Is surgical treatment better than conservative treatment for primary patellar dislocations? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Despite several randomized controlled trials comparing operative to nonoperative management of primary patellar dislocation, the optimal management of this condition remains a subject of controversy. The aim of this study was to compare surgical to conservative treatment of outcomes for primary patellar dislocation by meta-analysis all the relative randomized controlled trials. STUDY DESIGN: Meta-analysis. METHODS: After searching multiple online databases (MEDILINE, EMBASE, CLINICAL, OVID, BISOS and Cochrane registry of controlled clinical trials), eight randomized controlled trials including 430 patients were meta-analyzed in which operative treatment was compared with non-operative treatment for primary patellar dislocation. Outcomes evaluated were redislocation rate, Kujala score, episode of instability, Tegner activity score, Hughston visual analog score (VAS) and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Outcomes on recurrent patellar dislocation (P = 0.004) and Hughston VAS (P = 0.03) were statistically significant in favor of operative management. Tegner activity score (P < 0.00001) was significantly higher in favor of conservative treatment, though only a few studies were identified. There was no significant difference between the two treatments regarding episode of instability (P = 0.41), Kujala score (P = 0.32) or patient satisfaction (P = 0.49). CONCLUSION: Surgical treatment may be better than conservative treatment for patients with primary patellar dislocation on incidence of redislocation. However, since these findings are built on a limited number of studies available, well-designed, multicenter clinical trials with long-term follow-up are required to provide more solid evidence concerning optimal strategies.