Conceptual model of sport-specific classification for para-athletes with intellectual impairment.

The present paper describes the conceptual basis of evidence-based classification of para-athletes with intellectual impairment (II). An extensive description of the theoretical and conceptual foundation of the system as currently conceived is provided, as are examples of its applications in the three sports included in the Paralympic programme for II-athletes in 2020 (i.e., athletics, swimming and table tennis). Evidence-based classification for II-athletes is driven by two central questions: i. How can intellectual impairment be substantiated in a valid and reliable way, and ii. Does intellectual impairment limit optimal sport proficiency? Evolution of the system and current best practice for addressing these questions are described, and suggestions for future research and development are provided. Challenges of understanding and assessing a complex (multifaceted and intersectional) impairment in the context of sport also are considered.

Developing additional competition classes for athletes with intellectual impairments: Conceptual approach and efficacy of an ICF derived measure.

The purpose of para sport classification systems is to minimize the impact of impairment on competition outcome. Currently, athletes with intellectual impairment (II) compete in one class, regardless of the extent of activity limitation resulting from their impairment. Consequently, athletes with II that cause relatively minor difficulty in sport have a competitive advantage over athletes who have intellectual impairments that cause more significant advantage. This research investigated the efficacy of a measure of health-related functional impairment, derived from the World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF), as a tool to classify athletes with intellectual impairments (II) into groups with impairments that cause similar activity limitation. The first study used a Delphi technique to identify the most relevant codes within the ICF from which a measure of impairment presence and severity was derived. The second study investigated whether the measure could discriminate between groups of II athletes organized into three competition groups, and whether these groups could be predicted by ICF score. The ICF-based questionnaire shows promise as a conceptual approach and as a tool in this context, but this is a preliminary step before establishing a sport-specific approach to classification.

Behavioural and emotional problems in people with severe and profound intellectual disability.

BACKGROUND: People with severe and profound levels of intellectual disability (ID) are frequently examined as a single group in research. However, these two groups may be significantly different, particularly in the area of emotional and behavioural difficulties. METHOD: The Developmental Behaviour Checklist (DBC) was completed by parents and caregivers of 107 people with severe ID and 22 people with profound ID at four time periods across 12 years. Regression analyses were used to examine trends in sub-scale scores across time and groups. RESULTS: Significant differences between the groups of people with severe and profound ID were found. People with profound ID had significantly lower scores across all sub-scales except Social Relating. This was usually related to fewer items being selected as present for people with profound ID, as opposed to the scores being attributable to lower item severity scores. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant differences between groups of people with severe and profound ID in scores on the DBC, indicating differences in behavioural and emotional problems. Caution should be exercised by researchers treating these two disparate groups as a single group, and by practitioners translating such findings into practice.

Using the RUG-III classification system for understanding the resource intensity of persons with intellectual disability residing in nursing homes.

Since 1991, the Minimum Data Set 2.0 (MDS 2.0) has been the mandated assessment in US nursing homes. The Resource Utilization Groups III (RUG-III) case-mix system provides person-specific means of allocating resources based on the variable costs of caring for persons with different needs. Retrospective analyses of data collected on a sample of 9707 nursing home residents (2.4% had an intellectual disability) were used to examine the fit of the RUG-III case-mix system for determining the cost of supporting persons with intellectual disability (intellectual disability). The RUG-III system explained 33.3% of the variance in age-weighted nursing time among persons with intellectual disability compared to 29.6% among other residents, making it a good fit among persons with intellectual disability in nursing homes. The RUG-III may also serve as the basis for the development of a classification system that describes the resource intensity of persons with intellectual disability in other settings that provide similar types of support.

[Self determination as an axis to evaluate and intervene with intellectually disabled people]. / La autodeterminación como eje de evaluación e intervención en la Discapacidad Intelectual.

The article describes in an original way the concept of self-determination, including an analysis of its components and effects. The authors detail two groups of disorders of self-determination: subjective dissipation and subjective alienation. They sustain that this theoretical framework explains more fully the clinics of Intellectual Disability (DSM's Mental Retardation) and is more useful than IQ to orient teaching, therapeutic and rehabilitative interventions. The authors propose that the level and profile of self-determination of a person with intellectual disability should be utilized to sub-classify people with mental retardation diagnose, replacing the ranges of IQ traditionally used, and criticized as well, for useless.

Capacity of persons with mental retardation to consent to participate in randomized clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE: Adults with mental retardation have histories of cognitive and adaptive deficits posing unique ethical challenges for research consent assessment. This study examined the capacity of persons with mental retardation to consent to participate in randomized clinical trials. METHOD: A total of 150 adults (50 each with mild and moderate mental retardation and 50 comparison subjects without mental retardation) responded to a set of consent questions for a hypothetical randomized clinical trial testing a medication for aggressive disorders. Intelligence, adaptive behavior, medical treatment history, and consent history were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate methods were used to compare performance across and within groups. RESULTS: Comparison subjects scored significantly higher on measures of consent capacity than participants with mild mental retardation, who scored higher than those with moderate mental retardation. Most subjects with mental retardation were able to make a participation choice, and many understood research methods and appreciated the protagonist's disorder and the consequences of participation. Almost half of those with mild mental retardation understood human subject protections. Performance was weakest on understanding the purpose of research and reasoning about whether to participate, suggesting vulnerability to the therapeutic misconception. Psychiatric and experiential factors did not predict consent capacity. CONCLUSIONS: While adults with mental retardation as a group showed consent deficits, many attained consent capacity scores comparable to those of comparison subjects. Investigators should consider individual differences and a consent format suited to deficits in language, memory, and attention before restricting consent opportunities for persons with mental retardation.

A brief integer scorer for the SF-12: validity of the brief scorer in Australian community and clinic settings.

OBJECTIVE: The SF-36 and the shorter SF-12 are widely used in clinical research and increasingly so in practice. Scoring is complex and the validity of a brief scorer for the SF-12 in a community and a clinic sample was examined. METHOD: The sample comprised respondents with complete data on the SF-12 from the community sample in the 1997 Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Well-being (n = 10,641) and from a clinical sample from the Clinical Research Unit for Anxiety and Depression (n = 1,725). Each SF-12 was scored by the standard method (using weights to five decimal places) or by the brief method (using weights that are integers only). RESULTS: Scores generated by the standard scorer correlated almost perfectly with the brief scorer in both the community and clinic samples. Means and standard deviations were similar and no individual scores deviated by more than 2.89 in the community sample or by 3.06 in the clinical sample. IMPLICATIONS: The brief, rounded integer scorer for the SF-12 is an appropriate substitute for the standard scorer when hand scoring is an advantage.

Survey of nursing and medical profile prior to deinstitutionalization of a population with profound mental retardation.

During the planning stages of deinstitutionalization, the importance of nursing services must be recognized and given priority consideration in the community placement of persons with serious developmental disabilities. The objective of this study was to survey the medical and nursing profile of a group of nonambulatory, institutionalized individuals with profound mental retardation in anticipation of their nursing and medical needs in the community. Data were collected from the Individual Habilitation Plans of 55 individuals who had resided in a residential facility for individuals with mental retardation and were scheduled for community placement Serious medical problems in decreasing frequency were constipation (96%), seizure disorder (70%), poor dental hygiene (67%), cerebral palsy (62%), scoliosis (61%), contractions (41%), aspiration (44%), skin lesions (40%), and dysphagia (22%). Considering the complexity of health issues encountered in this population, adequate nursing and medical planning are critical to the wellness and successful community placement of a population with special needs.

Community learning disability teams: the need for objective methods of prioritization and discharge planning.

As part of caseload management for community learning disability teams (CLDTs), it would appear reasonable that services would have a mechanism for prioritizing referrals and discharge planning. However, any formal mechanism in relation to these two aspects apparently is lacking within the literature. This theoretical article attempts to illustrate this evidence-base need, and demonstrate how a prioritization and/or discharge planning system would aid CLDTs. In light of the scarcity of material for the learning disability sector, information has been examined from other health domains such as mental health. The paper also presents a discussion on whether rationing of services is best done via explicit or implicit means. Issues related to setting referral criteria and the allocation of referrals are also considered. Although suggestions have been made for CLDTs, it is difficult to do so whilst the evidence base for this sector is so lacking.

Classification of residents in nursing homes in Tuscany (Italy) using Resource Utilization Groups Version III (RUG-III).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Samples of nursing homes in Tuscany (Italy) classify their residents and determine their case-mix according to the Resource Utilization Groups System, Version III (RUG-III). METHODS: A large sample of nursing homes was selected, based on willingness to participate, representation of both public and private institutions, and wide geographic representation. Two registered nurses assessed all residents using the RUG questionnaire. The information collected was then used to group residents into 44 RUGs, and facility-specific case-mix indices were calculated using the RUG-specific weights previously validated in Italy. RESULTS: A total of 3981 residents from 93 nursing homes were assessed. Most residents were over 75 years old (87.4%) and women (68.6%). A large percentage was classified into RUGs within the following primary categories: reduced physical function (33.6%), impaired cognition (17.6%) and clinically complex (17.6%). The resulting nursing home case-mix indices ranged from 0.627 to 1.108 (mean 0.807+/-0.110). No significant association was found between type of facility, level of fees, or extent of staff in the nursing homes and their case-mix indices. CONCLUSIONS: RUGIII can provide information on types of nursing home residents and their care needs. This is useful for monitoring and evaluating long-term care services for the elderly, and allows for more effective planning and allocation of staffing and financial resources.

Health indicators for people with intellectual disabilities: a European perspective.

People with intellectual disabilities make up about 1% of the population of Europe. As trends toward community life advance, they have become more visible and more likely to access generic health systems. Yet evidence suggests that there are striking disparities between the health of this group and that of the general population. Increased longevity means that adults in this group expect to live longer lives and thus to encounter age-related risks for various health conditions. The 'Pomona' project, funded by the EU Health Monitoring Unit, aims to develop a set of health indicators for people with intellectual disabilities. It will build on the work accomplished by the team developing ECHI--European Community Health Indicators. This article outlines the rationale for the project, key elements in its implementation and expected outcomes.

Discapacidad mental: estudio de casos, Fundación General Ecuatoriana / mental Discapacidad: study of cases, Ecuadorian General Foundation

Se hace una revisión de los conceptos básicos sobre discapacidad mental, su etiología, prevalencia, clasificación, diagnóstico, manejo y prevención y se presenta un estudio de casos en 84 jóvenes pacientes de la Fundación General Ecuatoriana, haciendo incapié en las causas que originaron la condición.