A mechanistic framework for a priori pharmacokinetic predictions of orally inhaled drugs.

The fate of orally inhaled drugs is determined by pulmonary pharmacokinetic processes such as particle deposition, pulmonary drug dissolution, and mucociliary clearance. Even though each single process has been systematically investigated, a quantitative understanding on the interaction of processes remains limited and therefore identifying optimal drug and formulation characteristics for orally inhaled drugs is still challenging. To investigate this complex interplay, the pulmonary processes can be integrated into mathematical models. However, existing modeling attempts considerably simplify these processes or are not systematically evaluated against (clinical) data. In this work, we developed a mathematical framework based on physiologically-structured population equations to integrate all relevant pulmonary processes mechanistically. A tailored numerical resolution strategy was chosen and the mechanistic model was evaluated systematically against data from different clinical studies. Without adapting the mechanistic model or estimating kinetic parameters based on individual study data, the developed model was able to predict simultaneously (i) lung retention profiles of inhaled insoluble particles, (ii) particle size-dependent pharmacokinetics of inhaled monodisperse particles, (iii) pharmacokinetic differences between inhaled fluticasone propionate and budesonide, as well as (iv) pharmacokinetic differences between healthy volunteers and asthmatic patients. Finally, to identify the most impactful optimization criteria for orally inhaled drugs, the developed mechanistic model was applied to investigate the impact of input parameters on both the pulmonary and systemic exposure. Interestingly, the solubility of the inhaled drug did not have any relevant impact on the local and systemic pharmacokinetics. Instead, the pulmonary dissolution rate, the particle size, the tissue affinity, and the systemic clearance were the most impactful potential optimization parameters. In the future, the developed prediction framework should be considered a powerful tool for identifying optimal drug and formulation characteristics.

Fluticasone propionate-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles with augmented anti-inflammatory activity: optimisation, characterisation and pharmacodynamic evaluation on rats.

This work aimed to elaborate an optimised fluticasone propionate (FP)-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) to enhance FP effectiveness for topical inflammatory remediation. The influences of drug amount, lipid, and surfactant ratios, on drug release pattern and stability were investigated utilising Box-Behnken design. Elaboration, characterisation, and pharmacodynamic evaluation in comparison with the marketed formulation (Cutivate® cream, 0.05%w/w FP), were conducted for the optimised SLNs. The optimised SLNs with a size of 248.3 ± 1.89 nm (PDI = 0.275) and -32.4 ± 2.85 mV zeta potential were evidenced good stability physiognomies. The optimised SLNs pre-treated rats exhibited non-significant difference in paw volume from that of the control group and showed a significant reduction in both PGE2 and TNF-α levels by 51.5 and 61%, respectively, in comparison with the Carrageenan group. The optimised FP-loaded SLNs maximised the efficacy of FP towards inflammation alleviation that increase its potential as efficient implement in inflammatory skin diseases remediation.

Pharmacokinetic profile analyses for inhaled drugs in humans using the lung delivery and disposition model.

The kinetic clarification of lung disposition for inhaled drugs in humans via pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling aids in their development and regulation for systemic and local delivery, but remains challenging due to its multiplex nature. This study exercised our lung delivery and disposition kinetic model to derive the kinetic descriptors for the lung disposition of four drugs [calcitonin, tobramycin, ciprofloxacin and fluticasone propionate (FP)] inhaled via different inhalers from the published PK profile data. With the drug dose delivered to the lung (DTL) estimated from the corresponding γ-scintigraphy or in vivo predictive cascade impactor data, the model-based curve-fitting and statistical moment analyses derived the rate constants of lung absorption (ka ) and non-absorptive disposition (knad ). The ka values differed substantially between the drugs (0.05-1.00 h-1 ), but conformed to the lung partition-based membrane diffusion except for FP, and were inhaler/delivery/deposition-independent. The knad values also varied widely (0.03-2.32 h-1 ), yet appeared to be explained by the presence or absence of non-absorptive disposition in the lung via mucociliary clearance, local tissue degradation, binding/sequestration and/or phagocytosis, and to be sensitive to differences in lung deposition. For FP, its ka value of 0.2 h-1 was unusually low, suggesting solubility/dissolution-limited slow lung absorption, but was comparable between two inhaler products. Thus, the difference in the PK profile was attributed to differences in the DTL and the knad value, the latter likely originating from different aerosol sizes and regional deposition in the lung. Overall, this empirical, rather simpler model-based analysis provided a quantitative kinetic understanding of lung absorption and non-absorptive disposition for four inhaled drugs from PK profiles in humans.

Microencapsulation of Fluticasone Propionate and Salmeterol Xinafoate in Modified Chitosan Microparticles for Release Optimization.

Chitosan (CS) is a natural polysaccharide, widely studied in the past due to its unique properties such as biocompatibility, biodegradability and non-toxicity. Chemical modification of CS is an effective pathway to prepare new matrices with additional functional groups and improved properties, such as increment of hydrophilicity and swelling rate, for drug delivery purposes. In the present study, four derivatives of CS with trans-aconitic acid (t-Acon), succinic anhydride (Succ), 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate (2-HEA) and acrylic acid (AA) were prepared, and their successful grafting was confirmed by FTIR and 1H-NMR spectroscopies. Neat chitosan and its grafted derivatives were fabricated for the encapsulation of fluticasone propionate (FLU) and salmeterol xinafoate (SX) drugs, used for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), via the ionotropic gelation technique. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs demonstrated that round-shaped microparticles (MPs) were effectively prepared with average sizes ranging between 0.4 and 2.2 µm, as were measured by dynamic light scattering (DLS), while zeta potential verified in all cases their positive charged surface. FTIR spectroscopy showed that some interactions take place between the drugs and the polymeric matrices, while X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns exhibited that both drugs were encapsulated in MPs' interior with a lower degree of crystallinity than the neat drugs. In vitro release studies of FLU and SX exposed a great amelioration in the drugs' dissolution profile from all modified CS's MPs, in comparison to those of neat drugs. The latter fact is attributed to the reduction in crystallinity of the active substances in the MPs' interior.

Bioequivalence of fluticasone propionate and salmeterol (FS) given by the FS Spiromax® and Seretide Accuhaler® systems
.

OBJECTIVE: To determine pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of fluticasone propionate (FP) and salmeterol (SAL) in healthy volunteers following administration as two inhalations from the FS Spiromax 500/50 µg and Seretide Accuhaler 50/500 µg inhalers, without (study 1, n = 79) and with charcoal block (study 2, n = 77). Safety was also assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In two single-center, open-label, randomized two-period crossover studies, PK parameters were calculated from plasma drug concentrations obtained pre-dose through 36 hours post-dose. Bioequivalence was established if the 90% confidence intervals for the geometric mean ratios of the area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t) and the maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) for the comparison of both FP and SAL were within 0.80 - 1.25. RESULTS: In study 1, in subjects administered FS Spiromax, the mean (standard deviation (SD)) FP AUC0-t and Cmax were 1,622.64 (419.44) pg×h/mL and 151.36 (40.37) pg/mL, respectively, vs. 1,487.52 (341.25) pg×h/mL and 137.57 (33.64) pg/mL with Seretide Accuhaler. Mean (SD) SAL AUC0-t and Cmax with FS Spiromax were 408.42 (155.40) pg×h/mL and 269.48 (105.74) pg/mL, respectively, vs. 401.79 (125.32) pg×h/mL and 265.66 (87.28) pg/mL with Seretide Accuhaler. Comparable data were seen in study 2 with charcoal block. Bioequivalence of FS Spiromax with Seretide Accuhaler was observed both without and with charcoal block for FP and SAL for both AUC0-t and Cmax. Both study treatments were well tolerated, with a similar incidence of adverse events reported with the single use of FS Spiromax (23% study 1, 16% study 2) and Seretide Accuhaler (22%, 15%). CONCLUSION: FS Spiromax 500/50 µg (± charcoal block) was bioequivalent to Seretide Accuhaler 50/500µg.
.

Effect of USP Induction Ports, Glass Sampling Apparatus, and Inhaler Device Resistance on Aerodynamic Patterns of Fluticasone Propionate-Loaded Engineered Mannitol Microparticles.

The present investigation is to study the effect of two different induction ports (IP), i.e., USP IP and USP-modified IP equipped with andersen cascade impactor on in vitro aerodynamic performance along with the impact of USP-modified glass sampling apparatus on delivered dose uniformity of fluticasone propionate (FP) dry powder inhaler (DPI). FP DPI was fabricated by spray drying technique using engineered mannitol microparticles (EMP) with different force controlling agents, i.e., leucine and magnesium stearate. Additionally, commercially available two DPI inhaler devices namely Handihaler® and Breezhaler® were used to aerosolize the FP blends. Spherical smooth surface of EMP showed good powder flow properties and acceptable percentage content uniformity (> 95%). Amounts of FP deposited in cascade assembly using USP-modified IP with the Breezhaler® device was significantly higher (1.32-fold) as compared with the Handihaler® device. Moreover, USP-modified IP showed better deposition as compared with USP IP. Additionally, both inhaler devices showed a satisfactory delivered dose (> 105%) for FP using modified glass sampling apparatus at a flow rate of 60 L/min for 2 s. It was interesting to note that not only formulation properties but also IP geometry and device resistance have significant impact on DPI deposition pattern. This study is a first detailed account of aerodynamic performance of FP using USP-modified IP and USP-modified glass sampling apparatus. Thus, it can be of potential importance for both the academic and industry perspective.

The pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of single, high-strength doses of fluticasone propionate and fluticasone propionate/salmeterol delivered via a novel multidose dry powder inhaler in adolescents and adults with persistent asthma.

OBJECTIVE: Characterize fluticasone propionate (Fp) and combination fluticasone propionate and salmeterol (FS) pharmacokinetic and safety profiles, delivered via a novel, inhalation-driven, multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI). METHODS: This multicenter, open-label, four-period crossover, single-dose study randomized patients aged ≥12 years with persistent asthma to Fp MDPI 200 mcg, FS MDPI 200/12.5 mcg, Fp dry powder inhaler (DPI) 500 mcg (250 mcg × 2 inhalations), or FS DPI 500/50 mcg. Blood samples for determination of Fp and salmeterol pharmacokinetic parameters including Cmax, AUC0-t, AUC0-inf, tmax, and t½ were collected predose through 36 h postdose (14 time points). Safety assessments comprised adverse events, vital signs, and physical examinations. The institutional review board approved the study protocol. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic analysis set and safety population each included 40 patients. Fp systemic exposure (Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-inf) was highest for Fp DPI 500 mcg and similar for Fp MDPI 200 mcg, FS MDPI 200/12.5 mcg, and FS DPI 500/50 mcg. Fp geometric mean t½ values were similar across treatments. Salmeterol Cmax was 20% lower and AUC0-t and AUC0-inf were approximately 50% lower with FS MDPI versus FS DPI. Median tmax and geometric mean t½ were similar between FS MDPI and FS DPI. Adverse events were similar across treatments with no relevant changes in vital signs, physical examinations, or hematology test results. CONCLUSIONS: Fp MDPI and FS MDPI produced similar or lower systemic exposure to Fp and salmeterol, despite lower doses, versus conventional DPI devices, suggesting improved efficiency due to formulation and device differences.

Predicting Pulmonary Pharmacokinetics from In Vitro Properties of Dry Powder Inhalers.

PURPOSE: The ability of two semi-mechanistic simulation approaches to predict the systemic pharmacokinetics (PK) of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) delivered via dry powder inhalers (DPIs) was assessed for mometasone furoate, budesonide and fluticasone propionate. METHODS: Both approaches derived the total lung doses and the central to peripheral lung deposition ratios from clinically relevant cascade impactor studies, but differed in the way the pulmonary absorption rate was derived. In approach 1, the rate of in vivo drug dissolution/absorption was predicted for the included ICSs from in vitro aerodynamic particle size distribution and in vitro drug solubility estimates measured in an in vivo predictive dissolution medium. Approach 2 derived a first order absorption rate from the mean dissolution time (MDT), determined for the test formulations in an in vitro Transwell® based dissolution system. RESULTS: Approach 1 suggested PK profiles which agreed well with the published pharmacokinetic profiles. Similarly, within approach 2, input parameters for the pulmonary absorption rate constant derived from dissolution rate experiments were able to reasonably predict the pharmacokinetic profiles published in literature. CONCLUSION: Approach 1 utilizes more complex strategies for predicting the dissolution/absorption process without providing a significant advantage over approach 2 with regard to accuracy of in vivo predictions.

A Biocompatible Synthetic Lung Fluid Based on Human Respiratory Tract Lining Fluid Composition.

PURPOSE: To characterise a biorelevant simulated lung fluid (SLF) based on the composition of human respiratory tract lining fluid. SLF was compared to other media which have been utilized as lung fluid simulants in terms of fluid structure, biocompatibility and performance in inhalation biopharmaceutical assays. METHODS: The structure of SLF was investigated using cryo-transmission electron microscopy, photon correlation spectroscopy and Langmuir isotherms. Biocompatibility with A549 alveolar epithelial cells was determined by MTT assay, morphometric observations and transcriptomic analysis. Biopharmaceutical applicability was evaluated by measuring the solubility and dissolution of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) and fluticasone propionate (FP), in SLF. RESULTS: SLF exhibited a colloidal structure, possessing vesicles similar in nature to those found in lung fluid extracts. No adverse effect on A549 cells was apparent after exposure to the SLF for 24 h, although some metabolic changes were identified consistent with the change of culture medium to a more lung-like composition. The solubility and dissolution of BDP and FP in SLF were enhanced compared to Gamble's solution. CONCLUSION: The SLF reported herein constitutes a biorelevant synthetic simulant which is suitable to study biopharmaceutical properties of inhalation medicines such as those being proposed for an inhaled biopharmaceutics classification system.

Randomized, dose-ranging study of a fluticasone propionate multidose dry powder inhaler in adolescents and adults with uncontrolled asthma not previously treated with inhaled corticosteroids.

OBJECTIVE: A novel, inhalation-driven, multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) eliminates the need to coordinate actuation with inhalation. To characterize dose response, efficacy, and safety of fluticasone propionate (Fp) MDPI, a dose-ranging study was conducted with placebo and active comparators. METHODS: This 12-week, double-blind, parallel-group study randomized patients aged ≥12 years with uncontrolled persistent asthma not previously treated with inhaled corticosteroid therapy (N = 622) to twice-daily treatment with Fp MDPI (12.5, 25, 50, or 100 µg), placebo MDPI, or open-label Fp dry powder inhaler (DPI) 100 µg. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline over 12 weeks in trough (morning pre-dose and pre-rescue bronchodilator) forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). Blood samples were collected from a patient subset to evaluate pharmacokinetics. Adverse events were monitored. RESULTS: Fp MDPI 25, 50, and 100 µg significantly improved change from baseline in trough FEV1 over 12 weeks compared with placebo (p < 0.01). There were no substantial differences in FEV1 change from baseline over 12 weeks between any Fp MDPI dose and Fp DPI 100 µg. Maximum observed concentration (Cmax) of Fp increased with increasing Fp MDPI doses; time of Cmax was similar across doses and treatments. Systemic exposures for Fp MDPI 25 and 50 µg were lower than that for Fp DPI 100 µg. The safety profile of Fp MDPI was consistent with that of Fp DPI. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, Fp MDPI 25 and 50 µg provided comparable efficacy and safety to Fp DPI 100 µg, with lower systemic exposure.

Safety, efficacy, and dose response of fluticasone propionate delivered via the novel MDPI in patients with severe asthma: A randomized, controlled, dose-ranging study.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate fluticasone propionate (Fp) using a novel, inhalation-driven, multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) in patients with severe persistent asthma, versus placebo MDPI and Fp dry powder inhaler (DPI). METHODS: Patients with persistent asthma despite use of high-dose inhaled corticosteroids were randomized to Fp MDPI 50, 100, 200, or 400 mcg; Fp DPI 250 mcg; or placebo MDPI twice daily for 12 weeks. The primary outcome measure was change from baseline in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) over the 12-week period, compared with placebo; secondary measures included change from baseline in peak expiratory flow (PEF), rescue inhaler use, and time to withdrawal due to meeting stopping criteria. Safety included adverse events and laboratory evaluations. RESULTS: Six hundred forty patients were randomized; 459 (72%) completed the study. Numerical dose-related improvements in FEV1 were observed in all Fp MDPI groups over 12 weeks but were not significantly greater versus placebo. Increases in morning PEF (baseline to week 12) were substantially greater than placebo in all Fp MDPI groups. The Fp MDPI and Fp DPI groups had substantial reductions in rescue inhaler use from baseline to end point versus placebo (p ≤ 0.05). Efficacy was comparable between Fp MDPI and Fp DPI. No new safety signals were detected; the safety profile of Fp MDPI was similar to that of Fp DPI. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical benefit observed with Fp MDPI in patients with persistent asthma was comparable to Fp DPI. Safety was reassuring with no unexpected findings. These results support further evaluation of Fp MDPI in asthma. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01576718; EudraCT number 2010-023601-35).

Evaluation of the Transwell System for Characterization of Dissolution Behavior of Inhalation Drugs: Effects of Membrane and Surfactant.

Assessing the dissolution behavior of orally inhaled drug products (OIDs) has been proposed as an additional in vitro test for the characterization of innovator and generic drug development. A number of suggested dissolution methods (e.g., commercially available Transwell or Franz cell systems) have in common a membrane which provides the separation between the donor compartment, containing nondissolved drug particles, and an acceptor (sampling) compartment into which dissolved drug will diffuse. The goal of this study was to identify and overcome potential pitfalls associated with such dissolution systems using the inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), viz., budesonide, ciclesonide, and fluticasone propionate, as model compounds. A respirable fraction (generally stage 4 of a humidity, flow, and temperature controlled Andersen Cascade Impactor (ACI) or a Next Generation Impactor (NGI)) was collected for the tested MDIs. The dissolution behavior of these fractions was assessed employing the original and an adapted Transwell system using dissolution media which did or did not contain surfactant (0.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate). The rate with which the ICS transferred from the donor to the acceptor compartment was assessed by HPLC. Only a modified system that incorporated faster equilibrating membranes instead of the original 0.4 µm Transwell membrane resulted in dissolution and not diffusion being the rate-limiting step for the transfer of drug from the donor to the acceptor compartment. Experiments evaluating the nature of the dissolution media suggested that the presence of a surfactant (e.g., 0.5% SDS) is essential to obtain rank order of dissolution rates (e.g., for budesonide, fluticasone propionate, and ciclesonide) that is in agreement with absorption rates of these ICS obtained in studies of human pharmacokinetics. Using the optimized procedure, the in vitro dissolution behavior of budesonide, ciclesonide, and fluticasone propionate agreed approximately with descriptors of in vivo absorption. The optimized procedure, using membranes with increased permeability and surfactant containing dissolution medium, represents a good starting point to further evaluate in vitro/in vivo correlations.

Quantification of fluticasone propionate in human plasma by LC-MS/MS and its application in the pharmacokinetic study of nasal spray at clinical doses.

We developed a method for quantifying fluticasone propionate (FP) using general-purpose liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry equipment to measure the plasma concentration of FP for the pharmacokinetic study of FP following the administration of a prescribed nasal spray dose (100 µg). Using ammonium acetate (0.01 M)-formic acid (pH 2.9; 499:1, v/v) and methanol as the mobile phase, 3 pg/mL of FP was quantified. The relative error and standard deviation of the lower limit of quantification were <3.1%. The intra- and interday assay reproducibility was <3.5%. After 15 min of administering 200 µg FP nasal spray as the first dose, the FP concentration detected in the plasma of the two participants was 3.99 and 3.69 pg/mL. Subsequent doses of 100 µg FP were administered twice daily. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve values after 8-10 days of repeated administration of 100 µg of FP were approximately 1.6-fold higher than those achieved following a single administration of 200 µg of FP, which confirmed drug accumulation. The bioavailability of nasal FP was estimated to be 2% and 4%. This knowledge might help in reducing anxiety among patients who avoid using FP nasal spray, fearing its adverse effects.

Pharmacokinetic Models for Inhaled Fluticasone Propionate and Salmeterol Xinafoate to Quantify Batch-to-Batch Variability.

Advair Diskus is an essential treatment for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. It is a dry powder inhaler with a combination of fluticasone propionate (FP) and salmeterol xinafoate (SX). However, the pharmacokinetics (PK) batch-to-batch variability of the reference-listed drug (RLD) hindered its generic product development. This work developed the PK models for inhaled FP and SX that could represent potential batch variability. Two batches each of the reference and the test product (R1, R2, T1, T2) of Advair Diskus (100 µg FP/50 µg SX inhalation) were administered to 60 healthy subjects in a 4-period, 4-sequence crossover study. The failure of the bioequivalence (BE) between R1 and R2 confirmed the high between-batch variability of the RLD. Non-linear mixed effect modeling was used to estimate the population mean PK parameters for each batch. For FP, a 2-compartment model with a sequential dual zero-order absorption best described the PK profile. For SX, a 2-compartment model with a first-order absorption model best fit the data. Both models were able to capture the plasma concentration, the maximum concentration, and the total exposure (AUCinf) adequately for each batch, which could be used to simulate the BE study in the future. In vitro properties were also measured for each batch, and the batch with a higher fraction of the fine particle (diameter < 1 µm, < 2 µm) had a higher AUCinf. This positive correlation for both FP and SX could potentially assist the batch selection for the PK BE study.

Can Pharmacokinetic Studies Assess the Pulmonary Fate of Dry Powder Inhaler Formulations of Fluticasone Propionate?

In the context of streamlining generic approval, this study assessed whether pharmacokinetics (PK) could elucidate the pulmonary fate of orally inhaled drug products (OIDPs). Three fluticasone propionate (FP) dry powder inhaler (DPI) formulations (A-4.5, B-3.8, and C-3.7), differing only in type and composition of lactose fines, exhibited median mass aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) of 4.5 µm (A-4.5), 3.8 µm (B-3.8), and 3.7 µm (C-3.7) and varied in dissolution rates (A-4.5 slower than B-3.8 and C-3.7). In vitro total lung dose (TLDin vitro) was determined as the average dose passing through three anatomical mouth-throat (MT) models and yielded dose normalization factors (DNF) for each DPI formulation X (DNFx = TLDin vitro,x/TLDin vitro,A-4.5). The DNF was 1.00 for A-4.5, 1.32 for B-3.8, and 1.21 for C-3.7. Systemic PK after inhalation of 500 µg FP was assessed in a randomized, double-blind, four-way crossover study in 24 healthy volunteers. Peak concentrations (Cmax) of A-4.5 relative to those of B-3.8 or C-3.7 lacked bioequivalence without or with dose normalization. The area under the curve (AUC0-Inf) was bio-IN-equivalent before dose normalization and bioequivalent after dose normalization. Thus, PK could detect differences in pulmonary available dose (AUC0-Inf) and residence time (dose-normalized Cmax). The differences in dose-normalized Cmax could not be explained by differences in in vitro dissolution. This might suggest that Cmax differences may indicate differences in regional lung deposition. Overall this study supports the use of PK studies to provide relevant information on the pulmonary performance characteristics (i.e., available dose, residence time, and regional lung deposition).

Effect of Food Intake and Body Position on the Pharmacokinetics of Swallowed APT-1011, a Fluticasone Orally Disintegrating Tablet, in Healthy Adult Volunteers.

Eosinophilic esophagitis is a common atopic disease of the esophagus. APT-1011 is an orally disintegrating tablet formulation of fluticasone propionate under development for the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis. The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of APT-1011 under fed or fasted conditions in the morning (am) or at bedtime (hs) in the supine position. The study was a randomized, single-dose, 3-way, crossover design in healthy adult volunteers. In each study period participants received 2 3-mg orally disintegrating APT-1011 tablets. Serial plasma samples were collected before dosing and up to 72 hours after each dose. Twenty-two participants completed the study. The fluticasone propionate peak concentration (Cmax ) ranged from 5.97 to 200 pg/mL. Compared with am-fasted dosing, am-fed dosing was associated with a modestly higher Cmax (∼21%) but lower net exposure (area under the concentration-time curve ∼56% difference) and shorter time to reach Cmax (Tmax ) (Tmax fasted = 10 hours, fed = 5 hours). Dosing at hs resulted in an 18% and 32% decrease in Cmax relative to am-fasted and am-fed conditions, respectively. Dosing at hs led to an exposure that was higher than am-fed but lower than am-fasted dosing. Tmax with hs dosing (14 hours) was later than that with am dosing (Tmax fasted = 10 hours, fed = 5 hours). Adverse events were mild. There is low systemic exposure of fluticasone propionate with APT-1011. The rate of absorption was increased with a high-fat meal but decreased with hs dosing, suggesting the potential for longer dwell times in the esophagus.

Revealing the Regional Localization and Differential Lung Retention of Inhaled Compounds by Mass Spectrometry Imaging.

Background: For the treatment of respiratory disease, inhaled drug delivery aims to provide direct access to pharmacological target sites while minimizing systemic exposure. Despite this long-held tenet of inhaled therapeutic advantage, there are limited data of regional drug localization in the lungs after inhalation. The aim of this study was to investigate the distribution and retention of different chemotypes typifying available inhaled drugs [slowly dissolving neutral fluticasone propionate (FP) and soluble bases salmeterol and salbutamol] using mass spectrometry imaging (MSI). Methods: Salmeterol, salbutamol, and FP were simultaneously delivered by inhaled nebulization to rats. In the same animals, salmeterol-d3, salbutamol-d3, and FP-d3 were delivered by intravenous (IV) injection. Samples of lung tissue were obtained at 2- and 30-minute postdosing, and high-resolution MSI was used to study drug distribution and retention. Results: IV delivery resulted in homogeneous lung distribution for all molecules. In comparison, while inhalation also gave rise to drug presence in the entire lung, there were regional chemotype-dependent areas of higher abundance. At the 30-minute time point, inhaled salmeterol and salbutamol were preferentially retained in bronchiolar tissue, whereas FP was retained in all regions of the lungs. Conclusion: This study clearly demonstrates that inhaled small molecule chemotypes are differentially distributed in lung tissue after inhalation, and that high-resolution MSI can be applied to study these retention patterns.

In Vitro Measurement of Regional Nasal Drug Delivery with Flonase,® Flonase® Sensimist,™ and MAD Nasal™ in Anatomically Correct Nasal Airway Replicas of Pediatric and Adult Human Subjects.

Background: The majority of current nasal delivery devices, commercialized for children, are developed for adults. Differences in the dose reaching the target are expected due to significant differences between the pediatric and adult nasal airway geometries and their inhalation patterns. This study aims to compare the efficacy of most common nasal drug delivery devices in terms of regional delivery of suspension and solution formulations in pediatric and adult subjects. Methods: Anatomically correct nasal models of 2-, 5-, and 50-year old subjects were developed to evaluate regional nasal delivery of suspensions of fluticasone propionate and fluticasone furoate delivered with Flonase® and Flonase® Sensimist™, respectively, and the delivery of an aqueous solution of a model drug, administered with MAD Nasal™. Relevant inhalation patterns were considered for each nasal airway geometry. Controlled administration methods were used, and all contributing parameters, including particle size, velocity, and plume geometry, are reported. Results: Regional deposition patterns resulting from Flonase® Sensimist™ and Flonase® were not significantly different in each replica (p > 0.05), despite their different plume geometry and droplet size distributions. However, there was a significant difference in deposition of nasal sprays between the pediatric (2- and 5-year old) and adult models (p < 0.05), while no statistical differences were found between the two pediatric models (p > 0.05). The MAD atomizer resulted in different deposition patterns in all three subjects (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Nasal sprays are not adequate delivery devices for pediatric population, due to the narrower nasal passage and greater anterior deposition (∼60%). MAD atomizer resulted in significantly less anterior deposition (∼10%-15%) compared to the nasal pumps, but there was ∼30% run off to the throat. An in vitro platform incorporating anatomically correct nasal geometries and inhalation patterns can guide the development of age-appropriate nasal drug delivery devices.

Pharmacokinetics of Single and Repeat Doses of Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol in Healthy Chinese Adults.

The pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of single-inhaler fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) after single and repeat dosing in healthy Chinese adults were assessed. In this open-label study (NCT02837380), subjects received once-daily FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg on day 1 and repeat doses on days 2-7. PK parameters (days 1 and 7) included maximum observed concentration (Cmax ) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero (predose) to last time of quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t ). Terminal phase half-life (t½ ) on day 1 was estimated. The primary objective was to assess systemic exposure of FF 100 µg, UMEC 62.5 µg, and VI 25 µg following single-inhaler triple therapy on days 1 and 7. On day 1, geometric mean t½ of UMEC and VI was 0.36 and 0.52 hours, respectively; t½ of FF was not representative because of nonquantifiable concentration data. On days 1 and 7, geometric mean Cmax of FF was 10.46 and 27.32 pg/mL, respectively; Cmax of UMEC was 144.14 and 241.35 pg/mL, respectively; and Cmax of VI was 120.42 and 196.78 pg/mL, respectively. AUC0-t of FF was 1.77 and 276.96 pg·h/mL, respectively; AUC0-t of UMEC was 28.44 and 117.19 pg·h/mL, respectively; and AUC0-t of VI, 42.46 and 101.12 pg·h/mL, respectively. The PK of FF/UMEC/VI was as expected for the individual-component PK previously reported in healthy Chinese adults. No new safety signals were observed.

A Randomized Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics and Bioavailability of Fluticasone Propionate Delivered via Xhance Exhalation Delivery System Versus Flonase Nasal Spray and Flovent HFA Inhalational Aerosol.

PURPOSE: The exhalation delivery system with fluticasone propionate (Xhance®) has been shown to deliver drug substantially more broadly in the nasal cavity (particularly into superior/posterior regions), with less off-target loss of drug to drip-out and swallowing, than conventional nasal sprays. This open-label study evaluated the systemic bioavailability of Xhance® by comparing the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of a single dose of fluticasone from 3 products administering the drug using 3 different devices: Xhance®, Flonase® (fluticasone propionate inhalational nasal spray), and Flovent® HFA (fluticasone propionate inhalational aerosol). METHODS: This open-label study was conducted in 2 parts. Study part 1 compared systemic exposure with a single dose of Xhance® 186 or 372 µg versus Flonase® 400 µg (3-way, 3-treatment, 3-sequence, randomized crossover in healthy subjects; n = 90). A separate study, part 2, under the same umbrella protocol, compared systemic exposure with Xhance® 372 µg versus Flovent® HFA 440 µg (2-way, 2-treatment, 2-sequence, randomized crossover in patients with mild to moderate asthma; n = 30). FINDINGS: With Xhance® 186 µg, the geometric least squares mean (LSM) Cmax was higher than with Flonase® 400 µg (16.02 vs 11.66 pg/mL, respectively; geometric mean ratio [GMR], 137.42%) and the geometric LSM AUC0-∞ values were similar (97.30 vs 99.61 pg · h/mL; GMR, 97.78%). With Xhance® 372 µg, the geometric LSM Cmax and AUC0-∞ were higher than with Flonase® 400 µg (Cmax, 23.50 vs 11.66 pg/mL [GMR, 201.53%]; AUC0-∞, 146.61 vs 99.61 pg · h/mL [GMR, 147.19%]). In part 2, the geometric LSM Cmax and AUC0-∞ values were lower with Xhance® 372 µg than with Flovent® HFA 440 µg (Cmax, 25.28 vs 40.02 pg/mL [GMR, 63.18%]; AUC0-∞, 205.78 vs 415.16 pg · h/mL [GMR, 49.57%]). IMPLICATIONS: Similar intranasal doses of Xhance® (372 µg) and Flonase® (400 µg) are clearly not bioequivalent. Systemic exposure is very low with all products. Systemic exposure is higher with Xhance® than with Flonase® and substantially lower than with Flovent® HFA 440 µg and, based on dose normalization, Flovent® HFA 220 µg. ClincalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02266927.