Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Study of immunogenicity after primary vaccination by different sequential program of inactivated poliovirus vaccine and oral poliovirus vaccine].
Lu, Li; Li, Xiao-mei; Liu, Dong-lei; Zhang, He-run; Zhang, Zhu-jia-zi; Wang, Hai-hong; Liu, Fang; Ning, Zhao-qi; Zhang, Li-wen; Chu, Ping; Xie, Yan-tao; Xu, Ying; Li, Juan; Pang, Xing-huo; Deng, Ying.
Afiliação
  • Lu L; Department of Immunization, Beijing Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100013, China. lulibj@sina.com
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi ; 46(6): 510-3, 2012 Jun.
Article em Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22943896
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate immunogenicity after primary vaccination by different sequential program of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) and oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV).

METHODS:

Children of 2 months old (60-89 days) selected in Beijing were assigned to 4 groups, 1 dose IPV plus 2 doses OPV (I-O-O, 122 children), 2 doses IPV plus 1 dose OPV(I-I-O, 103 children), 3 doses IPV (I-I-I, 114 children), and 3 doses OPV (O-O-O, 106 children), and were vaccinated at the age of 2, 3, 4 months. Polio neutralizing antibody titers against poliovirus types 1, 2, and 3 were tested and protective rates were calculated before the 1st dose, after the last dose, and after the 1st and 2nd dose of IPV.

RESULTS:

After the primary immunization, geometric mean titers (GMT) of polio neutralizing antibody titers against poliovirus types 1, 2, and 3 were 788.32, 738.42 and 631.17 in O-O-O group, 212.02, 262.30 and 537.52 in I-I-I group, 940.35, 929.72 and 940.35 in I-O-O group and 901.09, 1102.68 and 1110.12 in I-I-O group (F values were 47.71, 53.84, and 9.81 respectively, all P values<0.01). The protective rate of three types among each group was 98.1% (104/106)-100.0% and the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). After the 1(st) dose of IPV, the GMT were 18.88, 37.77, 24.64 and the protective rate was 82.6% (122/138)-96.4% (133/138); after the 2nd dose of IPV, GMT were 177.03, 168.25, 321.86 and the protective rate was 99.1% (108/109)-100.0% (109/109) in antibody types 1, 2 and 3, respectively.

CONCLUSION:

GMT of polio neutralizing antibody titers against poliovirus is higher after vaccination by sequential program of IPV and OPV than that by IPV or OPV 3-doses program. High level of protective rate after 2 doses of IPV in I-I-O group may lead to better protection from vaccine associated paralytic poliomyelitis (VAPP). Sequential program of IPV and OPV can be used to maintain high level of herd immunity and to prevent VAPP, and the I-I-O sequential program should be the first choice.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Vacinas Atenuadas / Vacina Antipólio de Vírus Inativado / Vacina Antipólio Oral / Esquemas de Imunização Limite: Humans / Infant Idioma: Zh Revista: Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi Ano de publicação: 2012 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Vacinas Atenuadas / Vacina Antipólio de Vírus Inativado / Vacina Antipólio Oral / Esquemas de Imunização Limite: Humans / Infant Idioma: Zh Revista: Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi Ano de publicação: 2012 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China