Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical calibration of DSM-IV diagnoses in the World Mental Health (WMH) version of the World Health Organization (WHO) Composite International Diagnostic Interview (WMHCIDI).
Kessler, Ronald C; Abelson, Jamie; Demler, Olga; Escobar, Javier I; Gibbon, Miriam; Guyer, Margaret E; Howes, Mary J; Jin, Robert; Vega, William A; Walters, Ellen E; Wang, Philip; Zaslavsky, Alan; Zheng, Hui.
Afiliação
  • Kessler RC; Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. kessler@hcp.med.harvard.edu
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res ; 13(2): 122-39, 2004.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15297907
ABSTRACT
An overview is presented of the rationale, design, and analysis plan for the WMH-CIDI clinical calibration studies. As no clinical gold standard assessment is available for the DSM-IV disorders assessed in the WMH-CIDI, we adopted the goal of calibration rather than validation; that is, we asked whether WMH-CIDI diagnoses are 'consistent' with diagnoses based on a state-of-the-art clinical research diagnostic interview (SCID; Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV) rather than whether they are 'correct'. Consistency is evaluated both at the aggregate level (consistency of WMH-CIDI and SCID prevalence estimates) and at the individual level (consistency of WMH-CIDI and SCID diagnostic classifications). Although conventional statistics (sensitivity, specificity, Cohen's kappa) are used to describe diagnostic consistency, an argument is made for considering the area under the receiver operator curve (AUC) to be a more useful general-purpose measure of consistency. In addition, more detailed analyses are used to evaluate consistency on a substantive level. These analyses begin by estimating prediction equations in a clinical calibration subsample, with WMH-CIDI symptom-level data used to predict SCID diagnoses, and using the coefficients from these equations to assign predicted probabilities of SCID diagnoses to each respondent in the remainder of the sample. Substantive analyses then investigate whether estimates of prevalence and associations when based on WMH-CIDI diagnoses are consistent with those based on predicted SCID diagnoses. Multiple imputation is used to adjust estimated standard errors for the imprecision introduced by SCID diagnoses being imputed under a model rather than measured directly. A brief illustration of this approach is presented in comparing the precision of SCID and predicted SCID estimates of prevalence and correlates under varying sample designs.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Organização Mundial da Saúde / Saúde Global / Manual Diagnóstico e Estatístico de Transtornos Mentais / Entrevista Psicológica / Transtornos Mentais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Assunto da revista: PSIQUIATRIA Ano de publicação: 2004 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Organização Mundial da Saúde / Saúde Global / Manual Diagnóstico e Estatístico de Transtornos Mentais / Entrevista Psicológica / Transtornos Mentais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Assunto da revista: PSIQUIATRIA Ano de publicação: 2004 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos