Confirmation of Safety of Titanium Wire in Sternotomy Closure, A Randomized Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: There are many factors that are known to increase the risk of sternal wound infection (SWI); some studies have reported that nickel is a risk factor for SWI. Titanium wires have only been used as an alternative to steel wires in patients with known allergy to nickel. However, there is a paucity of literature regarding the safety of using titanium wires compared to that on the safety of steel wires for sternum closure after cardiac surgery. Therefore, this study aimed to demonstrate the noninferiority of titanium wires, even in patients without a known allergy. METHODS: A total of 322 patients who underwent elective full median sternotomy were randomly assigned to sternal closure either by titanium wires (n = 161) or by stainless steel wires. RESULTS: Fourteen patients had sternal instability, six (3.7%) patients in the titanium group and eight (5%) patients in the stainless steel group (p = 0.585). There was no statistically significant difference between both groups in terms of postoperative wound infection (p = 0.147). Patients in the titanium group experienced statistically significant lower postoperative pain than those in the stainless steel group (p = 0.024). The wire type was not an independent risk factor for SI, as shown by univariate and logistic regression analyses. CONCLUSION: Titanium wires are a good alternative and have been proven to be safe and effective for sternal closure. The surgeon should be aware of the possibility of developing an allergic reaction to the wires, especially in patients with previous multiple allergic histories.

Wound Complications Are Affected by Different Skin Closure Methods in Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of consensus on optimal skin closure and dressing strategies to reduce early wound complication rates after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: All 13,271 patients at low risk for wound complications undergoing primary, unilateral THA (7,816), and TKA (5,455) for idiopathic osteoarthritis at our institution between August 2016 and July 2021 were identified. Skin closure, dressing type, and postoperative events related to wound complications were recorded during the first 30 postoperative days. RESULTS: The need for unscheduled office visits to address wound complications was more frequent after TKA than THA (2.74 versus 1.78%, P < .001), and after direct anterior versus posterior approach THA (2.94 versus 1.39%, P < .001). Patients who developed a wound complication, had a mean of 2.9 additional office visits. Compared to the use of topical adhesives, skin closure with staples had the highest risk of wound complications (odds ratio 1.8 [1.07-3.11], P = .028). Topical adhesives with polyester mesh had higher rates of allergic contact dermatitis than topical adhesives without mesh (1.4 versus 0.5%, P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Wound complications after primary THA and TKA were often self-limited but increased burden on the patient, surgeon, and care team. These data, which suggest different rates of certain complications with different skin closure strategies, can inform a surgeon on optimal closure methods in their practice. Adoption of the skin closure technique with the lowest risk of complications in our hospital would conservatively result in a reduction of 95 unscheduled office visits and save a projected $585,678 annually.

Comparison of median sternotomy closure-related complication rates using orthopedic wire or suture in dogs: A multi-institutional observational treatment effect analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare median sternotomy (MS) closure-related complication rates using orthopedic wire or suture in dogs. STUDY DESIGN: Multi-institutional, retrospective observational study with treatment effect analysis. ANIMALS: 331 client-owned dogs, of which 68 were excluded. METHODS: Medical records of dogs with MS were examined across nine referral centers (2004-2020). Signalment, weight, clinical presentation, surgical details, complications, and outcomes were recorded. Follow-up was performed using patient records and email/telephone contact. Descriptive statistics, treatment effect analysis and logistic regression were performed. RESULTS: Median sternotomy closure was performed with wire in 115 dogs and suture in 148. Thirty-seven dogs experienced closure-related complications (14.1%), 20 in the wire group and 17 in the suture group. Twenty-three were listed as mild, four as moderate and 10 as severe. Treatment effect analysis showed a mean of 2.3% reduction in closure-related complications associated with using suture versus wire (95% CI: -9.1% to +4.5%). In multivariable logistic regression, the only factor associated with increased risk of closure-related complications was dog size (p = .01). This effect was not modified by the type of closure used (interaction term: OR = 0.99 [95% CI: 0.96/1.01]). CONCLUSION: The incidence of closure-related complication after MS was low compared to previous reports. The likelihood of developing a closure-related complication was equivalent between sutures and wires, independent of dog size, despite a higher proportion of complications seen in larger dogs (≥20 kg). CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Use of either orthopedic wire or suture appear to be an appropriate closure method for sternotomy in dogs of any size.

Single- vs multiple-layer wound closure for flank incisions: results of a prospective, randomised, double-blinded multicentre study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of postoperative flank bulges between patients with multiple-layer closure and single superficial-layer closure after retroperitoneal surgery via open flank incision in the SIngle versus MUltiple-LAyer wound Closure for flank incision (SIMULAC) trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was a randomised controlled, patient- and assessor-blinded, multicentre trial. Between May 2015 and February 2017, 225 patients undergoing flank incisions were randomised 1:1 to a multiple-layer closure (SIMULAC-I) or a single superficial-layer closure (SIMULAC-II) group. The primary outcome was the occurrence of a flank bulge 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: Overall, 177 patients (90 in SIMULAC-I, 87 in SIMULAC-II) were eligible for final assessment. The cumulative incidence of a flank bulge was significantly higher in the SIMULAC-II group (51.7%) compared to the SIMULAC-I group [34.4%; odds ratio (OR) 2.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-3.73; P = 0.02]. Rate of severe postoperative complications (4.4% SIMULAC-I vs 10.3% SIMULAC-II; P = 0.21) or hernia (6.7% SIMULAC-I vs 10.3% SIMULAC-II; P = 0.59) was similar between the groups. There was no difference in pain (visual analogue scale) and the requirement for pain medication at 6 months postoperatively. Quality of life assessed with the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions Questionnaire was higher in the SIMULAC-I group compared to the SIMULAC-II group at 6 months postoperatively, with a (median range) score of 80 (30-100) vs 75 (5-100) (P = 0.012). CONCLUSION: The overall risk of a flank bulge after flank incision is high. Multiple-layer closure after flank incision should be performed as a standard procedure.

Short-term Outcomes of Day-Case Stoma Closure: A Prospective, Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Elective stoma closure is a common, standardized procedure in digestive surgery. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of day-case surgery for elective stoma closure. DESIGN: This is a prospective, single-center, nonrandomized study of consecutive patients undergoing day-case elective stoma closure. SETTING: This study was performed at a French tertiary hospital between January 2016 and June 2018. PATIENTS: Elective stoma closure was performed by local incision with an ASA score of I, II, or stabilized III. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was the day-case surgery success rate in the overall population (all patients having undergone elective stoma closure) and in the per protocol population (patients not fulfilling any of the preoperative or perioperative exclusion criteria). The secondary end points (in the per protocol population) were the overall morbidity rate (according to the Clavien-Dindo classification), the major morbidity rate (Clavien score ≥3), and day-case surgery quality criteria (unplanned consultation, unplanned hospitalization, and unplanned reoperation). RESULTS: Between January 2016 and June 2018, 236 patients (the overall population; mean ± SD age: 54 ± 17; 120 men (51%)) underwent elective stoma closure. Fifty of these patients (21%) met all the inclusion criteria and constituted the per protocol population. The day-case surgery success rate was 17% (40 of 236 patients) in the overall population and 80% (40 of 50 patients) in the per protocol population. In the per protocol population, the overall morbidity rate was 30% and the major morbidity rate was 6%. Of the 40 patients with successful day-case surgery, the unplanned consultation rate and the unplanned hospitalization rate were both 32.5%. There were no unplanned reoperations. LIMITATIONS: This was a single-center study. CONCLUSION: In selected patients, day-case surgery for elective stoma closure is feasible and has acceptable complication and readmission rates. Day-case elective stoma closure can therefore be legitimately offered to selected patients. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B583. RESULTADOS A CORTO PLAZO DEL CIERRE DE ESTOMA AMBULATORIO UN ESTUDIO OBSERVACIONAL Y PROSPECTIVO: ANTECEDENTES:El cierre electivo de un estoma es un procedimiento común y estandarizado en cirugía digestiva.OBJETIVO:Evaluar la viabilidad de la cirugía ambulatoria para el cierre electivo de estomas.DISEÑO:Un estudio prospectivo, unicéntrico, no aleatorizado de pacientes consecutivos sometidos a cierre de estoma electivo ambulatorio.ESCENARIO:Un hospital terciario francés entre enero de 2016 y junio de 2018.PACIENTES:Cierre electivo de estoma realizado por incisión local con una puntuación de la American Society of Anesthesiologists de I, II o III estabilizado.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado principal fue la tasa de éxito de la cirugía ambulatoria en la población general (todos los pacientes habiendo sido sometidos a cierre de estoma electivo) y en la población por protocolo (pacientes que no cumplían con ninguno de los criterios de exclusión preoperatorios o perioperatorios). Los resultados secundarios (en la población por protocolo) fueron la tasa de morbilidad general (según la clasificación de Clavien-Dindo), la tasa de morbilidad mayor (puntuación de Clavien ≥ 3) y los criterios de calidad de la cirugía ambulatoria (consulta no planificada, hospitalización no planificada y reoperación no planificada).RESULTADOS:Entre enero de 2016 y junio de 2018, 236 pacientes (la población general; edad media ± desviación estándar: 54 ± 17; 120 hombres (51%)) se sometieron al cierre electivo del estoma. Cincuenta de estos pacientes (21%) cumplieron todos los criterios de inclusión y constituyeron la población por protocolo. La tasa de éxito de la cirugía ambulatoria fue del 17% (40 de 236 pacientes) en la población general y del 80% (40 de 50 pacientes) en la población por protocolo. En la población por protocolo, la tasa de morbilidad general fue del 30% y la tasa de morbilidad mayor fue del 6%. De los 40 pacientes con cirugía ambulatoria exitosa, la tasa de consultas no planificadas y la tasa de hospitalización no planificada fueron ambas del 32.5%. No hubo reoperaciones no planificadas.LIMITACIONES:Este fue un estudio de un solo centro.CONCLUSIÓN:En pacientes seleccionados, la cirugía ambulatoria para el cierre electivo de estoma es factible y tiene tasas aceptables de complicaciones y reingreso. Por lo tanto, se puede ofrecer legítimamente el cierre electivo ambulatorio de estoma a pacientes seleccionados. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B583.

Closure of Temporary Ileostomy 2 Versus 12 Weeks After Rectal Resection for Cancer: A Word of Caution From a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial.

BACKGROUND: The optimum timing for temporary ileostomy closure after low anterior resection is still open. OBJECTIVE: This trial aimed to compare early (2 wk) versus late (12 wk) stoma closure. DESIGN: The study included 2 parallel groups in a multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at 3 Swiss hospitals. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing low anterior resection and temporary ileostomy for cancer were included. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly allocated to early or late stoma closure. Before closure, colonic anastomosis was examined for integrity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy outcome was the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index 6 weeks after resection. Secondary end points included safety (morbidity), feasibility, and quality of life 4 months after low anterior resection. RESULTS: The trial was stopped for safety concerns after 71 patients were randomly assigned to early closure (37 patients) or late closure (34 patients). There were comparable baseline data between the groups. No difference in quality of life occurred 6 weeks (mean Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index: 99.8 vs 106.0; p = 0.139) and 4 months (108.6 vs 107.1; p = 0.904) after index surgery. Intraoperative tendency of oozing (visual analog scale: 35.8 vs 19.3; p = 0.011), adhesions (visual analog scale: 61.3 vs 46.2; p = 0.034), leak of colonic anastomosis (19% vs 0%; p = 0.012), leak of colonic or ileal anastomosis (24% vs 0%; p = 0.002), and reintervention (16% vs 0%; p = 0.026) were significantly higher after early closure. The concept of early closure failed in 10 patients (27% vs 0% in the late closure group (95% CI for the difference, 9.4%-44.4%)). LIMITATIONS: The trial was prematurely stopped because of safety issues. The aimed group size was not reached. CONCLUSIONS: Early stoma closure does not provide better quality of life up to 4 months after low anterior resection but is afflicted with significantly adverse feasibility and higher morbidity when compared with late closure. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B665. CIERRE DE LA ILEOSTOMA TEMPORAL VERSUS SEMANAS POSTERIOR A LA RESECCIN RECTAL POR CNCER UNA ADVERTENCIA DE UN ESTUDIO MULTICNTRICO CONTROLADO RANDOMIZADO PROSPECTIVO: ANTECEDENTES:El momento óptimo para el cierre temporal de la ileostomía posterior a la resección anterior baja es aun controversial.OBJETIVO:Este estudio tuvo como objetivo comparar el cierre del estoma temprano (2 semanas) versus tardío (12 semanas).DISEÑO:Estudio clínico controlado, randomizado, multicéntrico, de dos grupos paralelos.ENTORNO CLINICO:El estudio se llevó a cabo en 3 hospitales suizos.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron pacientes sometidos a resección anterior baja e ileostomía temporal por cáncer.INTERVENCIONES:Los pacientes fueron asignados aleatoriamente al cierre del estoma temprano o tardío. Antes del cierre, se examinó la integridad de la anastomosis colónica.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACION:El principal resultado de eficacia fue el Índice de Calidad de Vida Gastrointestinal 6 semanas después de la resección. Los criterios secundarios incluyeron la seguridad (morbilidad), factibilidad y calidad de vida 4 meses posterior a la resección anterior baja.RESULTADOS:El estudio se detuvo por motivos de seguridad después de que 71 pacientes fueron asignados aleatoriamente a cierre temprano (37 pacientes) o cierre tardío (34 pacientes). Hubo datos de referencia comparables entre los grupos. No se produjeron diferencias en la calidad de vida 6 semanas (índice de calidad de vida gastrointestinal, media 99,8 vs. 106; p = 0,139) y 4 meses (108,6 vs 107,1, p = 0,904) después de la cirugía inicial. Tendencia intraoperatoria de supuración (escala analógica visual 35,8 vs 19,3, p = 0,011), adherencias (escala analógica visual 61,3 vs 46,2, p = 0,034), fuga de anastomosis colónica (19% vs 0%, p = 0,012), fuga de anastomosis colónica o ileal (24% vs 0%, p = 0,002) y reintervención (16% vs 0%, p = 0,026) fueron significativamente mayores después del cierre temprano. El concepto de cierre temprano fracasó en 10 pacientes (27% vs ninguno en el grupo de cierre tardío (intervalo de confianza del 95% para la diferencia: 9,4% a 44,4%)).LIMITACIONES:El estudio se detuvo prematuramente debido a problemas de seguridad. No se alcanzó el tamaño del grupo previsto.CONCLUSIÓN:El cierre temprano del estoma no proporciona una mejor calidad de vida hasta 4 meses posterior a una resección anterior baja, esto se ve afectado por efectos adversos significativos durante su realización y una mayor morbilidad en comparación con el cierre tardío. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B665.

Follow-Up Study of Electrocardiographic Indices in 252 Children with Ventricular Septal Defect after Minimally Invasive Transthoracic Closure.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive transthoracic closure (MITC) in treating ventricular septal defect (VSD). METHODS: A total of 252 children with VSD were investigated between August 2013 and March 2015. Their electrocardiographic indices were monitored at different time points (before surgery [T0], immediately after surgery [T1], and 3 days/7 days/1 month/3 months/6 months after surgery [T2-6]) and followed up every year. Related adverse events also were recorded. RESULTS: All children with VSD successfully underwent MITC. The average follow-up time was 5 years, during which no changes in the heart rate or corrected QT interval were found. The PR and QRS intervals were prolonged in the early postoperative period (T3); the SV1+RV5 amplitude decreased significantly at T6, and the left axis deviation significantly recovered at T6 (P < 0.05). A total of 32 patients developed arrhythmia within 3 days after surgery; however, no severe arrhythmia, including ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, second-and third-degree atrioventricular block, complete left or right bundle branch block, and delayed arrhythmia, occurred during the follow-up period. Binary multivariate logistic regression revealed that the longer the surgery time and the larger the VSD diameter, the higher the risk of arrhythmia. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of long-term arrhythmia after MITC is low, and the outcomes are good.

Dual Topical Antibiotic Application Prior to Sternotomy Closure Reduces Sternal Wound Infection Rates: A Simple Solution to a Grave Morbidity.

BACKGROUND: A significant cohort of patients who undergo cardiac surgery suffer from diabetes and atherosclerosis. These patients have impaired tissue perfusion, hence a reduction in antibiotic concentration in the subcutaneous tissues at the side of the mammary artery harvesting. Topical application of gentamicin and vancomycin before wound closure broadens the antibiotic spectrum and reduces the incidence of deep sternal wound infection. In this article, we compare the use of single versus dual application of vancomycin and/or gentamicin in sternotomy wounds in a single tertiary center. METHODS: An observational cohort analysis with three sequential patient groups (N = 2550) was performed at Ain Shams University Hospital in Cairo. A control group (N = 850), vancomycin only group (N = 850), and vancomycin plus gentamicin group (N = 850) were included in the study, during the three-year period from January 2017 to December 2019. Patients who had minimal access surgery were excluded from this study. The presence of an infected postoperative sternotomy wound was assessed in all patients. RESULTS: The presence of an infected sternotomy wound (El Oakley class 2B) was present in 38 patients (4.5%) in the control group, in 19 patients (2.2%) in the vancomycin group, and in nine patients (1.1%) in the dual antibiotic group, respectively (P < .001). In contrast to the usual, we had a proliferous growth of gram-negative organisms 29 (3.4%) in the control group, 10 (1.2%) in the vancomycin group, and five (0.6%) in the dual antibiotic group, respectively (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Deep sternal wound infection is a major cause of post-cardiac surgery morbidity and prolonged hospital stay. Adding the simple step of topical application of vancomycin and gentamicin to the sternotomy wound at the end of the procedure appeared to significantly reduce deep wound infection rates.

Impact of timing on wound dressing removal after caesarean delivery: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

We compared wound dressing removal at 24 hours versus 48 hours following low-risk caesarean deliveries. This multicentre, randomised, controlled study included patients 18-44 years of age with low-risk term, singleton pregnancies. The randomisation was done weekly. Scheduled caesarean deliveries without labour were included. For comparison, the Additional treatment, Serous discharge, Erythema, Purulent exudate, Separation of deep tissues, Isolation of bacteria, Stay in hospital > 14 days (ASEPSIS) score for wound healing assessment was modified. The absolute scores were obtained based on a one-day reading rather than the five-day reading used in ASEPSIS. Zero ("0") was assigned as a complete healing. Higher scores were associated with more severe disruption of healing. The patients were enrolled between March 2015 and February 2017. The demographics were not statistically different. The wound scoring was similar in the groups at discharge and first-week evaluation. At the six weeks post-surgery, the wound scoring was significantly less in the 48-hour (3.9%) versus the 24-hour group (9%; p = .002). Dressing removal at 48 hours had a lower scoring in the low-risk population with scheduled caesarean deliveries.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Surgical dressings are used to provide suitable conditions to heal caesarean incisions. There has been a limited number of studies on the evaluation of ideal timing on wound dressing removal after a caesarean delivery. These studies concluded there are no increased wound complications with removal at six hours versus 24 hours or within or beyond 48 hours after surgery.What do the results of this study add? The postoperative removal of the wound dressing at 48 hours had a lower wound score at six weeks than the removal at 24 hours for women with uncomplicated scheduled caesarean deliveries.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Early discharge after caesarean delivery is becoming more common. Dressing removal at 24 hours versus 48 hours becomes more crucial and needs to be clarified. Besides, high-risk populations, different skin closure techniques, and patients in labour should be addressed separately.

Comparison of two fetoscopic open neural tube defect repair techniques: single- vs three-layer closure.

OBJECTIVES: We reported previously on an exteriorized-uterus fetoscopic repair for open neural tube defect (ONTD) using a single-layer closure (SLC) technique. However, because SLC was associated with a high rate of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage at birth, we developed a three-layer closure (3LC) technique comprising a bovine collagen patch, a myofascial layer and a skin layer. The aims of this study were to compare SLC and 3LC in terms of intraoperative, postoperative and obstetric outcomes, as well as short-term neonatal neurologic and non-neurologic outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data, from 32 consecutive SLC controls and 18 consecutive 3LC cases, that underwent exteriorized-uterus two-port fetoscopic repair of ONTD at our center, between April 2014 and December 2018. All patients satisfied the Management of Myelomeningocele Study (MOMS) criteria. Obstetric, maternal, fetal and early neonatal outcomes were compared between the SLC and 3LC groups. RESULTS: Maternal demographics and mean gestational age (GA) at fetal surgery (25.0 ± 0.7 vs 25.0 ± 0.5 weeks' gestation; P = 0.96), and at delivery (36.5 ± 3.5 vs 37.6 ± 3.0 weeks; P = 0.14), were similar between the SLC and 3LC groups, respectively. The rate of preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) < 37 weeks (28% vs 29%; P = 0.9), mean GA at PPROM (32.3 ± 3.4 vs 32.7 ± 1.9 weeks; P = 0.83) and rate of vaginal delivery (50% vs 47%; P = 0.84) were similar for the SLC vs 3LC groups, respectively. In pregnancies that had SLC compared with those that had 3LC, there was a significantly higher incidence of CSF leakage at birth (8/32 (25%) vs 0/17 (0%); P = 0.02) and a significantly lower rate of reversal of hindbrain herniation at 6 weeks postoperatively (18/30 (60%) vs 14/15 (93%); P = 0.02). The rate of infants that met the MOMS criteria for shunt placement or died before 12 months of age (23/31 (74%) vs 7/12 (58%); P = 0.31) and those that required treatment for hydrocephalus by 12 months (15/32 (47%) vs 4/12 (33%); P = 0.42) were similar between the SLC and 3LC groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to SLC, 3LC preserves the fetal and obstetric benefits of fetoscopic repair and shows improved rates of CSF leakage and reversal of hindbrain herniation at 6 weeks postoperatively. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Complication rates and lymph node count between two different skin incisions at time of inguino-femoral lymph node dissection in vulvar cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Inguino-femoral lymph node dissection plays a crucial role in the management of vulvar cancer. The procedure is associated with high complication rates, including infection, lymphocysts/lymphoedema and wound dehiscence. Several skin incision techniques exist and practice among gynecology oncologists is variable. Little evidence exists to guide surgeons regarding the optimal surgical approach. This study aimed to determine the difference in 30-day complication rates, number of lymph nodes and length of stay between patients undergoing the modified oblique and classical 'lazy S' skin incision. METHODS: A retrospective review between January 2014 and September 2018 was performed in the University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff. All cases of inguino-femoral lymph node dissection performed for vulvar cancer were included in the study without exclusion. Data collected included age, body mass index (BMI), incision type, suture material, length of hospital stay, complication rates, cancer stage, lymph node count, lymph node positivity rate and recurrence rates. Data were analyzed using SPSS software and clinical significance was set as p<0.05. RESULTS: Thirty-five cases of classical 'lazy S' and 14 cases of modified oblique were included in the analysis. The mean patient age was 65 years (range 41-86) in the classical 'lazy S' group and 58 years (range 19-81) in the modified oblique group. The mean BMI was 28 kg/m2 (range 18-45) in the classical 'lazy S' group and 29 kg/m2 (range 20-36) in the modified oblique group. In the classical 'lazy S' group, the stage classification was as follows: stage IB (18), II (2), IIIA (3), IIIB (4), IIIC (8). In the modified oblique group, the stage classification was: stage IB (8), II (4), IIIA (2). Grade 3-4 complications were statistically significantly more common after the classical 'lazy S' versus the modified oblique operation (20/35, 57.1% vs 2/14, 14.3%, p<0.02). Mean number of nodes harvested was statistically significantly higher in the classical 'lazy S' group compared with the modified oblique group (11.1 nodes, range 6-17 vs 7 nodes, range 4-11, p<0.001). Node positivity rate was higher in the classical 'lazy S' group compared with the modified oblique group (28.6% vs 10%, p=0.08). Mean hospital stay was statistically significantly longer in patients undergoing classical 'lazy S' versus modified oblique (10.7 vs 4.5 days, p=0.02). One case of groin node recurrence occurred and this patient was in the classical 'lazy S' arm. CONCLUSION: The rate of overall and serious complications was lower after modified oblique skin incision compared with classical 'lazy S'. However, the absolute lymph node count and lymph node positivity rate were higher in the 'lazy S' group.

Evaluation of negative-pressure wound therapy for surgical site infections after ileostomy closure in colorectal cancer patients: a prospective multicenter study.

PURPOSE: Surgical site infection (SSI) occurs at a high rate after ileostomy closure. The effect of preventive negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) on SSI development in closed wounds remains controversial. We conducted a prospective multicenter study to evaluate the usefulness of preventive NPWT for SSI after ileostomy closure. METHODS: From January 2018 to November 2018, 50 patients who underwent closure of ileostomy created after surgery for colorectal cancer participated in this study. An NPWT device was applied to each wound immediately after surgery and then treatment was continued for 3 days. The primary endpoint was 30-day SSI, and the secondary endpoints were the incidence of seroma, hematoma, and adverse events related to NPWT. RESULTS: No patients developed SSI, seroma, or hematoma. Adverse events that may have been causally linked with NPWT were contact dermatitis in two patients and wound pain in one patient, and there were no cases of discontinuation or decompression of NPWT. CONCLUSION: The use of NPWT following ileostomy closure may be useful for reducing the development of SSI in colorectal cancer patients. This is a prospective multicenter pilot study and we are planning a comparative study based on these successful results. TRAIL REGISTRATION: Registration number: UMIN000032053 ( https://www.umin.ac.jp/ ).

Skin closure with 2-octyl cyanoacrylate and polyester mesh after primary total knee arthroplasty offers superior cosmetic outcomes and patient satisfaction compared to staples: a prospective trial.

INTRODUCTION: The goals of this study were to compare patient satisfaction and wound-related complications in patients receiving 2-octyl cyanoacrylate (glue) and polyester mesh for skin closure after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) versus staples. METHODS: A total of 60 knees in 54 patients undergoing TKA were enrolled in a prospective trial and randomized to receive either skin closure with glue and polyester mesh (n = 30) or a control group closed with staples (n = 30). Hollander wound cosmesis score (measured on a scale of 0-5, with 0 being the best) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores (range 0-100 mm) for patient satisfaction with wound cosmesis, as well as wound-related readmission, reoperation, and complications, including superficial surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, wound hematoma, stitch abscess, and wound discharge, were assessed at 6 weeks and 90 days after TKA. Baseline characteristics were not statistically significantly different between the groups (p > 0.05). RESULTS: At 6 weeks and 90 days, the Hollander wound cosmesis score was significantly lower (p < 0.01) in the glue and polyester mesh groups. Similarly, at 6 weeks and 90 days, the VAS for patient satisfaction with wound cosmesis was significantly higher (p < 0.01) in the glue and polyester mesh groups. The rate of superficial surgical site infection was 1/30 (3%) in glue and polyester mesh groups versus zero in the control group (p = 1.00). The rate of wound dehiscence was 1/30 (3%) in glue and polyester mesh groups versus zero in the control group (p = 1.00). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that glue and polyester mesh closure may offer superior cosmetic outcomes to staples for skin closure in TKA.

A systematic review of patch angioplasty versus primary closure for carotid endarterectomy.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend routine patching after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) on the basis of a lower restenosis rate and presumed lower procedural stroke rate than with primary repair. Underlying evidence is based on studies performed decades ago with perioperative care that significantly differed from current standards. Recent studies raise doubt about routine patching and have suggested that a more selective approach to patch closure (PAC) might be noninferior for procedural safety and long-term stroke prevention. The objective was to review the literature on the procedural safety and perioperative stroke prevention of PAC compared with primary closure (PRC) after CEA. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched from January 1966 to September 2017. Two authors independently performed the search, study selection, assessment of methodologic quality, and data extraction. Articles were eligible if they compared PAC and PRC after CEA, were published in English, included human studies, and had a full text available. Methodologic quality for nonrandomized studies was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies score; randomized controlled trials were assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. Nonrandomized studies with a score ≤15 were excluded. The primary outcome measure was 30-day stroke risk. Secondary outcome measures were long-term restenosis (>50%) and postoperative bleeding. RESULTS: Twenty-nine articles met the inclusion criteria, 9 randomized studies and 20 nonrandomized studies, for a total of 12,696 patients and 13,219 CEAs. Overall 30-day stroke risk was higher in the PRC group (odds ratio [OR], 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-2.9). After exclusion of nonrandomized studies, this difference was not statistically significant anymore (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 0.8-3.9). The restenosis rate was higher after PRC (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.4-3.4). There were no differences in bleeding complications. Methodologic quality of the nonrandomized studies was moderate, and seven were excluded. Quality of the evidence according to Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation was moderate for restenosis, 30-day stroke, and bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: In this systematic review, on the basis of moderate-quality evidence, perioperative stroke rate was lower after PAC compared with PRC. The rate of restenosis was higher after PRC, although the clinical significance of this finding in terms of long-term stroke prevention remained unclear.

Network meta-analysis comparing techniques and outcomes of stump closure after distal pancreatectomy.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after distal pancreatectomy remains high, and different pancreatic stump closure techniques have been used to reduce the incidence. A network meta-analysis was undertaken to compare the most frequently performed pancreatic stump closure techniques after distal pancreatectomy and determine the technique associated with the lowest POPF rate. METHODS: A systematic search of the Scopus, PubMed, MEDLINE and Embase databases was conducted to identify eligible RCTs. The primary outcome was the occurrence of clinically relevant POPF. Secondary outcomes were duration of operation, blood loss, intrabdominal collections, postoperative complications and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Sixteen RCTs including 1984 patients and eight different pancreatic stump closure techniques were included in the network meta-analysis. Patch coverage of the pancreatic stump (round ligament or seromuscular patch) after stapler or suture closure ranked best, with the lowest rates of clinically relevant POPF, lowest volume of intraoperative blood loss, fewer intra-abdominal abscesses, and lower rates of overall complications and 30-day mortality. Round ligament patch closure outperformed seromuscular patch closure in preventing clinically relevant POPF with a significantly larger cohort for comparative analysis. Pancreaticoenteric anastomotic closure consistently ranked poorly for most reported postoperative outcomes. CONCLUSION: Patch coverage after stapler or suture closure has the lowest POPF rate and best outcomes among stump closure techniques after distal pancreatectomy.

ANTECEDENTES: La incidencia de fístula pancreática (postoperative pancreatic fistula, POPF) tras una pancreatectomía distal sigue siendo alta y se han utilizado diferentes técnicas para el cierre del muñón pancreático con la intención de reducir su incidencia. Se realizó un metaanálisis en red para comparar las técnicas de cierre del muñón pancreático realizadas con más frecuencia después de la pancreatectomía distal y determinar qué técnica se asocia a una menor tasa de POPF. MÉTODOS: Se realizó una búsqueda sistemática en las bases de datos Scopus, PubMed, Medline y EMBASE de los RCTs que podían ser incluidos en estudio. La variable principal fue la aparición de POPF clínicamente relevante. Las variables secundarias fueron el tiempo operatorio, la pérdida de sangre, las colecciones intraabdominales, las complicaciones postoperatorias y la mortalidad a los 30 días. RESULTADOS: En el metaanálisis se incluyeron 16 RCTs con 1.984 pacientes y 8 técnicas diferentes de cierre del muñón pancreático. Los mejores resultados (menor tasa de POPF clínicamente relevante, menor pérdida sanguínea intraoperatoria, menor número de abscesos intraabdominales, menor tasa de complicaciones generales y menor mortalidad a los 30 días) se obtuvieron con el refuerzo del muñón pancreático con parches (de ligamento redondo o seromuscular), seguidos del grapado quirúrgico o la sutura simple. El cierre con parche del ligamento redondo fue superior al parche seromuscular en la prevención de POPF clínicamente relevante en una cohorte suficiente para el análisis estadístico comparativo. Los peores resultados en la mayoría de las variables postoperatorias se obtuvieron con el cierre simple. CONCLUSIÓN: En la pancreatectomía distal, la menor tasa de POPF y los mejores resultados perioperatorios se obtuvieron con el refuerzo con parches, seguidos del grapado quirúrgico o la sutura simple.

Quality of life following ostomy reversal with purse-string vs linear skin closure: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The importance of the defunctioning stoma on minimizing anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery is well established. However, a defunctioning stoma can substantially impact on quality of life (QoL). Circumferential purse-string approximation (PSA) and linear skin closure (LSC) are the most commonly performed surgical technique for reversal of stoma. The aim of this review was to systemically review and meta-analyze available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PSA and LSC. METHODS: An electronic systematic search using MEDLINE databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science) of RCTs comparing PSA and LSC was performed. Eight RCTs totalling 647 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. RESULTS: Patient's satisfaction is significantly lower in PSA group during the first postoperative week, but it sharply improves afterwards and no difference were noted at 1 and 6 months between the two groups. Relative risk (RR) of developing a SSI is significantly lower in PSA compared to LSC group (RR 0.16 95% CI 0.09; 0.30; p = 0.0001), whereas incisional hernia (RR 0.53 95% CI 0.08; 3.53; p = 0.512), operative time (MD - 0.06 95% CI - 0.30; 0.17; p = 0.593), and hospital stay (MD - 0.09 (95% CI - 0.29-0.11; p = 0.401) remain similar. DISCUSSION: QoL was similar in both patients groups after the first postoperative week. PSA significantly reduced SSI rate. No difference was observed in incisional hernia rate, operative time, or length of hospital stay.

Comparison of Transthoracic Device Closure and Surgical Repair with Right Submammary or Right Infra-axillary Thoracotomy for Perimembranous VSD.

BACKGROUND: Transthoracic device closure (TTDC) and surgical repair with right infra-axillary thoracotomy (SRRIAT) or with right submammary thoracotomy (SRSMT) are all the primary alternative treatments for restrictive perimembranous ventricular septal defect (pmVSD). However, few studies have compared them in terms of effectiveness and complications. METHODS: Patients with restrictive pmVSD undergoing TTDC, or SRRIAT, or SRSMT from March 2016 to February 2017 were retrospectively reviewed in our cardiac center. There were no differences in age (1.3 ± 1.2 vs 1.1 ± 1.1 vs 1.2 ± 1.1 years), gender (35/37 vs 30/33 vs 29/29), body weight (8.3 ± 2.6 vs 8.2 ± 2.4 vs 8.1 ± 2.5 kg), and size of VSD (4.2 ± 1.1 vs 5.2 ± 1.3 vs 5.1 ± 1.2 mm) distribution between the three groups. RESULTS: The procedure success rates were similar in the three groups. The TTDC group had the shortest operative time, postoperative mechanical ventilation time, duration of intensive care, postoperative length of hospital stay, medical cost, and length of the incision. There were no significant differences in terms of operative time, aortic cross-clamping time, duration of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), blood transfusion volume, mechanical ventilation time, duration of intensive care, duration of hospital stays, pleural fluid drainage, or cost between the SRSMT and SRRIAT groups. No significant differences were noted in terms of major adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: TTDC, SRRIAT, and SRSMT all showed excellent outcomes and cosmetic appearances for selected VSD patients. TTDC had advantages over SRRIAT and SRSMT in terms of short operation duration and smaller incision size and shorter durations of intensive care and hospital stays.

Barbed Suture versus Conventional Suture for Vaginal Cuff Closure in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the surgical time, suture time, presence of postoperative dyspareunia, and complications that occur after closing the vaginal cuff with a barbed suture compared with conventional suture. DESIGN: A randomized, controlled clinical trial (Canadian Task Force classification I). SETTING: Private gynecologic clinic in Medellin, Colombia. PATIENTS: One hundred fifty women who underwent total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign pathology. INTERVENTIONS: The patients underwent total laparoscopic hysterectomy with intracorporeal closure of the vaginal cuff and were randomized to 2 groups, 1 using a barbed suture (V-Loc 90; Medtronic/Covidien, New Haven, CT) and 1 using polyglactin 910 (coated Vicryl suture; Ethicon/Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The total operative time, closing time of the vaginal vault, presence of complications in the cuff, and incidence of postoperative dyspareunia were recorded. The patients were evaluated at a postoperative office visit 2 weeks after the procedure and by telephone interview at 24 weeks. Seventy-five patients were included in the barbed suture group and 75 patients in the polyglactin 910 group. The average time to complete the suture of the vaginal cuff was 12.01 minutes (± 5.37 standard deviation) for the barbed suture group versus 13.49 minutes (± 6.48) in the polyglactin 910 group (95% confidence interval, -.44 to 3.4; p = .130). Blood loss was 31.56 ± 22.93 mL in the barbed suture group versus 30.82 ± 21.75 mL in the polyglactin 910 group (95% confidence interval, -7.95 to 6.47; p = .840). The frequency of postoperative events such as hematoma, cellulitis, cuff dehiscence, fever, emergency consultation, and hospitalization was not statistically significant between groups. No statistically significant difference was found regarding deep dyspareunia at 24 postoperative weeks. CONCLUSION: No differences were found in surgical time or frequency of adverse events when comparing patients after vaginal cuff closure with barbed suture versus polyglactin 910.

Proposal of Standardization of Closure Techniques After Endoscopic Pituitary and Skull Base Surgery Based on Postoperative Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak Risk Classification.

Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak still represents the main limitation of endonasal endoscopic surgery. The aim of the study is to classify the risk of postoperative leak and to propose a decision-making protocol to be applied in the preoperative phase based on radiological data and on intraoperative findings to obtain the best closure.One hundred fifty-two patients were treated in our institution; these patients were divided into 2 groups because from January 2013 the closure technique was standardized adopting a preoperative decision-making protocol. The Postoperative CSF leak Risk Classification (PCRC) was estimated taking into account the size of the lesion, the extent of the osteodural defect, and the presence of intraoperative CSF leak (iCSF-L). The closure techniques were classified into 3 types according to PCRC estimation (A, B, and C).The incidence of the use of a nasoseptal flap is significantly increased in the second group 80.3% versus 19.8% of the first group and the difference was statistically significant P < 0.0001. The incidence of postoperative CSF leak (pCSF-L) in the first group was 9.3%. The incidence of postoperative pCSF-L in the second group was 1.5%. An analysis of the pCSF-L rate in the 2 groups showed a statistically significant difference P = 0.04.The type of closure programmed was effective in almost all patients, allowing to avoid the possibility of a CSF leak. Our protocol showed a significant total reduction in the incidence of CSF leak, but especially in that subgroup of patients where a leak is usually unexpected.

Limberg flap versus Karydakis flap for treating pilonidal sinus disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: The Limberg flap reconstruction and the Karydakis flap reconstruction are the 2 most used off-midline closure techniques in pilonidal sinus surgery. The current evidence is inconclusive as to which is the optimal technique. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare differences in outcomes between these 2 flap-based techniques. Methods: We identified studies by a systematic literature search of the Embase, MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane Library and Google Scholar databases and studies selected as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the Limberg flap (standard or modified) and the Karydakis flap were included in this review. Results: Operative time was shorter by 7 minutes in the Karydakis group than in the Limberg group (mean difference 7.00 min, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53 to 13.48). The seroma formation rate was significantly higher in the Karydakis cohort (odds ratio [OR] 0.36, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.56); however, after excluding studies with a high risk of bias, the sensitivity analysis showed no significant differences in seroma formation rate between the 2 techniques (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.85). Other outcomes of interest showed no significant differences between the Limberg and Karydakis techniques. Conclusion: There were no significant differences between the Limberg and Karydakis techniques. Future RCTs with strict adherence to CONSORT guidelines will further elucidate the efficacy of these surgical procedures.

Contexte: Les reconstructions à l'aide de lambeaux de Limberg et de Karydakis sont 2 des techniques de fermeture décalées de la ligne médiane les plus utilisées pour la chirurgie du sinus pilonidal. Les preuves actuelles ne permettent pas de conclure à la supériorité de l'une par rapport à l'autre. Le but de la présente revue systématique/méta-analyse était de comparer les différences de résultats entre ces 2 techniques de lambeaux. Méthodes: Nous avons recensé des études au moyen d'une interrogation systématique des bases de données Embase, MEDLINE (PubMed), bibliothèque Cochrane et Google Scholar et les études sélectionnées à l'aide de la liste de vérification PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). Seuls les essais randomisés et contrôlés (ERC) qui comparaient les lambeaux de Limberg (standard ou modifié) et de Karydakis ont été inclus dans cette revue. Résultats: Les interventions ont duré 7 minutes de moins dans le groupe Karydakis que dans le groupe Limberg (différence moyenne 7,00 min, intervalle de confiance [IC] de 95 % 0,53 à 13,48). Le taux de formation de séromes a été significativement plus élevé dans la cohorte Karydakis (rapport ces cotes [RC] 0,36, IC de 95 % 0,24 à 0,56); par contre, après avoir exclu les études comportant un important risque de biais, l'analyse de sensibilité n'a montré aucune différence significative quant au taux de formation de séromes entre les 2 techniques (RC 0,76, IC de 95 % 0,31 à 1,85). Les autres paramètres d'intérêt n'ont montré aucune différence significative entre les techniques de Limberg et de Karydakis. Conclusion: On n'a noté aucune différence significative entre les techniques de Limberg et de Karydakis. De prochains ERC strictement conformes aux lignes directrices CONSORT permettront de préciser davantage l'efficacité de ces interventions chirurgicales.