Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Short day transcriptomic programming during induction of dormancy in grapevine.
Fennell, Anne Y; Schlauch, Karen A; Gouthu, Satyanarayana; Deluc, Laurent G; Khadka, Vedbar; Sreekantan, Lekha; Grimplet, Jerome; Cramer, Grant R; Mathiason, Katherine L.
Afiliação
  • Fennell AY; Northern Plains BioStress Laboratory, Plant Science Department, South Dakota State University Brookings, SD, USA.
  • Schlauch KA; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nevada, Reno Reno, NV, USA.
  • Gouthu S; Department of Horticulture, Oregon State University Corvallis, OR, USA.
  • Deluc LG; Department of Horticulture, Oregon State University Corvallis, OR, USA.
  • Khadka V; Northern Plains BioStress Laboratory, Plant Science Department, South Dakota State University Brookings, SD, USA.
  • Sreekantan L; Northern Plains BioStress Laboratory, Plant Science Department, South Dakota State University Brookings, SD, USA.
  • Grimplet J; Instituto de Ciencias de la Vid y del Vino (CSIC, Universidad de La Rioja, Gobierno de La Rioja) Logroño, Spain.
  • Cramer GR; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nevada, Reno Reno, NV, USA.
  • Mathiason KL; Northern Plains BioStress Laboratory, Plant Science Department, South Dakota State University Brookings, SD, USA.
Front Plant Sci ; 6: 834, 2015.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26582400
ABSTRACT
Bud dormancy in grapevine is an adaptive strategy for the survival of drought, high and low temperatures and freeze dehydration stress that limit the range of cultivar adaptation. Therefore, development of a comprehensive understanding of the biological mechanisms involved in bud dormancy is needed to promote advances in selection and breeding, and to develop improved cultural practices for existing grape cultivars. The seasonally indeterminate grapevine, which continuously develops compound axillary buds during the growing season, provides an excellent system for dissecting dormancy, because the grapevine does not transition through terminal bud development prior to dormancy. This study used gene expression patterns and targeted metabolite analysis of two grapevine genotypes that are short photoperiod responsive (Vitis riparia) and non-responsive (V. hybrid, Seyval) for dormancy development to determine differences between bud maturation and dormancy commitment. Grapevine gene expression and metabolites were monitored at seven time points under long (LD, 15 h) and short (SD, 13 h) day treatments. The use of age-matched buds and a small (2 h) photoperiod difference minimized developmental differences and allowed us to separate general photoperiod from dormancy specific gene responses. Gene expression profiles indicated three distinct phases (perception, induction and dormancy) in SD-induced dormancy development in V. riparia. Different genes from the NAC DOMAIN CONTAINING PROTEIN 19 and WRKY families of transcription factors were differentially expressed in each phase of dormancy. Metabolite and transcriptome analyses indicated ABA, trehalose, raffinose and resveratrol compounds have a potential role in dormancy commitment. Finally, a comparison between V. riparia compound axillary bud dormancy and dormancy responses in other species emphasized the relationship between dormancy and the expression of RESVERATROL SYNTHASE and genes associated with C3HC4-TYPE RING FINGER and NAC DOMAIN CONTAINING PROTEIN 19 transcription factors.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Plant Sci Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Plant Sci Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos