Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
TMSEG: Novel prediction of transmembrane helices.
Bernhofer, Michael; Kloppmann, Edda; Reeb, Jonas; Rost, Burkhard.
Afiliação
  • Bernhofer M; Department of Informatics & Center for Bioinformatics & Computational Biology - i12, Technische Universität München (TUM), Boltzmannstr. 3, Garching/Munich, 85748, Germany. Michael.Bernhofer@mytum.de.
  • Kloppmann E; Department of Informatics & Center for Bioinformatics & Computational Biology - i12, Technische Universität München (TUM), Boltzmannstr. 3, Garching/Munich, 85748, Germany.
  • Reeb J; New York Consortium on Membrane Protein Structure, New York Structural Biology Center, New York, New York, 10027.
  • Rost B; Department of Informatics & Center for Bioinformatics & Computational Biology - i12, Technische Universität München (TUM), Boltzmannstr. 3, Garching/Munich, 85748, Germany.
Proteins ; 84(11): 1706-1716, 2016 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27566436
ABSTRACT
Transmembrane proteins (TMPs) are important drug targets because they are essential for signaling, regulation, and transport. Despite important breakthroughs, experimental structure determination remains challenging for TMPs. Various methods have bridged the gap by predicting transmembrane helices (TMHs), but room for improvement remains. Here, we present TMSEG, a novel method identifying TMPs and accurately predicting their TMHs and their topology. The method combines machine learning with empirical filters. Testing it on a non-redundant dataset of 41 TMPs and 285 soluble proteins, and applying strict performance measures, TMSEG outperformed the state-of-the-art in our hands. TMSEG correctly distinguished helical TMPs from other proteins with a sensitivity of 98 ± 2% and a false positive rate as low as 3 ± 1%. Individual TMHs were predicted with a precision of 87 ± 3% and recall of 84 ± 3%. Furthermore, in 63 ± 6% of helical TMPs the placement of all TMHs and their inside/outside topology was correctly predicted. There are two main features that distinguish TMSEG from other methods. First, the errors in finding all helical TMPs in an organism are significantly reduced. For example, in human this leads to 200 and 1600 fewer misclassifications compared to the second and third best method available, and 4400 fewer mistakes than by a simple hydrophobicity-based method. Second, TMSEG provides an add-on improvement for any existing method to benefit from. Proteins 2016; 841706-1716. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aprendizado de Máquina / Proteínas de Membrana Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Proteins Assunto da revista: BIOQUIMICA Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aprendizado de Máquina / Proteínas de Membrana Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Proteins Assunto da revista: BIOQUIMICA Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha