Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Characteristics, interventions, and outcomes of lung transplant recipients co-managed with palliative care.
Colman, Rebecca; Singer, Lianne G; Barua, Reeta; Downar, James.
Afiliação
  • Colman R; 1 Division of Respirology, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario, Canada .
J Palliat Med ; 18(3): 266-9, 2015 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25162457
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Lung transplantation (LT) recipients carry a high symptom burden. Palliative Care (PC) is a field of medicine focused on symptom control and psychosocial support, but transplant recipients are often referred to PC very late in the disease course, if at all. In our institution, the LT service has increasingly consulted PC to co-manage LT recipients with end-stage graft dysfunction or other terminal conditions. We present the characteristics, PC interventions used, and outcomes of these patients.

METHODS:

We conducted a single-center, retrospective, cohort study of LT recipients referred for PC consultation between January 2010 and May 2012. We collected patient demographics, timing and location of PC consultation, PC interventions, and patient outcomes.

RESULTS:

Twenty-four patients met the inclusion criteria. Sixteen (67%) had chronic allograft dysfunction. Reasons for referral were dyspnea (42%), end-of-life planning (42%), pain (29%), cough (4%), anxiety (4%), and depression (4%). Referral was made a median of 3.2 (range, 0.2 to 18) years from transplant and a median 14 days (range, 0 to 227 days) from death. Eighty-three percent of consultations occurred >48 hours from time of death. Ninety-two percent of patients were prescribed opioids over their course of treatment. Among the 12 (50%) who died in our center, 10 (83%) were receiving comfort medications. Eight patients (33%) initially requested full resuscitation at the time of PC consultation, but seven of these patients (or their surrogates) later agreed to a do not resuscitate (DNR) order; the eighth was still alive at last follow-up. No patient in this study received cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) at the time of death.

CONCLUSION:

LT recipients referred for PC co-management typically receive comfort medications and avoid the aggressive end-of-life care usually reported for this population. The effect of PC interventions on patient quality of life requires further study.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cuidados Paliativos / Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente / Encaminhamento e Consulta / Transplante de Pulmão / Transplantados Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Palliat Med Assunto da revista: SERVICOS DE SAUDE Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cuidados Paliativos / Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente / Encaminhamento e Consulta / Transplante de Pulmão / Transplantados Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Palliat Med Assunto da revista: SERVICOS DE SAUDE Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá