What is pityriasis lichenoides?

Pityriasis lichenoides (PL) is an uncommon skin rash. PL has two main forms: Pityriasis lichenoides et varioliformis acuta (PLEVA): this "acute" (fast) form comes on quickly. Pityriasis lichenoides chronica (PLC): this "chronic" (long) form often develops slowly and lasts longer.

Rapid recovery in a child with febrile ulceronecrotic Mucha-Habermann disease following intravenous immunoglobulin administration.

Febrile ulceronecrotic Mucha-Habermann disease (FUMHD), a lymphocyte-mediated inflammatory skin disorder, is considered a severe variant of pityriasis lichenoides et varioliformis acuta that can lead to a fatal outcome if not managed in a timely fashion. Children with FUMHD can have systemic complications involving various organs. The scarcity of reported cases and the absence of well-designed studies or randomized clinical trials to evaluate different therapeutic modalities pose a major challenge in treating this potentially life-threatening disorder. We report a five-year-old child with FUMHD and seizures treated unsuccessfully with a combination of systemic steroids, methotrexate, dapsone, and oral erythromycin, who improved rapidly and achieved disease control with just a single infusion of low-dose intravenous immunoglobulin.

Febrile ulceronecrotic Mucha-Habermann disease - a case and treatment review.

Febrile ulceronecrotic Mucha-Habermann disease is a rare and severe variant of pityriasis lichenoides, characterized by sudden onset of generalized ulceronecrotic papules that rapidly coalesce into ulcers associated with high fever. Systemic manifestations such as intravascular disseminated coagulation and pulmonary, cardiac, gastrointestinal, and central nervous system involvement are common. Treatment is based on oral corticosteroids, immunosuppressive drugs such as methotrexate, and general supportive treatment. The present case describes a stepwise approach to a patient with Mucha-Habermann disease with insufficient response to methotrexate.

Febrile Ulceronecrotic Mucha-Habermann Disease: A Case Report and Review of Literature in the Paediatric Population.

Febrile ulceronecrotic Mucha-Habermann disease (FUMHD) is a rare fulminant variant of pityriasis lichenoides et varioliformis acuta (PLEVA) that is characterized by a large ulceronecrotic appearance with high fever and a variety of systemic symptoms. We report here a case of FUMHD in a 17-year-old male Chinese patient who was treated successfully with a combination therapy of methotrexate, methylprednisolone, and intravenous immunoglobulin. In addition, a literature review was conducted to summarize the key characteristics of paediatric FUMHD cases.

A case of febrile ulceronecrotic Mucha-Habermann disease responsive to systemic corticosteroids.

Febrile ulceronecrotic Mucha-Habermann disease (FUMHD) is a rare, potentially fatal subtype of pityriasis lichenoides et varioliformis acuta (PLEVA). Herein, we present a rare case of a 14-year-old male without significant past medical history who was diagnosed with FUMHD without a clear inciting factor. He was effectively treated with systemic corticosteroids with complete resolution of symptoms.

Febrile ulceronecrotic Mucha-Habermann disease during pregnancy: A case report.

Febrile ulceronecrotic Mucha-Habermann disease (FUMHD) is a rare and severe form of 'pityriasis lichenoides et varioliformis acuta', with a progressive and potentially fatal course. To the best of our knowledge, there has been no reported case of FUMDH during pregnancy before. Due to life-threatening nature of the disease and the lack of evidence-based treatment, management of FUMHD in pregnancy is a therapeutic challenge. Additionally, some of the drugs that are effective in the treatment are contraindicated in pregnancy. Herein, we report a 27-year-old woman diagnosed with FUMHD in her 19th week of pregnancy and treated with ceftriaxone and erythromycin.

Systematic review of the efficacies and adverse effects of treatments for pityriasis lichenoides.

BACKGROUND: Pityriasis lichenoides (PL) is a papulosquamous dermatosis affecting both children and adults, for which no standard treatment currently exists. OBJECTIVES: To characterize different treatment options and develop an evidence-based treatment algorithm for PL. METHODS: A systematic search of published literature on PL treatments was performed on 23 December 2017 via the MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov and the EU Clinical Trials Register databases. RESULTS: Of 1090 abstracts retrieved, 27 full-text articles with 502 participants were included for analysis. Seventeen of the full-text articles were retrospective cohort studies and two were randomized controlled studies. Treatment modalities included in these articles were phototherapy, antibiotics, methotrexate, pyrimethamine and trisulfapyrimidine, corticosteroids and conservative treatment. Of these treatments, phototherapy led to complete remission in the highest proportion of patients, and topical corticosteroids were found to have been trialled in the highest number of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The current literature consists almost entirely of uncontrolled studies, and none provides compelling data to support an evidence-based approach to PL treatment. Pityriasis lichenoides chronica and pityriasis lichenoides et varioliformis acuta should be distinguished in response to treatment, and definitions of response to treatment must be standardized. Additional randomized control studies with longer follow-up will help better differentiate between treatment efficacies and adverse effects.

Oral erythromycin in pityriasis lichenoides chronica and pityriasis lichenoides et varioliformis acuta.

Pityriasis lichenoides (PL) is an uncommon cutaneous disorder. Oral erythromycin is proposed to be effective in treating the disease. Here, we reported 16 pediatric patients with PL and systematically reviewed published literatures on erythromycin treatment response in pediatric PL patients, to observe the different treatment response to erythromycin in the pityriasis lichenoides chronica (PLC) and the pityriasis lichenoides et varioliformis acuta (PLEVA) groups. Sixteen patients, 8 with PLC and 8 with PLEVA, were treated with erythromycin. In the PLC group, 25% (n = 2) patients responded to erythromycin, while in the PLEVA group, 87.5% (n = 7) patients responded to erythromycin. The response rate was higher in the PLEVA group than the PLC group (P =.05). No side effect was reported in the 16 patients. A total of 34 children including 16 from our studies were included for further descriptive analysis, in which 12 had PLC and 22 had PLEVA. In the PLC group, 41.7% (n = 5) of patients responded to erythromycin while in the PLEVA group, 90.9 % (n = 20) of patients responded. The response rate was higher in the PLEVA group than the PLC group (P = .004). In conclusion, erythromycin is effective and safe in the treatment of children with PL, and erythromycin was more effective in patients with PLEVA than PLC.

Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Phototherapy: An Observational Study.

The aim of this prospective study in a phototherapy unit was to describe adverse events (AEs) associated with discontinuation of phototherapy in a clinical setting. A total of 872 included patients received 1,256 courses of phototherapy treatment: 76.9% narrow-band UVB (NBUVB); 9.6% systemic psoralen plus UVA (PUVA); 11.4% topical PUVA; and 2.1% UVA. Approximately a fifth of the treatments (n = 240, 19.1%) were associated with AEs, the most frequent of which was erythema (8.8%). Systemic PUVA had the highest rate of AEs (32.5%). Mycosis fungoides was the dermatosis with the highest rate of AE (36.9%). A total of 216 (17.2%) patients stopped treatment: 23.6% because of AEs (4.1% of all treatments). Treatment suspension due to AEs was associated with PUVA, both topical and systemic (p < 0.001), and diagnoses of mycosis fungoides (p <0.001), palmoplantar psoriasis (p = 0.002), hand eczema (p = 0.002) and pityriasis lichenoides (p = 0.01). In conclusion, one in every 5 patients receiving phototherapy had an AE, but few stopped treatment for this reason.

Pityriasis lichenoides acuta (PLEVA) pemphigoides: A rare bullous variant of PLEVA.

Although the clinical presentations of patients with pityriasis lichenoides et varioliformis acuta (PLEVA) may vary, bullae are not usually part of the clinical spectrum. To date, only two other cases of a bullous variant of PLEVA with evidence of autoantibodies against hemidesmosomal antigens have been reported. The term PLEVA pemphigoides was suggested for this unique clinical, pathological and serological combination of both PLEVA and bullous pemphigoid.

A case of pityriasis lichenoides et varioliformis acuta pemphigoides successfully treated with methotrexate and corticosteroids.

Pityriasis lichenoides et varioliformis acuta (PLEVA) pemphigoides is an uncommon skin disease, which is characterized by the appearance of blistering skin lesions in patients with PLEVA. We present a 3-year-old boy, who was diagnosed with PLEVA pemphigoides. Combined treatment of oral methotrexate and corticosteroids was more effective than corticosteroids alone on this patient.

A systematic review of treatments for pityriasis lichenoides.

Pityriasis lichenoides (PL) represents a spectrum of inflammatory skin diseases comprising pityriasis lichenoides et varioliformis acuta (PLEVA) and pityriasis lichenoides chronica (PLC). This study aimed to provide a summary of effective treatments for PL. A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines for studies investigating PL treatment including ≥3 subjects and published in English between 1 January 1970 and 15 April 2019. A total of 441 papers were screened, and 37 original manuscripts meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were found, including 12 case series, 18 reviews, four prospective studies, two comparative studies and a single randomized controlled study. In most studies, ultraviolet (UV) phototherapy (narrow-band UVB, broadband UVB, UVA1 or PUVA) was used. Clearance rates with the different modalities are hardly comparable between different studies, ranging approximately between 70% and 100%. Narrow-band UVB showed an efficacy similar to PUVA as such as the combination of UVA and UVB vs. PUVA. Oral erythromycin showed clearance rates ranging between 66% and 83%, whereas methotrexate up to 100% but in small and dated studies. Evidence for other treatments is scarce. There is a lack of high level of evidence studies on PL treatment. The interpretation of the results is biased by the possible auto-resolution of the disease, the sample heterogeneity between children and adults and the short follow-up period of the studies. Only some studies investigated how results were durable after cessation of therapy. Quality of life and the impact of treatment were never assessed. According to the results of this review, we suggest narrow-band UVB phototherapy as first-line treatment. Oral erythromycin with or without topical corticosteroids and low-dose methotrexate as second-line therapies. High-powered studies and randomized controlled trials are needed to establish the optimal treatment for PL.

A case of pityriasis lichenoides: Rapid resolution with azithromycin monotherapy in 3 weeks.

Pityriasis lichenoides (PL) is a spectrum of inflammatory skin diseases which include PL et varioliformis acuta (PLEVA) and PL chronica (PLC) as two ends of the disease and rarely both entities can coexist on the same patient. Treatment options are based on case series-reports, and anecdotes, and include topical corticosteroids, topical immunomodulators, systemic antibiotics (tetracycline, erythromycin), and phototherapy. Herein, we report a 13-year-old boy, exhibiting mixed manifestations of PLEVA and PLC lesions concurrently, with a rapid and dramatic response to azithromycin monotherapy.

[Febrile ulceronecrotic Mucha-Habermann disease]. / Enfermedad de Mucha-Habermann febril ulceronecrótica con respuesta favorable a minociclina, a propósito de un caso: Report of one case.

Pityriasis lichenoides et varioliformis acuta (PLEVA), pityriasis lichenoides chronica (PLC) and febrile ulceronecrotic Mucha-Habermann disease (FUMHD) are considered different manifestations of the same disease. Febrile ulceronecrotic Mucha-Habermann disease is a rare, and potentially lethal illness which is characterized by fast progression of numerous papules that converge, ulcerate and form a plaque with a necrotic center, together with hemorrhagic vesicles and pustules that are associated with high fever and variable systemic symptoms. We report a 16 years old male presenting with erythematous papules with crusts and fever. The diagnosis of febrile ulceronecrotic Mucha-Habermann disease was confirmed with the pathological study of the lesions. He was successfully treated with minocycline after a failed attempt of treatment with prednisone.

Febrile ulceronecrotic Mucha-Habermann disease following suspected hemorrhagic chickenpox infection in a 20-month-old boy.

We present the youngest pediatric patient so far with febrile ulcerative Mucha-Haberman disease (FUMHD) after an admitting clinical picture of hemorrhagic varicella infection. With a time to diagnosis of 25 days, the 20-month-old boy responded to low dose cyclosporine and prednisolone given for 3 months and is free of disease after 4 years of follow up. We describe a polyclonal CD8+ T cell response with elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines and a fivefold upregulation of the high-affinity Fc receptor type I (CD64) on granulocytes. Early consideration of FUMHD in the differential diagnosis of a systemic inflammatory disease combined with a generalized necrotizing rash is important for early and adequate management of children with this rare and challenging disease.

Hypertrophic Lichenoid Eruption in a Child Successfully Treated Using Acitretin and Surgery: A Case Report and Literature Review.

A 9-year-old boy presented with a history of keratotic violaceous plaques on the limbs and face for 8 years that had gradually progressed to erosive nodules on the extremities for 2 years. Several biopsies revealed hyperkeratosis, liquefactive degeneration of the basal layer, and a bandlike predominantly lymphocytic infiltrate. Based on the clinical and histologic findings, the patient was diagnosed with keratosis lichenoides chronica, a rare chronic dermatosis that is particularly uncommon in childhood. There are fewer than 20 reported cases of pediatric-onset keratosis lichenoides chronica in the current literature, with occurrence of pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia of primary keratosis lichenoides chronica lesions being even rarer. Here we present a unique pediatric-onset case accompanied by pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia that posed a significant treatment challenge to dermatologists. Significant improvement in the pseudoepitheliomatous skin lesions was achieved after treatment with oral acitretin capsules and surgical excision with skin grafting.