Early and Two-year Outcomes after Sutureless and Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement: a Nationwide Population-based Study.

BACKGROUND: We compared early and 2-year clinical outcomes of sutureless aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with conventional aortic valve replacement (CAVR) in a nationwide study based on claims data. METHODS: From December 2016 to November 2018, 3,173 patients underwent bioprosthetic aortic valve replacements. SAVR and CAVR were performed in 641 and 2,532 patients, respectively. Propensity score-matched analysis was performed in 640 patient pairs. RESULTS: Operative mortality rate was 2.8% without significant differences between the SAVR (3.4%) and CAVR (2.3%) groups (P = 0.324). There were no significant differences in postoperative morbidities between the groups except for permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation. PPM implantation rate was significantly higher in the SAVR (3.8%) than in the CAVR group (0.9%) (P < 0.001). One- and two-year overall survival was 89.1% and 87.5%, respectively, without significant differences between the groups (SAVR group vs. CAVR grouP = 89.9% and 90.5% vs. 87.2% and 88.7%, respectively; P = 0.475). There were no significant differences in the cumulative incidence of cardiac death, stroke, aortic valve reoperation and infective endocarditis between the groups. Cumulative PPM implantation incidence at 6 months in the CAVR was 1.1%, and no patient required PPM implantation after 6 months. In the SAVR, the cumulative PPM implantation incidence at 0.5, one, and two years was 3.9%, 5.0% and 5.6%, respectively. The cumulative PPM implantation rate was higher in the SAVR group than in the CAVR group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Early and 2-year clinical outcomes between SAVR and CAVR were not different except for a high rate of permanent pacemaker implantation in the SAVR group.

Epidemiology of Heart Valve Disease in Taiwan.

Studies conducted in developed nations have shown that increase in life expectancy has brought with it a rise in the incidence and treatment of degenerative aortic and mitral heart valve diseases. Current standards recommend valve replacement among even some asymptomatic patients. In this research, we examine the epidemiology of valvular heart disease and rate of valve replacement in Taiwan, where life expectancy now stands at 80.69 years. Patients were enrolled based on claims from a widely used national database and categorized into cohorts defined by type of valve disease and, further, by valve replacements and type of valve (mechanical, porcine, or bovine). Data, including disease type, age, and gender, were analyzed to determine annual and cumulative incidence rates and prosthetic usage from 2000 to 2017. Results showed that across the cohorts, the cumulative incidence rate in 2017 was 3.59%, and in the aortic valve cohort, the percentage of surgical valve replacement for those ≥60 years was 6.99%. Compared with other developed nations, this demonstrates that incidence rates are slightly higher, yet surgical replacements are less than half that of other developed nations. This under-treatment of patients with valvular heart disease presents an important public health challenge in Taiwan.

Evaluating the Validity of Risk Scoring in Predicting Pacemaker Rates following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

INTRODUCTION: Requirement of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation is a known and common postoperative consequence of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The Emory risk score has been recently developed to help risk stratify the need for PPM insertion in patients undergoing TAVR with SAPIEN 3 valves. Our aim was to assess the validity of this risk score in our patient population, as well as its applicability to patients receiving self-expanding valves. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 479 TAVR patients without preoperative pacemakers from November 2016 through December 2018. Preoperative risk factors included in the Emory risk score were collected for each patient: preoperative QRS, preoperative right bundle branch block (RBBB), preoperative syncope, and degree of valve oversizing. Multivariable analysis of the individual variables within the scoring system to identify predictors of PPM placement was performed. The predictive discrimination of the risk score for the risk of PPM placement after TAVR was assessed with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: Our results demonstrated that, of the 479 patients analyzed, 236 (49.3%) received balloon-expandable valves and 243 (50.7%) received self-expanding valves. Pacemaker rates were higher in patients receiving self-expanding valves than those receiving balloon-expandable valves (25.1% versus 16.1%, p=0.018). The Emory risk score showed a moderate correlation with pacemaker requirement in patients receiving each valve type, with AUC for balloon-expandable and self-expanding valves of 0.657 and 0.645, respectively. Of the four risk score components, preoperative RBBB was the only predictor of pacemaker requirement with an AUC of 0.615 for both balloon-expandable and self-expanding valves. Conclusion. In our cohort, the Emory risk score had modest predictive utility for PPM insertion after balloon-expandable and self-expanding TAVR. The risk score did not offer better discriminatory utility than that of preoperative RBBB alone. Understanding the determinants of PPM insertion after TAVR can better guide patient education and postoperative management.

Gender differences in incidence and in-hospital outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement in Spain, 2001-15.

BACKGROUND: we aim to examine trends in the incidence of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) among women and men in Spain from 2001 to 2015; compare in-hospital outcomes for mechanical and bioprosthetic SAVR by gender and; to identify factors associated with in-hospital mortality (IHM) after SAVR. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study using the Spanish National Hospital Discharge Database, 2001-15. We included patients that had SAVR as procedure in their discharge report. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to assess the impact of gender on the outcomes of mechanical and bioprosthetic SAVR. RESULTS: We identified 86 578 patients who underwent SAVR (40% women). Incidence of SVAR was higher in men (incidence rate ratio 1.57; 95%CI 1.55-1.59). In 2001, 73.36% of the men and 71.57% of women received a mechanical prosthesis; these proportions decreased to 43.04% in men and 35.89% in women in 2015, whereas bioprosthetic SAVR increased to 56.96% and 64.11%. After PSM we found that IHM was higher in women than in matched men for mechanical (8.94% vs. 6.79%; P < 0.001) and bioprosthetic (6.51 vs. 5.42%; P = 0.001) SAVR. The mean length of hospital stay was longer (19.54 vs. 18.74 days; P < 0.001) among females than males undergoing mechanical SAVR. Higher IHM after SAVR was associated with older age, comorbidities (except diabetes and atrial fibrillation), concomitant coronary artery bypass graft and emergency room admission. CONCLUSIONS: This nation-wide analysis over 15 years of gender-specific outcomes after SAVR showed that, after PSM women have significantly higher IHM after mechanical and bioprosthetic SAVR than men.

Clinical outcomes and hospital readmission rates in mechanical vs bioprosthetic mitral valves.

OBJECTIVE: Recent national trends have demonstrated increased use of bioprosthetic mitral valves. The primary objective of this study was to compare clinical outcomes as well as readmission rates for mechanical vs bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement (mMVR vs bMVR). METHODS: All patients undergoing MVR from 2011-2017 were included in a single center data set that was obtained retrospectively from a prospectively maintained cardiac surgical database. RESULTS: The total MVR patient cohort consisted of 828 patients, including bMVR (n = 522) and mMVR (n = 306). There was no significant difference in the operative (30-day) mortality between bMVR and mMVR (8.6% vs 6.5%; P = .31). The unadjusted estimated 1-year mortality was significantly higher for the bMVR group (19.8% vs 13.7%, P = .04) and this trend continued for the estimated 5-year mortality (35.1% vs 18.7%; P = .001). Valve prosthesis choice (bMVR vs mMVR) did not have a risk-adjusted impact on operative mortality at 30 days (P = .58); however 1-year (P = .05) and 5-year (P = .05) mortality remained significantly higher for the bMVR group. Propensity matching revealed a higher mortality rate on follow-up in the bMVR (26.7% vs 18.2%, P = .03) but no difference at 30 days or 1 year. There was no difference in hospital readmissions over 5 years CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical prostheses may confer a survival benefit in patients undergoing MVR. With emphasis on patient education and anticoagulation compliance, mMVR remains an efficacious option.

Quantifying infective endocarditis risk in patients with predisposing cardiac conditions.

Aims: There are scant comparative data quantifying the risk of infective endocarditis (IE) and associated mortality in individuals with predisposing cardiac conditions. Methods and results: English hospital admissions for conditions associated with increased IE risk were followed for 5 years to quantify subsequent IE admissions. The 5-year risk of IE or dying during an IE admission was calculated for each condition and compared with the entire English population as a control. Infective endocarditis incidence in the English population was 36.2/million/year. In comparison, patients with a previous history of IE had the highest risk of recurrence or dying during an IE admission [odds ratio (OR) 266 and 215, respectively]. These risks were also high in patients with prosthetic valves (OR 70 and 62) and previous valve repair (OR 77 and 60). Patients with congenital valve anomalies (currently considered 'moderate risk') had similar levels of risk (OR 66 and 57) and risks in other 'moderate-risk' conditions were not much lower. Congenital heart conditions (CHCs) repaired with prosthetic material (currently considered 'high risk' for 6 months following surgery) had lower risk than all 'moderate-risk' conditions-even in the first 6 months. Infective endocarditis risk was also significant in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices. Conclusion: These data confirm the high IE risk of patients with a history of previous IE, valve replacement, or repair. However, IE risk in some 'moderate-risk' patients was similar to that of several 'high-risk' conditions and higher than repaired CHC. Guidelines for the risk stratification of conditions predisposing to IE may require re-evaluation.

Antithrombotic Treatment after Transcatheter Heart Valves Implant.

Transcatheter heart valve replacement technology was introduced as alternative to surgery for the growing high-risk profile population. Developed first, aortic valve replacement (TAVR) became a standard of care for patients with severe aortic stenosis at high operative risk, with a potential future use also for low-risk subjects. In the last decade, a multitude of transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) devices have been developed for the treatment of severe mitral regurgitation, with encouraging results coming from first-in-man and feasibility studies. As for biological surgical-type valves, transcatheter implanted valves still preserve the risk of thrombosis and embolic events and anticoagulation- or antiplatelet-based strategies are the most widely used options. Unfortunately, these last remain recommended on the basis of empirical or not widely validated evidence. Therefore, given the exponential rise of TAVR and TMVR procedures, it is important to identify the optimal antithrombotic strategies that best fit the risk of thromboembolic and bleeding events. Hereafter, this review evaluates the current guidelines, trials, and observational data discussing antithrombotic strategy after transcatheter aortic or mitral valve replacement.

Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation in grown-up congenital heart disease patients: Insights from the Zurich experience.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to assess indications, procedural success, complications, echocardiographic, and clinical outcomes of percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation (PPVI) in adult patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). BACKGROUND: PPVI offers a non-surgical treatment option for failing prosthetic conduits in pulmonary position. However, efficacy and clinical outcomes after PPVI are still underreported. METHODS: From January 2008 to March 2016, 25 adult CHD patients with right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) stenosis and/or pulmonary regurgitation underwent PPVI in our institution. Clinical and echocardiographic data was collected at baseline, at 12 months of follow-up and yearly afterwards. RESULTS: Tetralogy of Fallot and repaired pulmonary atresia were among the most prevalent underlying congenital defects. Twenty-one (84%) received a Medtronic Melody® and four (16%) patients an Edwards Sapien valve prosthesis. The PPVI procedure was successful in all 25 patients. Pre-stenting was performed in all but two (8%) patients. PPVI reduced peak-to-peak pulmonary valve gradient from 43 (IQR 28-60) mmHg to 16 (IQR 14-22) mmHg (P < 0.001). Periprocedural complications occurred in two (8%) patients (tricuspid valve damage, pulmonary artery perforation). Over a median follow-up of 43 (IQR 18-58) months all patients were alive. Only two (8%) required re-operation and two (8%) developed stent fractures (one of them had not undergone pre-stenting). NYHA functional class improved significantly, with 20 (80%) patients in NYHA class I on follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: PPVI with Medtronic Melody or Edwards Sapien valve conduits is safe and provides effective relief from right ventricular outflow tract obstruction or pulmonary regurgitation.

Regional differences in aortic valve replacements: Atlantic Canadian experience.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is evolving rapidly and is increasingly being adopted in the treatment of aortic valve disease. The goal of this study was to examine regional differences in surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and TAVI across Atlantic Canada. METHODS: We identified all patients who underwent SAVR or TAVI between Jan. 1, 2010, and Dec. 31, 2014, in New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Newfoundland and Labrador. Data obtained included patient demographic characteristics and surgical procedure details. We performed univariate descriptive analyses and calculated crude and age- and sex-adjusted incidence rates. RESULTS: A total of 3042 patients underwent SAVR or TAVI during the study period, 1491 in Nova Scotia, 1042 in New Brunswick and 509 in Newfoundland and Labrador. Patient demographic characteristics were similar across regions. A much higher proportion of patients in Newfoundland and Labrador (43.6%) than in Nova Scotia (4.2%) or New Brunswick (13.6%) received a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve. Rates of TAVI increased over the study period, with New Brunswick adopting their program before Nova Scotia (144 v. 74 procedures). Adjusted rates of all AVR procedures remained stable in Nova Scotia (40-50 per 100 000 people). Adjusted rates were lower in New Brunswick and Newfoundland and Labrador than in Nova Scotia; they increased slowly in New Brunswick over the study period. CONCLUSION: Despite geographical proximity and similar patient demographic characteristics, there existed regional differences in the management of aortic valve disease within Atlantic Canada. Further study is required to determine whether the observed differences in age- and sex-adjusted rates of AVR may be explained by geographical disease-related differences, varying practice patterns or barriers in access to care.

CONTEXTE: Le remplacement valvulaire aortique par cathéter, une méthode en pleine évolution, est de plus en plus utilisé pour le traitement des valvulopathies aortiques. Cette étude visait à examiner les différences régionales quant au remplacement valvulaire aortique par cathéter ou par chirurgie dans les provinces de l'Atlantique. MÉTHODES: Nous avons recensé tous les patients ayant subi un remplacement valvulaire aortique entre le 1er janvier 2010 et le 31 décembre 2014 au Nouveau-Brunswick, en Nouvelle-Écosse et à Terre-Neuve-et-Labrador. Nous avons recueilli des données sur les caractéristiques démographiques des patients et les interventions chirurgicales, puis nous avons réalisé une analyse descriptive univariée et avons calculé les taux d'incidence bruts et corrigés selon l'âge et le sexe. RÉSULTATS: En tout, 3042 patients ont subi un remplacement valvulaire aortique par cathéter ou par chirurgie pendant la période à l'étude : 1491 en Nouvelle-Écosse, 1042 au Nouveau-Brunswick et 509 à Terre-Neuve-et-Labrador. Les caractéristiques démographiques des patients étaient semblables d'une région à l'autre. La proportion des patients recevant une prothèse mécanique plutôt qu'une bioprothèse était beaucoup plus élevée à Terre-Neuve-et-Labrador (43,6 %) qu'en Nouvelle-Écosse (4,2 %) ou au Nouveau-Brunswick (13,6 %). Les taux de remplacement par cathéter ont augmenté au cours de la période à l'étude; le Nouveau-Brunswick a adopté un programme à ce sujet avant la Nouvelle-Écosse (144 c. 74 interventions). Les taux corrigés pour tous les remplacements étaient stables en Nouvelle-Écosse (40-50 par 100 000 habitants); ils étaient plus faibles au Nouveau-Brunswick et à Terre-Neuve-et-Labrador, mais ont augmenté lentement au Nouveau-Brunswick pendant la période à l'étude. CONCLUSION: Malgré la proximité géographique des provinces de l'Atlantique et les caractéristiques démographiques semblables des patients, il existait des différences dans la prise en charge des valvulopathies aortiques. D'autres études seront nécessaires pour déterminer si les variations dans les taux de remplacement corrigés selon l'âge et le sexe pourraient s'expliquer par des différences géographiques dans le nombre de cas, des différences dans les pratiques ou des obstacles à l'accès aux soins.

Utilization and outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the United States shortly after device approval.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the national uptake of TAVR, associated in-hospital outcomes, and the effect of procedural experience on outcomes in the first two years following device approval. BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a newly established therapy for high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. Evaluating the manner in which TAVR has disseminated into real-world practice is essential for understanding its impact on population health. METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified patients undergoing TAVR from the National Inpatient Sample from January 2012 through December 2013. During this period, an estimated 21,185 cases were performed in the United States. Mean age was 81.1 years, 50.8% were male, 86.5% were Caucasian, and 89.6% were Medicare patients. The number of TAVRs performed and of hospitals performing the procedure nationally grew linearly throughout the study period. The most frequent complications included bleeding (26.9%), respiratory failure (19.3%), and renal/metabolic issues (17.2%). Median hospital length of stay was 6 days (IQR 4-10). In-hospital mortality was estimated to be 4.9%. A majority of cases were performed in large (80.8%) and in urban teaching (87%) hospitals. In the first year post-market approval, prior institutional experience with TAVR was associated with significantly reduced risk-adjusted, in-hospital mortality (OR 0.82 per 25 additional TAVRs performed, CI 0.70-0.951, P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Following device approval, the number of TAVRs and hospitals performing TAVR grew dramatically. Procedural complications were frequent and in-hospital mortality was approximately 4.9%. Finally, increased procedural experience was strongly associated with a reduction in inpatient mortality. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Long-Term (up to 21 Years) Follow Up after Biological and Mechanical Aortic Valve Replacement in Younger Patients.

BACKGROUND: Despite the limited durability of biological aortic valves, increasing numbers of younger patients are choosing to receive them, due mainly to the lack of a need for permanent anticoagulation. Few data exist, however, regarding the outcomes of valve replacement in patients aged <55 years, and additional data are required in this patient population. METHODS: Between 1993 and 2014, at the authors' institution, a total of 448 patients (237 males, 101 females; mean age 45.8 ± 8.0 years) underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) with either a mechanical prosthesis (M1 group, n = 318) or a biological prosthesis (B1 group, n = 130). The mean follow up was 8.5 ± 5.8 years (range: 4 days to 20.8 years) in the M1 group, and 4.9 ± 4.6 years (range: 2 days to 21 years) in the B1 group. The entire collective (EC) (n = 448 patients) was compared and analyzed with a selective collective (SC) (n = 109 patients) after exclusion of patients with concomitant procedures or comorbidities (M2 group, n = 74; B2 group, n = 35). RESULTS: Early mortality was greater after biological AVR in the EC (6.1% versus 1.9%), but in the SC no early deaths were observed after both primary and redo procedures. The reoperation rate was greater after biological AVR in both collectives. The late mortality, survival and endocarditis rates were comparable in both collectives. Bleeding occurred more often in the EC after mechanical AVR. CONCLUSIONS: Biological AVR in patients aged <55 years provides satisfactory outcomes, whereas reoperations were performed less commonly in patients with mechanical valve substitutes. In selective patients, AVR can be performed with zero mortality.

Temporal trends in transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement : An analysis of aortic valve replacements in Germany during 2012-2014.

This analysis of the data of the obligatory quality assurance programme AQUA shows the perioperative risk as well as the procedural outcome evaluated by the observed versus expected in-hospital mortality ratio (O/E ratio) of 62,872 patients undergoing isolated surgical (sAVR), transcatheter transvascular (TV-), or transapical (TA-) aortic valve replacement (TAVI) from 2012 to 2014 in Germany. The number of TAVI procedures increased from 9,352 in 2012 to 13,278 in 2014, whereas the number of sAVR remained constant (2012: 9,949; 2014: 9,953). Between 2012 and 2014, the number of TAVI implanted in patients with a logistic EuroScore I (logESI) of ≤10 % (2012: 21 %; 2014: 26 %) as well as with a logESI <20 % (2012: 57 %; 2014: 64 %) increased. In-hospital mortality in TAVI patients decreased from 5.2 % (TV: 5.0 %; TA: 7.4 %) in 2012 to 4.2 % (TV: 3.8 %; TA: 5.5 %) in 2014, whereas it was stable for sAVR patients (2012: 2.8 %; 2014: 2.6 %). The O/E ratio of TAVI patients decreased from 0.91 (TV: 0.79; TA: 1.2) to 0.73 (TV: 0.69; TA: 0.89), whereas this ratio remained constant for sAVR patients (2012: 0.92; 2014: 0.93). In summary, estimated surgical risk, in-hospital mortality, as well as the O/E ratio for patients undergoing TAVI declined constantly during the last 3 years.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With Different Valve Designs for Severe Device Landing Zone Calcification.

Severe device landing zone calcification (DLZ-CA) predicted paravalvular leak (PVL) and post-dilatation (PD) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The aim of this study was to determine the influence of DLZ-CA on PVL or PD rates after SAPIEN XT (XT) versus CoreValve (CV).We analyzed patients undergoing TAVI who had severe DLZ-CA. Severe DLZ-CA defined the upper left ventricular outflow tract calcification; the cross-sectional region 2 mm inferior to the annular plane. PVL was evaluated at 30days using transthoracic echocardiography. Overall, 133 patients had XT-TAVI and the remaining 41 patients had CV-TAVI. Two patients had annulus injury in the XT group (oversizing 20.2% and 20.5% for two XT cases). PD was less frequently performed in the XT group (34.1% versus 12.8%; P = 0.002), but PVL rates were similar between both groups (42.1% versus 41.5% for the XT and CV groups, respectively; P = 0.94). Importantly, excessive oversizing or the degree of filling volume was not associated with decreased PVL after XT-TAVI (P = non-significant for all). On multivariate analysis, CV-TAVI was found to be one of the independent predictors of need for PD (Odds ratio 3.63, 95% confidence interval 1.55 to 8.53, P = 0.003).In the setting of severe DLZ-CA, XT and CV have similar rates of PVL but XT had less need for PD. Excessive oversizing with XT carries a risk of root injury which could be further increased by DLZ-CA.

Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Severe Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Stenosis Undergoing Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.

BACKGROUND: With improved event-free survival of patients undergoing primary bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (AVR), reoperation to relieve severe prosthetic aortic stenosis (PAS) is increasing. We sought to (1) identify of the characteristics of patients with severe bioprosthetic PAS undergoing redo AVR, and (2) assess the outcomes of these patients, along with factors associated with adverse outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 276 patients with severe bioprosthetic PAS (64±16 years, 58% men) who underwent redo-AVR between 2000 and 2012 (excluding mechanical PAS, severe other valve disease, and transcatheter AVR). Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was calculated. Severe PAS was defined as AV area <0.8 cm(2), mean AV gradient ≥40 mm Hg, or dimensionless index <0.25. A composite outcome of death and congestive heart failure admission was recorded. Mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score and mean AV gradients were 8±8 and 53±17 mm Hg, whereas 28% had >II+ aortic regurgitation. Only 39% had an isolated redo AVR, the rest were combination surgeries (coronary bypass and/or aortic surgeries). At 4.2±3 years, 64 (23%) patients met the composite end point (48 deaths and 19 congestive heart failure admissions, 2.5% 30-day deaths). On multivariable Cox survival analysis, higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons score (hazard ratio, 1.35), higher grades of aortic regurgitation (hazard ratio, 1.29), and higher right ventricular systolic pressure (hazard ratio, 1.3) were associated with worse longer-term outcomes (all P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: At an experienced center, in patients with severe bioprosthetic PAS undergoing redo AVR, the majority undergo combination surgeries but have excellent outcomes.

Predisposing cardiac conditions, interventional procedures, and antibiotic prophylaxis among patients with infective endocarditis.

UNLABELLED: Efficacy and safety of antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) for prevention of infective endocarditis (IE) in patients with predisposing cardiac condition (PCC) undergoing invasive procedures is still debated. We sought to assess the prevalence of PCC, the type of interventional procedures preceding the onset of symptoms, and the usefulness of AP in a large cohort of consecutive patients with definite IE. METHODS: We examined 677 (median age 65.34 years; male 492 [73%]) consecutive patients with IE enrolled from July 2007 through 2010 into the Italian Registry of Infective Endocarditis. RESULTS: Predisposing cardiac condition was present in 341 patients (50%).Thirty-two patients (4.7%) underwent dental procedures. Of 20 patients with PCC undergoing dental procedure, 13 had assumed AP. Viridans group streptococci were isolated from blood cultures in 8 of 20 patients with PCC and prior dental procedure. Nondental procedures preceded IE in 139 patients (21%). They were significantly older and had more comordibities compared with patients undergoing dental procedures. Predisposing cardiac condition was identified in 91 patients. Perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis was administered to 67 patients. Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequent causative agent. Cardiac surgery was necessary in 85 patients (20 with prior dental and 65 with nondental procedure). Surgical mortality (12% vs 0%, P = .03) and hospital mortality (23% vs 3%, P = .001) were significantly larger among patients with nondental procedures. CONCLUSIONS: In a large unselected cohort of patients with IE, the incidence of preceding dental procedures was minimal. The number of cases potentially preventable by means of AP was negligible. Nondental procedures were more frequent than dental procedures and were correlated with poorer prognosis.

Rates of vascular access use in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A look into the next generation.

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: As smaller TAVR delivery systems emerge we sought to identify differences in vascular access use. METHODS: We analyzed all patients who had undergone TAVR in a single-center from March 2012 to May 2014. We identified all patients who had undergone nonfemoral TAVR and reviewed their femoral dimensions using CT imaging taking into vascular pathology and minimal lumen diameter (MLD). We then identified those patients in whom a smaller delivery system could have been used if such technology was available at that time. RESULTS: In total 208 consecutive TAVRs were performed, 129 cases using femoral arterial access and 75 cases using non-femoral access; 28 transapical, 27 transcaval, 12 transaortic, and 8 via an antegrade transseptal venous approach. Of the 75 nonfemoral access cases, 63 were completed using commercially available first-generation valves (Sapien Valve) and 12 using second-generation valves under research protocols (Sapien XT Valve). Of the 63 cases performed via a non-femoral route using a first generation valve, 31 cases could have been approached via a transfemoral (TF) route using second-generation delivery systems; and 48 cases could have been approached via a TF route using third generation delivery systems (S3 Valve). Of the 12 cases performed via a nonfemoral route using a second-generation valve, 4 cases could have been approached via a TF route using a third-generation delivery system. In total, only 11% of patients undergoing TAVR could not accommodate smaller second and third generation devices. CONCLUSIONS: As second and third generation devices become commercially available, we anticipate that 89% of cases will be preformed using a TF approach.

Permanent pacing after transcatheter aortic valve implantation of a CoreValve prosthesis as determined by electrocardiographic and electrophysiological predictors: a single-centre experience.

AIM: The most frequent conduction complications with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are complete atrioventricular (AV) block and new bundle branch block (BB). The purpose of this study was to assess clinical, electrocardiographic, and electrophysiological predictors of conduction abnormalities in patients (pts) undergoing TAVI with the CoreValve prosthesis. The secondary end points were the long-term rhythm follow-up and the recovery of conduction. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-five consecutive pts with severe aortic stenosis, New York Heart Association II/III, and normal or slightly impaired left ventricular function who underwent CoreValve transcatheter implantation were randomized 2:1 to electrocardiographic and electrocardiographic plus electrophysiological evaluations. Pacemakers were implanted in pts with complete AV block. Follow-up was performed at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months. Conduction was affected in the total group of pts undergoing TAVI. The PR lengthened compared with the baseline but did not exceed the normal cut-off of 200 ms, and the QRS widened, basically due to new left bundle branch blocks (LBBBs). Within 1 month of follow-up, 10 pts (22%) developed complete AV block (9 peri-procedurally-20%) and 15 pts (33%) developed a new bundle BB, with LBBBs being the most common (14-31%). In the 30 pts who underwent an electrophysiological study, analysis showed that prolonged HV intervals were prognostic for pacemaker implantation. Follow-up in the total study group revealed that only 4 of the 10 (9%) initial implantations remained completely pacemaker dependent. CONCLUSION: Conduction was affected in all pts undergoing TAVI, but serious complications that required permanent pacing generally occurred in pts with pre-existing conduction abnormalities.

[We carry out too many TAVI - contra]. / Wir machen zu viele TAVI - Kontra.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an established and approved procedure with an increasing implantation rate, whilst the number of surgical aortic valve replacements (SAVR) remained unchanged (AQUA data). This demonstrates that more patients who were unsuitable for SAVR were treated with TAVI. First randomized trials have shown a significant survival benefit for TAVI compared to conservative therapy (PARTNER B) and non-inferiority to SAVR in high-risk patients (PARTNER A). The US pivotal trials demonstrated even a significant survival benefit in TAVI patients compared to SAVR. The current 5-year data of the PARTNER trials demonstrate a long-term durability of the TAVI valves, which even have superior hemodynamic parameters. Increasing experience, optimization and evolution of the TAVI systems lead to better results and lower rates of complications and mortality, as was shown by the "real world data" from the German aortic valve registry (GARY). The analysis of the subgroups and also the Nordic aortic valve intervention (NOTION) study showed equivalent results for TAVI and SAVR in patients with intermediate and low risk. There is a trend to expand the indications to patients with intermediate risk and the currently ongoing large prospective and randomized trials SURTAVI and PARTNER II could provide greater clarity.

[TAVI in Germany. What have we learned from current studies?]. / TAVI-Implantationen in Deutschland. Was rechtfertigt die aktuelle Studienlage?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become an established treatment for symptomatic aortic valve stenosis in inoperable patients and high-risk patients. In Germany the TAVI procedure has now surpassed the annual numbers of isolated surgical aortic valve replacement with a recent trend towards treatment of intermediate-risk patients; however, before TAVI can also be used in patients with lower surgical risk, studies are required to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of this method for this patient population.