Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Gender differences in the adverse events' profile registered in seven observational studies of a wide gender-medicine (MetaGeM) project: the MetaGeM safety analysis.
Colombo, Delia; Zagni, Emanuela; Nica, Mihaela; Rizzoli, Sara; Ori, Alessandra; Bellia, Gilberto.
Afiliação
  • Colombo D; Patient Access, Novartis Farma S.p.A., Origgio, Varese.
  • Zagni E; Patient Access, Novartis Farma S.p.A., Origgio, Varese.
  • Nica M; Patient Access, Novartis Farma S.p.A., Origgio, Varese.
  • Rizzoli S; MediNeos Observational Research, Modena, Italy.
  • Ori A; MediNeos Observational Research, Modena, Italy.
  • Bellia G; Patient Access, Novartis Farma S.p.A., Origgio, Varese.
Drug Des Devel Ther ; 10: 2917-2927, 2016.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27695289
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

MetaGeM is a wide gender-medicine project comprising post hoc and meta-analyses by gender of clinical outcomes, therapeutic approaches, and safety data from previously conducted observational studies to explore possible gender differences in real-life clinical settings. We report the results of the safety meta-analysis of seven MetaGeM studies, evaluating gender differences in adverse event (AE) incidence and severity.

METHODS:

Data were collected between February 2002 and July 2013. Male and female patients were compared for the main safety variables, using Student's t-test, χ2 test, or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. As supportive analysis, a logistic regression model was estimated to evaluate associations between gender and outcome.

RESULTS:

In total, 4,870 patients (46% females, 54% males) were included in the analysis; age was higher for females (mean ± standard deviation 61.2±18.3 years) than males (56.3±16.6 years). Overall, 264 AEs were reported (59.1% in males). There were no significant gender differences in the percentage of patients with at least one AE 3.0% for females versus 3.9% for males, χ2 test P>0.05. According to the logistic regression model results, no association between gender and AEs occurrence seems to exist. A statistically significant gender difference in the percentage of drug-related AEs emerged (37.6% in females vs 20.8% in males, χ2P=0.0039). Slightly significantly more AEs in females were addressed with treatment compared with males (78.1% vs 66.7%, χ2P=0.0485). Total serious AEs (SAEs) were 47 (72% in males). The frequency of patients with ≥1 SAE was 0.6% in females versus 1.2% in males (χ2 test P=0.0246).

CONCLUSION:

This safety analysis on a large sample of almost 5,000 patients with different diseases and treated with a wide range of different drugs provides a useful overview on possible gender differences in drug tolerability, which may be helpful in more accurately designing future clinical trials from a gender-specific perspective.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Metanálise em Rede / Identidade de Gênero Tipo de estudo: Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Drug Des Devel Ther Assunto da revista: FARMACOLOGIA / TERAPIA POR MEDICAMENTOS Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Metanálise em Rede / Identidade de Gênero Tipo de estudo: Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Drug Des Devel Ther Assunto da revista: FARMACOLOGIA / TERAPIA POR MEDICAMENTOS Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article