Prostate volume did not affect voiding function improvements in diode laser enucleation of the prostate.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We compared safety and surgical outcomes in patients with different prostate sizes treated with diode laser enucleation of the prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2008 to 2012 consecutive patients with benign prostatic obstruction undergoing diode laser prostate enucleation at our institution were enrolled for analysis. A single surgeon performed diode laser prostate enucleation with an end firing, continuous wave diode laser (980 nm). Based on preoperative prostate volume on transrectal ultrasound, patients were stratified into 2 groups, including group 1-65 with less than 60 ml and group 2-55 with 60 ml or greater. Baseline and perioperative characteristics, and postoperative surgical outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: A total of 120 men with a mean ± SD age of 70.2 ± 9.0 years were enrolled for analysis. Compared with group 1 patients, those in group 2 had larger mean total prostate volume (85.0 ± 24.6 vs 40.9 ± 10.8 ml), longer mean operative time (117.7 ± 48.2 vs 60.7 ± 25.0 minutes), higher mean retrieved prostate weight (37.3 ± 16.1 vs 12.5 ± 7.3 gm) and a higher mean tissue retrieval ratio (74.4% ± 22.2% vs 58.8% ± 23.2%, p <0.01). There was no significant difference in the postoperative hemoglobin decrease in the 2 groups (median 0.5 vs 0.9 mg/dl, p = 0.11). The rate of temporary postoperative urinary retention after Foley catheter removal was significantly lower in group 2 (15.4% vs 3.6%, p = 0.04). Postoperative improvements in the peak flow rate, post-void residual urine volume and International Prostate Symptom Score were comparable in the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients with a larger prostate required significantly longer operative time and laser energy, voiding function improvements and surgical complication rates of diode laser prostate enucleation were comparable in patients with a larger vs smaller prostate.