Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pattern of invasion is the most important prognostic factor in patients with penile cancer submitted to lymph node dissection and pathological absence of lymph node metastasis.
Aita, Giuliano; da Costa, Walter Henriques; de Cassio Zequi, Stenio; da Cunha, Isabela Werneck; Soares, Fernando; Guimaraes, Gustavo Cardoso; Lopes, Ademar.
Afiliação
  • Aita G; Urology Division, A.C. Camargo Cancer Centre, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
  • da Costa WH; Urology Division, A.C. Camargo Cancer Centre, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
  • de Cassio Zequi S; Urology Division, A.C. Camargo Cancer Centre, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
  • da Cunha IW; Urology Division, A.C. Camargo Cancer Centre, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
  • Soares F; Urology Division, A.C. Camargo Cancer Centre, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
  • Guimaraes GC; Urology Division, A.C. Camargo Cancer Centre, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
  • Lopes A; Urology Division, A.C. Camargo Cancer Centre, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
BJU Int ; 116(4): 584-9, 2015 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25639616
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To identify prognostic factors in a cohort of patients with penile carcinoma with pathological absence of lymph node metastasis (pN0), as penile carcinoma is a rare neoplasm in European countries, in which the presence of lymph node metastasis is the most important prognostic factor but few studies have examined patients with penile carcinoma with histologically negative nodes (pN0). PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

Of patients with penile carcinoma, 101 met the inclusion criteria; 47 (46.5%) underwent bilateral inguinal lymph node dissection (LND) and 54 (53.5%) underwent bilateral inguinopelvic LND. Variables that had a prognostic impact on survival rates in univariate analysis were selected for multivariate survival analysis.

RESULTS:

The cohorts cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 88.1% and 52.5%, respectively. Histological grade and pattern of invasion were the only features to significantly impact survival rates in the univariate analysis. The CSS and OS rates in patients with 'pushing' vs 'infiltrating' patterns of invasion were 98.0% vs 78.4% (P = 0.003) and 70.0% vs 35.3% (P = 0.005), respectively. Pattern of invasion was the only independent predictor of survival. Patients with infiltrating invasion had a higher probability of death from cancer (hazard ratio [HR] 11.5, P = 0.019) and overall death (HR 2.3, P = 0.007) compared with those with a pushing invasion pattern.

CONCLUSIONS:

The presence of an infiltrating pattern of invasion is the most important predictor of survival in patients with penile carcinoma. We encourage other centres to confirm our findings that the pattern of invasion is an important prognostic factor in patients with penile carcinoma and pN0 disease.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Penianas Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: BJU Int Assunto da revista: UROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Penianas Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: BJU Int Assunto da revista: UROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil