The motor learning strategy instrument: interrater reliability within usual and virtual reality physical therapy interventions.
Pediatr Phys Ther
; 25(1): 53-60, 2013.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-23208222
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE:
To evaluate and compare the interrater reliability of the Motor Learning Strategy Rating Instrument (MLSRI) within usual and virtual reality (VR) interventions for children with acquired brain injury.METHODS:
Two intervention sessions for each of 11 children (total, 22) were videotaped; sessions were provided by 4 physical therapists. Videotapes were divided into usual and VR components and rated by 2 observers using the MLSRI. A generalizability theory approach was used to determine interrater reliability for each intervention.RESULTS:
Interrater reliability for usual interventions was high for the MLSRI total score (g-coefficient, 0.81), whereas it was low for the VR total score (g-coefficient, 0.28); MLSRI category g-coefficients varied from 0.35 to 0.65 for usual and from 0.17 to 0.72 for VR interventions.CONCLUSION:
Adequate reliability was achieved within ratings of usual interventions; however, challenges related to MLSRI use to rate VR-based interventions require further evaluation.
Texto completo:
1
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Interface Usuário-Computador
/
Lesões Encefálicas
/
Modalidades de Fisioterapia
/
Terapia de Exposição à Realidade Virtual
/
Destreza Motora
Tipo de estudo:
Evaluation_studies
Limite:
Adolescent
/
Child
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Pediatr Phys Ther
Assunto da revista:
MEDICINA FISICA
/
PEDIATRIA
Ano de publicação:
2013
Tipo de documento:
Article
País de afiliação:
Canadá