Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy of initial antiretroviral therapy for HIV-1 infection in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 114 studies with up to 144 weeks' follow-up.
Lee, Frederick J; Amin, Janaki; Carr, Andrew.
Afiliação
  • Lee FJ; Clinical Research Program, St. Vincent's Centre for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia.
  • Amin J; The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
  • Carr A; Clinical Research Program, St. Vincent's Centre for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia; HIV, Immunology and Infectious Diseases Unit, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
PLoS One ; 9(5): e97482, 2014.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24830290
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

A comprehensive assessment of initial HIV-1 treatment success may inform study design and treatment guidelines.

METHODS:

Group-based, systematic review and meta-analysis of initial antiretroviral therapy studies, in adults, of ≥ 48 weeks duration, reported through December 31, 2012. Size-weighted, intention-to-treat efficacy was calculated. Parameters of study design/eligibility, participant and treatment characteristics were abstracted. Multivariable, random effects, linear regression models with backwards, stepwise selection were then used to identify variables associated with efficacy. OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Antiviral efficacy (undetectable plasma viral load) and premature cessation of therapy.

RESULTS:

114 studies were included (216 treatment groups; 40,124 participants; mean CD4 count 248 cells/µL [SD 81]; mean HIV-1 plasma viral load log10 4.9 [SD 0.2]). Mean efficacy across all groups was 60% (SD 16) over a mean 82 weeks' follow-up (SD 38). Efficacy declined over time 66% (SD 16) at 48 weeks, 60% (SD 16) at 96 weeks, 52% (SD 18) at 144 weeks. The most common reason for treatment cessation was participant decision (11%, SD 6.6). Efficacy was higher with 'Preferred' than 'Alternative' regimens (as defined by 2013 United States antiretroviral guidelines) 75% vs. 65%, respectively, difference 10%; 95%CI 7.6 to 15.4; p<0.001. In 98 groups (45%) reporting efficacy stratified by pre-treatment viral load (< or ≥100,000 copies/mL), efficacy was greater for the lower stratum (70% vs. 62%, respectively, difference 8.4%; 95%CI 6.0 to 10.9; p<0.001). This difference persisted within 'Preferred' regimens. Greatest efficacy was associated with use of tenofovir-emtricitabine (vs. other nucleoside analogue backbones) and integrase strand transfer inhibitors (vs. other third drug classes).

CONCLUSION:

Initial antiretroviral treatments for HIV-1 to date appear to have suboptimal long-term efficacy, but are more effective when commenced at plasma viral loads <100,000 copies/mL. Rising viral load should be considered an indication for starting treatment. Integrase inhibitors offer a treatment advantage (vs. other third drug classes).
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções por HIV / Antirretrovirais Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Assunto da revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções por HIV / Antirretrovirais Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Assunto da revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália