Utility of PCR, Culture, and Antigen Detection Methods for Diagnosis of Legionellosis.
J Clin Microbiol
; 53(11): 3474-7, 2015 Nov.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-26292304
ABSTRACT
The goal of this retrospective study was to evaluate the performance of different diagnostic tests for Legionnaires' disease in a clinical setting where Legionella pneumophila PCR had been introduced. Electronic medical records at the Cleveland Clinic were searched for Legionella urinary antigen (UAG), culture, and PCR tests ordered from March 2010 through December 2013. For cases where two or more test methods were performed and at least one was positive, the medical record was reviewed for relevant clinical and epidemiologic factors. Excluding repeat testing on a given patient, 19,912 tests were ordered (12,569 UAG, 3,747 cultures, and 3,596 PCR) with 378 positive results. The positivity rate for each method was 0.4% for culture, 0.8% for PCR, and 2.7% for UAG. For 37 patients, at least two test methods were performed with at least one positive result:
10 (27%) cases were positive by all three methods, 16 (43%) were positive by two methods, and 11 (30%) were positive by one method only. For the 32 patients with medical records available, clinical presentation was consistent with proven or probable Legionella infection in 84% of the cases. For those cases, the sensitivities of culture, PCR, and UAG were 50%, 92%, and 96%, respectively. The specificities were 100% for culture and 99.9% for PCR and UAG.
Texto completo:
1
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Testes Imunológicos
/
Doença dos Legionários
/
Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase
/
Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina
/
Antígenos de Bactérias
Tipo de estudo:
Diagnostic_studies
/
Evaluation_studies
/
Observational_studies
Limite:
Adult
/
Aged
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
/
Middle aged
Idioma:
En
Revista:
J Clin Microbiol
Ano de publicação:
2015
Tipo de documento:
Article
País de afiliação:
Estados Unidos