Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Molecular genetic testing for cystic fibrosis: laboratory performance on the College of American Pathologists external proficiency surveys.
Lyon, Elaine; Schrijver, Iris; Weck, Karen E; Ferreira-Gonzalez, Andrea; Richards, C Sue; Palomaki, Glenn E.
Afiliação
  • Lyon E; 1] Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA [2] ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
  • Schrijver I; 1] Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA [2] Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Weck KE; 1] Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA [2] Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  • Ferreira-Gonzalez A; Department of Pathology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
  • Richards CS; Knight Diagnostic Laboratories, Department of Molecular and Medical Genetics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
  • Palomaki GE; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Women & Infants Hospital, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Genet Med ; 17(3): 219-25, 2015 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25077647
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Molecular testing for cystic fibrosis mutations is widespread and routine in reproductive decision making and diagnosis. Our objective was to assess the level of performance of laboratories for this test.

METHODS:

The College of American Pathologists administers external proficiency testing with multiple DNA samples distributed biannually. RESULTS are analyzed, reviewed, and graded by the joint College of American Pathologists/American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Biochemical and Molecular Genetics Committee. Assessment is based on genotype and associated clinical interpretation.

RESULTS:

Overall, 357 clinical laboratories participated in the proficiency testing survey between 2003 and 2013 (322 in the United States and 35 international). In 2013, US participants reported performing nearly 120,000 tests monthly. Analytical sensitivity and specificity of US laboratories were 98.8% (95% confidence interval 98.4-99.1%) and 99.6% (95% confidence interval 99.4-99.7%), respectively. Analytical sensitivity improved between 2003 and 2008 (from 97.9 to 99.3%; P = 0.007) and remained steady thereafter. Clinical interpretation matched the intended response for 98.8, 86.0, and 91.0% of challenges with no, one, or two mutations, respectively. International laboratories performed similarly.

DISCUSSION:

Laboratory testing for cystic fibrosis in the United States has improved since 2003, and these data demonstrate a high level of quality. Neither the number of samples tested nor test methodology affected performance.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Testes Genéticos / Regulador de Condutância Transmembrana em Fibrose Cística / Fibrose Cística / Laboratórios Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Genet Med Assunto da revista: GENETICA MEDICA Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Testes Genéticos / Regulador de Condutância Transmembrana em Fibrose Cística / Fibrose Cística / Laboratórios Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Genet Med Assunto da revista: GENETICA MEDICA Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos