RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Due to the radiation exposure for the urology staff during endourology, our aim was to evaluate the trends of radiation protection in the operation room by endourologists from European centers and to estimate their annual radiation. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter study involving experienced endourologists from different European centers to evaluate whether the protection and threshold doses recommended by the International Commission on Radiation Protection (ICRP) were being followed. A 36-question survey was completed on the use of fluoroscopy and radiation protection. Annual prospective data from chest, extremities, and eye dosimeters were collected during a 4-year period (2017-2020). RESULTS: Ten endourologists participated. Most surgeons use lead aprons and thyroid shield (9/10 and 10/10), while leaded gloves and caps are rarely used (2/10 both). Six out of ten surgeons wear leaded glasses. There is widespread use of personal chest dosimeters under the apron (9/10), and only 5/10 use a wrist or ring dosimeter and 4 use an eye dosimeter. Two endourologists use the ALARA protocol. The use of ultrasound and fluoroscopy during PCNL puncture was reported by 8 surgeons. The mean number of PCNL and URS per year was 30.9 (SD 19.9) and 147 (SD 151.9). The mean chest radiation was 1.35 mSv per year and 0.007 mSv per procedure. Mean radiation exposure per year in the eyes and extremities was 1.63 and 11.5 mSv. CONCLUSIONS: Endourologists did not exceed the threshold doses for radiation exposure to the chest, extremities and lens. Furthermore, the ALARA protocol manages to reduce radiation exposure.
Assuntos
Exposição Ocupacional , Exposição à Radiação , Proteção Radiológica , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Exposição Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Fluoroscopia/efeitos adversos , Exposição à Radiação/prevenção & controle , Doses de RadiaçãoRESUMO
We propose a modified dynamic CT-myelography technique for patients with fast CSF leaks caused by ventral dural tears in order to reduce radiation exposure and complications. A fluoroscopy-guided lumbar puncture using an epidural anesthesia kit replaces a CT-guided lumbar puncture, and a smaller volume of less concentrated contrast media is used. This approach has advantages, including speeding up the procedure, reduced radiation exposure, and elimination of the risk of contrast injection into the epidural space.
Assuntos
Hipotensão Intracraniana , Humanos , Hipotensão Intracraniana/diagnóstico por imagem , Hipotensão Intracraniana/complicações , Vazamento de Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/complicações , Vazamento de Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/diagnóstico , Mielografia/efeitos adversos , Mielografia/métodos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Fluoroscopia/efeitos adversosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive lumbar decompression (mild®) is becoming a popular procedure for treating lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) secondary to hypertrophic ligamentum flavum (LF). The mild® procedure is commonly performed under live fluoroscopic guidance and carries a risk of radiation exposure to the patient and healthcare. METHODS: One physician performed mild® on 41 patients at the Cleveland Clinic Department of Pain Management from October 2019 to December 2021, while wearing a radiation exposure monitor (Mirion Technologies). Mean fluoroscopy time, mean exposure per case, and mean exposure per unilateral level decompressed were the primary outcomes measured. The secondary outcome was to provide a comparison of radiation exposure during similar fluoroscopically guided procedures. RESULTS: Mean patient fluoroscopy exposure time was 2.1 min ±0.9 (range: 1.1-5.6) fluoroscopy time per unilateral level decompressed. The mean patient radiation skin exposure from mild® was 1.1 ± 0.9 mGym2, and the mean total dose was 142.3 ± 108.6 mGy per procedure. On average, the physician was exposed to an average deep tissue exposure of 4.1 ± 3.2 mRem, 2.9 ± 2.2 mRem estimated eye exposure, and 14.7 ± 11.0 mRem shallow tissue exposure per unilateral level decompressed. An individual physician would exceed the annual exposure limit of 5 Rem after approximately 610 mild® procedures per year. CONCLUSIONS: This study is an attempt to quantify the radiation exposure to the physician and patient during the mild® procedure. Compared with other fluoroscopically guided pain management procedures, patient and physician radiation exposure during mild® was low.
Assuntos
Médicos , Exposição à Radiação , Humanos , Raios X , Estudos Prospectivos , Fluoroscopia/efeitos adversos , Fluoroscopia/métodos , Exposição à Radiação/efeitos adversos , Descompressão , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare the long-term effectiveness, complications, and outcomes of primary obstructive megaureter (POM) treated by endoscopic balloon dilation under fluoroscopic guidance versus not using radioscopy during the procedure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A comparative study between POM cases treated at our institution by endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) under fluoroscopic guidance (FG) (n = 43) vs no fluoroscopic guidance (NFG) (n = 48) between the years 2004 and 2018 was conducted. The procedure in FG consisted of performing a retrograde pyelography before dilation. Then, a guidewire is introduced to the renal pelvis, and the dilation of the vesicoureteral junction is performed using high-pressure balloon catheters under fluoroscopic vision. Finally, a double-J stent is placed between the renal pelvis and bladder. The procedure in NFG was performed exclusively under cystoscopic vision without radiological exposure. Complications, outcomes, and success rates were analyzed using Spearman's correlation test. Mean follow-up was 12.5 ± 2.2 years in FG and 6.4 ± 1.3 years in NFG. RESULTS: MAG-3 showed significant differences in renal drainage before and after endoscopic treatment in both groups (p < 0.001 T-test). Statistical analysis did not reveal differences between groups in initial technical failure (r: - 0.035, p = 0.74), early postoperative complications (r: - 0.029, p = 0.79), secondary VUR (r: 0.033, p = 0.76), re-stenosis (r: 0.022, p = 0.84), long-term ureteral reimplantation (r: 0.065, p = 0.55), and final outcome (r: - 0.054, p = 0.61). The endoscopic approach of POM had a long-term success rate of 86.5% in FG VS 89.6% in NFG. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic balloon dilation of POM can be done with no radiation exposure with similar results, effectiveness, and outcomes.
Assuntos
Ureter , Obstrução Ureteral , Humanos , Obstrução Ureteral/diagnóstico por imagem , Obstrução Ureteral/cirurgia , Obstrução Ureteral/etiologia , Dilatação/métodos , Endoscopia/métodos , Ureter/diagnóstico por imagem , Ureter/cirurgia , Fluoroscopia/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Colonic self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) can be used to relieve malignant and benign large bowel obstruction (LBO) as a bridge to surgery (BTS) and for palliation. Guidelines suggest the use of fluoroscopic guidance for deployment. This may be difficult to obtain after hours and in certain centers. We aimed to determine the outcomes of stenting under endoscopic guidance alone. METHODS: All patients who underwent SEMS insertion in our tertiary referral center between August 2010 and June 2021 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Patient demographics (age/gender), disease characteristics (benign versus malignant/location/stage), stenting intent (BTS versus palliative), and outcomes (technical success/stoma/time from stenting to resection/death/study end) were analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty-three (n = 39, 73.6% male) patients underwent SEMS insertion. Indications included colorectal carcinoma (n = 48, 90.6%), diverticular stricture (n = 3), and gynecological malignancy (n = 2). In five (9.4%) patients (four BTS and one palliative), SEMSs deployment was not completed because of the inability to pass the guidewire. All underwent emergency surgery. In the BTS cohort (n = 29, median 70.4 [range 40.3-91.8] years), 10 patients underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The permanent stoma rate was 20.7% (n = 6). There was no 30- or 90-d mortality. In the palliative cohort (n = 24, median age 77.1 [range 54.4-91.9]), 16 (66.7%) were deceased at the study end. The median time from stenting to death was 5.2 (2.3-7.9) months. CONCLUSIONS: SEMS placed under endoscopic visualization alone, palliatively and as a BTS, had acceptable stoma, morbidity, and mortality rates. These results show that SEMS insertion can be safely performed without fluoroscopy.
Assuntos
Doenças do Colo , Neoplasias Colorretais , Obstrução Intestinal , Cirurgiões , Humanos , Masculino , Idoso , Feminino , Resultado do Tratamento , Estudos Retrospectivos , Obstrução Intestinal/etiologia , Obstrução Intestinal/cirurgia , Stents/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Fluoroscopia/efeitos adversos , Doenças do Colo/etiologia , Doenças do Colo/cirurgiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Unilateral diaphragmatic paralysis in patients with univentricular heart is a known complication after pediatric cardiac surgery. Because diaphragmatic excursion has a significant influence on perfusion of the pulmonary arteries and hemodynamics in these patients, unilateral loss of function leads to multiple complications. The current treatment of choice, diaphragmatic plication, does not lead to a full return of function. A unilateral diaphragmatic pacemaker has shown potential as a new treatment option. In this study, we investigated an accelerometer as a trigger for a unilateral diaphragm pacemaker (closed-loop system). METHODS: Seven pigs (mean weight 20.7 ± 2.25 kg) each were implanted with a customized accelerometer on the right diaphragmatic dome. Accelerometer recordings (mV) of the diaphragmatic excursion of the right diaphragm were compared with findings using established methods (fluoroscopy [mm]; ultrasound, M-mode [cm]). For detection of the amplitude of diaphragmatic excursions, the diaphragm was stimulated with increasing amperage by a cuff electrode implanted around the right phrenic nerve. RESULTS: Results with the different techniques for measuring diaphragmatic excursions showed correlations between accelerometer and fluoroscopy values (correlation coefficient 0.800, P < 0.001), accelerometer and ultrasound values (0.883, P < 0.001), and fluoroscopy and ultrasound values (0.816, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The accelerometer is a valid method for detecting diaphragmatic excursion and can be used as a trigger for a unilateral diaphragmatic pacemaker.
Assuntos
Diafragma , Paralisia Respiratória , Animais , Suínos , Diafragma/diagnóstico por imagem , Diafragma/fisiologia , Fluoroscopia/efeitos adversos , Paralisia Respiratória/diagnóstico , Paralisia Respiratória/etiologia , Paralisia Respiratória/cirurgia , Ultrassonografia , AcelerometriaRESUMO
AIM: To determine the incidence of positive fluoroscopic oesophagography in patients presenting with spontaneous or blunt traumatic pneumomediastinum. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed on patients who underwent fluoroscopic oesophagography for spontaneous or blunt traumatic pneumomediastinum between 2001-2019. Patients were excluded for history of oesophageal surgery, penetrating trauma, oesophageal cancer, or tracheal/oesophageal instrumentation. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty-two patients met the inclusion criteria; 170 presented with spontaneous pneumomediastinum and 82 presented with blunt traumatic pneumomediastinum. Fluoroscopic oesophagography was positive in eight patients with spontaneous pneumomediastinum, for a positivity rate of 4.7% (8/170). There was one false-negative case in a patient who presented with spontaneous pneumomediastinum and was found to have a non-full-thickness oesophageal injury on endoscopy. Fluoroscopic oesophagography was negative in all patients with blunt traumatic pneumomediastinum (0/82). The sensitivity and specificity of fluoroscopic oesophagography were 88.9% (8/9) and 100% (243/243), respectively. Oesophageal injury was more common in patients with spontaneous pneumomediastinum and a pleural effusion (5/11, 45.4%) than in patients with spontaneous pneumomediastinum and no pleural effusion (4/159, 2.5%, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The present findings do not support routine oesophagography in patients with blunt traumatic pneumomediastinum. Conversely, a positivity rate of 4.7% in patients with spontaneous pneumomediastinum suggests oesophagography may be warranted in this population, particularly if an associated pleural effusion is present.
Assuntos
Enfisema Mediastínico , Derrame Pleural , Humanos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Enfisema Mediastínico/diagnóstico por imagem , Enfisema Mediastínico/etiologia , Enfisema Mediastínico/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fluoroscopia/efeitos adversos , Esôfago/diagnóstico por imagemRESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim of the study is to analyze incidence and risk factors for air embolism during computed tomography (CT) fluoroscopy-guided lung biopsies using noncoaxial automatic needle. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between February 2014 and December 2019, 204 CT fluoroscopy-guided lung biopsies (127 men; mean age, 70.6 years) using noncoaxial automatic needle under inspiratory breath holding were performed. We retrospectively evaluated the incidence of air embolism as presence of air in the systemic circulation on whole-chest CT images obtained immediately after biopsy. Risk factors of the patient, tumor and procedural factors (size, location and type of nodule, distance from the pleura, the level of the lesion relative to the left atrium, emphysema, patient position, penetration of a pulmonary vein, etc) were analyzed. RESULTS: The technical success rate was 97.1%. Air embolism was radiologically identified in 8 cases (3.92%, 7 males; size, 21.6 ± 18.2 mm; distance to pleura, 11.9 ± 14.5 mm). Two patients showed overt symptoms and the others were asymptomatic. Independent risk factors were needle penetration of the pulmonary vein ( P = 0.0478) and higher location relative to left atrium ( P = 0.0353). Size, location and type of nodule, distance from the pleura, emphysema, patient position, and other variables were not significant risk factors. As other complications, pneumothorax and alveolar hemorrhage were observed in 57.4% and 77.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In CT fluoroscopy-guided lung biopsy using the noncoaxial automatic needles, radiological incidence of air embolism was 3.92%. Given the frequency of air embolism, it is necessary to incorporate this into postprocedure imaging and clinical evaluation.
Assuntos
Embolia Aérea , Enfisema , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Pneumotórax , Enfisema Pulmonar , Masculino , Humanos , Idoso , Embolia Aérea/diagnóstico por imagem , Embolia Aérea/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Biópsia por Agulha/efeitos adversos , Biópsia por Agulha/métodos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagem , Pulmão/patologia , Pneumotórax/diagnóstico por imagem , Pneumotórax/epidemiologia , Pneumotórax/etiologia , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem/efeitos adversos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Fluoroscopia/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Enfisema/complicações , Enfisema/patologia , Radiografia Intervencionista/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to conduct a case-control study of endoscopic and fluoroscopic metal stent placement combined with laparoscopic surgery versus conventional open Hartmann's procedure in treating acute left-sided colon cancer obstruction. Additionally, the study aims to discuss the application value of endoscopic and X-ray-guided metal stent placement combined with laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of acute left-sided colon cancer obstruction. METHODS: From June 2011 to December 2019, 23 patients with acute left-sided colon cancer obstruction who underwent metal stent implantation combined with laparoscopic surgery under endoscopy and X-ray fluoroscopy in Wenzhou Central Hospital were collected, and 20 patients with acute left-sided colon cancer obstruction who underwent traditional emergency open Hartmann's surgery during the same period were selected as a control group. All patients were diagnosed with left colon obstruction by plain abdominal film and/or CT before the operation and colon adenocarcinoma by colonoscopic biopsy and/or postoperative pathology. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative anal exhaust time, the success rate of one-stage anastomosis, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: This study showed a significant difference in the therapeutic effect between the two groups. Compared with the traditional Hartmann's operation group, the success rate of one-stage anastomosis in endoscopic and X-ray-guided metal stent placement combined with the laparoscopic operation group was significantly higher than that in the Hartmann's operation group (P < 0.05). The overall incidence of postoperative complications and hospital stay were significantly lower in the observation group than in the Hartmann's group (P < 0.05). Further subgroup analysis of the overall postoperative complication rate of the two groups showed that the traditional Hartmann's operation group was more likely to have an incomplete intestinal obstruction (P < 0.05). This study also showed no significant differences between the two groups in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, number of harvested lymph nodes, and postoperative anal exhaust time (all P > 0.05). This study also found no significant differences between the two groups in overall survival rates or recurrence-free survival rates (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The comparison of the therapeutic effects of the two groups verified the feasibility of endoscopy combined with X-ray fluoroscopy metal stent placement in combination with laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of acute left-sided colon cancer obstruction. Compared with the traditional emergency open Hartmann's procedure, metal stent implantation under endoscopy and X-ray fluoroscopy combined with laparoscopic surgery is more minimally invasive, safe, and effective. It avoids the traditional second or even third surgical trauma to effectively improve the quality of life of patients, so that patients can recover quickly after surgery.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias do Colo , Obstrução Intestinal , Laparoscopia , Humanos , Neoplasias do Colo/cirurgia , Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Qualidade de Vida , Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento , Estudos Retrospectivos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Colostomia/efeitos adversos , Obstrução Intestinal/etiologia , Obstrução Intestinal/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , Endoscópios/efeitos adversos , Fluoroscopia/efeitos adversos , Stents/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The European-funded Health Effects of Cardiac Fluoroscopy and Modern Radiotherapy in Pediatrics (HARMONIC) project is a multicenter cohort study assessing the long-term effects of ionizing radiation in patients with congenital heart disease. Knowledge is lacking regarding the use of ionizing radiation from sources other than cardiac catheterization in this cohort. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess imaging frequency and radiation dose (excluding cardiac catheterization) to patients from a single center participating in the Norwegian HARMONIC project. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2000 and 2020, we recruited 3,609 patients treated for congenital heart disease (age < 18 years), with 33,768 examinations categorized by modality and body region. Data were retrieved from the radiology information system. Effective doses were estimated using International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 60 conversion factors, and the analysis was stratified into six age categories: newborn; 1 year, 5 years, 10 years, 15 years, and late adolescence. RESULTS: The examination distribution was as follows: 91.0% conventional radiography, 4.0% computed tomography (CT), 3.6% diagnostic fluoroscopy, 1.2% nuclear medicine, and 0.3% noncardiac intervention. In the newborn to 15 years age categories, 4-12% had ≥ ten conventional radiography studies, 1-8% underwent CT, and 0.3-2.5% received nuclear medicine examinations. The median effective dose ranged from 0.008-0.02 mSv and from 0.76-3.47 mSv for thoracic conventional radiography and thoracic CT, respectively. The total effective dose burden from thoracic conventional radiography ranged between 28-65% of the dose burden from thoracic CT in various age categories (40% for all ages combined). The median effective dose for nuclear medicine lung perfusion was 0.6-0.86 mSv and for gastrointestinal fluoroscopy 0.17-0.27 mSv. Because of their low frequency, these procedures contributed less to the total effective dose than thoracic radiography. CONCLUSION: This study shows that CT made the largest contribution to the radiation dose from imaging (excluding cardiac intervention). However, although the dose per conventional radiograph was low, the large number of examinations resulted in a substantial total effective dose. Therefore, it is important to consider the frequency of conventional radiography while calculating cumulative dose for individuals. The findings of this study will help the HARMONIC project to improve risk assessment by minimizing the uncertainty associated with cumulative dose calculations.
Assuntos
Cardiopatias Congênitas , Adolescente , Criança , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Estudos de Coortes , Fluoroscopia/efeitos adversos , Cardiopatias Congênitas/diagnóstico por imagem , Doses de Radiação , Radiação Ionizante , Lactente , Pré-EscolarRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Cricopharyngeus muscle dysfunction (CPMD) is a common cause for progressive dysphagia and can lead to dietary restriction, reduced nutrition, weight loss, and pneumonia. Controversy exists whether CPMD is best managed with primary surgical treatment of the cricopharyngeus muscle and who represents a good surgical candidate. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients diagnosed with CPMD who underwent surgical treatment were evaluated through prospectively collected pre- and postoperative Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) and Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS). Videofluoroscopic swallowing studies (VFSS) were reviewed for presence or absence of a high-pressure barium stream through the upper esophageal sphincter, termed the jet phenomenon (JP). RESULTS: We identified 42 patients with CPMD who underwent surgical treatment and had serial Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) measures obtained pre- and postoperatively. Mean EAT-10 scores improved by 12.1 points (95%CI = 8.6-15.6), p < 0.0001. There was a significantly greater improvement among patients with JP (|∆EAT-10|= 17.0, 95%CI = 12.5-21.4) compared to those without (|∆EAT-10|= 6.2, 95%CI = 1.6-10.8), p = 0.0013. Patients with JP also showed improved FOIS score (p = 0.0023) while those without JP did not. CONCLUSION: This study provides the initial report on the utility of JP as a VFSS feature that is strongly associated with improved outcomes following surgical treatment of CPMD. Further work determining the physiologic correlates responsible for JP will help clarify its predictive capabilities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.
Assuntos
Transtornos de Deglutição , Doenças do Esôfago , Humanos , Transtornos de Deglutição/etiologia , Transtornos de Deglutição/cirurgia , Transtornos de Deglutição/diagnóstico , Esfíncter Esofágico Superior/cirurgia , Fluoroscopia/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Deglutição/fisiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: As part of a quality improvement project beginning in October 2011, our centre introduced changes to reduce radiation exposure during paediatric cardiac catheterisations. This led to significant initial decreases in radiation to patients. Starting in April 2016, we sought to determine whether these initial reductions were sustained. METHODS: After a 30-day trial period, we implemented (1) weight-based reductions in preset frame rates for fluoroscopy and angiography, (2) increased use of collimators and safety shields, (3) utilisation of stored fluoroscopy and virtual magnification, and (4) hiring of a devoted radiation technician. We collected patient weight (kg), total fluoroscopy time (min), and procedure radiation dosage (cGy-cm2) for cardiac catheterisations between October, 2011 and September, 2019. RESULTS: A total of 1889 procedures were evaluated (196 pre-intervention, 303 in the post-intervention time period, and 1400 in the long-term group). Fluoroscopy times (18.3 ± 13.6 pre; 19.8 ± 14.1 post; 17.11 ± 15.06 long-term, p = 0.782) were not significantly different between the three groups. Patient mean radiation dose per kilogram decreased significantly after the initial quality improvement intervention (39.7% reduction, p = 0.039) and was sustained over the long term (p = 0.043). Provider radiation exposure was also significantly decreased from the onset of this project through the long-term period (overall decrease of 73%, p < 0.01) despite several changes in the interventional cardiologists who made up the team over this time period. CONCLUSION: Introduction of technical and clinical practice changes can result in a significant reduction in radiation exposure for patients and providers in a paediatric cardiac catheterisation laboratory. These reductions can be maintained over the long term.
Assuntos
Melhoria de Qualidade , Exposição à Radiação , Criança , Humanos , Exposição à Radiação/prevenção & controle , Doses de Radiação , Angiografia , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Fluoroscopia/efeitos adversos , Fluoroscopia/métodosRESUMO
PURPOSE: There is an increasing need for pedicle screw positioning while decreasing radiation exposure. This study compares intra-operative radiation dose using posterior internal fixation using impedancemetry-guided pedicle positioning by the Pediguard system versus standard free-hand sighting when surgery was performed with a trainee or expert surgeon. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using the electrical properties of bone, the Pediguard detects iatrogenic penetration of the pedicle wall and gives auditory feedback to the surgeon. A single centre, two surgeons (one experienced and the other novice) conducted a continuous prospective randomized study for one year. Twenty patients were randomized into one group (free-hand control group) receiving pedicle instrumentation without the use of the Pediguard and the second group receiving pedicle instrumentation with the use of the Pediguard. The total screw placement times and fluoroscopic times for each screw was recorded and pedicle screw position was analyzed on post-operative CT scan. RESULTS: Among the 104 screwed pedicles, 22 unrecognized perforations were detected by CT scan, while no perforation signal was observed intra-operatively. Only one perforation was greater than 2 mm. The overall screwing time was 4.33 ± 1.2 minutes per screw for experienced surgeon and 5.84 ± 2.5 minutes per screw for the novice. Pediguard did not increased significantly the time (0.3 mn per screw) for the experienced surgeon, but the time with Pediguard was longer (2 mn more per screw) for the novice surgeon, particularly at the thoracic level. The overall fluoroscopic average time per screw for the experienced surgeon is 5.8 ± 2.3 s and 10.4 ± 4.5 s for the novice surgeon. For the novice surgeon, radiation time reduced from 12 (without Pediguard) to 6 s (with Pediguard). There was no significant difference for the experienced surgeon in terms of improvement in radiation time with the use of Pediguard. CONCLUSION: The overall time was longer for the novice surgeon with the Pediguard system, but allowed to decrease by 50% the fluoroscopy time.
Assuntos
Parafusos Pediculares , Fusão Vertebral , Cirurgia Assistida por Computador , Humanos , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Inteligência Artificial , Estudos Prospectivos , Aprendizado de Máquina , Fluoroscopia/efeitos adversos , CogniçãoRESUMO
The use of personal protective equipment (PPE) can significantly reduce staff exposure to harmful radiation and infection. Fluoroscopic procedures in orthopaedic theatre can generate high levels of radiation and good adherence to PPE use is essential to reduce long term cancer risk, including thyroid cancer. To assess baseline compliance with PPE, availability of PPE in theatre and carry out an intervention to promote greater use of PPE. This was a closed-loop interventional study set in a level 1 trauma centre and an elective/rehabilitation unit. Data were collected in 40 cases pre and post-intervention from 26th May-7th July 2017. All health care practitioners present at fluoroscopic screening were observed. PPE availability was audited daily. A questionnaire was used to assess surgical and nursing knowledge/practices regarding radiation/infection safety. An educational presentation was delivered to the groups at highest risk of exposure. 39/41 questionnaires were completed (29 surgeons, 10 nurses). 41% of respondents had taken a radiation training course or felt they had adequate training. There was a significant increase in the use of thyroid guards by surgeons 13/115 (11.3%) pre-intervention to 54/117 (46.2%) post-intervention (p<0.001) and radiographers (p=0.019) post-intervention. Logistic regression showed an 89.7% increased likelihood of thyroid guard use post-intervention and a 12.7% increased chance of thyroid guard use for each extra guard available. A short educational, easily replicated session, significantly improved compliance with thyroid guards by orthopaedic surgeons.
Assuntos
Cirurgiões Ortopédicos , Ortopedia , Cirurgiões , Humanos , Glândula Tireoide , Fluoroscopia/efeitos adversosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Given the growing demand for intraoperative imaging, there is increased concern for radiation dose for orthopaedic surgical staff. This study sought to determine the distribution of scatter radiation from fluoroscopic imaging in the orthopaedic surgical environment, with particular emphasis on the positions of personnel and the type of orthopaedic surgery performed. METHODS: A radiation survey detector was deployed at various angles and distances around an anthropomorphic phantom. The scatter dose rate in microsieverts per hour (µSv/h) was recorded using consistent exposure parameters for five common surgical procedures. A C-arm unit produced radiation for the hip arthroscopy, hip replacement and knee simulations, whilst a mini C-arm unit produced fluoroscopy for the foot and hand simulations. RESULTS: Readings were tabulated, and coloured heatmaps were generated from scatter measurements for each of the five procedures. Positions corresponding to the typical location of the surgical staff (surgeon, surgical assistant, anaesthetist, instrument (scrub) nurse, circulation (scout) nurse and anaesthetic nurse) were superimposed on heatmaps. The surgeon's proximity to the radiation source meant this position experienced the greatest amount of radiation in all five surgical procedures. Mini C-arm doses were considered low in all procedures for positions, with and without lead protection. CONCLUSION: This investigation demonstrated the distribution of scattered radiation dose experienced at different positions within the orthopaedic surgical theatre. It reinforces the importance of staff increasing their distance from the primary beam where possible, reducing exposure time and increasing shielding with lead protection.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Ortopédicos , Ortopedia , Exposição à Radiação , Humanos , Raios X , Fluoroscopia/efeitos adversos , Doses de Radiação , Exposição à Radiação/prevenção & controleRESUMO
Fluoroscopy is an indispensable tool that forms a significant part of the standard practice in many trauma and orthopaedic (T&O) procedures, as it facilitates dynamic assessment and aids intraoperative visualization and decision-making. It exposes patients and theatre staff to the potential hazards of ionizing radiation. Thus, the awareness of these hazards and proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE) will help mitigate increased exposure. This audit aimed to assess awareness regarding the safe use of fluoroscopy in T&O theatres, evaluate the level of PPE use and the knowledge of relevant guidelines, such as the British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) recommendations and local trust policy.A prospective audit was performed between June and July 2023 using an online survey sent to healthcare professionals working in T&O theatres across two hospital sites. Data were collected using an online questionnaire and responses kept anonymous and thus implied consent was applied. Standards followed the local trust policy at the University Hospitals Sussex NHS Trust and the BOA guidelines.Of the 49 respondents, 59% were fully aware of radiation hazards, and only the theatre radiographers were all fully aware. Surgeons (56%) and anaesthetists (46%) considered themselves to have adequate knowledge of these hazards. Just over half of the respondents (69%) could identify the major source of radiation, while only 37% understood the effect of distance on dose exposure. Of those surveyed, 49% knew the local trust policy, while 39.6% knew the BOA guidelines; less than half had formal training (40.8%). The results showed that less than half of the participants used the full PPE highlighted in the guidelines. Statistical analysis showed that only 46% of participants used a protective lead apron/lead skirt with a coat and thyroid shield. Of the survey participants, 84% never used eye protection during fluoroscopy procedures, and 58% had never received any formal training on radiation safety.The findings from this audit highlight the lack of awareness of the guidelines, resulting in suboptimal use of PPE in procedures with fluoroscopy. Recommendations for improvement include mandatory training for all theatre personnel. Methods of increasing awareness include using posters, performing regular audits to monitor the usage of PPE, and discussing the results in clinical governance meetings.
Assuntos
Ortopedia , Humanos , Equipamento de Proteção Individual , Fluoroscopia/efeitos adversos , Pessoal de Saúde , Hospitais UniversitáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Measures were undertaken at the Cleveland Clinic to reduce radiation exposure to patients and personnel working in the catheterization laboratories. We report our experience with these improved systems over a 7-year period in patients undergoing diagnostic catheterization (DC) and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). METHODS: Patients were categorized into preinitiative (2009-2012) and postinitiative (2013-2019) groups in the DC and PCI cohorts. Propensity score matching was done between the pre- and postinitiative groups for both cohorts based on age, sex, body surface area, total fluoroscopy time, and total acquisition time. The effectiveness of radiation reduction measures was assessed by comparing the total air kerma (Ka,r ), and fluoroscopy- and acquisition-mode air kerma in patients in the two groups. RESULTS: In the DC cohort, there was a significant reduction in Ka,r in the postinitiative group in comparison to the preinitiative group (median, 396 vs. 857 mGy; p < 0.001). In the PCI cohort, Ka,r in the postinitiative group was 1265 mGy, which was significantly lower than the corresponding values in the preinitiative group (1994 mGy; p < 0.001). We also observed a significant reduction in fluoroscopy- and acquisition-based air kerma rates, and air kerma area product in the postinitiative group in comparison to the preinitiative group in both matched and unmatched DC and PCI cohorts after the institution of radiation reduction measures. CONCLUSION: There was a significant and sustained reduction in radiation exposure to patients in the catheterization laboratory with the implementation of advanced protocols. Similar algorithms can be applied in other laboratories to achieve a similar reduction in radiation exposure.
Assuntos
Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Exposição à Radiação , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Fluoroscopia/efeitos adversos , Fluoroscopia/métodos , Humanos , Laboratórios , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Doses de Radiação , Exposição à Radiação/efeitos adversos , Exposição à Radiação/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The use of hybrid operating rooms (HOR) for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has increased, so radiation exposure during procedures that use X-ray fluoroscopy is a fundamental problem not only for patients but also for surgeons and interventional cardiologists, increasing the risk of cataracts among operators. We investigated the efficacy of leaded glasses and protective sheets for ocular radiation protection.MethodsâandâResults: Between January 2020 and February 2021 we enrolled 54 TAVI procedures using the transfemoral approach. The subjects were divided into a curtain protection group (Group C, n=20), glass protection group (Group G, n=17), and sheet protection group (Group S, n=17). The cumulative dose (CD) of the operators showed a decreasing trend in Group S compared with the other two groups. The CD normalized by dose area product (CD/DAP) of the operators was significantly reduced in Group S compared with Group C. However, Group G showed no significant difference compared with Group C. Regarding the distribution of CD/DAP, Group S had a significantly lower distribution than that in groups C and G. CONCLUSIONS: Protective sheets provide more stable radiation protection than conventional curtains or leaded glasses.
Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica , Exposição à Radiação , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter , Humanos , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/efeitos adversos , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/métodos , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Doses de Radiação , Fatores de Risco , Exposição à Radiação/efeitos adversos , Exposição à Radiação/prevenção & controle , Fluoroscopia/efeitos adversos , Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Ionizing radiation exposure during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an important quality issue especially in children. We aim to identify factors associated with extended fluoroscopy time (FT) in children undergoing ERCP. METHODS: ERCP on children <18âyears from 15 centers were entered prospectively into a REDCap database from May 2014 until May 2018. Data were retrospectively evaluated for outcome and quality measures. A univariate and step-wise linear regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with increased FT. RESULTS: 1073 ERCPs performed in 816 unique patients met inclusion criteria. Median age was 12.2âyears (interquartile range [IQR] 9.3-15.8). 767 (71%) patients had native papillae. The median FT was 120âseconds (IQR 60-240). Factors associated with increased FT included procedures performed on patients with chronic pancreatitis, ERCPs with American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) difficulty grade >3, ERCPs performed by pediatric gastroenterologist (GI) with adult GI supervision, and ERCPs performed at non-free standing children's hospitals. Hispanic ethnicity was the only factor associated with lower FT. CONCLUSION: Several factors were associated with prolonged FTs in pediatric ERCP that differed from adult studies. This underscores that adult quality indicators cannot always be translated to pediatric patients. This data can better identify children with higher risk for radiation exposure and improve quality outcomes during pediatric ERCP.
Assuntos
Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Exposição à Radiação , Adulto , Criança , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/efeitos adversos , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/métodos , Estudos de Coortes , Fluoroscopia/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Exposição à Radiação/efeitos adversos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: The global burden of kidney stone disease (KSD) and its management relies on ionising radiation. This includes the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of KSD patients. The concept 'As Low As Reasonably Achievable' (ALARA) developed in response to the radiation risks and the key principles include optimisation, justification and limitation of radiation. This article provides an overview of the topic including background to the risks and steps that can be taken during all stages of endourological management. RECENT FINDINGS: Our review suggests that ionising radiation is an invaluable tool in delineating the anatomy, localising disease, guiding manoeuvres and monitoring treatment in patients with KSD. It therefore plays an integral role in many stages of patient care; preoperatively, intraoperatively and postoperatively. The reduction of radiation pre- and post-surgical intervention relies on the use of low-radiation CT scan and ultrasound scan. It can also be achieved through various intraoperative techniques or fluoroless techniques in selected patients/procedures, customised to the patients and procedural complexity. There are many parts of the patient journey where exposure to radiation can take place. Urologists must be diligent to minimise and mitigate this wherever possible as they too face exposure risks. Implementation of strategies such as teaching programmes, fluoroscopy checklists and judicious use of CT imaging among other things is a step towards improving practice in this area.