Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Virtual dissection CT colonography: evaluation of learning curves and reading times with and without computer-aided detection.
Hock, Danielle; Ouhadi, Roxanne; Materne, Roland; Aouchria, Amir-Samy; Mancini, Isabelle; Broussaud, Thomas; Magotteaux, Paul; Nchimi, Alain.
Afiliação
  • Hock D; Department of Medical Imaging, Clinique Saint-Joseph, Rue de Hesbaye, 75, 4000 Liège, Belgium. Danielle.hock@chc.be
Radiology ; 248(3): 860-8, 2008 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18710980
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To prospectively evaluate the learning curves and reading times of inexperienced readers who used the virtual dissection reading method for retrospective computed tomographic (CT) colonography data sets, with and without concurrent computer-aided detection (CAD). MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

An Institutional Review Board approved this study; informed consent was waived. Four radiologists without experience in CT colonography evaluated 100 optical colonoscopy-proved data sets of 100 patients (49 men, 51 women; mean age, 59 years +/- 13 [standard deviation]; range, 21-85 years) by using the virtual dissection reading method. Two readers used concurrent CAD. Data sets were read during five consecutive 1-day sessions (20 data sets per session). Polyp detection and false-positive rates, receiver operating characteristics (ROCs), and reading times were calculated for individual, CAD group, and non-CAD group readings. Diagnostic values were compared by calculating the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) around the relative risk. Areas under ROC curves (AUCs) (Hanley and McNeil for paired analysis and z statistics for unpaired analysis) and reading times (Wilcoxon signed rank test) were compared across the sessions, within each session and for the whole study.

RESULTS:

The range of detection rates was 79 of 111 (.71 [95% CI .61, .79]) to 91 of 111 (.82 [95% CI .73, .88]). The range of false-positive rates was 17 of 111 (.15 [95% CI .09, .23]) to 22 of 111 (.20 [95% CI .12, .28]). All readers' AUCs rose from session 1 to session 4; this rise was significant (P < .05) for the non-CAD group. Only during session 1 was the CAD group AUC (.83) higher than the non-CAD group AUC (.54) (P < .05). Comparison of CAD and non-CAD reading times showed no significant difference for the whole study or during each session (P > .05).

CONCLUSION:

The virtual dissection reading technique allows short learning curves, which may be improved by the concurrent use of CAD, without significant effect on average reading time.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Competência Profissional / Análise e Desempenho de Tarefas / Interface Usuário-Computador / Inteligência Artificial / Interpretação de Imagem Radiográfica Assistida por Computador / Pólipos do Colo / Colonografia Tomográfica Computadorizada Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Evaluation_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Radiology Ano de publicação: 2008 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Bélgica

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Competência Profissional / Análise e Desempenho de Tarefas / Interface Usuário-Computador / Inteligência Artificial / Interpretação de Imagem Radiográfica Assistida por Computador / Pólipos do Colo / Colonografia Tomográfica Computadorizada Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Evaluation_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Radiology Ano de publicação: 2008 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Bélgica