Challenging Dogma by Skipping the Emergency Department Thoracotomy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of the Trauma Quality Improvement Database.

INTRODUCTION: Survival following emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) for patients in extremis is poor. Whether intervention in the operating room instead of EDT in select patients could lead to improved outcomes is unknown. We hypothesized that patients who underwent intervention in the operating room would have improved outcomes compared to those who underwent EDT. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of the Trauma Quality Improvement Program database from 2017 to 2021. All adult patients who underwent EDT, operating room thoracotomy (ORT), or sternotomy as the first form of surgical intervention within 1 h of arrival were included. Of patients without prehospital cardiac arrest, propensity score matching was utilized to create three comparable groups. The primary outcome was survival. Secondary outcomes included time to procedure. RESULTS: There were 1865 EDT patients, 835 ORT patients, and 456 sternotomy patients who met the inclusion criteria. There were 349 EDT, 344 ORT, and 408 sternotomy patients in the matched analysis. On Cox multivariate regression, there was an increased risk of mortality with EDT versus sternotomy (HR 4.64, P < 0.0001), EDT versus ORT (HR 1.65, P < 0.0001), and ORT versus sternotomy (HR 2.81, P < 0.0001). Time to procedure was shorter with EDT versus sternotomy (22 min versus 34 min, P < 0.0001) and versus ORT (22 min versus 37 min, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: There was an association between sternotomy and ORT versus EDT and improved mortality. In select patients, operative approaches rather than the traditional EDT could be considered.

A radiologist's guide to median sternotomy.

Median sternotomy is widely recognised as the primary incision technique in cardiac surgery. This surgical procedure involves dividing the sternum to gain access to the heart and lungs, making it invaluable in correcting congenital heart defects. Furthermore, it is frequently employed in adult patients, particularly during coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) procedures. In this imaging review, we present a comprehensive overview of the pre-procedural assessment and various post-sternotomy complications encountered within our clinical experience at a tertiary cardiothoracic centre. The focus of this review is to outline the imaging features associated with mediastinal adhesions and establish the minimal safe distance between the sternum and common mediastinal structures when considering re-sternotomy. By providing visual examples, we aim to facilitate a better understanding of these key concepts. Moreover, we delve into a detailed discussion of a spectrum of postoperative complications that may arise following median sternotomy including those related to metalwork (sternal wire fracture), bone (sternal dehiscence, non-union and osteomyelitis), and soft tissue (abscess, haematoma).

Biomarkers of inflammation and coagulation after minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a prospective comparison to conventional surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Minimally invasive cardiac surgery techniques are increasingly used but have longer cardiopulmonary bypass time, which may increase inflammatory response and negatively affect coagulation. Our aim was to compare biomarkers of inflammation and coagulation as well as transfusion rates after minimally invasive mitral valve repair and mitral valve surgery using conventional sternotomy. DESIGN: A prospective non-randomized study was performed enrolling 71 patients undergoing mitral valve surgery (35 right mini-thoracotomy and 36 conventional sternotomy procedures). Blood samples were collected pre- and postoperatively to assess inflammatory response. Thromboelastometry (ROTEM) was performed to assess coagulation, and transfusion rates were monitored. RESULTS: The minimally invasive group had longer cardiopulmonary bypass times compared to the sternotomy group: 127 min ([115-146] vs 79 min [65-112], p < 0.001) and were cooled to a lower temperature during cardiopulmonary bypass, 34 °C vs 36 °C (p = 0.04). IL-6 was lower in the minimally invasive group compared to the conventional sternotomy group when measured at the end of the surgical procedure, (38 [23-69] vs 61[41-139], p = 0.008), but no differences were found at postoperative day 1 or postoperative day 3. The transfusion rate was lower in the minimally invasive group (14%) compared to full sternotomy (35%, p = 0.04) and the chest tube output was reduced, (395 ml [190-705] vs 570 ml [400-1040], p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed that despite the longer use of extra corporal circulation during surgery, minimally invasive mitral valve repair is associated with reduced inflammatory response, lower rates of transfusion, and reduced chest tube output.

Confirmation of Safety of Titanium Wire in Sternotomy Closure, A Randomized Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: There are many factors that are known to increase the risk of sternal wound infection (SWI); some studies have reported that nickel is a risk factor for SWI. Titanium wires have only been used as an alternative to steel wires in patients with known allergy to nickel. However, there is a paucity of literature regarding the safety of using titanium wires compared to that on the safety of steel wires for sternum closure after cardiac surgery. Therefore, this study aimed to demonstrate the noninferiority of titanium wires, even in patients without a known allergy. METHODS: A total of 322 patients who underwent elective full median sternotomy were randomly assigned to sternal closure either by titanium wires (n = 161) or by stainless steel wires. RESULTS: Fourteen patients had sternal instability, six (3.7%) patients in the titanium group and eight (5%) patients in the stainless steel group (p = 0.585). There was no statistically significant difference between both groups in terms of postoperative wound infection (p = 0.147). Patients in the titanium group experienced statistically significant lower postoperative pain than those in the stainless steel group (p = 0.024). The wire type was not an independent risk factor for SI, as shown by univariate and logistic regression analyses. CONCLUSION: Titanium wires are a good alternative and have been proven to be safe and effective for sternal closure. The surgeon should be aware of the possibility of developing an allergic reaction to the wires, especially in patients with previous multiple allergic histories.

Minimally Invasive versus Conventional Aortic Root Surgery: Results of an Intermediate-Volume Center.

BACKGROUND: We evaluate the outcome of aortic root surgery via an upper J: -shaped mini-sternotomy (MS) versus full sternotomy (FS) in an intermediate-volume center. METHODS: Between November 2011 and February 2019, 94 consecutive patients underwent aortic root surgery: 62 (66%) patients were operated via a J: -shaped MS (group A) and 32 (34%) patients via FS (group B). The primary endpoints were mortality, major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE), and reoperation in a 2-year follow-up. The secondary endpoints were perioperative complications and patient's satisfaction with the procedural results. RESULTS: Valve sparing root replacement (David procedure) was performed in 13 (21%) of the MS and 7 (22%) of the FS patients. The Bentall procedure in MS versus FS was 49 (79%) versus 25 (78%), respectively. Both groups presented similar mean operation, cardiopulmonary bypass, and cross-clamp times. Postoperative bleeding was 534 ± 300 and 755 ± 402 mL (p = 0.01) in MS and FS, respectively, erythrocyte concentrate substitution was 3 ± 3 and 5.3 ± 4.8 (p = 0.018) in MS and FS, respectively, and pneumonia rates were 0 and 9.4% (p = 0.03) in MS and FS, respectively. The 30-day mortality was 0% in both groups, whereas MACCE was 1.6 and 3% (p = 0.45) in MS and FS, respectively. After 2 years, the mortality and MACCE were 4.6 and 9.5% (p = 0.11) and 4.6 and 0% (p = 0.66) in MS and FS, respectively. The number of patients who were satisfied with the surgical cosmetic results in groups A and B was 53 (85.4%) and 26 (81%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Aortic root surgery via MS is a safe alternative to FS even in an intermediate-volume center. It offers a shorter recovery time and similar midterm results.

Sternal Pin Used to Close Sternum in Infants after Cardiac Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: A retrospective study was conducted to explore the efficacy of bioabsorbable poly-L-lactic acid sternal pins in sternal closure in infants after cardiac surgery. METHODS: A total of 170 infantile patients who underwent cardiac surgery were divided into the steel wire group (group A), the PDS cord group (group B), and the steel wire + sternal pin group (group C). The occurrence of the thoracic deformity was evaluated by vertebral index (VI), frontosagittal index (FSI), and Haller index (HI) values; the stability of the sternum was evaluated by detecting sternal dehiscence and displacement. RESULTS: By comparing the absolute values of the differences in VI, FSI, and HI in the three groups, it was found that the difference values of VI and HI in group C were significantly lower than those in group B (p = 0.028 and 0.005). For the highest deformation index, the deformation rate of infants in group C before discharge and during the 1-year follow-up was lower than that in group A and group B (p = 0.009 and 0.002, respectively). The incidence of sternal displacement in group C was also significantly lower than that in groups A and B (p = 0.009 and 0.009). During the 1-year follow-up, there was no sternal dehiscence, and the sternum healed completely in the three groups. CONCLUSION: The use of "steel wire + sternal pin" for sternal closure in infants after cardiac surgery can reduce the occurrence of sternal deformity, reduce anterior and posterior displacement of the sternum, and improve sternal stability.

Superficial parasternal intercostal plane blocks in cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Traditional multimodal analgesic strategies have several contraindications in cardiac surgery patients, forcing clinicians to use alternative options. Superficial parasternal intercostal plane blocks, anesthetizing the anterior cutaneous branches of the thoracic intercostal nerves, are being explored as a straightforward method to treat pain after sternotomy. We sought to evaluate the literature on the effects of superficial parasternal blocks on pain control after cardiac surgery. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science databases for RCTs evaluating superficial parasternal intercostal plane blocks in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery via midline sternotomy published from inception to 11 March 2022. The prespecified primary outcome was opioid consumption at 12 hr. The risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool, and the quality of evidence was evaluated using the grading of recommendations, assessments, development, and evaluations. Outcomes were analyzed with a random-effects model. All subgroups were prespecified. RESULTS: We reviewed 1,275 citations. Eleven RCTs, comprising 756 patients, fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Only one study reported the prespecified primary outcome, precluding the possibility of meta-analysis. This study reported a reduction in opioid consumption (-11.2 mg iv morphine equivalents; 95% confidence interval [CI], -8.2 to -14.1) There was a reduction in opioid consumption at 24 hr (-7.2 mg iv morphine equivalents; 95% CI, -5.6 to -8.7; five trials; 436 participants; moderate certainty evidence). All five studies measuring complications reported that none were detected, which included a sample of 196 blocks. CONCLUSION: The literature suggests a potential benefit of using superficial parasternal blocks to improve acute postoperative pain control after cardiac surgery via midline sternotomy. Future studies specifying dosing regimens and adjuncts are required. STUDY REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42022306914); first submitted 22 March 2022.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Il existe plusieurs contre-indications aux stratégies analgésiques multimodales traditionnelles chez la patientèle de chirurgie cardiaque, ce qui oblige les clinicien·nes à se tourner vers d'autres options. Les blocs des plans intercostaux parasternaux superficiels, anesthésiant les branches cutanées antérieures des nerfs intercostaux thoraciques, sont l'une des méthodes simples actuellement explorées pour traiter la douleur après une sternotomie. Nous avons cherché à évaluer la littérature sur les effets des blocs parasternaux superficiels sur le contrôle de la douleur après une chirurgie cardiaque. MéTHODE: Nous avons réalisé une revue systématique et une méta-analyse des études randomisées contrôlées (ERC). Nous avons fait des recherches dans les bases de données MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL et Web of Science pour en tirer les ERC évaluant les blocs des plans intercostaux parasternaux superficiels chez les patient·es adultes bénéficiant d'une chirurgie cardiaque par sternotomie médiane publiées depuis leur création jusqu'au 11 mars 2022. Le critère d'évaluation principal préspécifié était la consommation d'opioïdes à 12 heures. Le risque de biais a été évalué à l'aide de l'outil Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias, et la qualité des données probantes à l'aide de l'outil GRADE. Les résultats ont été analysés à l'aide d'un modèle à effets aléatoires. Tous les sous-groupes étaient préspécifiés. RéSULTATS: Nous avons examiné 1275 citations. Onze ERC, comprenant 756 patient·es, remplissaient les critères d'inclusion. Une seule étude a rapporté le critère d'évaluation principal préspécifié, ce qui a exclu la possibilité d'une méta-analyse. Cette étude a rapporté une réduction de la consommation d'opioïdes (−11,2 mg équivalents de morphine iv; intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 %, −8,2 à −14,1). Il y a eu une réduction de la consommation d'opioïdes à 24 heures (−7,2 mg équivalents de morphine iv; IC 95 %, −5,6 à −8,7; cinq études; 436 participant·es; données probantes de certitude modérée). Les cinq études mesurant les complications ont rapporté qu'aucune complication n'avait été détectée, en incluant un échantillon de 196 blocs. CONCLUSION: La littérature suggère un avantage potentiel de l'utilisation de blocs parasternaux superficiels pour améliorer le contrôle de la douleur postopératoire aiguë après une chirurgie cardiaque par sternotomie médiane. Des études futures précisant les schémas posologiques et les adjuvants sont nécessaires. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: PROSPERO (CRD42022306914); soumis pour la première fois le 22 mars 2022.

Clinical Outcomes of Erector Spinae Plane Block for Midline Sternotomy in Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefit of single-shot erector spinae plane block (ESPB) on pain at postoperative hours 4 and 12, duration of mechanical ventilation, hospital length of stay, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, cumulative postoperative opioid usage, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after cardiac surgery via sternotomy DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective clinical trials. SETTING: Studies were identified through the search of PubMed and EMBASE on July 19, 2023. PARTICIPANTS: Adults and children undergoing cardiac surgery via sternotomy. INTERVENTIONS: Single-shot ESPB versus standard-of-care analgesia. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 10 studies (N = 695 patients). The single-shot ESPB arm exhibited statistically significant reductions in pain score at postoperative hour 4 (standardized mean difference [SMD] -2.95, 95% CI -5.86 to -0.04, p = 0.0466), duration of mechanical ventilation (SMD -1.23, 95% CI -2.21 to -0.24, p = 0.0145), cumulative postoperative opioid usage (SMD -1.48, 95% CI -2.46 to -0.49, p = 0.0033), and PONV incidence (risk ratio 0.4358, 95% CI 0.2105-0.9021, p = 0.0252). The single-shot ESPB arm did not exhibit a statistically significant reduction in pain score at postoperative hour 12, length of hospital stay, and length of ICU stay. CONCLUSIONS: Single-shot ESPB improves near-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery via sternotomy. More randomized controlled trials are needed to validate these findings.

Deep Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Sternotomy for Cardiac Surgery-A Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the analgesic efficacy of postoperative deep parasternal intercostal plane (DPIP) blocks for patients having cardiac surgery via median sternotomy. DESIGN: This single-center retrospective study compared patients receiving bilateral DPIP blocks with a matched cohort of patients not receiving DPIP blocks. SETTING: Large quaternary referral center. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients admitted to the authors' institution from January 1, 2016, to August 14, 2020, for elective cardiac surgery via median sternotomy. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received ultrasound-guided bilateral DPIP blocks. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 113 patients received a DPIP block; 3,461 patients did not. The estimated multiplicative change in cumulative opioid consumption through 24 hours was 0.42 (95% CI 0.32-0.56; p < 0.001), indicating that patients receiving DPIP blocks required 60% fewer opioids than patients who did not. Proportional odds ratios for the average pain score on postoperative day (POD) 0 was 0.46 (95% CI 0.32-0.65; p < 0.001), and POD 1 was 0.67 (95% CI 0.47-0.94; p = 0.021), indicating lower pain scores for patients receiving blocks. The exploratory analysis identified an inverse correlation between DPIP blocks and atrial fibrillation incidence (2% v 15%; inverse probability of treatment weighting odds ratio 0.088, 95% CI 0.02-0.41; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The use of DPIP blocks in patients undergoing cardiac surgery via median sternotomy was associated with less opioid use and improved pain scores in the early postoperative period compared with patients not receiving blocks. Prospective randomized controlled studies should further elucidate the efficacy and risks of DPIP blocks in cardiac surgery.

Comparison of Erector Spinae Plane Block and Pectointercostal Facial Plane Block for Enhanced Recovery After Sternotomy in Adult Cardiac Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate and compare the effects of the pectointercostal fascial plane block (PIFPB) and the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) on enhancing the recovery of patients who undergo cardiac surgery. DESIGN: A randomized, controlled, double-blinded study. SETTING: The operating rooms and intensive care units of university hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred patients who were American Society of Anesthesiologists class II to III aged 18-to-70 years scheduled for elective cardiac surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to undergo either ultrasound-guided bilateral PIFPB or ESPB. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients shared comparable baseline characteristics. Time to extubation, the primary outcome, did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference between the groups, with median (95% confidence interval) values of 115 (90-120) minutes and 110 (100-120) minutes, respectively (p = 0.875). The ESPB group had a statistically significant reduced pain score postoperatively. The median (IQR) values of postoperative fentanyl consumption were statistically significantly lower in the ESPB group than in the PIFPB group (p < 0.001): 4 (4-5) versus 9 (9-11) µg/kg, respectively. In the ESPB group, the first analgesia request was given 4 hours later than in the PIFPB group (p < 0.001). Additionally, 12 (24%) patients in the PIFPB group reported nonsternal wound chest pain, compared with none in the ESPB group. The median intensive care unit length of stay for both groups was 3 days (p = 0.428). CONCLUSIONS: Erector spinae plane block and PIFPB were found to equally affect recovery after cardiac surgery, with comparable extubation times and intensive care unit length of stay.

Comparison of Multiple Injection Costotransverse Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block for Post-Sternotomy Pain Relief in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound-guided multiple injection costotransverse block (MICB) and compare it with erector spinae plane block (ESPB) for poststernotomy pain relief in pediatric cardiac surgical patients. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, comparative study. SETTING: At a single institution tertiary referral cardiac center. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 90 children with acyanotic congenital heart disease requiring surgery via sternotomy. INTERVENTIONS: Children were allocated randomly to 1 of the 3 following groups: ESPB (group 1), MICB (group 2), or Control (group 3). Participants in groups 1 and 2 received 4 mg/kg of 0.2% ropivacaine for bilateral ultrasound-guided block after induction of anesthesia. Postoperatively, intravenous paracetamol was used for multimodal analgesia, and fentanyl/tramadol was used for rescue analgesia. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The modified objective pain score (MOPS) was evaluated at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours postextubation. After all exclusions, 84 patients were analyzed. The MOPS score was found to be significantly lower in ESPB and MICB groups compared to the control group until 10 hours postextubation (p < 0.05), with no statistically significant difference at the 12th hour (p = 0.2198). The total intraoperative fentanyl consumption (p = 0.0005), need for fentanyl supplementation on incision (p < 0.0001), and need for rescue opioid requirement in the postoperative period (p = 0.034) were significantly lower in both the ESPB and MICB groups than the control group. There were no statistically significant differences in both primary and secondary outcomes between the ESPB and MICB groups. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided MICB was effective and comparable to ESPB for post-sternotomy pain management in pediatric cardiac surgical patients.

Incidence and Factors Associated With Post-Sternotomy Pain Syndrome in the National Heart Institute, Malaysia.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of poststernotomy pain syndrome (PSPS) after open cardiac surgery in 2021. To determine characteristics and assess the severity of symptoms in patients diagnosed with PSPS. To identify factors that can be associated with patients who were positive for PSPS. DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY: This study used a retrospective observational approach. Logistic regression analysis was employed to identify factors associated with the positive group. SETTING: This study included all adult patients who underwent open cardiac surgery at the National Heart Institute, Malaysia, in 2021. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1,395 patients were enrolled. INTERVENTIONS: The study involved conducting phone interviews to assess the presence of PSPS, followed by administering the Brief Pain Inventory questionnaire in the positive group to identify characteristics and severity of chronic pain. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The incidence of PSPS after open cardiac surgery in 2021 was 20.35%. A total of 17.7% of patients reported that pain affected their daily activities, sleep, or emotions. Univariate analysis identified factors associated with PSPS, including age <60 years old, body mass index >30 kg/m2, history of previous percutaneous coronary intervention, ejection fraction <50%, the absence of chronic kidney disease (CKD), and internal mammary artery harvesting (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that 4 independent factors were associated with PSPS: age <60 years old, history of previous percutaneous coronary intervention, ejection fraction <50%, and the absence of CKD (as compared with CKD) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Poststernotomy pain syndrome is a complex issue affected by various factors. Although the pain score may not be as severe as previously believed, it remains crucial to recognize PSPS because a significant proportion of patients are affected.

Deep Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block for Intraoperative Pain Control in Cardiac Surgical Patients for Sternotomy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVES: Sternotomy pain is common after cardiac surgery. The deep parasternal intercostal plane (DPIP) block is a novel technique that provides analgesia to the anterior chest wall. The aim of this study was to investigate the analgesic effect of bilateral DPIP blocks on intraoperative pain control in cardiac surgery. DESIGN: This is a double-blinded, prospective randomized controlled trial (Oct 2020-Dec 2022). SETTINGS: This study was conducted in a single institution, which is an academic university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-six elective cardiac surgical patients with median sternotomy were recruited. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly divided into DPIP or control group. Either 20ml 0.25% levobupivacaine or 0.9% normal saline was injected for the DPIP under ultrasound guidance after induction of general anaesthesia. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was intraoperative opioids consumption and hemodynamic changes at sternotomy. Secondary outcomes included postoperative morphine consumption, postoperative pain and time to tracheal extubation. Intraoperative opioids requirement was reduced from a median (IQR) intravenous morphine equivalence of 21.4mg (13.8-24.3mg) in control group to 9.5mg (7.3-11.2mg) in the DPIP group (P<0.001). Hemodynamic parameters were more stable in DPIP group at sternotomy, as evidenced by lower percentage increase in systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure from baseline. No difference was observed in time to tracheal extubation, postoperative morphine consumption, postoperative pain score and spirometry. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral DPIP block provides effective intraoperative analgesia and opioid-sparing. It may be included as part of the multimodal analgesia for enhanced recovery in cardiac surgery.

Biomechanical comparison of bone staple fixation methods with suture material for median sternotomy closure using 3D-printed bone models.

AIM: To compare the biomechanical properties of three different sternal closure techniques in a 3D-printed bone model of a sternum from a 30-kg dog. METHODS: Median sternotomy was performed on a total of 90 three-dimensional (3D) copies of a polycarbonate (PC) model of a sternum, generated from the CT images of the sternum of a 30-kg German Shepherd dog. Three different methods were used to repair the sternotomies: polydioxanone suture (group PDS, n = 30), stainless steel bone staples (group SS, n = 30), and nitinol bone staples (group NS, n = 30). Each repair method was tested by applying tensile force in one of three ways (longitudinally, laterally, or torsionally) resulting in a sample size of n = 10 for each repair method-loading combination. In all experiments, the loads at 1-mm and 2-mm gap formation, failure, and the displacement at the failure point were measured. RESULTS: In lateral distraction and longitudinal shear tests, NS and SS staple repairs required application of significantly greater force than PDS across all displacement criteria (1 and 2 mm). NS exhibited significantly greater failure load than PDS. In torsion tests, NS required significantly greater application of force compared to SS or PDS at all displacement criteria (1 and 2 mm) and exhibited a greater failure load than PDS. In terms of displacement at failure point, PDS suture showed more displacement than SS or NS across all experiments (laterally, longitudinally, torsionally). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, bone staples were mechanically superior to PDS suture in median sternotomy closure using 3D-printed bone model in terms of 1-mm, 2-mm displacement loads, and displacement at failure. NS had a higher failure load than PDS under lateral, longitudinal, and torsional distraction. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These study results imply that bone staples can be considered as an alternative surgical method for median sternotomy closure in dogs.

Effect of right anterolateral thoracotomy versus median sternotomy on postoperative wound tissue repair in patients with congenital heart disease: A meta-analysis.

Right anterolateral thoracotomy (RAT) and median sternotomy (MS) are two major methods for treatment of congenital cardiac disease. But there are various types of surgery that provide a better operative outcome for the patient. Therefore, we carried out a meta-analysis to investigate the effects of these two methods in the treatment of wound tissue, hospitalization and so on, to find out which surgery method could provide the best short-term effect. In this research, we chose an English controlled trial from 2003 to 2022 to evaluate the influence of right anterolateral thoracotomy and median sternotomy on the short-term outcome of Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), time of operation, time spent in the hospital, and the time of scar formation. Our findings suggest that the RAT method was associated with a shorter surgical scars for congenital heart disease operations compared to MS with respect to post-operation scars (WMD, 3.55; 95% CI, 0.04, 7.05; p = 0.05). The RAT method is better suited to the needs of patients who care about their injuries. Nevertheless, in addition to other surgery related factors which might affect post-operative wound healing, we discovered that MS took a shorter time to perform CPB compared with RAT surgery (WMD, - 1.94; 95% CI, -3.39, -0.48; p = 0.009). Likewise, when it comes to the time taken to perform surgery, MS needs less operational time compared to RAT methods (WMD, -12.84; 95% CI, -25.27, -0.42; p = 0.04). On the other hand, the time needed for MS to recover was much longer compared to the RAT (WMD, 0. 60; 95% CI, 0.02, 1.18; p = 0.04). This indicates that while RAT is advantageous in terms of shortening the duration of post-operative scar, it also increases the time needed for surgical operations and CPB.

Risk factors for sternal wound infection after median sternotomy: A nested case-control study and time-to-event analysis.

Although potential risk factors for sternal wound infection (SWI) have been extensively studied, the onset time of SWI and different risk factors for superficial and deep SWI were rarely reported. This nested case-control study aims to compare the onset time and contributors between superficial and deep SWI. Consecutive adult patients who underwent cardiac surgery through median sternotomy in a single center from January 2011 to January 2021 constituted the cohort. The case group was those who developed SWI as defined by CDC and controls were matched 6:1 per case. Kaplan-Meier analysis, LASSO and univariate and multivariate Cox regressions were performed. A simple nomogram was established for clinical prediction of the risk of SWI. The incidence of SWI was 1.1% (61 out of 5471) in our cohort. Totally 366 controls were matched to 61 cases. 26.2% (16 of 61) SWI cases were deep SWI. The median onset time of SWI was 35 days. DSWI had a longer latency than SSWI (median time 46 days vs. 32 days, p = 0.032). Kaplan-Meier analyses showed different time-to-SWI between patients with and without DM (p = 0.0011) or MI (p = 0.0019). Multivariate Cox regression showed that BMI (HR = 1.083, 95% CI: 1.012-1.116, p = 0.022), DM (HR = 2.041, 95% CI: 1.094-3.805, p = 0.025) and MI (HR = 2.332, 95% CI: 1.193-4.557, p = 0.013) were independent risk factors for SWI. Superficial SWI was only associated with BMI (HR = 1.089, 95% CI: 1.01-1.175, p = 0.027), while deep SWI was associated with DM (HR = 3.271, 95% CI: 1.036-10.325, p = 0.043) and surgery time (HR = 1.004, 95% CI: 1.001-1.008, p = 0.027). The nomogram for SWI prediction had an AUC of 0.67, good fitness and clinical effectiveness as shown by the calibration curve and decision curve analyses. BMI, DM and MI were independent risk factors for SWI. DSWI had a longer latency and different risk factors compared to SSWI. The nomogram showed a fair performance and good effectiveness for the clinical prediction of SWI.

[Epicardial Pacemaker Infection Treated by Leads Removal via Re-sternotomy:Report of a Case].

A 69-year-old woman was diagnosed with a pacemaker infection after generator-exchange. Eight years ago, she underwent mitral and tricuspid valve replacement and had biventricular pacing with three pairs of epicardial leads placed in the right atrium, right ventricle, and left ventricle for left ventricular dysfunction. Skin perforation due to infection was detected 1 month after generator-exchange. At first, antibiotic treatment, generator-re-exchange, and pocket repositioning surgery were performed. Following all these failed attempts, a temporary pacemaker was placed, the infected generator was removed, and the lead was cut short. Eight days later, new intravenous caradiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker (CRT-P) implantation was performed. However, despite the repeat debridement, infection at the lead stumps recurred. Moreover, plain chest computed tomography (CT) revealed an abscess around the leads in the anterior mediastinum. Eventually, leads were removed under extracorporeal circulation via re-sternotomy. Postoperative course was uneventful, and she has been doing well without recurrence of infection for 6 years after operation.

[Mitral valve surgery via minimally invasive and conventional access]. / Mitral'naya khirurgiya iz mini- i traditsionnogo dostupov.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the immediate results of mini-thoracotomy and sternotomy in patients with mitral valve disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 52 patients who underwent mitral valve surgery (25 cases - mini-thoracotomy, 27 cases - sternotomy). RESULTS: Aortic cross-clamping time was significantly longer in sternotomy compared to mini-thoracotomy group - 110 vs 94 min (p=0.03). Ventilation time was also significantly longer in the sternotomy group (12 vs. 8 hours, p=0.01). Postoperative morbidity was similar (postoperative wound infection, neurological complications, coronavirus disease, overall in-hospital mortality). CONCLUSION: In addition to cosmetic effect, minimally invasive approach in mitral valve surgery has some other advantages including less duration of aortic cross-clamping and mechanical ventilation, availability of reconstructive interventions due to better exposition of the mitral valve and subvalvular structures.

[Postoperative sternomediastinitis: morphology of lesion, treatment strategy]. / Posleoperatsionnyi sternomediastinit: morfologiya porazheniya, taktika lecheniya.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze bone tissue damage at different stages of disease (El Oakley classification), treatment options for each clinical situation and results after each approach. MATERIAL AND METHODS: There were 45 patients with wound complications after cardiac surgery between October 2022 and September 2023. Thirty-eight (84.4%) patients underwent CABG, 7 (15.6%) patients - heart valve or aortic surgery. Mean age of patients was 68.1±10.3 years. There were 35 men (77.8%) and 10 women (22.2%). The first type was found in 11 (24.5%) patients, type 2-3 - 19 (42.2%), type 4 - 4 (8.8%), type 5 - 11 (24.5%) patients. RESULTS: Systemic inflammatory response syndrome was observed in 7 (36.8%) persons of the 1st group, 14 (73.7%) ones of the 2nd group, 4 (100%) patients of the 3rd group and 2 (18.2%) patients of the 4th group. C-reactive protein and procalcitonin increased in all patients with the highest values in groups 2 and 3. Redo soft tissue inflammation occurred in all groups after treatment. Mean incidence was 25%. Two (10.5%) patients died in the 2nd group and 1 (25%) patient in the 3rd group. CONCLUSION: The modern classification of sternomediastinitis does not fully characterize severity of disease in a particular patient. Simultaneous debridement with wound closure demonstrates acceptable mortality (within 10%). The highest mortality rate was observed in patients with diffuse lesions of the sternum. Less aggressive treatment approaches are possible for stable anterior chest wall.

Reduced Morbidity and Mortality Associated With Minimally Invasive Single-vessel Coronary Artery Bypass Compared With Conventional Sternotomy.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe the safety and clinical benefits of minimally invasive, nonsternotomy coronary artery bypass grafting (MICABG) using data from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) National Database. BACKGROUND: MICABG has gained popularity, owing to expected lower perioperative morbidity and shorter recovery. Despite this, concerns remain regarding anastomotic quality and the validity of proposed perioperative benefits. METHODS: We queried the STS National Database for all patients who underwent single-vessel coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) from January 2014 to December 2016 to compare outcomes of MICABG with conventional CABG. Patients who underwent concomitant or emergent procedures were excluded. Propensity-weighted cohorts were compared by operative approach with adjustment for variability across institutions. RESULTS: Of 12,406 eligible patients, 2688 (21.7%) underwent MICABG, and 9818 (78.3%) underwent conventional CABG. Propensity weighting produced excellent balance in patient characteristics, including completeness of revascularization, body mass index, and STS predictive risk scores. MICABG was associated with significant reduction of in-hospital mortality [odds ratio (OR)=0.32, absolute reduction (AR)=0.91%, P <0.0001]; 30-day mortality (OR=0.51, AR=0.88%, P =0.001), duration of ventilation (8.62 vs 12.6 hours, P <0.0001), prolonged hospitalization (OR=0.77, AR=1.6, P =0.043), deep wound infection (OR=0.33, AR=0.68, P <0.004), postoperative transfusions (OR=0.52, AR=7.7%, P <0.0001), and STS composite morbidity (OR=0.72, AR=1.19%, P =0.008). Subgroup analysis of only off-pump left internal mammary artery-left anterior descending CABG showed similar findings. Major adverse cardiac events and graft occlusion did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: MICABG is associated with lower mortality and perioperative morbidity compared with conventional sternotomy CABG. MICABG may have a role in treating single-vessel disease.