous albuterol duration and hospital length of stay.

Effects of a PICU Status Asthmaticus De-Escalation Pathway on Length of Stay and Albuterol Use.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the effects of an asthma de-escalation clinical pathway on selected outcomes for patients admitted to a PICU with status asthmaticus. DESIGN: Time series quality improvement trial. SETTING: PICU in a tertiary care children's hospital. PATIENTS: Children age 2-18 years old with a known diagnosis of asthma presenting with status asthmaticus. INTERVENTION: One-hundred five admissions to a PICU for status asthmaticus were treated according to a new de-escalation pathway between August 15, 2015, and August 30, 2016. This group was compared with a prepathway group of 141. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Primary outcome was variability in PICU length of stay. Secondary outcomes were median PICU length of stay, median hospital length of stay, and median duration a patient received continuous nebulized albuterol. The effectiveness of the intervention was tracked using control charts. The postpathway group demonstrated decreased variability of PICU length of stay and time receiving continuous albuterol. Statistically significant decreases were seen in median PICU length of stay (16 vs 13 hr; p = 0.0009), median duration a child spent receiving continuous nebulized albuterol (10.8 vs 7.3 hr; p = 0.0008), and median hospital length of stay (37 vs 31 hr; p = 0.02). Total number of asthma assessments completed by respiratory therapists increased from 741 to 1,087. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a PICU asthma de-escalation pathway demonstrated statistical decrease in the reported measures for children with status asthmaticus. Although the clinical significance of these changes may be debatable, the results demonstrate that efforts to standardize asthma care in the PICU setting is an area in need of further study.

High-flow nasal cannula therapy versus non-invasive ventilation in children with severe acute asthma exacerbation: An observational cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: The present study describes our experience with the high-flow humidified nasal cannula (HFNC) versus non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in children with severe acute asthma exacerbation (SA). METHODS: An observational study of a retrospective cohort of 42 children with SA admitted to a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) for non-invasive respiratory support was made. The primary outcome measure was failure of initial respiratory support (need to escalate from HFNC to NIV or from NIV to invasive ventilation). Secondary outcome measures were the duration of respiratory support and PICU length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: Forty-two children met the inclusion criteria. Twenty (47.6%) received HFNC and 22 (52.3%) NIV as initial respiratory support. There were no treatment failures in the NIV group. However, 8 children (40%) in the HFNC group required escalation to NIV. The PICU LOS was similar in both the NIV and HFNC groups. However, on considering the HFNC failure subgroup, the median length of respiratory support was 3-fold longer (63h) and the PICU LOS was also longer compared with the rest of subjects exhibiting treatment success. CONCLUSIONS: Despite its obvious limitations, this observational study could suggest that HFNC in some subjects with SA may delay NIV support and potentially cause longer respiratory support, and longer PICU LOS.

Clinical Practice Guidelines for Sustained Neuromuscular Blockade in the Adult Critically Ill Patient.

OBJECTIVE: To update the 2002 version of "Clinical practice guidelines for sustained neuromuscular blockade in the adult critically ill patient." DESIGN: A Task Force comprising 17 members of the Society of Critical Medicine with particular expertise in the use of neuromuscular-blocking agents; a Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation expert; and a medical writer met via teleconference and three face-to-face meetings and communicated via e-mail to examine the evidence and develop these practice guidelines. Annually, all members completed conflict of interest statements; no conflicts were identified. This activity was funded by the Society for Critical Care Medicine, and no industry support was provided. METHODS: Using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation expert on the Task Force created profiles for the evidence related to six of the 21 questions and assigned quality-of-evidence scores to these and the additional 15 questions for which insufficient evidence was available to create a profile. Task Force members reviewed this material and all available evidence and provided recommendations, suggestions, or good practice statements for these 21 questions. RESULTS: The Task Force developed a single strong recommendation: we recommend scheduled eye care that includes lubricating drops or gel and eyelid closure for patients receiving continuous infusions of neuromuscular-blocking agents. The Task Force developed 10 weak recommendations. 1) We suggest that a neuromuscular-blocking agent be administered by continuous intravenous infusion early in the course of acute respiratory distress syndrome for patients with a PaO2/FIO2 less than 150. 2) We suggest against the routine administration of an neuromuscular-blocking agents to mechanically ventilated patients with status asthmaticus. 3) We suggest a trial of a neuromuscular-blocking agents in life-threatening situations associated with profound hypoxemia, respiratory acidosis, or hemodynamic compromise. 4) We suggest that neuromuscular-blocking agents may be used to manage overt shivering in therapeutic hypothermia. 5) We suggest that peripheral nerve stimulation with train-of-four monitoring may be a useful tool for monitoring the depth of neuromuscular blockade but only if it is incorporated into a more inclusive assessment of the patient that includes clinical assessment. 6) We suggest against the use of peripheral nerve stimulation with train of four alone for monitoring the depth of neuromuscular blockade in patients receiving continuous infusion of neuromuscular-blocking agents. 7) We suggest that patients receiving a continuous infusion of neuromuscular-blocking agent receive a structured physiotherapy regimen. 8) We suggest that clinicians target a blood glucose level of less than 180 mg/dL in patients receiving neuromuscular-blocking agents. 9) We suggest that clinicians not use actual body weight and instead use a consistent weight (ideal body weight or adjusted body weight) when calculating neuromuscular-blocking agents doses for obese patients. 10) We suggest that neuromuscular-blocking agents be discontinued at the end of life or when life support is withdrawn. In situations in which evidence was lacking or insufficient and the study results were equivocal or optimal clinical practice varies, the Task Force made no recommendations for nine of the topics. 1) We make no recommendation as to whether neuromuscular blockade is beneficial or harmful when used in patients with acute brain injury and raised intracranial pressure. 2) We make no recommendation on the routine use of neuromuscular-blocking agents for patients undergoing therapeutic hypothermia following cardiac arrest. 3) We make no recommendation on the use of peripheral nerve stimulation to monitor degree of block in patients undergoing therapeutic hypothermia. 4) We make no recommendation on the use of neuromuscular blockade to improve the accuracy of intravascular-volume assessment in mechanically ventilated patients. 5) We make no recommendation concerning the use of electroencephalogram-derived parameters as a measure of sedation during continuous administration of neuromuscular-blocking agents. 6) We make no recommendation regarding nutritional requirements specific to patients receiving infusions of neuromuscular-blocking agents. 7) We make no recommendation concerning the use of one measure of consistent weight over another when calculating neuromuscular-blocking agent doses in obese patients. 8) We make no recommendation on the use of neuromuscular-blocking agents in pregnant patients. 9) We make no recommendation on which muscle group should be monitored in patients with myasthenia gravis receiving neuromuscular-blocking agents. Finally, in situations in which evidence was lacking or insufficient but expert consensus was unanimous, the Task Force developed six good practice statements. 1) If peripheral nerve stimulation is used, optimal clinical practice suggests that it should be done in conjunction with assessment of other clinical findings (e.g., triggering of the ventilator and degree of shivering) to assess the degree of neuromuscular blockade in patients undergoing therapeutic hypothermia. 2) Optimal clinical practice suggests that a protocol should include guidance on neuromuscular-blocking agent administration in patients undergoing therapeutic hypothermia. 3) Optimal clinical practice suggests that analgesic and sedative drugs should be used prior to and during neuromuscular blockade, with the goal of achieving deep sedation. 4) Optimal clinical practice suggests that clinicians at the bedside implement measure to attenuate the risk of unintended extubation in patients receiving neuromuscular-blocking agents. 5) Optimal clinical practice suggests that a reduced dose of an neuromuscular-blocking agent be used for patients with myasthenia gravis and that the dose should be based on peripheral nerve stimulation with train-of-four monitoring. 6) Optimal clinical practice suggests that neuromuscular-blocking agents be discontinued prior to the clinical determination of brain death.

Response to nebulized salbutamol versus combination with ipratropium bromide in children with acute severe asthma.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of nebulised salbutamol alone and in combination with ipratropium bromide in acute severe asthma in children. METHODS: The randomised controlled trial was conducted at the National Institute of Child Health, Karachi, from October 2012 to March 2013, and comprised patients with acute severe asthma who were randomised into two equal groups. Group A patients received 3 doses of nebulised salbutamol alone (0.03 ml/kg/dose) at 15-minute intervals and Group B received 3 similar doses of salbutamol along with ipratropium (250 ug/dose). Acute severe asthma was categorised as serve exacerbation (clinical score >10) and moderate (5-10 score) based on Bentur Modification. Efficacy was measured after 5minutes of the last dose by change in severity score from severe exacerbation (baseline) to low score. SPSS 10 was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: There were two groups of 100(50%) patients each. The mean age in Group A was 9.1±3 years and 9.3±2.8 years in Group B. Male-Female ratio in Group A was 1.5:1 and in Group B it was 1.2:1. In Group B, 93(93%) children showed improvement in clinical score (<10 score) while it was 84(84%) in Group A. There was better response in clinical score in Group A than Group B, but it was not significant (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of nebulised salbutamol along with ipratropium bromide in the treatment of acute asthma exacerbation was not superior to salbutamol alone.

Fatal visit to the general practitioner.

A 31-year-old female asthmatic patient received an infusion of metamizole and tramadol for chronic pain at a GP surgery. After a few minutes, the patient developed breaing difficulties and died in spite of resuscitation measures. The general practitioner was suspected of medical malpractice. Medico-legal investigations confirmed the assumption that death was caused by anaphylacitic shock. In spite of temporary intubation into the oesophagus no evidence of medical malpractice was found, however.

Diastolic hypotension in pediatric patients with asthma receiving continuous albuterol.

OBJECTIVES: Concerns have been raised regarding cardiac side effects of continuous high-dose albuterol nebulization in status asthmaticus management. Our study goal was to determine prevalence and potential risk factors for hypotension development during continuous albuterol administration in pediatric patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital from 1 January 2011 to 31 August 2012. A total of 152 patients admitted to pediatric intensive or intermediate care units who received continuous albuterol nebulization for management of status asthmaticus were analyzed. RESULTS: Diastolic hypotension, defined as a value < 50 mmHg or <5th percentile of normal for age, developed in 90% of patients and a positive correlation with increasing doses of albuterol was demonstrated. The overall median time to onset of hypotension was 4 h (interquartile range (IQR): 2-6.5) and was significantly lower among patients admitted to the intensive care unit rather than intermediate care (p = 0.005). The odds of hypotension were 82% lower among patients who received fluid boluses prior to continuous albuterol nebulization. None of the potential risk factors demonstrated statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Diastolic hypotension is a common occurrence among patients who receive continuous albuterol nebulization for status asthmaticus. Total albuterol dose appeared to be directly related to risk of developing diastolic hypotension. Administration of supplemental fluid boluses before continuous nebulized albuterol appeared to provide a significant protective effect. The clinical impact and the significance of diastolic hypotension and the importance of prophylactic administration of intravenous fluid boluses in patients experiencing status asthmaticus are yet to be determined.

Effect of high-dose continuous albuterol nebulization on clinical variables in children with status asthmaticus.

OBJECTIVES: Continuous albuterol nebulization is generally administered at 2.5-20 mg/hr at most centers. We examined the effect of high-dose (75 or 150 mg/hr) albuterol on clinical variables in children with status asthmaticus. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of inpatient medical records and prospectively collected computerized PICU respiratory therapy database. SETTING: Twenty-five-bed multidisciplinary PICU in a tertiary care children's hospital. PATIENTS: Children admitted to the PICU between January 2006 and December 2007 with status asthmaticus receiving high-dose continuous albuterol nebulization. (Those with cerebral palsy, cardiac pathology, and ventilator dependence were excluded.) INTERVENTIONS: : Chart review for PICU length of stay, albuterol dose, duration of nebulization, occurrence of chest pain, vomiting, tremors, hypokalemia (serum potassium < 3.0 mEq/L), and cardiac arrhythmia. Maximal heart rate, lowest diastolic blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure were compared to the variables at initiation of therapy and at hospital discharge. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Forty-two patients (22 boys and 20 girls) received high-dose continuous albuterol nebulization. Twenty-three received 75 mg/hr and 19 received 150 mg/hr (3.7 mg/kg/hr [interquartile range, 2.4-5.8 mg/kg/hr]) for a duration of 22.3 hours (interquartile range, 6.6-31.7 hr). Heart rate increased and diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure were significantly lower during nebulization compared to initiation of therapy or at hospital discharge (p < 0.05). No patient required fluid resuscitation or inotropic support, and one had self-limited premature ventricular contractions. Hypokalemia occurred in five of 33 patients who had serum electrolytes measured but did not require supplementation. One patient required endotracheal intubation after initiation of nebulization, and seven patients (16.7%) received noninvasive ventilation. PICU length of stay was 2.3 ± 1.7 days; there were no deaths. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose continuous albuterol nebulization is associated with a low rate of subsequent mechanical ventilation and fairly short PICU length of stay without significant toxicity. Prospective studies comparing conventional and high-dose albuterol nebulization are needed to determine the optimum dose providing maximum efficacy with the least adverse effects.