Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effectiveness of protected areas for representing species and populations of terrestrial mammals in Costa Rica.
González-Maya, José F; Víquez-R, Luis R; Belant, Jerrold L; Ceballos, Gerardo.
Afiliação
  • González-Maya JF; Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, 04318, México D. F., México; Proyecto de Conservación de Aguas y Tierras, ProCAT Colombia/Internacional, Carrera 13 No. 96-82 Of. 205, Bogotá, Colombia.
  • Víquez-R LR; Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, 04318, México D. F., México.
  • Belant JL; Carnivore Ecology Laboratory, Forest and Wildlife Research Center, Mississippi State University, 39759, Starkville, Mississippi, United States of America.
  • Ceballos G; Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, 04318, México D. F., México.
PLoS One ; 10(5): e0124480, 2015.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25970293
Costa Rica has one of the greatest percentages (26%) of protected land in the world. The National Protected Areas System (NPAS) of Costa Rica was established in 1976 and currently includes >190 protected areas within seven different protection categories. The effectiveness of the NPAS to represent species, populations, and areas with high species richness has not been properly evaluated. Such evaluations are fundamental to understand what is necessary to strengthen the NPAS and better protect biodiversity. We present a novel assessment of NPAS effectiveness in protecting mammal species. We compiled the geographical ranges of all terrestrial Costa Rican mammals then determined species lists for all protected areas and the estimated proportion of each species' geographic range protected. We also classified mammal species according to their conservation status using the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. We found almost complete representation of mammal species (98.5%) in protected areas, but low relative coverage (28.3% on average) of their geographic ranges in Costa Rica and 25% of the species were classified as underprotected according to a priori representation targets. Interestingly, many species-rich areas are not protected, and at least 43% of cells covering the entire country are not included in protected areas. Though protected areas in Costa Rica represent species richness well, strategic planning for future protected areas to improve species complementarity and range protection is necessary. Our results can help to define sites where new protected areas can have a greater impact on mammal conservation, both in terms of species richness and range protection.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Espécies em Perigo de Extinção / Conservação dos Recursos Naturais / Distribuição Animal / Mamíferos Limite: Animals / Humans País/Região como assunto: America central / Costa rica Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Assunto da revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Colômbia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Espécies em Perigo de Extinção / Conservação dos Recursos Naturais / Distribuição Animal / Mamíferos Limite: Animals / Humans País/Região como assunto: America central / Costa rica Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Assunto da revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Colômbia