Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ultrasound Assessment of Abdominal Muscle Thickness in Postpartum vs Nulliparous Women.
Weis, Carol Ann; Triano, John J; Barrett, Jon; Campbell, Michelle D; Croy, Martine; Roeder, Jessica.
Afiliação
  • Weis CA; Chiropractor, Researcher, Department of Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: cweis@cmcc.ca.
  • Triano JJ; Professor, Graduate Education and Research Department, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Barrett J; Chief of Maternal Fetal Medicine Program, Maternal Fetal Medicine and Program Research Director of Womens and Babies, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Campbell MD; Chiropractor, Private Practice, London, Ontario, Canada.
  • Croy M; Chiropractor, Private Practice, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
  • Roeder J; Chiropractor, Private Practice, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther ; 38(5): 352-7, 2015 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26189917
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect size in measurable change of abdominal musculature morphology using ultrasonography in postpartum women within 1 month of a healthy, vaginal delivery.

METHODS:

One hundred fifty-six participants were recruited for this study. B-mode ultrasound imaging was used to measure abdominal muscle thickness on 80 nulliparous women and 76 mothers who had delivered within the past 4 weeks. Measures were taken for the upper and lower rectus abdominus, external and internal obliques, and transversus abdominus at rest.

RESULTS:

Statistically significant differences were found in the thickness of the rectus abdominus muscle at both sites; upper (P < .0001) and lower (P < .0001) as well as the internal oblique (P < .0001). All 3 muscles were thinner in postpartum participants (8.29 ± 1.83 mm, 8.89 ± 2.29 mm, and 7.06 ± 1.82 mm, respectively) within the first month of delivery than in controls (10.82 ± 1.93 mm, 11.13 ± 2.38 mm, and 8.36 ± 1.87 mm, respectively). Large effect sizes were found for the influence of pregnancy on the rectus muscle segments (1.35 for the upper rectus abdominus and 1.00 for the lower rectus abdominus) and a medium effect size for the internal oblique (0.71). No significant differences were observed in the remaining 2 muscles.

CONCLUSION:

This study showed that there are differences in morphology of the abdominal muscles in pregnant women vs nonpregnant controls. The large effect sizes reported may provide the basis for future studies examining relationships between morphology, functional change, and back pain during pregnancy.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Músculos Abdominais / Período Pós-Parto / Contração Muscular Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Manipulative Physiol Ther Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Músculos Abdominais / Período Pós-Parto / Contração Muscular Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Manipulative Physiol Ther Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article