Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Synchrotron microbeam irradiation induces neutrophil infiltration, thrombocyte attachment and selective vascular damage in vivo.
Brönnimann, Daniel; Bouchet, Audrey; Schneider, Christoph; Potez, Marine; Serduc, Raphaël; Bräuer-Krisch, Elke; Graber, Werner; von Gunten, Stephan; Laissue, Jean Albert; Djonov, Valentin.
Afiliação
  • Brönnimann D; Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 2, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.
  • Bouchet A; Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 2, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.
  • Schneider C; Institute of Pharmacology, University of Bern, Inselspital INO-F, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.
  • Potez M; Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 2, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.
  • Serduc R; Université Grenoble Alpes, EA-Rayonnement Synchrotron et Recherche Medicale, ESRF, ID17 F-38043 Grenoble, France.
  • Bräuer-Krisch E; Biomedical Beamline, European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, BP220, F38043 Grenoble, France.
  • Graber W; Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 2, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.
  • von Gunten S; Institute of Pharmacology, University of Bern, Inselspital INO-F, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.
  • Laissue JA; Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 2, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.
  • Djonov V; Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 2, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.
Sci Rep ; 6: 33601, 2016 09 19.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27640676
ABSTRACT
Our goal was the visualizing the vascular damage and acute inflammatory response to micro- and minibeam irradiation in vivo. Microbeam (MRT) and minibeam radiation therapies (MBRT) are tumor treatment approaches of potential clinical relevance, both consisting of parallel X-ray beams and allowing the delivery of thousands of Grays within tumors. We compared the effects of microbeams (25-100 µm wide) and minibeams (200-800 µm wide) on vasculature, inflammation and surrounding tissue changes during zebrafish caudal fin regeneration in vivo. Microbeam irradiation triggered an acute inflammatory response restricted to the regenerating tissue. Six hours post irradiation (6 hpi), it was infiltrated by neutrophils and fli1a(+) thrombocytes adhered to the cell wall locally in the beam path. The mature tissue was not affected by microbeam irradiation. In contrast, minibeam irradiation efficiently damaged the immature tissue at 6 hpi and damaged both the mature and immature tissue at 48 hpi. We demonstrate that vascular damage, inflammatory processes and cellular toxicity depend on the beam width and the stage of tissue maturation. Minibeam irradiation did not differentiate between mature and immature tissue. In contrast, all irradiation-induced effects of the microbeams were restricted to the rapidly growing immature tissue, indicating that microbeam irradiation could be a promising tumor treatment tool.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Plaquetas / Vasos Sanguíneos / Adesividade Plaquetária / Síncrotrons / Infiltração de Neutrófilos Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suíça

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Plaquetas / Vasos Sanguíneos / Adesividade Plaquetária / Síncrotrons / Infiltração de Neutrófilos Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suíça