Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A randomized trial of the traditional sitting position versus the hamstring stretch position for labor epidural needle placement.
Fisher, Kyle S; Arnholt, Alan T; Douglas, Michal E; Vandiver, Scott L; Nguyen, Daniel H.
Afiliação
  • Fisher KS; Watauga Anesthesia Associates, PA, USA. kylefisher@bellsouth.ne
Anesth Analg ; 109(2): 532-4, 2009 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19608828
BACKGROUND: Anecdotal and experimental evidence suggest that a sitting position with maximum knee extension, hip adduction, and forward lean (hamstring stretch position) may produce better reversal of the lumbar lordosis than a traditional sitting position. METHODS: In a randomized trial during initiation of epidural labor analgesia, we compared the traditional versus hamstring stretch positions. The primary outcome was the number of needle-bone contacts. RESULTS: The groups were equivalent with respect to the number of needle-bone contacts. CONCLUSIONS: The hamstring stretch position is equivalent to the traditional sitting position in terms of the number of needle-bone contacts encountered when placing labor epidural needles.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Postura / Anestesia Epidural / Anestesia Obstétrica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Anesth Analg Ano de publicação: 2009 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Postura / Anestesia Epidural / Anestesia Obstétrica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Anesth Analg Ano de publicação: 2009 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos