Aminoterminal propeptide of type I collagen and bone alkaline phosphatase in the study of bone metastases associated with prostatic carcinoma.

ABSTRACT

The aim of this work was to evaluate the usefulness of serum aminoterminal propeptide of type I collagen (PINP) in the early detection of bone metastases associated with prostatic carcinoma. The results were compared with those of bone isoenzyme of alkaline phosphatase (bAP). Levels of total alkaline phosphatase (TAP) and prostatic specific antigen (PSA), related to the existence of bone metastases, are also evaluated. Fifty-five male patients aged 70-80 years were studied. Nine presented a benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and the rest clinically confirmed prostatic cancer. Cancer patients were classified in accordance with the staging grouping of the International Union Against Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM 1992 Revision stage 0 or BPH (n=9), I (n=6), II (n=12), III (n=18) and IV (n=10). According to this classification, patients of groups BPH, I, II and III have no evidence of metastases. Those of stage IV present any type of metastases. In the case of this work, all patients of group IV presented bone metastases. Some patients of group BPH, I and II were untreated. The rest of the patients were under treatment (radical prostatectomy, telecobaltotherapy or hormonal therapy) for a period of between 6 months and 15 years. Serum PSA (Quimioluminiscence, IMMULITE), PINP (RIA, Orion Diagnostica), bAP (IRMA, Tamdem R-Ostase, Hybritech), and TAP (autoanalyzer) were determined. We found the following sensitivities and specificities (relating the presence of bone metastases to values higher than the upper limit of normality and, in the case of PSA, to values higher than 100 microg/L) (1) PINP 100% (10/10) and 87% (39/45), (2) bAP 90% (9/10) and 82% (37/45), (3) TAP 60% (6/10) and 93% (42/45), (4) PSA 40% (4/10) and 100% (45/45). These results suggest that PINP and bAP are adequate biochemical markers of bone formation to be used in the detection of bone metastases in prostatic carcinoma, improving the sensitivity and specificity of TAP and PSA. With respect to PINP, bAP presents the disadvantage of its cross-reactivity with liver isoenzyme.