Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Development and Early Piloting of a CanMEDS Competency-Based Feedback Tool for Surgical Grand Rounds.
Fahim, Christine; Bhandari, Mohit; Yang, Ilun; Sonnadara, Ranil.
Afiliação
  • Fahim C; Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
  • Bhandari M; Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
  • Yang I; Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
  • Sonnadara R; Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: ranil@skillslab.ca.
J Surg Educ ; 73(3): 409-15, 2016.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26896145
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Grand rounds offer an excellent opportunity for the evaluation of medical expertise, and other competencies, such as communication and professionalism. The purpose of this study was to develop a tool that would facilitate the provision of formative feedback for grand rounds to improve learning. The resulting CanMEDS-based evaluation tool was piloted in an academic surgical department.

DESIGN:

This study employed the use of a 3-phase, qualitatively-focused, embedded mixed methods approach. In Phase 1, an intrinsic case study was conducted to identify preliminary themes. These findings were crystallized using a quantitative survey. Following interpretation of these data, a grand rounds evaluation tool was developed in Phase 2. The tool was piloted in the Phase 3 focus group.

SETTING:

This study was piloted at an academic surgical center among members of the Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada.

PARTICIPANTS:

Purposive sampling was used for this study. A total of n = 7 individuals participated in the Phase 1 interviews, and n = 24 participants completed the Phase 1 survey. Participants included a representative sample of medical students, residents, fellows, and staff. The tool was piloted among n = 19 participants.

RESULTS:

The proposed evaluation tool contains 13 Likert-scale questions and 2 open-ended questions. The tool outlines specific questions to assess grand rounds presenters within the structure of the 7 CanMEDS competency domains. "Evaluation fatigue" was identified as a major barrier in the willingness to provide effective feedback. Further, a number of factors regarding the preferred content, structure, and format of surgical grand rounds were identified.

CONCLUSIONS:

This pilot study presents a CanMEDS-specific evaluation tool that can be applied to surgical grand rounds. With the increasing adoption of competency-based medical education, comprehensive evaluation of surgical activities is required. This form provides a template for the development of competency-based evaluation tools for medical and surgical learning activities.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ortopedia / Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina / Retroalimentação / Visitas de Preceptoria Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Educ Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ortopedia / Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina / Retroalimentação / Visitas de Preceptoria Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Educ Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá