Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Immunoadsorption or plasma exchange in the treatment of autoimmune encephalitis: a pilot study.
Heine, Josephine; Ly, Lam-Thanh; Lieker, Ina; Slowinski, Torsten; Finke, Carsten; Prüss, Harald; Harms, Lutz.
Afiliação
  • Heine J; Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany. josephine.heine@charite.de.
  • Ly LT; Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
  • Lieker I; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
  • Slowinski T; Department of Nephrology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
  • Finke C; Department of Nephrology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
  • Prüss H; Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
  • Harms L; Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Luisenstr. 56, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
J Neurol ; 263(12): 2395-2402, 2016 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27604620
ABSTRACT
Therapeutic apheresis has emerged as a major treatment option for autoantibody-associated inflammatory diseases of the nervous system. This includes patients with autoimmune encephalitides caused by antibodies against neuronal proteins. Plasma exchange (PE) and immunoadsorption (IA) constitute two possibilities to eliminate pathogenic antibodies from patients' plasma, but their efficacy and safety has not been prospectively assessed in larger patient groups of autoimmune encephalitides. In a prospective observational case control study, we, therefore, investigated the disease courses and treatment effects of 21 patients with autoimmune encephalitis associated with NMDAR, LGI1, CASPR2, GAD, mGluR5 and Hu antibodies. Patients were randomly assigned to receive PE (n = 11) or IA (n = 10). Symptoms were evaluated using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Side effects or adverse events were recorded. Both interventions, IA (p = 0.014) and PE (p = 0.01), resulted in significant reduction of the median mRS. With IA, 60 % of the patients improved clinically by at least 1 mRS score, none worsened. PE led to a comparable symptom reduction in 67 % of the cases. During 83 PE sessions, three adverse events were documented, while no side effects occurred under IA. Symptom improvement was significantly associated with younger age (r = -0.58), but not with disease duration. Therapeutic apheresis was most effective for neuronal surface antigens (83.3 %), followed by intracellular-synaptic antigens (66.7 %). Both IA and PE resulted in moderate to marked clinical improvement, with a low rate of adverse events. Apheresis is well tolerated and effective also as first-line therapy in autoimmune encephalitis, particularly in patients with antibodies targeting neuronal surfaces.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Troca Plasmática / Encefalite / Doença de Hashimoto / Imunoterapia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Neurol Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Troca Plasmática / Encefalite / Doença de Hashimoto / Imunoterapia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Neurol Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha