Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Exploring academics' views on designs, methods, characteristics and outcomes of inclusive health research with people with intellectual disabilities: a modified Delphi study.
Frankena, T K; Naaldenberg, J; Cardol, M; Meijering, J V; Leusink, G; van Schrojenstein Lantman-de Valk, H M J.
Afiliação
  • Frankena TK; Department of Primary and Community Care, Research group Intellectual Disabilities and Health, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Naaldenberg J; Department of Primary and Community Care, Research group Intellectual Disabilities and Health, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Cardol M; University of Applied Sciences, Research Centre Innovations in Care, Chair Disability Studies: Diversity in Participation, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Meijering JV; Research Methodology Group, Wageningen University and Research Centre, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
  • Leusink G; Department of Primary and Community Care, Research group Intellectual Disabilities and Health, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • van Schrojenstein Lantman-de Valk HM; Department of Primary and Community Care, Research group Intellectual Disabilities and Health, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
BMJ Open ; 6(8): e011861, 2016 08 18.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27540101
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The British Medical Journal's (BMJ's) patient revolution strives for collaboration with patients in healthcare and health research. This paper studies collaboration with people with intellectual disabilities (ID) in health research, also known as inclusive health research. Currently, transparency and agreement among academics is lacking regarding its main aspects, preventing upscaling of the patient revolution.

OBJECTIVE:

This study aims to gain agreement among academics on 3 aspects of inclusive health research for people with ID (1) designs and methods, (2) most important characteristics and (3) outcomes.

DESIGN:

A Delphi study was conducted with academics with experience in inclusive (health) research and on people with ID. The study consisted of 2 sequential questionnaire rounds (n=24; n=17), followed by in-depth interviews (n=10).

RESULTS:

Academics agreed on (1) a collaborative approach to be most suitable to inclusive health research, (2) characteristics regarding the accessibility and facilitation of inclusive health research, and (3) several outcomes of inclusive health research for people with ID and healthcare. Other characteristics agreed on included atmosphere, relationship, engagement, partnership and power. It was stressed that these characteristics ensure meaningful inclusion. Interviewed academics voiced the need for a tool supporting the facilitation and evaluation of inclusive health research. There was ambiguity as to what this tool should comprise and the extent to which it was possible to capture the complex process of inclusive health research. DISCUSSION AND

CONCLUSIONS:

This study underlines the need for transparency, facilitation and evaluation of inclusive health research. The need for in-depth interviews after 2 Delphi rounds underlines its complexity and context dependence. To increase process transparency, future research should focus on gaining insight into inclusive health research in its context. A tool could be developed to facilitate and evaluate inclusive health research. This tool will be partially applicable to participatory research in general and thereby upscale the patient revolution.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pesquisadores / Comportamento Cooperativo / Pessoas com Deficiência Mental / Pesquisa Biomédica / Pesquisa Participativa Baseada na Comunidade Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pesquisadores / Comportamento Cooperativo / Pessoas com Deficiência Mental / Pesquisa Biomédica / Pesquisa Participativa Baseada na Comunidade Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda