Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Out-of-hospital diagnosis of cerebral infarction versus intracranial hemorrhage.
Woisetschläger, C; Kittler, H; Oschatz, E; Bur, A; Lang, W; Waldenhofer, U; Laggner, A N; Hirschl, M M.
Afiliação
  • Woisetschläger C; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Vienna, Austria.
Intensive Care Med ; 26(10): 1561-5, 2000 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11126273
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To establish a model based on clinical and anamnestic data easily available in the out-of-hospital setting, which facilitates the differential diagnosis between cerebral infarction and intracranial hemorrhage.

DESIGN:

Retrospective study that simulates a prospective approach.

SETTING:

Emergency Department of the University Hospital in Vienna, Austria. PATIENTS AND

PARTICIPANTS:

Data of 224 patients with either intracranial hemorrhage or cerebral infarction were prospectively collected. Uni-and multivariate analysis was performed to identify neurological symptoms and anamnestic data, which were associated with either intracranial hemorrhage or cerebral infarction. MEASUREMENTS AND

RESULTS:

Unilateral weakness or sensory loss was observed more frequently in patients with infarction compared to hemorrhage (69.8 % vs 11.9 %, P < 0.001). The frequency of patients with impaired level of consciousness was significantly higher in the hemorrhage group compared to the infarction group (59.3 % vs 3.8 %, P < 0.001). A multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that hypertension (OR = 0.31, 95 % CI = 0.12-0.76, P = 0.01), diabetes (OR = 0.17, 95% CI = 0.04-0.68, P = 0.01), and unilateral weakness or sensory loss (OR = 0.10, 95 % CI = 0.04-0.26, P < 0.001) were significantly associated with cerebral infarction. Impaired level of consciousness was significantly related to hemorrhage (OR = 13.41, 95 % CI = 3.92-45.91, P < 0.001). On the basis of the logistic regression analysis, we generated a scoring system for the out-of-hospital diagnosis between infarction and hemorrhage. The values of the score lay between -3 and +3. The probability of infarction increases when the score becomes negative, and the probability for hemorrhage increases when the score becomes positive.

CONCLUSION:

Our model is a useful guideline for the differential diagnosis between cerebral infarction and intracranial hemorrhage in the out-of-hospital setting, as it is based on easily available clinical and anamnestic parameters.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Índice de Gravidade de Doença / Infarto Cerebral / Hemorragias Intracranianas / Serviços Médicos de Emergência Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Intensive Care Med Ano de publicação: 2000 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Áustria
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Índice de Gravidade de Doença / Infarto Cerebral / Hemorragias Intracranianas / Serviços Médicos de Emergência Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Intensive Care Med Ano de publicação: 2000 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Áustria