Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Decoding NF1 Intragenic Copy-Number Variations.
Hsiao, Meng-Chang; Piotrowski, Arkadiusz; Callens, Tom; Fu, Chuanhua; Wimmer, Katharina; Claes, Kathleen B M; Messiaen, Ludwine.
Afiliação
  • Hsiao MC; Medical Genomics Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
  • Piotrowski A; Medical Genomics Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA; Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-416 Gdansk, Poland.
  • Callens T; Medical Genomics Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
  • Fu C; Medical Genomics Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
  • Wimmer K; Division of Human Genetics, Medical University Innsbruck, Peter-Mayr-Straße 1, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
  • Claes KB; Center for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan, 185 9000 Gent, Belgium.
  • Messiaen L; Medical Genomics Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA. Electronic address: lmessiaen@uabmc.edu.
Am J Hum Genet ; 97(2): 238-49, 2015 Aug 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26189818
ABSTRACT
Genomic rearrangements can cause both Mendelian and complex disorders. Currently, several major mechanisms causing genomic rearrangements, such as non-allelic homologous recombination (NAHR), non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), fork stalling and template switching (FoSTeS), and microhomology-mediated break-induced replication (MMBIR), have been proposed. However, to what extent these mechanisms contribute to gene-specific pathogenic copy-number variations (CNVs) remains understudied. Furthermore, few studies have resolved these pathogenic alterations at the nucleotide-level. Accordingly, our aim was to explore which mechanisms contribute to a large, unique set of locus-specific non-recurrent genomic rearrangements causing the genetic neurocutaneous disorder neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Through breakpoint-spanning PCR as well as array comparative genomic hybridization, we have identified the breakpoints in 85 unrelated individuals carrying an NF1 intragenic CNV. Furthermore, we characterized the likely rearrangement mechanisms of these 85 CNVs, along with those of two additional previously published NF1 intragenic CNVs. Unlike the most typical recurrent rearrangements mediated by flanking low-copy repeats (LCRs), NF1 intragenic rearrangements vary in size, location, and rearrangement mechanisms. We propose the DNA-replication-based mechanisms comprising both FoSTeS and/or MMBIR and serial replication stalling to be the predominant mechanisms leading to NF1 intragenic CNVs. In addition to the loop within a 197-bp palindrome located in intron 40, four Alu elements located in introns 1, 2, 3, and 50 were also identified as intragenic-rearrangement hotspots within NF1.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neurofibromatose 1 / Neurofibromina 1 / Variações do Número de Cópias de DNA Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am J Hum Genet Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neurofibromatose 1 / Neurofibromina 1 / Variações do Número de Cópias de DNA Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am J Hum Genet Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos