Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Multidetector computed tomography angiography for assessment of in-stent restenosis: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance.
Vanhoenacker, Piet K; Decramer, Isabel; Bladt, Olivier; Sarno, Giovanna; Van Hul, Erik; Wijns, William; Dwamena, Ben A.
Afiliação
  • Vanhoenacker PK; Department of Radiology and Imaging, OLV Ziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium. piet@vanhoenacker.be
BMC Med Imaging ; 8: 14, 2008 Jul 31.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18671850
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Multi-detector computed tomography angiography (MDCTA)of the coronary arteries after stenting has been evaluated in multiple studies.The purpose of this study was to perform a structured review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of MDCTA for the detection of in-stent restenosis in the coronary arteries.

METHODS:

A Pubmed and manual search of the literature on in-stent restenosis (ISR) detected on MDCTA compared with conventional coronary angiography (CA) was performed. Bivariate summary receiver operating curve (SROC) analysis, with calculation of summary estimates was done on a stent and patient basis. In addition, the influence of study characteristics on diagnostic performance and number of non-assessable segments (NAP) was investigated with logistic meta-regression.

RESULTS:

Fourteen studies were included. On a stent basis, Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.82(0.72-0.89) and 0.91 (0.83-0.96). Pooled negative likelihood ratio and positive likelihood ratio were 0.20 (0.13-0.32) and 9.34 (4.68-18.62) respectively. The exclusion of non-assessable stents and the strut thickness of the stents had an influence on the diagnostic performance. The proportion of non-assessable stents was influenced by the number of detectors, stent diameter, strut thickness and the use of an edge-enhancing kernel.

CONCLUSION:

The sensitivity of MDTCA for the detection of in-stent stenosis is insufficient to use this test to select patients for further invasive testing as with this strategy around 20% of the patients with in-stent stenosis would be missed. Further improvement of scanner technology is needed before it can be recommended as a triage instrument in practice. In addition, the number of non-assessable stents is also high.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Prótese Vascular / Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X / Stents / Angiografia Coronária / Reestenose Coronária / Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Incidence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Med Imaging Assunto da revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Ano de publicação: 2008 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Bélgica

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Prótese Vascular / Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X / Stents / Angiografia Coronária / Reestenose Coronária / Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Incidence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Med Imaging Assunto da revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Ano de publicação: 2008 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Bélgica