[Direct dissection of urogenital diaphragm in abdominoperineal resection].
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi
; 91(39): 2769-71, 2011 Oct 25.
Article
em Zh
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-22322057
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:
To compare the clinical outcomes of two operative approaches of perineal dissection in rectal carcinoma undergoing abdominoperineal resection.METHODS:
A randomized controlled trial was conducted in a total of 126 patients with rectal cancer undergoing the Miles operation from June 2007 to June 2011 at Henan Provincial Cancer Hospital. They were divided into 2 groups. One group (Group A) underwent a direct dissection of urogenital diaphragm while another group (Group B) received the traditional operative method. And the duration of perineal surgery, rupture of rectum or tumor, urethral injury and the post-operative rate of perineal hemorrhage were compared between 2 groups.RESULTS:
Group A had a shorter duration of perineal surgery ((16 ± 5) min vs (23 ± 5) min, P = 0.032). And the differences were significant statistically. However the rupture of rectum or tumor, urethral injury and the post-operative rate of perineal hemorrhage were equivalent for two groups (1 vs 5, 2 vs 5, 0 vs 1, 1 vs 3, all P > 0.05).CONCLUSION:
A direct dissection of urogenital diaphragm offers more clinical advantages over the traditional operative method in abdominoperineal resection.
Buscar no Google
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Períneo
/
Neoplasias Retais
/
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório
/
Abdome
Tipo de estudo:
Clinical_trials
Limite:
Adult
/
Aged
/
Humans
/
Male
/
Middle aged
Idioma:
Zh
Revista:
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi
Ano de publicação:
2011
Tipo de documento:
Article
País de afiliação:
China